Average daily gain rates determine eye muscle area and rump fat depth of beef heifers

References

• Arije GF, Wiltbank JN. 1974. Prediction of age and weight at puberty in Beef Heifers. J Anim Sci. 38:803–810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagley CP. 1993. Nutritional management of replacement beef heifers: a review. J Anim Sci. 71:3155–3163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barcellos JOJ, Pereira GR, Dias EA, McManus C, Canellas L, Bernardi ML, Tarouco A, Prates ÊR. 2014. Higher feeding diets effects on age and liveweight gain at puberty in crossbred Nelore × Hereford heifers. Trop Anim Health Prod. 46:953–960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg RT, Butterfield RM. 1976. New concepts of cattle growth. New South Wales, Australia: Sydney University Press, University of Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Bond GB, von Keyserlingk MAG, Chapinal N, Pajor EA, Weary DM. 2015. Among farm variation in heifer BW gains. Animal. 9:1884–1887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endecott RL, Funston RN, Mulliniks JT, Roberts AJ. 2013. Implications of beef heifer development systems and lifetime productivity. Paper presented at: The Joint Alpharma-beef Species Symposium of Journal of Animal Science and the American Society of Animal Science; 2012 July 15–19; Phoenix, AZ, USA. Vol. 91; p. 1329–1335.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez FAL, Patino HO, Swanson KC, Pereira CH, Tarouco JU, Diaz AMP, Silveira SRL. 2016. Performance of heifers supplemented with different levels of corn on pasture. Bol Ind Anim. 73:260–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greer RC, Whitman RW, Staigmiller RB, Anderson DC. 1983. Estimating the impact of management decisions on the occurrence of puberty in Beef Heifers. J Anim Sci. 56:30–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guggeri D, Meikle A, Carriquiry M, Montossi F, De Barbieri I, Viñoles C. 2014. Effect of different management systems on growth, endocrine parameters and puberty in Hereford female calves grazing Campos grassland. Livest Sci. 167:455–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays C, Meadows A. 2012. Field technician study guide. Miles, MT: Ultrasound Guidelines Council. Chapter V, Ultrasound scanning technique.
   Google Scholar
• Hersom MJ, Bodine TN, Herring A. 2013. Redefining the replacement heifer paradigm. Paper presented at: The Joint Alpharma-Beef Species Symposium of Journal of Animal Science and the American Society Of Animal Science; 2012 July 15–19; Phoenix, AZ, USA. Vol 91. p. 1321–1322.
   Google Scholar
• Lancaster PA, Carstens GE, Crews DH, Welsh TH, Forbes TDA, Forrest DW, Tedeschi LO, Randel RD, Rouquette FM. 2009. Phenotypic and genetic relationships of residual feed intake with performance and ultrasound carcass traits in Brangus heifers. J Anim Sci. 87:3887–3896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landarin CM, Lobato JFP, Tarouco AK, Tarouco JU, Eloy LR, Pötter L, Rosa AAG. 2016. Growth and reproductive performance of 14- to 15-month-old Hereford heifers. R Bras Zootec. 45:667–676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lardner HA, Damiran D, Hendrick S, Larson K, Funston R. 2014. Effect of development system on growth and reproductive performance of beef heifers. J Anim Sci. 92:3116–3126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MAPA. 2017. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento (MAPA): Projeções do agronegócio, Brasil 2016/2017 a 2026/2027. 8th edition. Brasilia, DF, Brasil.
   Google Scholar
• Moriel P, Johnson SE, Vendramini JMB, Mercadante VRG, Hersom MJ, Arthington JD. 2014. Effects of calf weaning age and subsequent management system on growth and reproductive performance of beef heifers. J Anim Sci. 92:3096–3107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn GP, Keough MJ. 2002. Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Randel RD, Welsh TH. 2013. Interactions of feed efficiency with beef heifer reproductive development. Paper presented at: The Joint Alpharma Beef Cattle Nutrition and Beef Species Symposium of Journal of Animal Science and the American Society of Animal Science: 2012 July 15–19; Phoenix, AZ, USA. Vol 91; p.1323–1328.
   Google Scholar
• Reis MM, Cooke RF, Cappellozza BI, Marques RS, Guarnieri Filho TA, Rodrigues MC, Bradley JS, Mueller CJ, Keisler DH, Johnson SE, et al. 2015. Creep-feeding to stimulate metabolic imprinting in nursing beef heifers: impacts on heifer growth, reproductive and physiological variables. Animal. 9:1500–1508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts AJ, Petersen MK, Funston RN. 2015. Can we build the cowherd by increasing longevity of females? Paper presented at: The Beef Species Symposium of Journal of Animal Science and the American Society of Animal Science; 2014 July 20–24; Kansas, MO, USA. Journal of animal science. Vol 93; p. 4235–4243.
   Google Scholar
• SAS. 2004. SAS 9.0. SAS user’s guide. Cary (NC): SAS Institute Inc. https://support.sas.com/documentation/onlinedoc/91pdf/sasdoc_913/whatsnew_10878.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tait RG, Wilson DE, Rouse GH. 2005. Prediction of retail product and trimmable fat yields from the four primal cuts in beef cattle using ultrasound or carcass data. J Anim Sci. 83:1353–1360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titterington FM, Morrison SJ, Lively FO, Wylie ARG, Gordon AW, Browne MR. 2015. An analysis of Northern Ireland farmers' experiences of using a target-driven beef heifer growth management plan and development of an empirical model leading to the launch of a decision support tool to promote first calving of beef heifers at 24 months. Agricult Sys. 132:107–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truscott T, Tulloh N, Whitfield D. 1980. A seriatim study using ultrasonic measurements of fat depth and M. longissimus area in Hereford bulls, steers and heifers under grazing conditions. Animal Sci. J. 30:199–209.
   Google Scholar
• Yokoo MJ-I, Ortelan AA, Sarmento JLR, de Magalhães Rosa GJ, Cardoso FF, de Albuquerque LG. 2014. Medidas repetidas no estudo de características de crescimento e carcaça avaliadas por ultrassom em novilhas de corte cruzadas. Bol Ind Anim. 71:200–210.
   Google Scholar