Effect of the number of daily distributions of solid feed on veal calves’ health status, behaviour, and alterations of rumen and abomasa

References

• Ahmed AF, Constable PD, Misk NA. 2002. Effect of feeding frequency and route of administration on abomasal luminal pH in dairy calves fed milk replacer. J Dairy Sci. 85:1502–1508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AOAC. 1990. Official methods of analysis. 15th ed. Arlington (VA): Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
   Google Scholar
• Bähler C, Regula G, Stoffel MH, Steiner A, von Rotz A. 2010. Effects of the two production programs ‘Naturafarm’ and ‘conventional’ on the prevalence of non-perforating abomasal lesions in Swiss veal calves at slaughter. Res Vet Sci. 88:352–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berends H, van den Borne JJGC, Stockhofe-Zurwieden N, Gilbert MS, Zandstra T, Pellikaan WF, van Reenen CG, Bokkers EAM, Gerrits WJJ. 2015. Effects of solid feed level and roughage-to-concentrate ratio on ruminal drinking and passage kinetics of milk replacer, concentrates and roughage in veal calves. J Dairy Sci. 98:5621–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bokkers EAM, Koene P. 2001. Activity, oral behaviour and slaughter data as welfare indicators in veal calves: a comparison of three housing systems. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 75:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bokkers EAM, Leruste H, Heutinck LFM, Wolthuis-Fillerup M, van der Werf JTN, Lensink BJ. van Reenen CG. 2009. Inter-observer and test-retest reliability ofon-farm behavioural observations in veal calves. Anim Welfare. 18:381–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broom DM. 2006. Behaviour and welfare in relation to pathology. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 97:73–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brscic M, Gottardo F, Prevedello P, Tessitore E, Cozzi G. 2009. Veal calves’ clinical/health status in large groups fed with automatic feeding devices. Ital J Anim Sci. 8:187–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brscic M, Heutinck LFM, Wolthuis-Fillerup M, Stockhofe N, Engel B, Visser EK, Gottardo F, Bokkers EAM, Lensink BJ, Cozzi G, et al. 2011a. Prevalence of gastrointestinal disorders recorded at postmortem inspection in white veal calves and associated risk factors. J Dairy Sci. 94:853–863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brscic M, Gottardo F, Leruste H, Lensink J, Van Reenen CG, Cozzi G. 2011b. Prevalence of locomotory system disorders in veal calves and risk factors for occurrence of bursitis. Agric Conspec Sci. 76:4.
   Google Scholar
• Brscic M, Prevedello P, Stefani AL, Cozzi G, Gottardo F. 2014. Effects of the provision of solid feeds enriched with protein or nonprotein nitrogen on veal calf growth, welfare, and slaughter performance. J Dairy Sci. 97:4649–4657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicchetti DV. 1994. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess. 6:284–290.
   Google Scholar
• Cozzi G, Brscic M, Gottardo F. 2009. Main critical factors affecting the welfare of beef cattle and veal calves raised under intensive rearing systems in Italy: a review. Ital J Anim Sci. 8:67–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cozzi G, Gottardo F, Mattiello S, Canali E, Scanziani E, Verga M, Andrighetto I 2002. The provision of solid feeds to veal calves: I. Growth performance, forestomach development, and carcass and meat quality. J Anim Sci. 80: 357–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Council. 1991. Directive 91/629/EC laying down minimum standards for the protection of calves. Official Journal of the European Communities of 11 December 1991, No. L 340/28.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. 1997. Directive 97/2/EC amending Directive 91/629/EEC laying down minimum standards for the protection of calves. Official Journal of European Communities of the 20 January 1997, No. L 25/24.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. 2008. European Council. 2008. Directive 2008/119/EC laying down minimum standards for the protection of calves (Codified version). Official Journal of the European Union of 18 December 2008, No. L 10/7.
   Google Scholar
• Gottardo F, Mattiello S, Cozzi G, Canali E, Scanziani E, Ravarotto L, Ferrante V, Verga M, Andrighetto I. 2002. The provision of drinking water to veal calves for welfare purposes. J Anim. Sci. 80:2362–2372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood RH, Morrill JL, Titgemeyer EC, Kennedy GA. 1997. A new method of measuring diet abrasion and its effect on the development of the forestomach. J Dairy Sci. 80:2534–2541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinders RG, Owen FG. 1965. Relation of ruminal parakeratosis development to volatile fatty acid absorption. J Anim Sci. 48:1069–1073.
   Google Scholar
• Hund A, Dzieciol M, Schmitz-Esser S, Wittek T. 2015. Characterization of mucosa-associated bacterial communities in abomasal ulcers by pyrosequencing. Vet Microbiol. 177:132–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leruste H, Brscic M, Cozzi G, Kemp B, Wolthuis-Fillerup M, Lensink BJ, Bokkers EAM, van Reenen CG. 2014. Prevalence and potential influencing factors of non-nutritive oral behaviors of veal calves on commercial farms. J Dairy Sci. 97:7021–7030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin P, Bateson P. 2007. Measuring behaviour: an introductory guide. 3rd ed. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mattiello S, Canali E, Ferrante V, Caniatti M, Gottardo F, Cozzi G, Andrighetto I, Verga M. 2002. The provision of solid feeds to veal calves: II. Behavior, physiology, and abomasal damage. J Anim Sci. 80:367–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollenhorst H, Berentsen PBM, Berends H, Gerrits WJJ, de Boer IJM. 2016. Economic and environmental effects of providing increased amounts of solid feed to veal calves. J Dairy Sci. 99:2180–2189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morisse JP, Huonnic D, Cotte JP, Martrenchar A. 2000. The effect of four fibrous feed supplementations on different welfare traits in veal calves. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 84:129–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardon B, Catry B, Boone R, Theys H, De Bleecker K, Dewulf J, Deprez P. 2014. Characteristics and challenges of the modern Belgian veal industry. Vlaams Diergeneeskd Tijdschr. 83:155–163.
   Google Scholar
• Prevedello P, Moro L, Brscic M, Gottardo F, Stefani A. 2009. Trend overtime of total haemoglobin, iron metabolism and trace minerals in veal calves fed high amounts of two different solid feeds. Ital J Anim Sci. 8:184–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prevedello P, Brscic M, Schiavon E, Cozzi G, Gottardo F. 2012. Effects of the provision of large amounts of solid feeds to veal calves on growth and slaughter performance and intravitam and postmortem welfare indicators. J Anim Sci. 90:3538–3546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suárez BJ, Van Reenen CG, Beldman G, van Delen J, Dijkstra J, Gerrits WJJ. 2006. Effects of supplementing concentrates differing in carbohydrate composition in veal calf diets: I. Animal performance and rumen fermentation characteristics. J Dairy Sci. 89:4365–4375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suárez BJ, Van Reenen CG, Stockhofe N, Dijkstra J, Gerrits WJJ. 2007. Effect of roughage source and roughage to concentrate ratio on animal performance and rumen development in veal calves. J Dairy Sci. 90:2390–2403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci. 74:3583–3597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veissier I, Ramirez De La Fe AR, Pradel P. 1998. Nonnutritive oral activities and stress responses of veal calves in relation to feeding and housing conditions. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 57:35–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veissier I, Passillé AM De, Rushen J, Van Reenen C, Roussell S, Andanson S, Pradel P. 2001. Calves’ response to repeated social regroupiny and relocation. J Anim Sci. 79:2580–2593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb LE, Bokkers EAM, Engel B, Gerrits WJJ, Berends H, Van Reenen CG. 2012. Behaviour and welfare of veal calves fed different amounts of solid feed supplemented to a milk replacer ration adjusted for similar growth. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 136:108–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb LE, Jensen MB, Engel B, Van Reenen CG, Gerrits WJJ, De Boer IJM, Bokkers EAM. 2014. Chopped or long roughage: What do calves prefer? Using cross point analysis of double demand functions. PLoS One. 9:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiepkema PR, Van Hellemond KK, Roessingh P, Romberg H. 1987. Behaviour and abomasal damage in individual veal calves. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 18:257–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar