Carbohydrate digestion and predicted glycemic index of bakery/confectionary ex-food intended for pig nutrition

References

• Abdulrhman M, El-Hefnawy M, Hussein R, El-Goud AA. 2011. The glycemic and peak incremental indices of honey, sucrose and glucose in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: effects on C-peptide level-a pilot study. Acta Diabetol. 48:89–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Rabadi GJ, Torley PJ, Williams BA, Bryden WL, Gidley MJ. 2011. Effect of extrusion temperature and pre-extrusion particle size on starch digestion kinetics in barley and sorghum grain extrudates. Anim. Feed Sci Technol. 168:267–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AOAC. 2005. Official methods of analysis. 18th ed. Gaithersburg (MD): Association of Official Analytical Chemists Int.
   Google Scholar
• Black J, Williams B, Gidley M. 2009. Metabolic regulation of feed intake in monogastric mammals. In: Torrallardona, D., Roura, E, editors. Voluntary feed intake in pigs. Wagenigen, Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers; p 189–214.
   Google Scholar
• Capriles VD, Coehlo KD, Guerra Matias AC, Arêas J. 2008. Effect of processing methods on amaranth starch digestibility and predicted glycemic index. J Food Sci. 73:160–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doti S, Suárez-Belloch J, Latorre MA, Guada JA, Fondevila M. 2014. Effect of dietary starch source on growth performances, digestibility and quality traits of growing pigs. Livest Sci. 164:119–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew MD, Schafer TC, Zijlstra RT. 2012. Glycemic index of starch affects nitrogen retention in grower pigs. J Anim Sci. 90:1233–1241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englyst HN, Kingman SM, Cummings JH. 1992. Classification and measurement of nutritionally important starch fractions. Eur J Clin Nutr. 46:33–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2009. Commission Regulation (EC) No 152/2009 of 27 January 2009 laying down the methods of sampling and analysis for the official control of feed establishes the sampling method and the methods of analysis of feed for control purposes. Off J L. 54:177.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013. Commission Regulation (EC) No 68/2013 of 16 January 2013 on the Catalogue of feed materials. Off J L. 29:1–64.
   Google Scholar
• Featherstone P. 2014. Keeping food losses in the food chain through animal feed. In: Jovanka L, editor. XVI International Symposium “Feed Technology”. Novi Sad: University of Novi Sad, Institute of Food Technology, 66. 2014. ISBN 978-86-7994-042-1.
   Google Scholar
• Giromini C, Ottoboni M, Tretola M, Marchis D, Gottardo D, Caprarulo V, Baldi A, Pinotti L. 2017. Nutritional evaluation of former food products (ex-food) intended for pig nutrition. Food Addit Contam: Part A. 34:1436–1445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuberti G, Gallo A, Masoero F. 2012. Plasma glucose response and glycemic indices in pigs fed diets differing in in vitro hydrolysis indices. Animal. 6:1068–1076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuberti G, Gallo A, Cerioli C, Masoero F. 2012. In vitro starch digestion and predicted glycemic index of cereal grains commonly utilized in pig nutrition. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 174:163–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo JY, Phillips CE, Coffey MT, Kim SW. 2015. Efficacy of a supplemental candy coproduct as an alternative carbohydrate source to lactose on growth performance of newly weaned pigs in a commercial farm condition. J Anim Sci. 93:5304–5312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim IB, Allee GL. 2001. Effect of carbohydrate sources in phase I and phase II pig starter diets. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 14:1419–1424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudsen KEB, Laerke HN. 2018. Carbohydrates and lignin in the feed-from sugars to complex composed carbohydrates. In Feed evaluation science. Wagenigen, Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers; p. 113–144.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Jha R, Stein HH. 2018. Nutritional composition, gross energy concentration, and in vitro digestibility of dry matter in 46 sources of bakery meals. J Anim Sci. 96:4685–4692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahasukhonthachat K, Sopade PA, Gidley MJ. 2010. Kinetics of starch digestion in sorghum as affected by particle size. J Food Eng. 96:18–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavromichalis I, Hancock JD, Hines RH, Senne BW, Cao H. 2001. Lactose, sucrose, and molasses in simple and complex diets for nursery pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 93:127–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavromichalis I. 2012. Molasses as a feed ingredient in low-cost piglet diets [cited 2018 Nov 1]. Available from: http://www.wattagnet.com/articles/12260-molasses-as-a-feed-ingredient-in-low-cost-piglet-diets
   Google Scholar
• McDonald P, Edwards RA, Greenhalgh JFD, Morgan CA, Sinclair LA, Wilkinson RG. 2012. Animal nutrition. 7th ed. Essex (England): Pearson Education Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Menoyo D, Serrano MP, Barrios V, Valencia DG, Lázaro R, Argente J, Mateos GG. 2011. Cereal type and heat processing of the cereal affect nutrient digestibility and dynamics of serum insulin and ghrelin in weanling pigs. J Anim Sci. 89:2793–2800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naranjo VD, Bidner TD, Southern LL. 2010a. Comparison of dried whey permeate and a carbohydrate product in diets for nursery pigs. J Anim Sci. 88:1868–1879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naranjo VD, Bidner TD, Southern LL. 2010b. Effect of milk chocolate product on week-1 feed intake and growth performance of weanling pigs. J Anim Sci. 88:2779–2788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). 2012. Nutrient requirements of swine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinotti L, Giromini C, Ottoboni M, Tretola M, Marchis D. 2019. Review: insects and former foodstuffs for upgrading food waste biomasses/streams to feed ingredients for farm animals. Animal 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Prandini A, Sigolo S, Moschini M, Giuberti G, Morlacchini M. 2016. Effect of the inclusion of dry pasta by-products at different levels in the diet of typical Italian finishing heavy pigs: performance, carcass characteristics, and ham quality. Meat Sci. 114:38–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlegel P, Hall R. 2006. Effects of diet type and an artificial high intensity sweetener (SUCRAM®) on weaned piglet performances. J Anim Sci. 84:45–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin JL, Jacobs D, Marquart L. 2000. Grain processing and nutrition. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 40:309–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solà-Oriol D, van Kempen T, Torrallardona D. 2010. Relationship between glycaemic index and digesta passage of cereal-based diets in pigs. Livestock Sci. 134:41–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterk A, Schlegel P, Mul AJ, Ubbink-Blanksma M, Bruininx E. 2008. Effects of sweeteners on individual feed intake characteristics and performance in group-housed weanling pigs. J Anim Sci. 86:2990–2997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevnebø A, Sahlström S, Svihus B. 2006. Starch structure and degree of starch hydrolysis of small and large starch granules from barley varieties with varying amylose content. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 130:23–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun T, Laerke HN, Jørgensen H, Bach Knudsen KE. 2006. The effect of extrusion cooking of different starch sources on the in vitro and in vivo digestibility in growing pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 131:6685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svihus B, Uhlen AK, Harstad OM. 2005. Effect of starch granule structure, associated components and processing on nutritive value of cereal starch: a review. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 122:303–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tretola M, Ottoboni M, Luciano A, Rossi L, Baldi A, Pinotti L. 2018a. Effects of former food products as cereal substitute on growth performance in post-weaning pig. Book of Abstracts of the 69th Annual Meeting of the European Federation of Animal Science; Aug 27–31; Dubrovnik (HR): Scientific Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Tretola M, Ottoboni M, Luciano A, Rossi L, Baldi A, Pinotti L. 2018b. Effects of bakery/confectionary former food products as cereal substitute on growth performance and gut microbiota in post-weaning piglets. Proceedings of the 6th International Feed Conference: Present and Future Challenges; Oct 25–26; Bergen (NO): The Research Council of Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Tretola M, Di Rosa AR, Tirloni E, Ottoboni M, Giromini C, Leone F, Bernardi CEM, Dell’Orto V, Chiofalo V, Pinotti L. 2017. Former food products safety: microbiological quality and computer vision evaluation of packaging remnants contamination. Food Addit Contam: Part A. 34:1427–1435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tretola M, Ottoboni M, Di Rosa AR, Giromini C, Fusi E, Rebucci R, Leone F, Dell’Orto V, Chiofalo V, Pinotti L. 2017. Former food products safety evaluation: computer vision as an innovative approach for the packaging remnants detection. J Food Quality. 2017:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Kempen T, Regmi PR, Matte JJ, Zijlstra RT. 2010. In vitro starch digestion kinetics, corrected for estimated gastric emptying, predicts the kinetics of portal glucose appearance in swine. J Nutr. 140:1227–1233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weurding RE, Veldman A, Veen WAG, van der Aar PJ, Verstegen MWA. 2001. In vitro starch digestion correlates well with rate and extent of starch digestion in broiler chickens. J Nutr. 131:2336–2342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiseman J. 2006. Variations in starch digestibility in non-ruminants. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 130:66–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar