Former food products have no detrimental effects on diet digestibility, growth performance and selected plasma variables in post-weaning piglets

References

• Addass PA, David DI, Edward A, Zira KE, Midak A. 2012. Effect of age, sex and management system on some haematological parameters of intensively and semi-intensively kept chicken in Mubi, Adamawa State, Nigeria. Iran J Appl Anim Sci. 2:277–282.
   Google Scholar
• Alsaffar A. 2011. Effect of food processing on the resistant starch content of cereals and cereal products - A review. Int J Food Sci and Tech. 46:455–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altan A, McCarthy K, Maskan M. 2009. Effect of extrusion cooking on functional properties and in vitro starch digestibility of barley‐based extrudates from fruit and vegetable by‐products. J Food Sci. 74:77–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anguita M, Gasa J, Martín-Orúe S, Pérez J. 2006. Study of the effect of technological processes on starch hydrolysis, non-starch polysaccharides solubilization and physicochemical properties of different ingredients using a two-step in vitro system. Anim Feed Sci Tech. 129:99–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [AOAC] Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 2005. Official methods of analysis. 18th ed. Gaithersburg (MD): AOAC Int.
   Google Scholar
• Bellmann S, Minekus M, Sanders P, Bosgra S, Havenaar R. 2018. Human glycemic response curves after intake of carbohydrate foods are accurately predicted by combining in vitro gastrointestinal digestion with in silico kinetic modeling. Cli Nutr Exp. 17:8–22.
   Google Scholar
• Boisen S, Fernández J. 1997. Prediction of the total tract digestibility of energy in feedstuffs and pig diets by in vitro analyses. Anim Feed Sci Tech. 68:277–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doti S, Suárez-Belloch J, Latorre M, Guada J, Fondevila M. 2014. Effect of dietary starch source on growth performances, digestibility and quality traits of growing pigs. Livest Sci. 164:119–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EFFPA. 2018. Keeping food losses in the food chain. European Former Foodstuff Processors Association. http://www.effpa.eu/.
   Google Scholar
• Etim NN, Offiong EE, Williams ME, Asuquo LE. 2014. Influence of nutrition on blood parameters of pigs. AJBLS. 2:46–52.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2018a. Commission notice of 16 April 2018 laying down guidelines for the feed use of food no longer intended for human consumption. In: Official Journal of the European Union. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission; p.1–33
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2018b. Commission decision of 30 May 2018 amending Directive 2008/98/EC on waste. In: Official Journal of the European Union. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission; p. 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• FEFAC. 2017. Annual report 2016–2017. European feed manufacturers’ federation. https://www.fefac.eu/files/75933.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gerrits WJ, Bosch MW, van den Borne JJ. 2012. Quantifying resistant starch using novel, in vivo methodology and the energetic utilization of fermented starch in pigs. J Nutr. 142:238–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giromini C, Ottoboni M, Tretola M, Marchis D, Gottardo D, Caprarulo V, Baldi A, Pinotti L. 2017. Nutritional evaluation of former food products (ex-food) intended for pig nutrition. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 34:1436–1445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuberti G, Gallo A, Masoero F. 2012. Plasma glucose response and glycemic indices in pigs fed diets differing in in vitro hydrolysis indices. Animal. 6:1068–1076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuberti G, Gallo A, Masoero F, Ferraretto L, Hoffman P, Shaver R. 2014. Factors affecting starch utilization in large animal food production system – a review. Stärke. 66:72–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo J, Phillips C, Coffey M, Kim S. 2015. Efficacy of a supplemental candy coproduct as an alternative carbohydrate source to lactose on growth performance of newly weaned pigs in a commercial farm condition. J Anim Sci. 93:5304–5312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanagh S, Lynch P, O’mara F, Caffrey P. 2001. A comparison of total collection and marker technique for the measurement of apparent digestibility of diets for growing pigs. Anim Feed Sci Tech. 89:49–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Li J, Zhang L, Gao F, Zhou G. 2017. Effects of dietary starch types on growth performance, meat quality and myofibre type of finishing pigs. Meat Sci. 131:60–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Jha R, Stein HH, Adedokun SA, Adeola O, Azain MJ, Baidoo SK, Carter SD, Crenshaw TD, Dilger R, et al. 2018. Nutritional composition, gross energy concentration, and in vitro digestibility of dry matter in 46 sources of bakery meals. J Anim Sci. 96:4685–4692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald P, Edwards R, Greenhalgh J, Morgan C, Sinclair L, Wilkinson R. 2011. Nutrient requirements of the lactating ewe. Animal Nutrition. 7th ed. London, England: Pearson Education Limited; p. 444–449.
   Google Scholar
• [NRC] National Research Council. 2011. Nutrient requirements of swine. Washington (DC): National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newman M, Zebeli Q, Eberspächer E, Grüll D, Molnar T, Metzler-Zebeli B. 2017. Transglycosylated starch improves insulin response and alters lipid and amino acid metabolome in a growing pig model. Nutrients. 9:291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noblet J, Perez J. 1993. Prediction of digestibility of nutrients and energy values of pig diets from chemical analysis. J Anim Sci. 71:3389–3398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olabanji RO, Farinu GO, Akinlade JA, Ojebiyi OO, Odunsi AA, Akingbade AA. 2007. Studies on haematological and serum biochemical characteristics of weaner rabbits fed different levels of wild sunflower (Tithonia diversifolia Hemsl A. Gray) leaf-blood meal mixture. Int J App Agr Apic Res. 4:80–89.
   Google Scholar
• Ottoboni M, Tretola M, Cattaneo D, Luciano A, Giromini C, Fusi E, Rebucci R, Pinotti L. 2018. Predicted glycemic index and hydrolysis index in in former food products intended for pig nutrition. Proceedings of 69th Annual Meeting EAAP; Aug 27–31; Dubrovnik, Croatia: (p. Accepted abstract (number 28838).
   Google Scholar
• Ottoboni M, Tretola M, Luciano A, Giuberti G, Gallo A, Pinotti L. 2019. Carbohydrate digestion and predicted glycemic index of bakery/confectionary ex-food intended for pig nutrition. Italian J Anim Sci. DOI:10.1080/1828051X.2019.1596758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinotti L, Dell’Orto V. 2011. Feed safety in the feed supply chain. Biotechnol Agron Soc and Env. 15:9–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinotti L, Giromini C, Ottoboni M, Tretola M, Cheli F, Baldi A. 2016. Ex-food 4 feed: quality and safety. Proceedings of the 1st ed. of Celebrating Food; Oct 25–27; Novi Sad, Serbia: University of Novi Sad.
   Google Scholar
• Pinotti L, Krogdahl A, Givens I, Knight C, Baldi A, Baeten V, Luten J. 2014. The role of animal nutrition in designing optimal foods of animal origin as reviewed by the COST Action Feed for Health (FA0802). Biotechnol Agron Soc Env. 18:471–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regmi P, Ferguson N, Zijlstra R. 2009. In vitro digestibility techniques to predict apparent total tract energy digestibility of wheat in grower pigs. J Anim Sci. 87:3620–3629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehman Z, Shah W. 2005. Thermal heat processing effects on antinutrients, protein and starch digestibility of food legumes. Food Chem. 91:327–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renaudeau D, Brochain J, Giorgi M, Bocage B, Hery M, Crantor E, Marie-Magdeleine C, Archimède H. 2014. Banana meal for feeding pigs: digestive utilization, growth performance and feeding behavior. Animal. 8:565–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauvant D, Perez J, Tran G. 2004.Tables of composition and nutritional value of feed materials: pigs, poultry, cattle, sheep, goats, rabbits, horses and fish. Wageningen (NL): Wageningen Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Singh J, Dartois A, Kaur L. 2010. Starch digestibility in food matrix: a review. Trends Food Sci Technol. 21:168–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tretola M, Di Rosa A, Tirloni E, Ottoboni M, Giromini C, Leone F, Bernardi CEM, Dell’Orto V, Chiofalo V, Pinotti L. 2017. Former food products safety: microbiological quality and computer vision evaluation of packaging remnants contamination. Food Addit Contam Part A. 34:1427–1435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tretola M, Ottoboni M, Di Rosa A, Giromini C, Fusi E, Rebucci R, Leone F, Dell’Orto V, Chiofalo V, Pinotti L. 2017. Former food products safety evaluation: computer vision as an innovative approach for the packaging remnants detection. J Food Qual. 2017:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Kempen T, Regmi P, Matte J, Zijlstra R. 2010. In vitro starch digestion kinetics, corrected for estimated gastric emptying, predict portal glucose appearance in pigs. J Nutr. 140:1227–1233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Keulen J, Young B. 1977. Evaluation of acid-insoluble ash as a natural marker in ruminant digestibility studies 1, 2. J Anim Sci. 44:282–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin F, Zhang Z, Huang J, Yin Y. 2010. Digestion rate of dietary starch affects systemic circulation of amino acids in weaned pigs. Br J Nutr. 103:1404–1412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar