Effects of probiotics and sex on physicochemical, sensory and microstructural characteristics of broiler chicken meat

References

• Abdulla NR, Zamri ANM, Sabow AB, Kareem KY, Nurhazirah S, Ling FH, Sazili AQ, Loh TC. 2017. Physicochemical properties of breast muscle in broiler chickens fed probiotics, antibiotics or antibiotic-probiotic mix. J Appl Anim Res. 45:64–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baryłko-Pikielna N, Matuszewska I. 2009. Sensoryczne badania żywności [Sensory food testing]. Kraków (PL): PTTŻ. [Polish].
   Google Scholar
• Bourne MC. 1982. Food texture and viscosity concept and measurement. New York (NY): Academic Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Burck HC. 1975. Histological technology. Warszawa: Państwowy Zakład Wydawnictw Lekarskich.
   Google Scholar
• Chartrin P, Méteau K, Juin H, Bernadet MD, Guy G, Larzul C, Rémignon H, Mourot J, Duclos MJ, Baéza E. 2006. Effects of intermuscular fat levels on sensory characteristics of duck breast meat. Poult Sci. 85:914–922.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CIELab Colour System. 1976. Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage. France: CIE Publication.
   Google Scholar
• FAOSTAT. 2019. Livestock primary, production quantity, poultry meat, 2017. Rome: FAO Publisher; [accessed 2019 Apr 25]. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QL.
   Google Scholar
• Gesek M, Sokół R, Lambert BD, Otrocka-Domagała I. 2018. Effect of effective microorganisms on internal morphology and morphometry in Japanese quails. Turk J Vet Anim Sci. 42:285–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnanadesigan M, Sandhanasamy I, Ponnusamy S, Lakshmanan R, Natarajan M, Rajagopal R. 2014. Quality evaluation of egg compositions and productivity of layers in EM (effective microorganisms) treatments: a field report. Egypt J Basic Appl Sci. 1:161–166.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanovic S, Baltic M, Popov-Raljic J, Pisinov B, Madlic-Strizak D, Stojanovic Z, Pavlovic I. 2012. The effect of different probiotics on broiler meat quality. Afr J Microbiol Res. 6:937–943.
   Google Scholar
• Inatomi T. 2015. Growth performance, gut mucosal immunity and carcass and intermuscular fat of broiler fed diets containing a combination of three probiotics. Sci Post. 1:1.
   Google Scholar
• Jwher DMT, Abd SK, Mohammad AG. 2013. The study of using effective microorganism (EM) on health and performance of broiler chicks. Iraqi J Vet Sci. 27:73–78.
   Google Scholar
• Kim HW, Yan FF, Hu JY, Cheng HW, Kim Y. 2016. Effects of probiotic feeding on meat quality of chicken breast during postmortem storage. Poult Sci. 95:1457–1464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Král M, Angelovičová M, Alfaig E, Walczycka M. 2013. Meat quality of broiler chickens fed diets with Bacillus subtilis and malic acid additives. Sci Pap Anim Sci Biotech. 46:375–378.
   Google Scholar
• Loddi MM, Gonzales E, Takita TS. 2000. Effect of the use of probiotic and antibiotic on the performance, yield and carcass quality of broilers. Braz J Anim Sci. 29:1124–1131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Łyczyński A, Runowska G, Pospiech E, Koćwiń-Podsiadła M, Wojczak J, Rzosińska E, Grześ B, Mikołajczak B, Iwańska E. 2009. Estimation of selected porcine meat quality indicators on the basis of electrical conductivity measured 24 hours post-slaughter. Anim Sci Pap Rep. 27:5158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JH, Kim IH. 2014. Supplemental effect of probiotic Bacillus subtilis B2A on productivity, organ weight, intestinal Salmonella microflora, and breast meat quality of growing broiler chicks. Poult Sci. 93:2054–2059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelicano ERL, de Souza PA, de Souza HBA, Oba A, Norkus EA, Kodawara LM, de Lima TMA. 2003. Effect of different prebiotics and probiotics on broiler carcass and meat quality. Rev Bras Cienc Avic. 5:207–214.
   Google Scholar
• Pelicia K, Mendes A, Sadanhp E, Pizzolante CC, Takahashi SE, Moreira J, Garcia RG, Quinteira RR, Paz I, Komiyama CM. 2004. Use of prebiotics and probiotics of bacterial and yeast origin for free-range broiler chickens. Braz J Poult Sci. 6:163–169.
   Google Scholar
• Pietrzak D, Mroczek J, Garbaczewska A, Florkowski T, Riedel J. 2009. Effects of selected antimicrobial feed additives on the quality of meat and fat of chicken. Med Vet. 65:268–271.
   Google Scholar
• SAS Institute Inc. 2014. SAS/STAT user’s guide, version 9.4. Gary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Simeamelak M, Solomon D, Taye T. 2013. The effect of effective microorganisms on production and quality performance of Rhode Island Red layers. Int J Livest Prod. 4:22–29.
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi SE, Mendes AA, Saldanha E, Pizzolante CC, Pelícia K, Quinteiro RR, Komiyama CM, Garcia RG, Almeida Paz ICL. 2005. Efficiency of prebiotics and probiotics on the performance, yield, meat quality and presence of Salmonella spp. in carcass of free-range broiler chickens. Rev Bras Cienc Avic. 7:151–157.
   Google Scholar
• Wondmeneh E, Gattachew T, Dessie T. 2011. Effect of effective microorganisms (EM) on the growth performance of Fayouni and Horro chicken. Intern. J Poult Sci. 10:185–188.
   Google Scholar
• Yang X, Zhang B, Guo Y, Jiao P, Long F. 2010. Effects of dietary lipids and Clostridium butyricum on fat deposition and meat quality of broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 89:254–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou X, Wang Y, Gu Q, Li W. 2010. Effect of dietary probiotic, Bacillus coagulans, on growth performance, chemical composition, and meat quality of Guangxi Yellow chicken. Poult Sci. 89:588–593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar