Animal welfare and gender: a nexus in awareness and preference when choosing fresh beef meat?

References

• Balcombe K, Bradley D, Fraser I, Hussein M. 2016. Consumer preferences regarding country of origin for multiple meat products. Food Policy. 64:49–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett JL, Hemsworth PH. 2009. Welfare monitoring schemes: using research to safeguard welfare of animals on the farm. J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 12(2):114–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr SI, Chapman GE. 2002. Perceptions and practices of self-defined current vegetarian, former vegetarian, and nonvegetarian women. J Am Diet Assoc. 102(3):354–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertoni G. 2009. Ethical motivations (consumers) of animal welfare and the interest for farmers. Ital J Anim Sci. 8(sup2):897–899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brugiapaglia A, Lussiana C, Destefanis G. 2014. Fatty acid profile and cholesterol content of beef at retail of Piemontese, Limousin and Friesian breeds. Meat Sci. 96(1):568–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buller H, Cesar C. 2007. Eating well, eating fare: farm animal welfare in France. Int J Sociol Food Agric. 15(3):45–58.
   Google Scholar
• Burger J. 2002. Daily consumption of wild fish and game: exposures of high end recreationists. Int J Environ Health Res. 12(4):343–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch G, Weary DM, Spiller A, Von Keyserlingk M. 2017. American and German attitudes towards cowcalf separation on dairy farms. PLoS One. 12(3):e0174013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan EY, Zlatevska N. 2019. Is meat sexy? Meat preference as a function of the sexual motivation system. Food Qual Prefer. 74:78–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Graaf S, Van Loo EJ, Bijttebier J, Vanhonacker F, Lauwers L, Tuyttens FAM, Verbeke W. 2016. Determinants of consumer intention to purchase animal-friendly milk. J. Dairy Sci. 99(10):8304–8313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Pasquale J, Nannoni E, Adinolfi F, Del Duca I, Capitanio F, Sardi L, Vitali M, Martelli G. 2016. A case-study on profiling Italian consumers of animal-friendly foods. Ital J Anim Sci. 15(2):294–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Vita G, Blanc S, Brun F, Bracco S, D'Amico M. 2019b. Quality attributes and harmful components of cured meats: exploring the attitudes of Italian consumers towards healthier cooked ham. Meat Sci. 155:8–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Vita G, Blanc S, Mancuso T, Massaglia S, La Via G, D’Amico M. 2019a. Harmful compounds and willingness to buy for reduced-additives salami. An outlook on Italian consumers. IJERPH. 16(14):2605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellies-Oury MP, Lee A, Jacob H, Hocquette JF. 2019. Meat consumption–what French consumers feel about the quality of beef? Ital J Anim Sci. 18(1):646–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunert KG. 2005. Food quality and safety: consumer perception and demand. Eur Rev Agric Econ. 32(3):369–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henchion M, McCarthy M, Resconi VC, Troy D. 2014. Meat consumption: trends and quality matters. Meat Sci. 98(3):561–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman LC, Wiklund E. 2006. Game and venison – meat for the modern consumer. Meat Sci. 74(1):197–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISMEA. 2019. Allevamento bovino da carne – Scheda di settore. [Accessed 2020 Feb 25]. http://www.ismeamercati.it/carni/carne-bovina.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser HF, Rice J. 1974. Little Jiffy, Mark Iv. Educ Psychol Meas. 34(1):111–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapferer J-N, Michaut-Denizeau A. 2014. Is luxury compatible with sustainability? Luxury consumers’ viewpoint. J Brand Manag. 21(1):1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Kraljević R, Filipović Z. 2017. Gender differences and consumer behavior of millennials. Acta Econ Tur. 3(1):5–13.
   Google Scholar
• Kubberød E, Dingstad GI, Ueland Ø, Risvik E. 2006. The effect of animality on disgust response at the prospect of meat preparation – an experimental approach from Norway. Food Qual Prefer. 17(3–4):199–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubberød E, Ueland Ø, Rødbotten M, Westad F, Risvik E. 2002. Gender specific preferences and attitudes towards meat. Food Qual Prefer. 13(5):285–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagerkvist CJ. 2013. Consumer preferences for food labelling attributes: comparing direct ranking and best-worst scaling for measurement of attribute importance, preference intensity and attribute dominance. Food Qual Prefer. 29(2):77–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ljung PE, Riley SJ, Heberlein TA, Ericsson G. 2012. Eat prey and love: game-meat consumption and attitudes toward hunting. Wildl Soc Bull. 36(4):669–675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomasky L. 2013. Is it wrong to eat animals? Soc Phil Pol. 30(1–2):177–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughnan S, Haslam N, Bastian B. 2010. The role of meat consumption in the denial of moral status and mind to meat animals. Appetite. 55(1):156–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martelli G. 2009. Consumers’ perception of farm animal welfare: an Italian and European perspective. Ital J Anim Sci. 8(sup1):31–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massaglia S, Merlino VM, Borra D. 2018. Marketing strategies for animal welfare meat identification: comparison of preferences between millennial and conventional consumers. Qual - Access Success. 19:305–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayfield LE, Bennett RM, Tranter RB, Wooldridge MJ. 2007. Consumption of welfare-friendly food products in Great Britain, Italy and Sweden, and how it may be influenced by consumer attitudes to, and behaviour towards, animal welfare attributes. Int J Sociol Food Agric. 15(3):59–73.
   Google Scholar
• McEachern MG, Schróder M. 2002. The role of livestock production ethics in consumer values towards meat. J Agric Environ Ethics. 15(2):221–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merlino VM, Borra D, Girgenti V, Dal Vecchio A, Massaglia S. 2018. Beef meat preferences of consumers from Northwest Italy: analysis of choice attributes. Meat Sci. 143:119–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merlino VM, Borra D, Verduna T, Massaglia S. 2017. Household behavior with respect to meat consumption: differences between households with and without children. Vet Sci. 4(4):53.
   Google Scholar
• Miranda-de la Lama GC, Estévez-Moreno LX, Sepúlveda WS, Estrada-Chavero MC, Rayas-Amor AA, Villarroel M, María GA. 2017. Mexican consumers’ perceptions and attitudes towards farm animal welfare and willingness to pay for welfare friendly meat products. Meat Sci. 125:106–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napolitano F, Girolami A, Braghieri A. 2010. Consumer liking and willingness to pay for high welfare animal-based products. Trends Food Sci Technol. 21(11):537–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nocella G, Hubbard L, Scarpa R. 2010. Farm animal welfare, consumer willingness to pay, and trust: results of a cross-national survey. Appl Econ Perspect Policy. 32(2):275–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payen S, Falconer S, Carlson B, Yang W, Ledgard S. 2020. Eutrophication and climate change impacts of a case study of New Zealand beef to the European market. Sci Total Environ. 710:136120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourová M, Stehlik V. 2012. Czech consumers evaluation of choosen meat products. Agric Econ – Czech. 48(No. 3):121–125.
   Google Scholar
• Resano H, Olaizola AM, Dominguez-Torreiro M. 2018. Exploring the influence of consumer characteristics on veal credence and experience guarantee purchasing motivators. Meat Sci. 141:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resurreccion A. 2004. Sensory aspects of consumer choices for meat and meat products. Meat Sci. 66(1):11–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahelices A, Mesías FJ, Escribano M, Gaspar P, Elghannam A. 2017. Are quality regulations displacing PDOs? A choice experiment study on Iberian meat products in Spain. Ital J Anim Sci. 16(1):9–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scozzafava G, Corsi AM, Casini L, Contini C, Loose SM. 2016. Using the animal to the last bit: consumer preferences for different beef cuts. Appetite. 96:70–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan M, Wolfson DJ. 2007. What’s good for the goose … The Israeli supreme court, foie gras, and the future of farmed animals in the United States. Law Contemp Probl. 70(1):139–173.
   Google Scholar
• Telligman AL, Worosz MR, Bratcher CL. 2017. Local” as an indicator of beef quality: an exploratory study of rural consumers in the southern US. Food Qual Preference. 57:41–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thøgersen J, Pedersen S, Paternoga M, Schwendel E, Aschemann-Witzel J. 2017. How important is country-of-origin for organic food consumers? A review of the literature and suggestions for future research. Br Food J. 119(3):558–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonsor GT, Wolf CA. 2011. On mandatory labeling of animal welfare attributes. Food Policy. 36(3):430–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topcu Y, Uzundumlu AS, Baran D. 2015. How sensory and hedonic quality attributes affect fresh red meat consumption decision of Turkish consumers? Ital J Food Sci. 27(2):53–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vecchione M, Feldman C, Wunderlich S. 2015. Consumer knowledge and attitudes about genetically modified food products and labelling policy. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 66(3):329–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeke W, Viaene J. 1999. Beliefs, attitude and behaviour towards fresh meat consumption in Belgium: empirical evidence from a consumer survey. Food Qual Prefer. 10(6):437–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlontzos G, Kyrgiakos L, Duquenne M. 2018. What are the main drivers of young consumers purchasing traditional food products? European field research. Foods. 7(2):22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang O, Gellynck X, Verbeke W. 2017. Chinese consumers and European beer: associations between attribute importance, socio-demographics, and consumption. Appetite. 108:416–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar