High-intensity ultrasonication of rabbit carcases: a first glance into a small-scale model to improve meat quality traits

References

• Alarcon-Rojo AD, Carrillo-Lopez LM, Reyes-Villagrana R, Huerta-Jiménez M, Garcia-Galicia IA. 2019. Ultrasound and meat quality: a review. Ultrason Sonochem. 55:369–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AMSA. 2016. Research guidelines for cookery, sensory evaluation, and instrumental tenderness measurements of meat. AMSA: Champaign (IL).
   Google Scholar
• Chang HJ, Wang Q, Tang CH, Zhou GH. 2015. Effects of ultrasound treatment on connective tissue collagen and meat quality of beef semitendinosus muscle. J Food Qual. 38:256–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang HJ, Xu XL, Zhou GH, Li CB, Huang M. 2012. Effects of characteristics changes of collagen on meat physicochemical properties of beef semitendinosus muscle during ultrasonic processing. Food Bioprocess Technol. 5:285–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CIELab. 2004. Colorimetry. 3th ed. Vienna (Austria): CIE.
   Google Scholar
• Cullere M, Dalle Zotte A. 2018. Rabbit meat production and consumption: State of knowledge and future perspectives. Meat Sci. 143:137–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalle Zotte A, Szendrő Z. 2011. The role of rabbit meat as functional food. Meat Sci. 88:319–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flint EB, Suslick KS. 1991. The temperature of cavitation. Science. 253:1397–1399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Galicia IA, Huerta-Jimenez M, Morales-Piñon C, Diaz-Almanza S, Carrillo-Lopez LM, Reyes-Villagrana R, Estepp C, Alarcon-Rojo AD. 2020. The impact of ultrasound and vacuum pack on quality properties of beef after modified atmosphere on display. J Food Process Eng. 43:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Salazar JA, Ochoa-Montes DA, Ozuna C, Sosa-Morales ME, Cerón-García A, Ozuna C, Sosa-Morales ME. 2018. Effect of acid marination assisted by power ultrasound on the quality of rabbit meat. J Food Qual. 2018:1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM SPSS. 2008. SPSS Inc. Released 2008. SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 17.0. Chicago (IL): SPSS.
   Google Scholar
• Jayasooriya SD, Torley PJ, D’Arcy BR, Bhandari BR. 2007. Effect of high power ultrasound and ageing on the physical properties of bovine Semitendinosus and Longissimus muscles. Meat Sci. 75:628–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang DC, Gao X, Ge Q, Zhou G, Zhang W. 2017. Effects of ultrasound on the beef structure and water distribution during curing through protein degradation and modification. Ultrason Sonochem. 38:317–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang D, Jiang Y, Xing L, Zhou G, Zhang W. 2017. Inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Bacillus cereus by power ultrasound during the curing processing in brining liquid and beef. Food Res Int. 102:717–727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang D, Zou Y, Chen Y, Xing L, Zhou G, Zhang W. 2016. Effects of power ultrasound on oxidation and structure of beef proteins during curing processing. Ultrason Sonochem. 33:47–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klont RE, Brocks L, Eikelenboom G. 1998. Muscle fibre type and meat quality. Meat Sci. 49:S219–S229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindahl G, Lundström K, Tornberg E. 2001. Contribution of pigment content, myoglobin forms and internal reflectance to the colour of pork loin and ham from pure breed pigs. Meat Sci. 59:141–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moczkowska M, Półtorak A, Montowska M, Pospiech E, Wierzbicka A. 2017. The effect of the packaging system and storage time on myofibrillar protein degradation and oxidation process in relation to beef tenderness. Meat Sci. 130:7–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan MG, Byrne DV, Martens M. 2003. Evaluation of pork colour: sensory colour assessment using trained and untrained sensory panellists. Meat Sci. 63:119–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peña-Gonzalez E, Alarcon-Rojo AD, Garcia-Galicia I, Carrillo-Lopez L, Huerta-Jimenez M. 2019. Ultrasound as a potential process to tenderize beef: sensory and technological parameters. Ultrason Sonochem. 53:134–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roufs J. 1978. Light as a true visual quantity: principles of measurement. Paris (France): Commission Internationale de l'Éclairage.
   Google Scholar
• Sikes AL, Mawson R, Stark J, Warner R. 2014. Quality properties of pre- and post-rigor beef muscle after interventions with high frequency ultrasound. Ultrason Sonochem. 21:2138–2143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stadnik J, Dolatowski ZJ, Baranowska HM. 2008. Effect of ultrasound treatment on water holding properties and microstructure of beef (m. semimembranosus) during ageing. LWT Food Sci Technol. 41:2151–2158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suslick KS, Flannigan DJ. 2008. Inside a collapsing bubble: sonoluminescence and the conditions during cavitation. Annu Rev Phys Chem. 59:659–683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai TC, Ockerman HW. 1981. Water binding measurement of meat. J Food Science. 46:697–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang A, Kang D, Zhang W, Zhang C, Zou Y, Zhou G. 2018. Changes in calpain activity, protein degradation and microstructure of beef M. semitendinosus by the application of ultrasound. Food Chem. 245:724–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warriss PD. 2010. Meat science: an introductory text. 2nd ed. Wallingford (UK): CABI Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Xiao S, Ahn DU. 2013. Protein oxidation: basic principles and implications for meat quality. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 53:1191–1201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou Y, Zhang W, Kang D, Zhou G. 2018. Improvement of tenderness and water holding capacity of spiced beef by the application of ultrasound during cooking. Int J Food Sci Technol. 53:828–836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar