Comparison of non-linear models to describe the growth in the Andalusian turkey breed

References

• Afrouziyeh M, Kwakkel RP, Zuidhof MJ. 2021. Improving a nonlinear Gompertz growth model using bird-specific random coefficients in two heritage chicken lines. Poult Sci. 100(5):101059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arando A, González-Ariza A, León JM, Doctor J, Marín C, Navas-González FJ, Gallardo M, Delgado JV, Camacho ME. 2019. Resultados preliminares de la calidad externa del huevo en el pavo Andaluz (Meleagris gallopavo). XX Simposio Iberoamericano sobre Conservación y Utilización de Recursos Zoogenéticos. Corumbá, Mato Grosso do Sul.
   Google Scholar
• Barr D, Levy R, Scheepers C, Tily H. 2013. Random effects. Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. p. 197–202.
   Google Scholar
• Camacho‐Escobar MA, Arroyo‐Ledezma J, Ramirez‐Cancino L. 2008. Diseases of backyard turkeys in the Mexican tropics. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1149(1):368–370.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Canales Vergara AM, Landi V, Delgado Bermejo JV, Martínez A, Cervantes Acosta P, Pons Barro Á, Bigi D, Sponenberg P, Helal M, Hossein Banabazi M, et al. 2019. Tracing worldwide turkey genetic diversity using D-loop sequence mitochondrial DNA analysis. Animals. 9(11):897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan JS, Kuk AY. 1997. Maximum likelihood estimation for probit-linear mixed models with correlated random effects. Biometrics. 53(1):86–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciurescu G, Vasilachi A, Grosu H. 2020. Efficacy of microbial phytase on growth performance, carcass traits, bone mineralization, and blood biochemistry parameters in broiler turkeys fed raw chickpea (Cicer arietinum L., cv. Burnas) diets. J Appl Poult Res. 29(1):171–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darmani Kuhi H, Porter T, López S, Kebreab E, Strathe AB, Dumas A, Dijkstra J, France J. 2010. A review of mathematical functions for the analysis of growth in poultry. World's Poult Sci J. 66(2):227–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewez MF, Etourneau P, Lecompte F, Briere S, Froment P. 2018. Use of computed tomography to determine body composition of heavy strain turkey hens (Meleagris gallopavo) from rearing to early laying. Poult Sci. 97(11):4093–4106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Halimi R. 2005. Nonlinear mixed effects models and non parametric inference. A Method based on bootstrap for the analysis of non-normal repeated [doctoral thesis]. Barcelona: University of Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Ersoy IE, Mendeş M, Aktan S. 2006. Growth curve establishment for American Bronze turkeys. Arch Anim Breed. 49(3):293–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farghly MF, Mahrose KM, Cooper RG, Ullah Z, Rehman Z, Ding C. 2018. Sustainable floor type for managing turkey production in a hot climate. Poult Sci. 97(11):3884–3890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes TJ, Souza FACD, Ribeiro RA, Cunha FO, Meirelles SLC, Moura RSD, Muniz JA. 2020. Growth curve for height at withers and body length of Mangalarga Marchador horses. Cienc Rural. 50(12):e20200140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández M, Gómez M, Delgado J, Adán S, Jiménez M. 2009. Guía de campo de las razas autóctonas españolas. Madrid: SERGA. p. 683–684.
   Google Scholar
• Gbangboche AB, Glele-Kakai R, Salifou S, Albuquerque LGD, Leroy PL. 2008. Comparison of non-linear growth models to describe the growth curve in West African Dwarf sheep. Animal. 2(7):1003–1012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman A, Hill J. 2007. Data analysis using regression and hierarchical/multilevel models. New York (NY): Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez DAA, Muñoz MFC, Restrepo LF. 2007. Modelación de funciones de crecimiento aplicadas a la producción animal. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias. 20(2):157–173.
   Google Scholar
• González-Ariza A, Navas-González FJ, Arando A, León JM, Barba CJ, Camacho ME. 2019. Non-parametrical canonical analysis of quality-related characteristics of eggs of different varieties of native hens compared to laying lineage. Animals. 9(4):153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Ariza A, Nogales S, Lupi TM, Arando A, Navas-González FJ, León JM, Delgado JV, Camacho ME. 2021. Characterization of biological growth curves of different varieties of an endangered native hen breed kept under free range conditions. Ital J Anim Sci. 20(1):806–813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison XA. 2015. A comparison of observation-level random effect and Beta-Binomial models for modelling overdispersion in Binomial data in ecology & evolution. PeerJ. 3:e1114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison XA, Donaldson L, Correa-Cano ME, Evans J, Fisher DN, Goodwin CE, Robinson BS, Hodgson DJ, Inger R. 2018. A brief introduction to mixed effects modelling and multi-model inference in ecology. PeerJ. 6:e4794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamara D, Gyenai KB, Geng T, Hammade H, Smith EJ. 2007. Microsatellite marker-based genetic analysis of relatedness between commercial and heritage turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo). Poult Sci. 86(1):46–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan S, Narinc D, Gurcan EK. 2016. Genetic parameter estimates of weekly body weight and Richard's growth curve in Japanese quail. Eur Poultry Sci. 80: 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kéry M. 2010. Introduction to WinBUGS for ecologists: Bayesian approach to regression, ANOVA, mixed models and related analyses. Cambridge: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhi HD, Lopez S, France J, Mohit A, Shabanpour A, Hosssein-Zadeh NG, Falahi S. 2019. A sinusoidal equation as an alternative to classical growth functions to describe growth profiles in turkeys. Acta Sci Anim Sci. 41(1):e45990.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence TLJ, Fowler VR, Novakofski JE. 2012. Growth of farm animals. Cambridge: Cabi.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard T, Hsu JS. 2001. Bayesian methods: an analysis for statisticians and interdisciplinary researchers, Vol. 5. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lepetit J. 2008. Collagen contribution to meat toughness: theoretical aspects. Meat Sci. 80(4):960–967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Listrat A, Lebret B, Louveau I, Astruc T, Bonnet M, Lefaucheur L, Picard B, Bugeon J. 2016. How muscle structure and composition influence meat and flesh quality. Sci World J. 2016:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• López-Zavala R, Monterrubio-Rico TC, Cano-Camacho H, Chassin-Noria O, Aguilera-Reyes U, Zavala-Páramo MG. 2008. Native turkey (Meleagris gallopavo gallopavo) backyard production systems' characterization in the physiographic regions of the State of Michoacan, Mexico. Técnica Pecuaria En México. 46(3):303–316.
   Google Scholar
• Lupi TM, Nogales S, León JM, Barba C, Delgado JV. 2015. Characterization of commercial and biological growth curves in the Segureña sheep breed. Animal. 9(8):1341–1348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magothe TM, Muhuyi WB, Kahi AK. 2010. Influence of major genes for crested-head, frizzle-feather and naked-neck on body weights and growth patterns of indigenous chickens reared intensively in Kenya. Trop Anim Health Prod. 42(2):173–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mata-Estrada A, González-Cerón F, Pro-Martínez A, Torres-Hernández G, Bautista-Ortega J, Becerril-Pérez CM, Vargas-Galicia AJ, Sosa-Montes E. 2020. Comparison of four nonlinear growth models in Creole chickens of Mexico. Poult Sci. 99(4):1995–2000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauri S, Guijarro Á, Peña F, Domenech V, Avilés C. 2017. Relevance of age at slaughter on meat quality of turkeys stunned with CO2. Br Poult Sci. 58(6):656–663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mpenda FN, Schilling MA, Campbell Z, Mngumi EB, Buza J. 2019. The genetic diversity of local African chickens: a potential for selection of chickens resistant to viral infections. J Appl Poult Res. 28(1):1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahashon SN, Aggrey SE, Adefope NA, Amenyenu A, Wright D. 2006. Growth characteristics of pearl gray guinea fowl as predicted by the Richards, Gompertz, and Logistic models. Poult Sci. 85(2):359–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narinc D, Karaman E, Aksoy T, Firat MZ. 2014. Genetic parameter estimates of growth curve and reproduction traits in Japanese quail. Poult Sci. 93(1):24–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narinc D, Karaman E, Firat MZ, Aksoy T. 2010. Comparison of non-linear growth models to describe the growth in Japanese quail. J Anim Vet Adv. 9(14):1961–1966.
   Google Scholar
• Narinc D, Öksüz Narin ÇN, Aygün A. 2017. Growth curve analyses in poultry science. World Poult Sci J. 73(2):395–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newey W. 2007. Nonlinear models with panel data. Proceedings of the Course Materials for 14.386 New Econometric Methods. MA, USA. p. 163–179.
   Google Scholar
• Nogales S, Calderón J, Lupi TM, Bressan MC, Delgado JV, Camacho ME. 2017. A comparison of the growth performance between cattle reared in conventional systems and in feral conditions. Livestock Sci. 206:154–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Lara E, Camacho-Escobar M, García-López J, Machorro-Samano S, Ávila-Serrano N, Arroyo-Ledezma J. 2013. Mathematical modeling of the native Mexican turkey's growth. OJAS. 3(4):305–310.
   Google Scholar
• Pizarro MG, Landi V, Navas-González FJ, León JM, Delgado JV. 2019. Non-parametric analysis of the effects of αS1-casein genotype and parturition non-genetic factors on milk yield and composition in Murciano-Granadina goats. Ital J Anim Sci. 18(1):1021–1034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pizarro MG, Navas-González FJ, Landi V, León JM, Delgado JV, Fernández J, Martínez MA. 2020a. Software-automatized individual lactation model fitting, peak and persistence and Bayesian criteria comparison for milk yield genetic studies in Murciano-Granadina goats. Mathematics. 8(9):1505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pizarro MG, Navas-González FJ, Landi V, León JM, Delgado JV, Fernández J, Martínez MA. 2020b. Goat milk nutritional quality software-automatized individual curve model fitting, shape parameters calculation and Bayesian flexibility criteria comparison. Animals. 10(9):1693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter T, Kebreab E, Darmani Kuhi H, Lopez S, Strathe AB, France J. 2010. Flexible alternatives to the Gompertz equation for describing growth with age in turkey hens. Poult Sci. 89(2):371–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos SB, Caetano SL, Savegnago RP, Nunes BN, Ramos AA, Munari DP. 2013. Growth curves for ostriches (Struthio camelus) in a Brazilian population. Poult Sci. 92(1):277–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarica M, Ocak N, Turhan S, Kop C, Yamak U. 2011. Evaluation of meat quality from 3 turkey genotypes reared with or without outdoor access. Poultr Sci. 90(6):1313–1323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sariyel V, Aygun A, Keskin I. 2017. Comparison of growth curve models in partridge. Poult Sci. 96(6):1635–1640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segura-Correa J, Santos-Ricalde R, Palma-Ávila I. 2017. Non-linear model to describe growth curves of commercial turkey in the tropics of Mexico. Rev Bras Cienc Avic. 19(1):27–32.
   Google Scholar
• Şengül T, Kiraz S. 2005. Non-linear models for growth curves in Large White turkeys. Turk J Vet Anim Sci. 29(2):331–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silk MJ, Harrison XA, Hodgson DJ. 2020. Perils and pitfalls of mixed-effects regression models in biology. PeerJ. 8:e9522 doi:https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siopes T. 2010. Initiation of egg production by turkey breeder hens: sexual maturation and age at lighting. Poult Sci. 89(7):1490–1496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Testik A, Baselga M, Yavuz C, García M. 1999. Growth performances of California and V reared turkey. Cahiers Opt Meditérr. 41:159–162.
   Google Scholar
• Ulutas Z, Sezer M, Aksoy Y, Sirin E, Sen U, Kuran M, Akbas Y. 2010. The effect of birth types on growth curve parameters of Karayaka lamb. J Anim Vet Adv. 9(9):1384–1388.
   Google Scholar
• Van Staaveren N, Leishman EM, Adams SM, Wood BJ, Harlander-Matauschek A, Baes CF. 2020. Housing and management of turkey flocks in Canada. Animals. 10(7):1159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Vleck LD. 1993. Selection index and introduction to mixed model methods for genetic improvement of animals: the green book. 04; SF105. 26, V3.
   Google Scholar
• Ware A, Power N. 2017. Modelling methane production kinetics of complex poultry slaughterhouse wastes using sigmoidal growth functions. Renew Energy. 104:50–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Mekki DM, Lv SJ, Wang LY, Yu JH, Wang JY. 2006. Analysis of fitting growth models in Jinghai mixed-sex yellow chicken. Int J Poultry Sci. 5(6):517–521.
   Google Scholar
• Zampiga M, Tavaniello S, Soglia F, Petracci M, Mazzoni M, Maiorano G, Meluzzi A, Clavenzani P, Sirri F. 2019. Comparison of 2 commercial turkey hybrids: productivity, occurrence of breast myopathies, and meat quality properties. Poultr Sci. 98(5):2305–2315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar