Italian semen cryobank of autochthonous chicken and turkey breeds: a tool for preserving genetic biodiversity

References

• Bailey JL, Morrier A, Cormier N. 2003. Semen cryopreservation: success and persistent problems in farm species. Can J Anim Sci. 83(3):393–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bittante G. 2011. Italian animal genetic resources in the Domestic Animal Diversity Information System of FAO. Ital J Anim Sci. 10:151–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackburn HD. 2009. Genebank development for the conservation of livestock genetic resources in the United States of America. Livest Prod Sci. 120(3):196–203.
   Google Scholar
• Blanco JM, Long JA, Gee G, Wildt DE, Donoghue AM. 2011. Comparative cryopreservation of avian spermatozoa: benefits of non-permeating osmoprotectants and ATP on turkey and crane sperm cryosurvival. Anim Reprod Sci. 123(3–4):242–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blesbois E, Grasseau I, Seigneurin F. 2005. Membrane fluidity and the ability of domestic bird spermatozoa to survive cryopreservation. Rev Reprod. 129(3):371–378.
   Google Scholar
• Blesbois E, Seigneurin F, Grasseau I, Limouzin C, Besnard J, Gourichon D, Coquerelle G, Rault P, Tixier-Boichard M. 2007. Semen cryopreservation for ex situ management of genetic diversity in chicken: creation of the French avian cryobank. Poult Sci. 86(3):555–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blesbois E. 2011. Freezing avian semen. Avian Biol Res. 4(2):52–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brillard JP, McDaniel GR. 1985. The reliability and efficiency of various methods for estimating spermatozoa concentration. Poult Sci. 64(1):155–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrows WH, Quinn JP. 1935. A method of obtaining spermatozoa from the domestic fowl. Poult Sci. 14:253–254.
   Google Scholar
• Castillo A, Gariglio M, Franzoni A, Soglia D, Sartore S, Buccioni A, Mannelli F, Cassandro M, Cendron F, Castellini C, et al. 2021. Overview of native chicken breeds in Italy: conservation status and rearing systems in use. Animals. 11(2):490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cendron F, Perini F, Mastrangelo S, Tolone M, Criscione A, Bordonaro S, Iaffaldano N, Castellini C, Marzoni M, Buccioni A, Soglia D, et al. 2020. Genome-wide SNP analysis reveals the population structure and the conservation status of 23 Italian chicken breeds. Animals. 10(8):1441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerolini S, Zaniboni L, Mangiagalli MG, Gliozzi TM. 2007. Effect of glycine on cryopreservation of chicken spermatozoa. Av Poult Biol Rev. 18(2):65.
   Google Scholar
• Cerolini S, Vasconi M, Sayed AA, Iaffaldano N, Mangiagalli MG, Pastorelli G, Moretti VM, Zaniboni L, Mosca F. 2019. Free-range rearing density for male and female Milanino chickens: Carcass yield and qualitative meat traits. J Appl Poult Res. 28(4):1349–1358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalah T, Seigneurin F, Blesbois E, Brillard JP. 1999. In vitro comparison of fowl sperm viability in ejaculates frozen by three different techniques and relationship with subsequent fertility in vivo. Cryobiology. 39(2):185–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çiftci HB, Aygün A. 2018. Poultry semen cryopreservation technologies. World’s Poult Sci J. 74(4):699–799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delany ME. 2004. Genetic variants for chick biology research: from breeds to mutants. Mech Dev. 121(9):1169–1177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Iorio M, Rusco G, Iampietro R, Colonna MA, Zaniboni L, Cerolini S, Iaffaldano N. 2020. Finding an effective freezing protocol for Turkey semen: benefits of ficoll as non-permeant cryoprotectant and 1:4 as dilution rate. Animals. 10(3):421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Iorio M, Rusco G, Iampietro R, Maiuro L, Schiavone A, Cerolini S, Iaffaldano N. 2020. Validation of the Turkey semen cryopreservation by evaluating the effect of two diluents and the inseminating doses. Animals. 10(8):1329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donoghue AM, Wishart GJ. 2000. Storage of poultry semen. Anim Reprod Sci. 62(1–3):213–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehling C, Taylor U, Baulain U, Weigend S, Henning M, Rath D. 2012. Cryopreservation of semen from genetic resource chicken lines. Agric Forest Res. 62:151–158.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 1998. Secondary guidelines for development of national farm animal genetic resources management plans. Management of small populations at risk. Rome. [accessed 2020 Nov 18]. http://www.fao.org/documents/card/fr/c/d074fc39-aca0-58ab-8024-beaf80ba6014/
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2003. Community-based management of animal genetic resources. Proceedings of the Workshop Held in Mbabane, Swaziland 7–11 May 2001. Rome. [accessed 19 Nov 2020]. www.fao.org/DOCREP/006/Y3970E/Y3970E00.htm.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2009. Preparation of national strategies and action plans for animal genetic resources. FAO Animal Production and Health Guidelines. No. 2. Rome. [accessed 14 Oct 2020]. http://www.fao.org/docrep/012/i0770e/i0770e00.htm.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2012. Cryoconservation of animal genetic resources. FAO animal production and health guidelines no. 12. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2015. The second report on the state of the world’s animal genetic resources for food and agriculture. In: Scherf BD, Pilling D, editors. FAO Commission on genetic resources for food and agriculture assessments. Rome: FAO. [accessed 2020 Sept 16]. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4787e/index.htmL.
   Google Scholar
• Franzoni A, Gariglio M, Castillo A, Soglia D, Sartore S, Buccioni A, Mannelli F, Cassandro M, Cendron F, Castellini C, et al. 2021. Overview of native chicken breeds in Italy: small scale production and marketing. Animals. 11(3):629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulton JE. 2006. Avian genetic stock preservation: an industry perspective. Poult Sci. 85(2):227–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner DL, Thomas CA, Gravance CG. 1999. The effect of glycerol on the viability, mitochondrial function and acrosomal integrity of bovine spermatozoa. Reprod Domest Anim. 34(5):399–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandini G, Oldenbroek K. 2007. Strategies for moving fom conservation to utilization. In: Oldenbroek K, editor. Utilisation and conservation of animal genetic resources. The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers; p. 29–54.
   Google Scholar
• Iaffaldano N, Manchisi A, Gambacorta M, Di Iorio M, Rosato MP. 2009. Effect of different sperm concentrations on the post-thaw viability and motility of turkey spermatozoa cryopreserved by the pellet method. Ital J Anim Sci. 8(sup2):760–762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iaffaldano N, Romagnoli L, Manchisi A, Rosato MP. 2011. Cryopreservation of turkey semen by the pellet method: effects of variables such as the extender, cryoprotectant concentration, cooling time and warming temperature on sperm quality determined through principal components analysis. Theriogenology. 76(5):794–801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iaffaldano N, Di Iorio M, Cerolini S, Manchisi A. 2016. Overview of Turkey semen storage: focus on cryopreservation a review. Ann Anim Sci. 16(4):961–974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iaffaldano N, Di Iorio M, Miranda M, Zaniboni L, Manchisi A, Cerolini S. 2016. Cryopreserving turkey semen in straws and nitrogen vapour using DMSO or DMA: effects of cryoprotectant concentration, freezing rate and thawing rate on post-thaw semen quality. Br Poult Sci. 57(2):264–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SW, Choi JS, Ko YG, Do YJ, Byun M, Park SB, Seong HH, Kim CD. 2014. Effect of N-Methylacetamide concentration on the fertility and hatchability of cryopreserved Ogye rooster semen. Korean J Poult Sci. 41(1):21–27.
   Google Scholar
• Lee HJ, Kim SK, Jang HJ, Kang KS, Kim JH, Choi SB, Han JY. 2012. Cryopreservation of Korean Oge chicken semen using N-metylacetamide. Cryo Lett. 33(6):427–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leroy G, Boettcher P, Besbes B, Danchin-Burge C, Baumung R, Hiemstra SJ. 2019. Cryoconservation of animal genetic resources in Europe and two African countries: a gap analysis. Divers. 11(12):240.
   Google Scholar
• Liptoi K, Horvath G, Gal J, Varadi E, Barna J. 2013. Preliminary results of the application of gonadal tissue transfer in various chicken breeds in the poultry gene conservation. Anim Reprod Sci. 141(1–2):86–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long JA. 2006. Avian semen cryopreservation: what are the biological challenges? Poult Sci. 85(2):232–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madeddu M, Mosca F, Sayed AA, Zaniboni L, Mangiagalli MG, Colombo E, Cerolini S. 2016. Effect of cooling rate on the survival of cryopreserved rooster sperm: comparison of different distances in the vapor above the surface of the liquid nitrogen. Anim Reprod Sci. 171:58–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mara L, Casu S, Carta A, Dattena M. 2013. Cryobanking of farm animal gametes and embryos as a means of conserving livestock genetics. Anim Reprod Sci. 138: 25–38.
   Google Scholar
• Marzoni M. 2008. Inseminazione artificiale. In: Cerolini S, Marzoni M, Romboli I, Schiavone A, Zaniboni L, editors. Avicoltura e Coniglicoltura. Milano: Le Point Veterinaire Italie; p. 125–138.
   Google Scholar
• Meuwissen T. 2017. Operation of conservation schemes. In: Oldenbroek K, editor. Utilisation and conservation of animal genetic resources. The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers; p. 167–193.
   Google Scholar
• Miranda M, Kulíková B, Vašíček J, Olexiková L, Iaffaldano N, Chrenek P. 2018. Effect of cryoprotectants and thawing temperatures on chicken sperm quality. Reprod Domest Anim. 53(1):93–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosca F, Madeddu M, Sayed AA, Zaniboni L, Iaffaldano N, Cerolini S. 2016a. Combined effect of permeant and non-permeant cryoprotectants on the quality of frozen/thawed chicken sperm. Cryobiology. 73(3):343–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosca F, Madeddu M, Sayed AA, Zaniboni L, Iaffaldano N, Cerolini S. 2016b. Data on the positive synergic action of dimethylacetamide and trehalose on quality of cryopreserved chicken sperm. Data Brief. 9:1118–1121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosca F, Zaniboni L, Sayed AA, Madeddu M, Iaffaldano N, Cerolini S. 2019. Effect of dimethylacetamide and N-methylacetamide on the quality and fertility of frozen/thawed chicken semen. Poult Sci. 98(11):6071–6077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosca F, Zaniboni L, Sayed AA, Iaffaldano N, Soglia D, Schiavone A, Cerolini S. 2020. Effect of N-Methylacetamide concentration and thawing rate on chicken sperm quality after cryopreservation. Animals. 10(5):824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura Y, Tasai M, Takeda K, Nirasawa K, Tagami T. 2013. Production of functional gametes from cryopreserved primordial germ cells of the Japanese Quail. J Reprod Dev. 59(6):580–587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura Y. 2016. Poultry genetic resource conservation using primordial germ cells. J Reprod Dev. 62(5):431–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nandi S, Whyte J, Taylor L, Sherman A, Nair V, Kaiser P, McGrew MJ. 2016. Cryopreservation of specialized chicken lines using cultured primordial germ cells. Poult Sci. 95(8):1905–1911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozdemir D, Ozdemir ED, De Marchi M, Cassandro M. 2013. Conservation of local Turkish and Italian chicken breeds: a case study. Ital J Anim Sci. 12:313–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paiva SR, McManus CM, Blackburn H. 2016. Conservation of animal genetic resources – a new tact. Livest Sci. 193:32–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson DL, Silversides FG. 2003. Farm animal genetic resource conservation. Why and how? [accessed 2020 Dec 16]. http://www.cfagrf.com/FarmAnimalGenteticResourceConservation. WhyandHow.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Pranay Kumar K, Swathi B, Shanmugam M. 2018. Cryopreservation of rooster semen using N-methylacetamide as cryoprotective agent. IJAS. 10(3):5123–5126.
   Google Scholar
• Prentice JR, Anzar M. 2011. Cryopreservation of mammalian oocyte for conservation of animal genetics. Vet Med Int. 2011:146405.
   Google Scholar
• Santiago-Moreno J, Castaño C, Toledano-Díaz A, Coloma MA, López- Sebastián A, Prieto MT, Campo JL. 2011. Semen cryopreservation for the creation of a Spanish poultry breeds cryobank: optimization of freezing rate and equilibration time. Poult Sci. 90(9):2047–2053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasaki K, Tatsumi T, Tsutsui M, Niinomi T, Imai T, Naito M, Tajima A, Nishi Y. 2010. A method for cryopreserving semen from Yakido roosters using N-Methylacetamide as a cryoprotective agent. J Poult Sci. 47(4):297–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanmugam M, Pranay Kumar K, Mahapatra RK, Anand Laxmi N. 2018. Effect of different cryoprotectants on post-thaw semen parameters and fertility in Nicobari chicken. India J Poul Sci. 53(2):208–211.
   Google Scholar
• Silversides FG, Purdy PH, Blackburn HD. 2012. Comparative costs of programmes to conserve chicken genetic variation based on maintaining living populations or storing cryopreserved material. Br Poult Sci. 53(5):599–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soglia D, Sartore S, Lasagna E, Castellini C, Cendron F, Cassandro M, Marzoni M, Iaffaldano I, Buccioni A, Dabbou S, et al. 2021. Italian poultry biodiversity of 17 Autochthonous Chicken Breeds and their extinction risk status. Front Genet. 12:715656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain JE, Smith GD. 2010. Cryoprotectants. In: Chian RC, Quinn P, editors. Fertility cryopreservation. Vol. 4. New York: Cambridge University Press; p. 24–38.
   Google Scholar
• Szalay I. 2004. A régi magyar baromfifajták tenyésztése és génvédelme a KÁTKI-ban. [Breeding and conservation of old Hungarian poultry breeds in KATKI. In Hungarian]. A Baromfi. 7(3):22–25.
   Google Scholar
• Sztan N, Lazar B, Bodzsar N, Vegi B, Liptoi K, Pain B, Varkonyi EP. 2017. Successful chimera production in the Hungarian goose (Anser anser domestica) by intracardiac injection of blastodermal cells in 3-day-old embryos. Reprod Fertil Dev. 29(11):2206–2216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thélie A, Bailliard A, Seigneurin F, Zerjal T, Tixier-Boichard M, Blesbois E. 2019. Chicken semen cryopreservation and use for the restoration of rare genetic resources. Poult Sci. 98(1):447–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tselutin K, Seigneurin F, Blesbois E. 1999. Comparison of cryoprotectants and methods of cryopreservation of fowl spermatozoa. Poult Sci. 78(4):586–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woelders H, Zuidberg CA, Hiemstra SJ. 2006. Animal genetic resources conservation in the Netherlands and Europe: poultry perspective. Poult Sci. 85(2):216–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaniboni L, Cassinelli C, Mangiagalli MG, Gliozzi TM, Cerolini S. 2014. Pellet cryopreservation for chicken semen: Effects of sperm working concentration, cryoprotectant concentration, and equilibration time during in vitro processing. Theriogenology. 82(2):251–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaniboni L, Madeddu M, Mosca M, Ahmad AS, Marelli SP, Di Iorio M, Iaffaldano N, Cerolini S. 2021. Concentration dependent effect of dimethylacetamide and N-methylacetamide on the quality and fertility of cryopreserved chicken semen. Cryobiology, submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Zanon A, Sabbioni A. 2001. Identificazione e salvaguardia genetica delle razze avicole Italiane. Ann Med Vet. 21:117–134.
   Google Scholar