1,025
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Livestock Systems, Management and Environment

Milk-related performances of Murciano-Granadina goats reared in Italy compared to cosmopolitan breeds

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1170-1180 | Received 20 Apr 2022, Accepted 11 Jul 2022, Published online: 23 Jul 2022

References

  • AIA (Associazione Italiana Allevatori). 2021. Statistiche ufficiali. [accessed 20 Jun 2022]. http://bollettino.aia.it/Contenuti.aspx?CD_GruppoStampe=RS&CD_Specie=C4.
  • Arrebola F, Pérez-Marín CC, Santiago-Moreno J. 2010. Limitation of seasonality in reproductive parameters of Mediterranean bucks, using photoperiod treatment. Small Rum Res. 89(1):31–35.
  • Barrón-Bravo OG, Gutiérrez-Chávez AJ, Ángel-Sahagún CA, Montaldo HH, Shepard L, Valencia-Posadas M. 2013. Losses in milk yield, fat and protein contents according to different levels of somatic cell count in dairy goats. Small Rum Res. 113(2–3):421–431.
  • Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using ime4. J Statist Softw. 67(1):1–48.
  • Bermejo JVD, Pérez FAL, González FJN, León JM, Álvarez JF, Gama LT. 2020. Conditioning factors of linearized wood’s function lactation curve shape parameters, milk yield, fat and protein content in Murciano-Granadina primiparous does. Animals. 10: 2115.
  • Boutinaud M, Jammes H. 2002. Potential uses of milk epithelial cells: a review. Reprod Nutr Dev. 42(2):133–147.
  • CAPRIGAN. 2022. The Murciano-Granadina goat breeding program [accessed 2022 Jun 14]. https://caprigran.com/en/breeding-program/.
  • Costa A, Lopez-Villalobos N, Sneddon NW, Shalloo L, Franzoi M, De Marchi M, Penasa M. 2019b. Milk lactose—current status and future challenges in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 102(7):5883–5898.
  • Costa A, Neglia G, Campanile G, De Marchi M. 2020. Milk somatic cell count and its relationship with milk yield and quality traits in Italian water buffaloes. J Dairy Sci. 103(6):5485–5494.
  • Costa A, Visentin G, De Marchi M, Cassandro M, Penasa M. 2019a. Genetic relationships of lactose and freezing point with minerals and coagulation traits predicted from milk mid-infrared spectra in Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci. 102(8):7217–7225.
  • Crepaldi P, Corti M, Cicogna M. 1999. Factors affecting milk production and prolificacy of Alpine goats in Lombardy (Italy). Small Rum Res. 32(1):83–88.
  • Delgado JV, Landi V, Barba CJ, Fernández J, Gómez MM, Camacho ME, Martínez MA, Navas FJ, León JM. 2017. Murciano-granadina goat: a Spanish local breed ready for the challenges of the twenty-first century. Sustain Goat Prod Adv Environ. 2:205–219.
  • Deroide CAS, Jacopini LA, Delgado JV, Léon JM, Brasil LHA, Ribeiro MN. 2016. Inbreeding depression and environmental effect on milk traits of the Murciano-Granadina goat breed. Small RumRes. 134:44–48.
  • Frank E, Harrell J. 2022. Hmisc: harrell miscellaneous. R package version 4.7-0. [accessed 2022 Jan 17]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Hmisc.
  • Forsbäck L, Lindmark-Månsson H, Andrén A, Svennersten-Sjaunja K. 2010. Evaluation of quality changes in udder quarter milk from cows with low-to-moderate somatic cell counts. Animal. 4(4):617–626.
  • Gipson TA. 2002. Preliminary observations: inbreeding in dairy goats and its effects on milk production. Proceedings of 17th Annual Goat Field Day; April 27. Langston, OK: Langston University; p. 51–56.
  • Goetsch AL, Zeng SS, Gipson TA. 2011. Factors affecting goat milk production and quality. Small Rum Res. 101(1–3):55–63.
  • Guan D, Martínez A, Luigi-Sierra MG, Delgado JV, Landi V, Castello A, Fernandez Alvarez J, Such X, Jordana J, Amills M. 2021. Detecting the footprint of selection on the genomes of Murciano Granadina goats. Anim Genet. 52(5):683–693.
  • Ibrahim NS, Tajuddin FHA. 2021. Evaluation of milk production and milk composition at different stages of Saanen dairy goats. J Agrobiotechnol. 12(1S):204–221.
  • ISTAT. 2020. Istituto nazionale di statistica. [accessed 2022 April 6www.istat.it.
  • Jiménez-Granado R, Sánchez-Rodríguez M, Arce C, Rodríguez-Estévez V. 2014. Factors affecting somatic cell count in dairy goats: a review. Span J Agric Res. 12(1):133–150.
  • Komsta L, Novomestky F. 2022. moments: Moments, cumulants, skewness, kurtosis and related tests. 2022. R package version 0.14.1. [accessed 2022 Feb 5]. https://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=moments.
  • Leitner G, Merin U, Silanikove N. 2004. Changes in milk composition as affected by subclinical mastitis in goats. J Dairy Sci. 87(6):1719–1726.
  • Leitner G, Merin U, Silanikove N. 2011. Effects of glandular bacterial infection and stage of lactation on milk clotting parameters: comparison among cows, goats and sheep. Int Dairy J. 21(4):279–285.
  • León JM, Macciotta NPP, Gama LT, Barba C, Delgado JV. 2012. Characterization of the lactation curve in Murciano-Granadina dairy goats. Small Rum Res. 107(2–3):76–84.
  • MAPA. 2021. Ministerio de agricultura, pesca y alimentación. [accessed 2021 Dec 17]. https://www.mapa.gob.es/es/ganaderia/temas/zootecnia/razas-ganaderas/razas/catalogorazas/caprino/murciano-granadina/datos_productivos.aspx.
  • Martínez AM, Vega-Pla JL, León JM, Camacho ME, Delgado JV, Ribeiro MN. 2010. Is the Murciano-Granadina a single goat breed? A molecular genetics approach. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec. 62(5):1191–1198.
  • Morand-Fehr P, Fedele V, Decandia M, Le Frileux Y. 2007. Influence of farming and feeding systems on composition and quality of goat and sheep milk. Small Rum Res. 68(1–2):20–34.
  • Paape MJ, Capuco AV. 1997. Cellular defense mechanisms in the udder and lactation of goats. J Anim Sci. 75(2):556–565.
  • Pizarro MG, Landi V, Navas FJ, León JM, Martínez A, Fernández J, Delgado JV. 2020. Non-parametric analysis of the effects of nongenetic factors on milk yield, fat, protein, lactose, dry matter content and somatic cell count in Murciano-Granadina goats. Italian J Anim Sci. 19(1):960–973.
  • Pulina, G. Cannas, A. Serra, A. Vallebella, R1991. Determination and estimation of the energy value in Sardinian goat milk. In Proceedings of the Congress of Società Italiana Scienze Veterinarie (SISVet), Altavilla Milicia (PA), Italy, 25–28 September 1991; pp. 1779–1781.
  • Pulina G, Nudda A, Battacone G, Fancellu S, Francesconi AHD. 2008. Nutrition and quality of Goat’s milk. In: Cannas, A, Pulina, G, editors. Dairy goats feeding and nutrition. Wallingford: CAB International; p. 1–30.
  • R Core Team. 2022. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  • Salama AAK, Caja G, Hamzaoui S, Badaoui B, Castro-Costa A, Façanha DAE, Guilhermino MM, Bozzi R. 2014. Different levels of response to heat stress in dairy goats. Small Rum Res. 121(1):73–79.
  • Sandrucci A, Bava L, Tamburini A, Gislon G, Zucali M. 2019. Management practices and milk quality in dairy goat farms in Northern Italy. Italian J Anim Sci. 18(1):1–12.
  • Summer A, Malacarne M, Sandri S, Formaggioni P, Mariani P, Franceschi P. 2012. Effects of somatic cell count on the gross composition, protein fractions and mineral content of individual ewe’s milk. Afr J Biotechnol. 11(97):16377–16381.
  • Teissier M, Brito LF, Schenkel FS, Bruni G, Fresi P, Bapst B, Robert-Granie C, Larroque H. 2022. Genetic characterization and population connectedness of North American and European dairy goats. Front Genet. 13:862838.
  • Vacca GM, Stocco G, Dettori ML, Pira E, Bittante G, Pazzola M. 2018. Milk yield, quality, and coagulation properties of 6 breeds of goats: environmental and individual variability. J Dairy Sci. 101(8):7236–7247.
  • Wiggans GR, Shook GE. 1987. A lactation measure of somatic cell count. J Dairy Sci. 70(12):2666–2672.
  • Ying C, Wang HT, Hsu JT. 2002. Relationship of somatic cell count, physical, chemical and enzymatic properties to the bacterial standard plate count in dairy goat milk. Livest Prod Sci. 74(1):63–77.
  • Zarazaga LA, Gatica MC, Celi I, Guzmán JL. 2012. Reproductive performance is improved during seasonal anoestrus when female and male Murciano–Granadina goats receive melatonin implants and in Payoya goats when females are thus treated. Reprod Domestic Anim. 47(3):436–442.