Effects of developmental stage and store time on the microbial community and fermentation quality of sweet sorghum silage

References

• Bai J, Ding Z, Ke W, Xu D, Wang M, Huang W, Zhang Y, Liu F, Guo X. 2021. Different lactic acid bacteria and their combinations regulated the fermentation process of ensiled alfalfa: ensiling characteristics, dynamics of bacterial community and their functional shifts. Microb Biotechnol. 14(3):1171–1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee S, Kirkby CA, Schmutter D, Bissett A, Kirkegaard JA, Richardson AE. 2016. Network analysis reveals functional redundancy and keystone taxa amongst bacterial and fungal communities during organic matter decomposition in an arable soil. Soil Biol Biochem. 97:188–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassam EL, Jakob K. 1997. Sweet sorghum, a sustainable crop for energy production in Europe - results of 10 years experiments (1985–1995). Paper presented at the First International Sweet Sorghum Conference; 14–19; Beijing, China.
   Google Scholar
• Beck P, Poe K, Stewart B, Capps P, Gray H. 2013. Effect of brown midrib gene and maturity at harvest on forage yield and nutritive quality of sudangrass. Grassl Sci. 59(1):52–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broderick GA, Kang JH. 1980. Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media. J Dairy Sci. 63(1):64–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buxton DR. 1996. Quality-related characteristics of forages as influenced by plant environment and agronomic factors. Anim Feed Sci Tech. 59(1–3):37–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai Y, Benno Y, Ogawa M, Ohmomo S, Kumai S, Nakase T. 1998. Influence of Lactobacillus spp. from an inoculant and of Weissella and Leuconostoc spp. from forage crops on silage fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 64(8):2982–2987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Li J, Dong Z, Yuan X, Shao T. 2018. Effects of applying oil-extracted microalgae on the fermentation quality, feed-nutritive value and aerobic stability of ensiled sweet sorghum. J Sci Food Agric. 98(12):4462–4470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contreras‐Govea FE, Albrecht KA. 2006. Forage production and nutritive value of oat in autumn and early summer. Crop Sci. 46(6):2382–2386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Brouwer CHM, Van Der Merwe HJ, Snyman LD. 1991. A laboratory study of the composition and fermentation of various crop silages. S Afr J Anim Sci. 21:21–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Marco ON, Aello MS, Nomdedeu M, Van Houtte S. 2002. Effect of maize crop maturity on silage chemical composition and digestibility (in vivo, in situ and in vitro). Anim Feed Sci Technol. 99(1–4):37–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doggett H. 1988. Sorghum. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Longman Scientific & Technical.
   Google Scholar
• Dong Z, Li J, Chen L, Wang S, Shao T. 2019. Effects of freeze-thaw event on microbial community dynamics during red clover ensiling. Front Microbiol. 10(1559):1559.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dong Z, Shao T, Li J, Yang L, Yuan X. 2020. Effect of alfalfa microbiota on fermentation quality and bacterial community succession in fresh or sterile Napier grass silages. J Dairy Sci. 103(5):4288–4301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faria WG, Goncalves LC, Ribeiro GO, Carvalho WTV, Mauricio RM, Rodrigues JAS, Faria WG, Saliba EOS, Rodriguez NM, Borges ALCC. 2011. Effect of grain maturity stage on the quality of sorghum BRS-610 silages. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec. 63(5):1215–1223.
   Google Scholar
• Farre-Armengol G, Filella I, Llusia J, Penuelas J. 2016. Bidirectional interaction between phyllospheric microbiotas and plant volatile emissions. Trends Plant Sci. 21(10):854–860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrero F, Piano S, Tabacco E, Borreani G. 2019. Effects of conservation period and Lactobacillus hilgardii inoculum on the fermentation profile and aerobic stability of whole corn and sorghum silages. J Sci Food Agric. 99(5):2530–2540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher D, Parker D, Allen DJ, Tsesmetzis N. 2018. Dynamic bacterial and fungal microbiomes during sweet sorghum ensiling impact bioethanol production. Bioresour Technol. 264:163–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graf K, Ulrich A, Idler C, Klocke M. 2016. Bacterial community dynamics during ensiling of perennial ryegrass at two compaction levels monitored by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism. J Appl Microbiol. 120(6):1479–1491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan H, Yan Y, Li X, Li X, Shuai Y, Feng G, Ran Q, Cai Y, Li Y, Zhang X. 2018. Microbial communities and natural fermentation of corn silages prepared with farm bunker-silo in Southwest China. Bioresour Technol. 265:282–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson LM, Harrison JH, Davidson D, Mahanna WC, Shinners K. 2003. Corn silage management: effects of hybrid, maturity, inoculation, and mechanical processing on fermentation characteristics. J Dairy Sci. 86(1):287–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan SH, Azim A, Sarwar M, Khan AG. 2011. Effect of maturity on comparative nutritive value and fermentation characteristics of maize, sorghum and millet silages. Pak J Bot. 43(6):2967–2970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinkel LL, Wilson M, Lindow SE. 2000. Plant species and plant incubation conditions influence variability in epiphytic bacterial population size. Microb Ecol. 39(1):1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma J, Sun G, Shah AM, Fan X, Li S, Yu X. 2019. Effects of different growth stages of amaranth silage on the rumen degradation of dairy cows. Animals. 9(10):793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macarisin D, Patel J, Bauchan G, Giron JA, Ravishankar S. 2013. Effect of spinach cultivar and bacterial adherence factors on survival of Escherichia coli O157:H7 on spinach leaves. J Food Prot. 76(11):1829–1837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister TA, Duniere L, Drouin P, Xu S, Wang Y, Munns K, Zaheer R. 2018. Silage review: using molecular approaches to define the microbial ecology of silage. J Dairy Sci. 101(5):4060–4074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullough ME. 1989. Forage for dairy cows: part 4. Don’t overlook annuals when feeding your herd. Fort Atkinson (WI): Hoard’s Dairymen; p. 137.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald P, Henderson AR, Heron SJE. 1991. The biochemistry of silage. 2nd ed. Marlow (UK): Chalcombe Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mendez-Garcia C, Pelaez AI, Mesa V, Sanchez J, Golyshina OV, Ferrer M. 2015. Microbial diversity and metabolic networks in acid mine drainage habitats. Front Microbiol. 6(475):475.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mutegi E, Sagnard F, Muraya M, Kanyenji B, Rono B, Mwongera C, Marangu C, Kamau J, Parzies H, de Villiers S, et al. 2010. Ecogeographical distribution of wild, weedy and cultivated Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench in Kenya: implications for conservation and crop-to-wild gene flow. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 57(2):243–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira SS, Costa K, Souza W, Santos C, Teixeira DAA, Silva V. 2020. Production and quality of the silage of sorghum intercropped with Paiaguas palisadegrass in different forage systems and at different maturity stages. Anim Prod Sci. 60(5):694–704.
   Google Scholar
• Onyango CM. 2010. Preharvest and postharvest factors affecting yield and nutrient contents of vegetable amaranth (var. Amaranthus hypochondriacus) Wageningen (The Netherlands): Wageningen University; p. 129.
   Google Scholar
• Playne MJ, McDonald P. 1966. The buffering constituents of herbage and of silage. J Sci Food Agric. 17(6):264–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Queiroz FEd, Rocha VR, Monção FP, Rigueira JPS, Parella RAdC, Rufino LDdA, Santos ASd, Cordeiro MWS. 2021. Effect of row spacing and maturity at harvest on the fermentative profile, aerobic stability, and nutritional characteristics of biomass sorghum (BRS 716) silage in the semiarid region of Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 50:e20200254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronda V, Aruna C, Visarada KBRS, Bhat BV. 2019. Sorghum for animal feed. In: Aruna C, Visarada KBRS, Bhat BV, editors. Breeding sorghum for diverse end uses. Sawston (UK): Woodhead Publishing; p. 229–238.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt J, Sipocz J, Kaszas I, Szakacs G, Gyepes A, Tengerdy RP. 1997. Preservation of sugar content in ensiled sweet sorghum. Bioresour Technol. 60(1):9–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma M, Sudheer S, Usmani Z, Rani R, Gupta P. 2020. Deciphering the omics of plant-microbe interaction: perspectives and new insights. Curr Genomics. 21(5):343–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas TA. 1977. An automated procedure for the determination of soluble carbohydrates in herbage. J Sci Food Agric. 28(7):639–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson IP, Bailey MJ, Fenlon JS, Fermor TR, Lilley AK, Lynch JM, Mccormack PJ, Mcquilken MP, Purdy KJ, Rainey PB, et al. 1993. Quantitative and qualitative seasonal changes in the microbial community from the phyllosphere of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Plant Soil. 150(2):177–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toruk F, Gonulol E, Kayisoglu B, Koc F. 2010. Effects of compaction and maturity stages on sunflower silage quality. Afr J Agr Res. 5(1):55–59.
   Google Scholar
• van Niekerk WA, Hassen A, Bechaz FM. 2010. Influence of growth stage at harvest on fermentative characteristics of Panicum maximum silage. S Afr J Anim Sci. 40(4):334–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci. 74(10):3583–3597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, He L, Xing Y, Zheng Y, Zhou W, Pian R, Yang F, Chen X, Zhang Q. 2019. Dynamics of bacterial community and fermentation quality during ensiling of wilted and unwilted Moringa oleifera leaf silage with or without lactic acid bacterial inoculants. Msphere. 4(4):e00341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weissbach F. 1996. New developments in crop conservation. In: Jones DIH, Jones R, Dewhurst R, Merry R, Haigh PM, editors. Proceedings of the 11th International Silage Conference. Aberystwyth (UK): IGER; p. 11–25.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan X, Dong Z, Li J, Shao T. 2020. Microbial community dynamics and their contributions to organic acid production during the early stage of the ensiling of Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum). Grass Forage Sci. 75(1):37–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang SJ, Chaudhry AS, Osman A, Shi CQ, Edwards GR, Dewhurst RJ, Cheng L. 2015. Associative effects of ensiling mixtures of sweet sorghum and alfalfa on nutritive value, fermentation and methane characteristics. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 206:29–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Dong Z, Li J, Chen L, Bai Y, Jia Y, Shao T. 2018. Ensiling as pretreatment of rice straw: the effect of hemicellulase and Lactobacillus plantarum on hemicellulose degradation and cellulose conversion. Bioresour Technol. 266:158–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Yin X, Dong Z, Wang S, Li J, Dong D, Shao T. 2022. Using gamma-ray irradiation and epiphytic microbiota inoculation to separate the effects of chemical and microbial factors on fermentation quality and bacterial community of ensiled Pennisetum giganteum. J Appl Microbiol. 132(3):1675–1686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Yin XJ, Wang SR, Li JF, Shao T. 2021. Separating the effects of chemical and microbial factors on fermentation quality and bacterial community of Napier grass silage by using gamma-ray irradiation and epiphytic microbiota transplantation. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 280:115082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar