Detecting truth, deception, and innocence in a mock counter-terrorism scenario: The use of forced-choice testing

References

• Australian National Security. (2015). Listed terrorist organisations. Retrieved from http://www.nationalsecurity.gov.au/
   Google Scholar
• Beasley, T. M., & Schumacker, R. E. (1995). Multiple regression approach to analyzing contingency tables: Post Hoc and planned comparison procedures. The Journal of Experimental Education, 64(1), 79–93. doi: 10.1080/00220973.1995.9943797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Shakhar, G., & Elaad, E. (2003). The validity of psychophysiological detection of information with the guilty knowledge test: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 131–151. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Shakhar, G., & Furedy, J. J. (1990). Theories and applications in the detection of deception: A psychophysiological and international perspective. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Blandón-Gitlin, I., Fenn, E., Masip, J., & Yoo, A. H. (2014). Cognitive-load approaches to detect deception: Searching for cognitive mechanisms. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(9), 441–444. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogacz, R., Brown, E., Moehlis, J., Holmes, P., & Cohen, J. D. (2006). The physics of optimal decision-making: A formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks. Psychological Review, 113(4), 700–765. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.4.700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 214–234. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR1003_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2008). Individual differences in judging deception: Accuracy and bias. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 477–492. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). Quantitative methods in psychology: A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conroy, M. A., & Kwartner, P. P. (2006). Malingering. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 2(3), 29–51.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. (2015). Terrorist threat worldwide. Retrieved from https://smartraveller.gov.au/
   Google Scholar
• Derrick, D. C., Moffitt, K., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2011, January). Eye gaze behavior as a guilty knowledge test: Initial exploration for use in automated, kiosk-based screening. Paper presented at the HICSS-44 symposium on credibility assessment and information quality in government and business: 44th Annual Hawaii International conference on system sciences, Koloa, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Ekman, P. (1992). Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics, and marriage. London: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). Nonverbal leakage and clues to deception. Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes, 32(1), 88–106. doi: 10.1080/00332747.1969.11023575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioural, and biomedical sciences. Behaviour Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. doi: 10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Frederick, R. I., & Speed, F. M. (2007). On the interpretation of below-chance responding in forced-choice tests. Assessment, 14(1), 3–11. doi: 10.1177/1073191106292009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granhag, P. A., Oleszkiewicz, S., & Kleinman, S. (2016). Eliciting information from small cells of sources. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter-Terrorism, 11(2), 143–162. doi: 10.1080/18335330.2016.1215507
   Google Scholar
• Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2004). Statistics for the behavioural sciences (6th ed.). Belmont: Thomson/Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Greve, K. W., Binder, L. M., & Bianchini, K. J. (2009). Rates of below-chance performance in forced-choice symptom validity tests. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23(1), 534–544. doi: 10.1080/13854040802232690
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greve, K. W., Ord, J., Curtis, K. L., Bianchini, K. J., & Brennan, A. (2008). Detecting malingering in traumatic brain injury and chronic pain: A comparison of three forced-choice symptom validity tests. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 22(5), 896–918. doi: 10.1080/13854040701565208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartwig, M., & Bond, C. F. (2011). Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgements. Psychological Bulletin, 137(4), 643–659. doi: 10.1037/a0023589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartwig, M., & Bond, C. F. (2014). Lie detection from multiple cues: A meta-analysis. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(5), 661–676. doi: 10.1002/acp.3052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• High-value Detainee Interrogation Group. (2016). Interrogation best practices: The science [Report]. Retrieved from http://www.fbi.gov/
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, C. J., Farrow, T. F., Hopwood, M.-C., Pratt, A., Hunter, M. D., & Spence, S. A. (2005). Recent developments in deception research. Current Psychiatry Review, 1(3), 273–279. doi: 10.2174/157340005774575118
   Google Scholar
• Iacono, W. G., & Patrick, C. J. (1988). Assessing deception: Polygraph techniques. In R. R. (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (pp. 205–233). New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Jokinen, A., Santtilla, P., Ravaja, N., & Puttonen, S. (2006). Salience of guilty knowledge test items affects accuracy in realistic mock crimes. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 62(1), 175–184. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, E. F. (2011). Intelligence gathering post-9/11. American Psychologist, 66(6), 532–541. doi: 10.1037/A0024614
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lykken, D. T. (1959). The GSR in the detection of guilt. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43(6), 385–388. doi: 10.1037/h0046060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lykken, D. T. (1960). The validity of the guilty knowledge technique: The effects of faking. Journal of Applied Psychology, 44(4), 258–262. doi:10.1037.H0044413 doi: 10.1037/h0044413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, P. L., & Gardner, R. C. (2000). Type I error rate comparisons of post hoc procedures for I j chi-square tables. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(5), 735–754. doi: 10.1177/00131640021970871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLaren, V. V. (2001). A quantitative review of the guilty knowledge test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 674–683. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, E. H., Verschuere, B., Gamer, M., Merckelbach, H., & Ben-Shakhar, G. (2016). Deception detection with behavioral, autonomic, and neural measures: Conceptual and methodological considerations that warrant modesty. Psychophysiology, 53(5), 593–604. doi: 10.1111/PSYP.12609
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers, J. E., & Volbrecht, M. (1998). Validation of reliable digits for detection of malingering. Assessment, 5(3), 303–307. doi: 10.1177/107319119800500309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minhas, R., Walsh, D., & Bull, R. (2017). An exploration of perceptions of real-life suspects’ from the Asian Muslim community relating to the police interviewing practices in England. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 12(2), 158–174. doi: 10.1080/18335330.2017.1355103
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, C. A., Rabinowitz, Y., Leidy, R., & Coric, V. (2014). Efficacy of combining interview techniques in detecting deception related to bio-threat issues. Behavioural Sciences & the Law, 32(3), 269–285. doi: 10.1002/BSL.2098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orne, M. T. (1996). Demand characteristics. In P. Banyard & A. Grayson (Eds.), Introducing psychological research (pp. 395–401). London: Macmillan Education UK.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, S., Stewart, C., & Campbell, M. A. (2007). To the best of my knowledge, officer: Investigation of crime questionnaire patterns associated with guilty knowledge concealment. The Canadian Journal of Police and Security Services, 5(4), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Schatz, P. (2011). Forced-choice test. In J. S. Kreutzer, J. DeLuca, & B. Caplan (Eds.), Encyclopedia of clinical neuropsychology (pp. 1067). doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-79948-3_183
   Google Scholar
• Secret Services: MI5. (2016). Threat levels. Retrieved from https://www.mi5.gov.uk/
   Google Scholar
• Spence, S. A., Hunter, M. D., Farrow, T. F. D., Green, R. D., Leung, D. H., Hughes, C. J., & Ganesan, V. (2004). A cognitive neurobiological account of deception: Evidence from functional neuroimaging. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 359(1451), 1755–1762. doi: 10.1098/RSTB.2004.1555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Thiel, D. (2009). Policing terrorism: A review of the evidence. Retrieved from http://www.police-foundation.org.uk
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (2016). National terrorism advisory system bulletin (Date Issued: Wednesday, June 15). Retrieved from https://www.dhs.gov/
   Google Scholar
• Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities (2nd ed.). West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Fisher, R. P., Mann, S., & Leal, S. (2006). Detecting deception by manipulating cognitive load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(4), 141–142. doi:10.1016/j.tic.2006.02.003 doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., & Granhag, P. A. (2012). Eliciting cues to deception and truth: What matters are the questions asked. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1(2), 110–117. doi:10/1016/j.jarmac.2012.02.004 doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., & Granhag, P. A. (2014). Eliciting information and detecting lies in intelligence interviewing: An overview of recent research. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(3), 289–446. doi:10.1002/ACP.3071 doi: 10.1002/acp.2993
   Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Granhag, P. A., Mann, S., & Leal, S. (2011). Outsmarting the liars: Toward a cognitive lie detection approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(1), 28–32. doi: 10.1177/0963721410391245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Granhag, P. A., & Porter, S. (2010). Pitfalls and opportunities in nonverbal and verbal lie detection. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 11(3), 89–121. doi: 10.1177/1529100610390861
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vrij, A., Leal, S., & Mann, S. (2015). Deception detection in counter-terrorism. In A. Stedmon & G. Lawson (Eds.), Hostile intent and counter-terrorism: Human factors theory and application (pp. 93–107). Burlington: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Mann, S., Fisher, R. P., Leal, S., Milne, R., & Bull, R. (2008). Increasing cognitive load to facilitate lie detection: The benefit of recalling an event in reverse order. Law and Human Behavior, 32(3), 253–265. doi: 10.1007/s10979-007-9103-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walczyk, J. J., Griffith, D. A., Yates, R., Visconte, S. R., Simoneaux, B., & Harris, L. L. (2012). LIE detection by inducing cognitive load. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(7), 887–909. doi: 10.1177/0093854812437014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walczyk, J. J., Roper, K. S., Seemann, E., & Humphrey, A. M. (2003). Cognitive mechanisms underlying lying to questions: Response time as a cue to deception. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17(7), 755–774. doi: 10.1002/ACP.914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B. M., & Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 2–51). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar