Participation and representation in governing multiple-use marine ecosystems

References

• Abers, Rebecca Neaera. 2003. “Reflections on What Makes Empowered Participatory Governance Happen.” In Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance, edited by A. Fung and E. O. Wright, 200–207. New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Agardy, Tundi, Giuseppe Notarbartolo Di Sciara, and Patrick Christie. 2011. “Mind the Gap: Addressing the Shortcomings of Marine Protected Areas Through Large Scale Marine Spatial Planning.” Marine Policy 35 (2): 226–232. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2010.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, Chris, and Alison Gash. 2008. “Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (4): 543–571. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mum032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armitage, Derek R., Ryan Plummer, Fikret Berkes, Robert I. Arthur, Anthony T. Charles, Iain J. Davidson-Hunt, Alan P. Diduck, et al. 2009. “Adaptive co-Management for Social–Ecological Complexity.” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7 (2): 95–102. doi: 10.1890/070089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basurto, Xavier, Gordon Kingsley, Kelly McQueen, Mshadoni Smith, and Christopher M. Weible. 2010. “A Systematic Approach to Institutional Analysis: Applying Crawford and Ostrom’s Grammar.” Political Research Quarterly 63 (3): 523–537. doi: 10.1177/1065912909334430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkes, Fikret. 2009. “Evolution of Co-Management: Role of Knowledge Generation, Bridging Organizations and Social Learning.” Journal of Environmental Management 90 (5): 1692–1702. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, Kate, and Sarah Fairfull. 2017. “Managing the NSW Coastal Zone: Restructuring Governance for Inclusive Development.” Ocean & Coastal Management 150: 62–72. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabannes, Yves, and Barbara Lipietz. 2018. “Revisiting the Democratic Promise of Participatory Budgeting in Light of Competing Political, Good Governance and Technocratic Logics.” Environment and Urbanization 30 (1): 67–84. doi: 10.1177/0956247817746279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cinner, Joshua E., and Shankar Aswani. 2007. “Integrating Customary Management into Marine Conservation.” Biological Conservation 140 (3–4): 201–216. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cinner, Joshua E., Tim R. McClanahan, M. Aaron MacNeil, Nicholas A. J. Graham, Tim M. Daw, Ahmad Mukminin, David A. Feary, et al. 2012. “Comanagement of Coral Reef Social-Ecological Systems.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 (14): 5219–5222. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1121215109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, Sue E. S., and Elinor Ostrom. 1995. “A Grammar of Institutions.” American Political Science Review 89 (3): 582–600. doi: 10.2307/2082975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cvitanovic, Chris, E. I. van Putten, A. J. Hobday, M. Mackay, R. Kelly, Jan McDonald, Kelly Waples, and Peter Barnes. 2018. “Building Trust among Marine Protected Area Managers and Community Members Through Scientific Research: Insights from the Ningaloo Marine Park, Australia.” Marine Policy 93: 195–206. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2018.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, Jon C., and Kirstin Dobbs. 2013. “Effective Governance of a Large and Complex Cross-Jurisdictional Marine Protected Area: Australia's Great Barrier Reef.” Marine Policy 41: 14–24. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.12.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, Thomas, Elinor Ostrom, and Paul C. Stern. 2003. “The Struggle to Govern the Commons.” Science 302 (5652): 1907–1912. doi: 10.1126/science.1091015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, John S. 2007. “Networks and Democratic Ideals: Equality, Freedom, and Communication.” In Theories of Democratic Network Governance, 262–273. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Eckstein, Harry. 2000. “Case Study and Theory in Political Science.” In Case Study Method: Key Issues, Key Texts, edited by Roger Gomm, Martyn Hammersley, and Peter Foster, 119–164. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ehler, Charles. 2008. “Conclusions: Benefits, Lessons Learned, and Future Challenges of Marine Spatial Planning.” Marine Policy 32 (5): 840–843. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2008.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, Graham, Jeremy Pittman, Steven M. Alexander, Samantha Berdej, Thomas Dyck, Ursula Kreitmair, Kaitlyn J. Rathwell, Sergio Villamayor-Tomas, Jessica Vogt, and Derek Armitage. 2015. “Institutional fit and the Sustainability of Social–Ecological Systems.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 14: 34–40. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flannery, Wesley, Geraint Ellis, Geraint Ellis, Wesley Flannery, Melissa Nursey-Bray, Jan PM van Tatenhove, Christina Kelly, et al. 2016. “Exploring the Winners and Losers of Marine Environmental Governance/Marine Spatial Planning: Cui Bono?/“More Than Fishy Business”: Epistemology, Integration and Conflict in Marine Spatial Planning/Marine Spatial Planning: Power and Scaping/Surely not all Planning is Evil?/Marine Spatial Planning: A Canadian Perspective/Maritime Spatial Planning–“ad Utilitatem Omnium”/Marine Spatial Planning:“It is Better to be on the Train Than Being hit by it”/Reflections From the Perspective of Recreational Anglers … .” Planning Theory & Practice 17 (1): 121–151. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2015.1131482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flannery, Wesley, Noel Healy, and Marcos Luna. 2018. “Exclusion and non-Participation in Marine Spatial Planning.” Marine Policy 88: 32–40. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folke, Carl, Thomas Hahn, Per Olsson, and Jon Norberg. 2005. “Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30: 441–473. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fudge, Maree, and Kiros Hiruy. Forthcoming. “Linked Boundary Functions: Examining the Role of ‘Research for Development’ Organisations in Integrating Levels of Resource Governance.” Society and Natural Resources. doi:10.1080/08941920.2018.1517914.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, Archon. 2015. “Putting the Public Back into Governance: The Challenges of Citizen Participation and Its Future.” Public Administration Review 75 (4): 513–522. doi: 10.1111/puar.12361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, Archon, and Erik Olin Wright. 2003. “Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations.” In Empowered Participatory Governance. Vol. 4. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Golden, Jay S., John Virdin, D. P. Nowacek, Patrick Halpin, Lori Bennear, and Pawan G. Patil. 2017. “Making Sure the Blue Economy is Green.” Nature Ecology & Evolution 1: 0017. doi: 10.1038/s41559-016-0017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopnik, Morgan, Clare Fieseler, Laura Cantral, Kate McClellan, Linwood Pendleton, and Larry Crowder. 2012. “Coming to the Table: Early Stakeholder Engagement in Marine Spatial Planning.” Marine Policy 36 (5): 1139–1149. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haward, Marcus G., and Joanna Vince. 2008. Oceans Governance in the Twenty-first Century: Managing the Blue Planet. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, Tanya. 2018. “Balancing the See-saw of Natural Resource Governance: The Interaction of Legislation, Policy and Practice in Four Australian Participatory Processes.” Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 25 (2): 174–192. doi:10.1080/14486563.2017.1420500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, Terence P., David R. Bellwood, Carl Folke, Robert S. Steneck, and James Wilson. 2005. “New Paradigms for Supporting the Resilience of Marine Ecosystems.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 20 (7): 380–386. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2005.03.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jentoft, Svein, Thijs C. van Son, and Maiken Bjørkan. 2007. “Marine Protected Areas: A Governance System Analysis.” Human Ecology 35 (5): 611–622. doi: 10.1007/s10745-007-9125-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kooiman, Jan, and Maarten Bavinck. 2005. “The Governance Perspective.” In Fish for Life: Interactive Governance for Fisheries, edited by J. Kooiman, S. Jentoft, R. Pullin, and M. Bavinck, 11. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leith, Peat, Emily Ogier, and Marcus Haward. 2014. “Science and Social License: Defining Environmental Sustainability of Atlantic Salmon Aquaculture in South-Eastern Tasmania, Australia.” Social Epistemology 28 (3–4): 277–296. doi: 10.1080/02691728.2014.922641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leith, Peat, Kevin O’Toole, Marcus Haward, Brian Coffey, Chris Rees, and Emily Ogier. 2014. “Analysis of Operating Environments: A Diagnostic Model for Linking Science, Society and Policy for Sustainability.” Environmental Science & Policy 39: 162–171. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, Jack S. 2008. “Case Studies: Types, Designs, and Logics of Inference.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 25 (1): 1–18. doi: 10.1080/07388940701860318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, Rachel D., Anthony Charles, and Robert L. Stephenson. 2015. “Key Principles of Marine Ecosystem-based Management.” Marine Policy 57: 53–60. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2015.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer-McLean, Catriona Bride, and Melissa Nursey-Bray. 2017. “Getting Off the Conflict Treadmill: Community Engagement and Marine Park Policy in South Australia, Australia.” Australian Journal of Maritime and Ocean Affairs 9 (4): 240–264. doi:10.1080/18366503.2017.1332475.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy-Gregory, Hannah. 2018. “Governance via Persuasion: Environmental NGOs and the Social Licence to Operate.” Environmental Politics 27 (2): 320–340. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2017.1373429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogier, E., and C. MacLeod. 2013. “Your Marine Values: Public Report 2013.” http://ecite.utas.edu.au/100307.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, Elinor. 2005. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Vol. 241. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, Elinor. 2007. “A Diagnostic Approach for Going Beyond Panaceas.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104 (39): 15181–15187. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702288104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, Elinor. 2011. “Background on the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework.” Policy Studies Journal 39 (1): 7–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00394.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, Elinor. 2015. Governing the Commons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, Elinor, and Sue Crawford. 2005. “Classifying Rules.” In Understanding Institutional Diversity, edited by Elinor Ostrom, 186–215. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, K. 2012. “State of the D’Entrecasteaux Channel and the Lower Huon Estuary 2012: Report for the D’Entrecasteaux Channel Project.” Report prepared by Ecomarine Consulting, Tasmania, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Pomeroy, Robert, and Fanny Douvere. 2008. “The Engagement of Stakeholders in the Marine Spatial Planning Process.” Marine Policy 32 (5): 816–822. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2008.03.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, Mark S. 2008. “Stakeholder Participation for Environmental Management: A Literature Review.” Biological Conservation 141 (10): 2417–2431. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, Rod A. W. 1997. Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, Heather, and Geraint Ellis. 2010. “‘A System That Works for the Sea’? Exploring Stakeholder Engagement in Marine Spatial Planning.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 53 (6): 701–723. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2010.488100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, A., and E. Babbie. 2010. The Practice of Social Research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, Eva, and Jacob Torfing. 2016. “Introduction.” In Theories of Democratic Network Governance, edited by Eva Sørensen and Jacob Torfing. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Speer, Johanna. 2012. “Participatory Governance Reform: A Good Strategy for Increasing Government Responsiveness and Improving Public Services?” World Development 40 (12): 2379–2398. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.05.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, Robert L., Stacey Paul, Martin A. Pastoors, Marloes Kraan, Petter Holm, Melanie Wiber, Steven Mackinson, Dorothy J. Dankel, Kate Brooks, and Ashleen Benson. 2016. “Integrating Fishers’ Knowledge Research in Science and Management.” ICES Journal of Marine Science 73 (6): 1459–1465. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsw025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vince, Joanna, and Marcus Haward. 2017. “Hybrid Governance of Aquaculture: Opportunities and Challenges.” Journal of Environmental Management 201: 138–144. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.06.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, Norbert. 2018. “Participation or Involvement? Development of Forest Strategies on National and Sub-National Level in Germany.” Forest Policy and Economics 89: 98–106. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westley, Frances R., Ola Tjornbo, Lisen Schultz, Per Olsson, Carl Folke, Beatrice Crona, and Örjan Bodin. 2013. “A Theory of Transformative Agency in Linked Social-Ecological Systems.” Ecology and Society 18 (3): 27. doi: 10.5751/ES-05072-180327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, Robert K. 2014. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 5th ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar