A move to an innovative games teaching model: Style E Tactical (SET)

References

• Anderson, J. R. (1976). Language memory and thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, B., Haynes, J., & Miller, J. (2004). Using a game sense approach for improving fundamental motor skills. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE) International Conference, December, Melbourne. publications.aare.edu.au/04pap/hay04358.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bompa, T. (1999). Periodization: Theory and methodology of training. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Buck, M. M., Lund, J. M., Harrison, J. M., & Cook, C. B. (2007). Instructional strategies for secondary school physical education. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Bunker, D., & Thorpe, R. (1982). A model for the teaching of games in the secondary schools. The Bulletin of Physical Education, 10, 9–16.
   Google Scholar
• Byra, M. (2000). A review of spectrum research: The contributions of two eras. Quest, 52(3), 229–245. doi:10.1080/00336297.2000.10491712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, S. (1998). Student enjoyment of physical education class in three teaching style environments. Education Chula Vista, 111(3), 412–420.
   Google Scholar
• Chatoupis, C., & Emmanuel, C. (2003). Teaching physical education with the Inclusion Style: The case of a Greek elementary school. Journal of Health, Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 74(8), 33–38. doi:10.1080/07303084.2003.10608500
   Google Scholar
• Denis, G. (1993). Human skills: Ideas, concepts and models. Handbook research in sports psychology. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Ferry, M., McCaughtry, & Kulina, P. M. (2011). Social and emotional pedagogy: Rhythm and junctures. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 30, 13–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, K. E., Werner, P. H., Taylor, K., Hussey, K., & Jones, J. (1996). The effects of a 6 week unit of tactical, skill, or combined tactical and skill instruction on badminton performance of ninth-grade students. Journal of Teaching Physical Education, 15, 439–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grehaigne, J.-F., Godbout, P., & Bouthier, D. (2001). The teaching and learning of decision making in team sports. Quest, 53(1), 59–76. doi:10.1080/00336297.2001.10491730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, L. L., & Paton, K. (Eds.) (2005). Two decades of teaching games for understanding: Looking at the past, present and future. Champaigne, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, L. L., & Patton, K. (2005). Two decades of teaching games for understanding: Looking at the past, present and future. In L. L. Griffin & J. I. Butler (Eds.), Teaching games for understanding: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 1–18). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, S. (2003). Teaching games for understanding: A study of U19 college soccer players imnprovement in game performance using the Game performance assessment instrument. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference: Teaching Sport and Physical Education for understanding, University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, N. L., Strean, W. B., & Bengoechea, E. G. (2002). Expanding the teaching games for understanding model: New avenues for future research and practice. Journal of Teaching Physical Education, 21, 162–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk, D., & McPhail, A. (2002). Teaching games for understanding and situated learning: Rethinking the Bunker-Thorpe model. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 21, 177–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, R. (2003). The joy of learning: Emotion and learning in games through TGFU. Journal of Physical Education New Zealand, 36(1), 93–103.
   Google Scholar
• Light, R., & Fawns, R. (2003). Knowing the game: Integrating speech and action in games teaching through TGfU. QUEST. National Association for Kinesiology and Physical Education in Higher Education, 55(2), 161–176.
   Google Scholar
• Mandigo, J. L., & Holt, N. L. (2002). The inclusion of optimal challenge in teaching games for understanding. (pp. 1–23). Spartan, Canada: Brock University Department of Physical Education.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education: Revised and expanded from case study research in education. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, J. N. (1987). Field hockey: Questions for Physical Education activities test. In R. S. McGhee & A. Barrow (Eds.), Test Questions for Physical Education Activities (pp 85–110). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. A., Griffin, L. L., & Oslin, J. L. (1994). Tactical awareness as adevelopmentally appropriate focus for teaching of games in elementary andsecondary physical education. The Physical Educator, 51, 21–17.
   Google Scholar
• Mosston, M., & Ashworth, S. (2002). Teaching physical education (5 ed.). New York: Benjamin Cummings.
   Google Scholar
• Nathan, S. (2008). The effects and sustainabilities of training programmes using tactical model of TGfU with different teaching styles on students with varying hockey skills level. Paper presented at the Asia Pacific Sports Education Conference, Flinders University, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. R., Nelson, J. K., & Silverman, S. L. (2011). Research methods in physical activity (6 ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. J. (1991). Introduction to coaching theory. Monaca Cedex: International Amateur Athletic Federation.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, A. P., & Martinek, T. J. (1999). An investigation into teaching games for understanding: Effects on skill, knowledge, and play. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 70(3), 286–296. doi:10.1080/02701367.1999.10608047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilmore, J. H., & Costill, D. L. (1994). Physiology of sport and exercise. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar