Productive pedagogies and teachers’ professional learning in physical education

References

• Alfrey, L., Cale, L., & Webb, L. A. (2012). Physical education teachers’ continuing professional development in health-related exercise. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 17, 477–491.
   Google Scholar
• Armour, K. M., & Yelling, M. R. (2004). Continuing professional development for experienced physical education teachers: Towards effective provision. Sport, Education and Society, 9(1), 95–114. doi:10.1080/1357332042000175836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atencio, M., Jess, M., & Dewar, K. (2012). It is a case of changing your thought processes, the way you actually teach’: Implementing a complex professional learning agenda in Scottish physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 17(2), 127–144.
   Google Scholar
• Bechtel, P., & O'Sullivan, M. (2006). Effective professional development: What we know. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 25, 363–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinnappan, M. (2006). Using the productive pedagogies framework to build a community of learners online in mathematics education. Distance Education, 27, 355–369. doi:10.1080/01587910600940430
   Google Scholar
• Craft, A. (1996). Continuing professional development: a practical guide for teachers and schools. London, New York: Routledge in association with The Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C. (1999). Developing teachers: The challenge of lifelong learning. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deglau, D., & O'Sullivan, M. (2006). The effects of a long-term professional development program on the beliefs and practices of experienced teachers. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 25, 379–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deglau, D., Ward, P., O'sullivan, M., & Bush, K. (2006). Professional dialogue as professional development. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 25, 413–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Education Review Office. (2009). Managing professional learning and development in secondary schools. Wellington. Education Review Office.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Carwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8, 381–391.
   Google Scholar
• Hattam, R. (2007, November). Easier said than done: ‘Strong connectedness’ in the middle years. Paper presented at the Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Adelaide, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, D., Mills, M., Christie, P., & Lingard, B. (2006). Teachers and schooling: Making a difference. NSW: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Hickey, R., & Dinan Thompson, M. (2003). Collaborative curriculum making: The interplay of ownership and dialogue. Curriculum Perspectives, 23(3), 24–33.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1982). The action research planner. Waurn Ponds: Deakin University.
   Google Scholar
• Khalid Mohammed, A. (2011). Towards quality teacher education: Productive pedagogies as a framework for Saudi pre-service teachers’ training in m mathematics education ( Unpublished doctoral thesis). Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Legrain, P. (2006). Immigrants: Your country needs them. London: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., & Keddie, A. (2013). Redistribution, recognition and representation: Working against pedagogies of indifference. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 21, 427–447.
   Google Scholar
• Maykut, P., & Morehouse, R. (1994). Beginning qualitative research. A philosophic and practical guide. London: The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, M., & Goos, M. (2007, November). Productive pedagogies: Working with disciplines and teacher and student voices. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education Conference, Freemantle, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, M., Goos, M., Keddie, A., Honan, E., Pendergast, D., Gilbert, R., … Wright, T. (2009). Productive pedagogies: A redefined methodology for analysing quality teacher practice. The Australian Educational Researcher, 36, 127–144.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (1999). Health and physical education in the New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2003). Physical education scholarship standard. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Newmann, F. M., & Associates. (1996). Authentic achievement. Restructuring schools for intellectual quality. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, M. (1993). Social research and sociology. In N. Gilbert (Ed.), Researching social life (pp. 1–17). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Penney, D. (2007). The curriculum of the future. Ahead of its time? Critical Studies in Education, 48(1), 149–155. doi:10.1080/17508480601121002
   Google Scholar
• Rennie, J., & Ortlieb, E. (2013). Diverse literacy learners: Deficit versus productive pedagogies. Literacy Research, Practice and Evaluation, 3, 203–218.
   Google Scholar
• Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Tinning, R., Macdonald, D., Tregenza, K., & Boustead, J. (1996). Action research and the professional development of teachers in the health & physical education field: The Australian NPDP experience. Educational Action Research, 4, 391–406.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C., & Wilson, S. (2012). Achieving both intellectual quality and relevance in classroom learning experiences: Some conceptual challenges. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 33, 471–484. doi:10.1080/01596306.2012.692956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar