Novel research approaches to gauge global teacher familiarity with game-based teaching in physical education: an exploratory #Twitter analysis

References

• Australian Government. (2015a). Playing for Life Philosophy. Retrieved September 10, 2015, from http://www.ausport.gov.au/participating/aasc/about/playing_for_life_philosophy
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government. (2015b). Sporting schools – playing for life. Retrieved September 10, 2015, from https://www.sportingschools.gov.au/About/Playing-For-Life
   Google Scholar
• Australian Sports Commission. (1996). Game sense: Perceptions and actions research report. Belconnen: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Beamish, W., Bryer, F., & Davies, M. (2006). Teacher reflections on co-teaching a unit of work. International Journal of Whole Schooling, 2(2), 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, D., Golder, S., & Lotan, G. (2010, January 6). Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter. HICSS-43. IEEE: Kauai, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, A. (2012a, August). Journalists and twitter: How Australian news organisations adapt to a new medium. Media International Australia, Incorporating Culture & Policy, 144, 97–107. Retrieved from http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=724290467516841;res=IELLCC
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, A. (2012b). Quantitative approaches to comparing communication patterns on twitter. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 30(3/4), 160–185. doi: 10.1080/15228835.2012.744249
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. (2012). Researching news discussions on twitter. Jounalism Studies, 13(5/6), 801–814. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2012.664428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunker, D., & Thorpe, R. (1982). A model for the teaching of games in secondary schools. Bulletin of Physical Education, 18(1), 5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J. P., & Krutka, D. G. (2014). How and why educators use Twitter: A survey of the field. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(4), 414–434. doi: 10.1080/15391523.2014.925701
   Google Scholar
• Conway, M. (2014). Ethical issues in using Twitter for public health surveillance and research: Developing a taxonomy of ethical concepts from the research literature. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(12), e290. doi:10.2196/jmir.3617
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crofts, K., & Bisman, J. (2010). Interrogating accountability: An illustration of the use of Leximancer software for qualitative data analysis. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 7(2), 180–207. doi: 10.1108/11766091011050859
   Google Scholar
• Dıaz-Cueto, M., Hernandez-Alvarez, J. L., & Castejon, F. (2010). Teaching games for understanding to in-service physical education teachers: Rewards and barriers regarding the changing model of teaching sport. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 29, 378–398. doi: 10.1123/jtpe.29.4.378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R., & Miller, D. (2008). Responding to student expectations: A partnership approach to course evaluation. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(2), 191–202. doi: 10.1080/02602930701292514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, F., Luo, T., & Zhang, K. (2012). Tweeting for learning: A critical analysis of research on microblogging in education published in 2008–2011. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(5), 783–801. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01357.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodyear, V., & Dudley, D. (2015). ‘I’m a facilitator of learning!’ Understanding what teachers and students do within student-centered physical education models. Quest, 67(3), 274–289. doi: 10.1080/00336297.2015.1051236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, L., Mitchell, S., & Oslin, J. (1997). Teaching sport concepts and skills: A tactical games approach. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Grimbeek, P., Bartlet, B., & Loke, K. K. (2004). Using Leximancer to identify themes and patterns in the talk of three high-distinction students. In B. Bartlett, F. Bryer, & D. Roebuck (Eds.), Second annual conference on cognition, language, and special education research: Vol. 2: Educating: Weaving research into practice (pp. 122–128). Brisbane: Griffith University.
   Google Scholar
• Grimbeek, P., Bryer, F., Davies, M., & Bartlett, B. (2005). Themes and patterns in 3 years of abstracts from the international conference on cognition, language, and special education research: Identified by Leximancer analysis. In Stimulating the ‘action’ as participants in participatory research (pp. 101–113). Brisbane, QLD: Griffith University, School of Cognition, Language, and Special Education.
   Google Scholar
• Gurvitch, R., Blankenship, B. T., Metzler, M. W., & Lund, J. L. (2008). Chapter 3: Student teachers’ implementation of model-based instruction: Facilitators and inhibitors. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 27(4), 466–486. doi: 10.1123/jtpe.27.4.466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, S., & Jarrett, K. (2014). A review of the game-centred approaches to teaching and coaching literature since 2006. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 19(3), 278–300. doi: 10.1080/17408989.2012.754005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, S., & Light, R. L. (2015). Questioning for learning in game-based approaches to teaching and coaching. Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education, 6(2), 175–190. doi: 10.1080/18377122.2015.1051268
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, S., & Pill, S. (2016). Comparisons of academic researchers’ and physical education teachers’ perspectives on the utilization of the tactical games model. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 35(4), 313–323. doi: 10.1123/jtpe.2016-0085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes, J. E., Miller, J. A., & Varea, V. (2016). Preservice generalist teachers enlightened approach to teaching physical education through teacher biography. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 21–38. doi: 10.14221/ajte.2016v41n3.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horsley, J. (2012). Teacher catalysts: Characteristics of teachers who facilitate high academic success. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 21(1), 23–31.
   Google Scholar
• Hyndman, B. P., & Pill, S. (2017). What’s in a concept? A Leximancer text mining analysis of physical literacy across the international literature. European Physical Education Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X17690312
   Google Scholar
• Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., & Tseng, B. (2007). Why we twitter: Understanding microblogging usage and communities. Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD workshop on web mining and social network analysis, pp. 56–65.
   Google Scholar
• Kamimaeda, N., Izumi, N., & Hasida, K. (2007). Evaluation of participants’ contributions in knowledge creation based on semantic authoring. The Learning Organization, 14(3), 263–280. doi: 10.1108/09696470710739426
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, D. (2010). Physical education futures. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Laurillard, D. (2016). The educational problem that MOOCs could solve: professional development for teachers of disadvantaged students. Research in Learning Technology, 24(1), 29369. doi:10.3402/rlt.v24.29369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, R. (2013). Game sense: Pedagogy for performance, participation and enjoyment. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Metzler, M. (2011). Instructional models for physical education (3rd ed.). Scottsdale, AZ: Holcomb Hathaway.
   Google Scholar
• Oslin, J., & Mitchell, S. (2006). Game-centred approaches to teaching physical education. In D. Kirk, D. Macdonald, & M. O’Sullivan (Eds.), The handbook of physical education (pp. 627–651). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pill, S. (2011). Seizing the moment: Can game sense further inform sport teaching in Australian physical education? Revue phénEPS/PHEnex Journal, 3(1), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Pill, S. (2014). An appreciative inquiry exploring game sense teaching in physical education. Sport, Education and Society. Published online 20 April. doi:10.1080/13573322.2014.912624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooney, D., Brabant, M., Paulsen, N., Callan, V. J., & Jones, E. (2006). Researching place and social identity in organizational change: A theoretically informed leximancer analysis of a participant historiographical study. 56th annual conference of the International Communication Association: Networking communication research, Dresden, Germany, 19-23 June.
   Google Scholar
• Rudat, A., & Buder, J. (2015). Making retweeting social: The influence of content and context information on sharing news in Twitter. Computers in Human Behaviour, 46, 75–84. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudat, A., Burder, J., & Hesse, F. W. (2014). Audience design in Twitter: Retweeting behaviour between informational value and followers’ interests. Computers in Human Behaviour, 35, 132–139. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schembri, G. (2005). Active after schools communities playing for life coach’s guide. Belconnen: Australian Sports Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Stolz, S., & Pill, S. (2014). Teaching games and sport for understanding: Exploring and reconsidering its relevance in physical education. European Physical Education Review, 20(1), 36–71. doi: 10.1177/1356336X13496001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stronge, J. H. (2007). Qualities of effective teachers. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
   Google Scholar
• Tinning, R. (2007). Aliens in the gym? Considering young people as learners in physical education. ACHPER Healthy Lifestyles Journal, 54(2), 13–18.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, P. (2013). The role of content knowledge in conceptions of teaching effectiveness in physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 84(4), 431–440. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2013.844045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, S. A., Terras, M., & Warwick, C. (2013a). What people study when they study Twitter. Classifying Twitter related academic papers. Journal of Documentation, 69(3), 384–410. doi: 10.1108/JD-03-2012-0027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, S. A., Terras, M., & Warwick, C. (2013b). How Twitter is studied in the medical professions: A classification of twitter papers indexed in PubMed. Medicine 2.0 – Official Proceedings Publication of the Medicine 2.0 Congress, 2(2), e2. doi:10.2196/med20.2269.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S., McNeill, M., & Fry, J. M. (2009). The tactical approach to teaching games from teaching, learning and mentoring perspectives. Sport, Education and Society, 14, 223–244. doi: 10.1080/13573320902809153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmer, M., & Proferes, N. J. (2014). A topology of Twitter research: Disciplines, methods and ethics. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 66(3), 250–261. doi: 10.1108/AJIM-09-2013-0083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuccolo, A., Spittle, M., & Pill, S. (2014). Game sense research in coaching: Findings and reflection. University of Sydney Papers in HMHCE – Special Game Sense Edition, 15–30.
   Google Scholar