Chinese Medicine as Boundary Object(s): Examining TCM’s Integration into International Science Through the Case of Australian--Chinese Research Collaboration

References

• Adams, Vincanne. 2002. “Randomized Controlled Crime: Postcolonial Sciences in Alternative Medicine Research.” Social Studies of Science 32 (5-6): 659–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, Christine. A. 2006. “The Role of Evidence in Alternative Medicine: Contrasting Biomedical and Anthropological Approaches.” Social Science & Medicine 62 (11): 2646–2657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosnan, Caragh. 2015. “‘Quackery’ in the Academy? Professional Knowledge, Autonomy and the Debate Over Complementary Medicine Degrees.” Sociology 49 (6): 1047–1064.
   Google Scholar
• Brosnan, Caragh. 2016. “Epistemic Cultures in Complementary Medicine: Knowledge-Making in University Departments of Osteopathy and Chinese Medicine.” Health Sociology Review 25 (2): 171–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosnan, Caragh, Vincent C.H. Chung, Anthony L. Zhang, and Jon Adams. 2016. “Regional Influences on Chinese Medicine Education: Comparing Australia and Hong Kong.” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6960207
   Google Scholar
• Brosnan, Caragh, Pia Vuolanto, and Jenny-Ann Brodin Danell. 2018. “Introduction: Reconceptualising Complementary and Alternative Medicine as Knowledge Production and Social Transformation.” In Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Knowledge Production and Social Transformation, edited by Caragh Brosnan, Pia Vuolanto and Jenny-Ann Brodin Danell, 1–29. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, Elizabeth. F. 2017. “Quackademia? Mass-Media Delegitimation of Homeopathy Education.” Science as Culture 26 (3): 380–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Yi-Bing, Xiao-Fang Tong, Junge Ren, Chun-Quan Yu, and Yuan-Lu Cui. 2019. “Current Research Trends in Traditional Chinese Medicine Formula: A Bibliometric Review from 2000 to 2016.” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 19. doi: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3961395
   Google Scholar
• Cyranoski, David. 2018. “Why Chinese Medicine is Heading for Clinics Around the World.” Nature 561 (7724): 448–448.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Danell, Jenny-Ann Brodin. 2018. “Translation of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Swedish Politics”. In Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Knowledge Production and Social Transformation, edited by Caragh Brosnan, Pia Vuolanto and Jenny-Ann Brodin Danell, 165-191. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Derkatch, Colleen. 2016. Bounding Biomedicine: Evidence and Rhetoric in the New Science of Alternative Medicine. Chicago: Uni Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eigenschink, Michael, Lukas Dearing, Tom E. Dablander, Julian Maier, and Harald H. Sitte. 2020. “A Critical Examination of the Main Premises of Traditional Chinese Medicine.” Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift 132 (9): 260–273.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013. Good Practice in Traditional Chinese Medicine Research in the Post-genomic Era. Cordis: EU Research Results. Available at: https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/223154/reporting (accessed 19 November 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Farquhar, Judith, and Lili Lai. 2014. “Information and Its Practical Other: Crafting Zhuang Nationality Medicine.” East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal 8 (4): 417–437.
   Google Scholar
• Farquhar, Judith, and Kaushik Sunder Rajan. 2014. “Introduction.” East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal 8 (4): 383–389.
   Google Scholar
• Flatt, Jeff. 2013. “Critical Discourse Analysis of Rhetoric Against Complementary Medicine.” Creative Approaches to Research 6 (2): 57–70.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, Nick J. 2011. “Boundary Objects, Social Meanings and the Success of New Technologies.” Sociology 45 (1): 70–85.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, Hon-Ngen, and Consilz Tan. 2021. “Networking Universities and Hospitals: A Case Study of Research and Commercialization in the Taiwanese Herbal Medicine Sector.” East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal 15 (4): 467–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gale, Nicola. 2014. “The Sociology of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicine.” Sociology Compass 8 (6): 805–822.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gieryn, Thomas F. 1983. “Boundary-work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists.” American Sociological Review 48 (6): 781–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, Elisabeth. 2008. “The History of Chinese Medicine in the People's Republic of China and Its Globalization.” East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal 2 (4): 465–484.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Youliang, Mingquan Zhou, Qingqiong Deng, Juan Zhang, Pengbo Zhou, and XianGang Shang. 2015. “Bibliometric Analysis for the Literature of Traditional Chinese Medicine in PubMed.” Scientometrics 105 (1): 557–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ijaz, Nadine, and Heather Boon. 2018. “Safety as ‘Boundary Object’: The Case of Acupuncture and Chinese Medicine Regulation in Ontario, Canada.” In Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Knowledge Production and Social Transformation, edited by Caragh Brosnan, Pia Vuolanto, and Jenny-Ann Brodin Danell, 193–213. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kelner, Merrijoy, Beverly Wellman, Sandy Welsh, and Heather Boon. 2006. “How Far Can Complementary and Alternative Medicine Go? The Case of Chiropractic and Homeopathy.” Social Science & Medicine 63 (10): 2617–2627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, Andrew. 2019. “China’s Rise as a Science Power: Rapid Progress, Emerging Reforms, and the Challenge of Illiberal Innovation.” Asian Survey 59 (6): 1022–1043.
   Google Scholar
• Keshet, Yael. 2009. “The Untenable Boundaries of Biomedical Knowledge: Epistemologies and Rhetoric Strategies in the Debate Over Evaluating Complementary and Alternative Medicine.” Health 13 (2): 131–155.
   Google Scholar
• Keshet, Yael, Eran Ben-Arye, and Elan Schiff. 2013. “The Use of Boundary Objects to Enhance Interprofessional Collaboration: Integrating Complementary Medicine in a Hospital Setting.” Sociology of Health & Illness 35 (5): 666–681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Jongyoung. 2007. “Alternative Medicine's Encounter with Laboratory Science: The Scientific Construction of Korean Medicine in a Global Age.” Social Studies of Science 37 (6): 855–880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lainer-Vos, Dan. 2013. “Boundary Objects, Zones of Indeterminacy, and the Formation of Irish and Jewish Transnational Socio-Financial Networks.” Organization Studies 34 (4): 515–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurenceson, James, and Michael Zhou. 2019. Partners in Knowledge Creation: Trends in Australia-China Research Collaboration and Future Challenges. Australia-China Relations Institute: University of Technology Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Jenny J., and John P. Haupt. 2020. “Winners and Losers in US-China Scientific Research Collaborations.” Higher Education 80: 57–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei, Sean Hsiang-Lin. 1999. “From Changshan to a New Anti-Malarial Drug: Re-Networking Chinese Drugs and Excluding Chinese Doctors.” Social Studies of Science 29 (3): 323–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, Monique. 2019. “De-Legitimising Complementary Medicine: Framings of the Friends of Science in Medicine-CAM Debate in Australian Media Reports.” Sociology of Health & Illness 41 (5): 831–851.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, Dang. 2019. “Mapping Knowledge Domains of Non-biomedical Modalities: A Large-Scale Co-word Analysis of Literature 1987–2017.” Social Science & Medicine 233: 1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nogrady, Bianca. 2019. “Foreign Interference Fears Prompt Guidelines for Australian Universities.” Nature 19 November. Available at https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03523-2 (accessed 21 April 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Owens, Kellie. 2015. “Boundary Objects in Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Acupuncture vs. Christian Science.” Social Science & Medicine 128: 18–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, Michael Q. 2015. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 4th ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pritzker, Sonia. 2014. Living Translation: Language and the Search for Resonance in US Chinese Medicine. New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• QSR International. 2018. NVivo Qualitative Data Analysis Software. QS International Pty Ltd Version 12. Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Robb, Andrew. 2015. Andrew Robb to Gao Hucheng, 15 June. Side-Letter on Traditional Chinese Medicine within China-Australia Free Trade Agreement. Available at https://www.dfat.gov.au/trade/agreements/in-force/chafta/official-documents/Pages/official-documents (accessed 28 November 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, Charles E. 2007. Our Present Complaint: American Medicine, Then and Now. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scheid, Volker. 2002. Chinese Medicine in Contemporary China: Plurality and Synthesis. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scheid, Volker. 2008. “Globalising Chinese Medical Understandings of Menopause.” East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal 2 (4): 485–506.
   Google Scholar
• Scheid, Volker. 2014. “Convergent Lines of Descent: Symptoms, Patterns, Constellations, and the Emergent Interface of Systems Biology and Chinese Medicine.” East Asian Science, Technology and Society 8 (1): 107–139.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scientific American. 2019. “The World Health Organization Gives the Nod to Traditional Chinese Medicine: Bad Idea.” Scientific American, 1 April. Available at https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-world-health-organization-gives-the-nod-to-traditional-chinese-medicine-bad-idea/ (accessed 18 October 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Star, Susan Leigh. 2010. “This is not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 35 (5): 601–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, Susan Leigh, and James R. Griesemer. 1989. “Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39.” Social Studies of Science 19 (3): 387–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stöckelová, Tereza, and Jaroslav Klepal. 2018a. “Chinese Medicine on the Move Into Central Europe: A Contribution to the Debate on Correlativity and Decentering STS.” East Asian Science, Technology and Society 12 (1): 57–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stöckelová, Tereza, and Jaroslav Klepal. 2018b. “Evidence-based Alternative, ‘Slanted Eyes’ and Electric Circuits.” In Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Knowledge Production and Social Transformation, edited by Caragh Brosnan, Pia Vuolanto, and Jenny-Ann Brodin Danell, 33–58. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tao, Iven Francis. 2008. “A Critical Evaluation of Acupuncture Research.” East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal 2 (4): 507–524.
   Google Scholar
• Veziari, Yasamin, Matthew Leach, and Saravana Kumar. 2017. “Barriers to the Conduct and Application of Research in Complementary and Alternative Medicine: A Systematic Review.” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 17: 166. Article number 166. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-017-1660-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Simeng. 2019. “Les Nouvelles Circulations de la Médecine Chinoise: après l’Afrique, l’Europe.” Mouvements 2: 133–141.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, Etienne. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, Karen. 2019. “Analysing Qualitative Data.” In Social Research Methods, 4th Edition, edited by Maggie Walter, 341–364. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2019. International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision. Available at https://icd.who.int/en (accessed 4 March 2022).
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2022. WHO Expert Meeting on Evaluation of Traditional Chinese Medicine in the Treatment of COVID-19, 28 February – 2 March. Available at https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/who-expert-meeting-on-evaluation-of-traditional-chinese-medicine-in-the-treatment-of-covid-19 (accessed 4 April 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Yibo, Simone Volet, and Caroline Mansfield. 2018. “Motivations and Influences in Chinese International Doctoral Students’ Decision for STEM Study Abroad.” Educational Studies 44(3): 264–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, Lili, Yanni Hao, Minglu Li, Chunbing Bao, Jianping Li, and Dengsheng Wu. 2018. “Who are the International Research Collaboration Partners for China?” Scientometrics 116 (1): 401–422.
   Google Scholar
• Zhan, Mei. 2009. Other-worldly: Making Chinese Medicine Through Transnational Frames. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhan, Mei. 2014. “The Empirical as Conceptual: Transdisciplinary Engagements with an ‘Experiential Medicine’.” Science, Technology & Human Values 39 (2): 236–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar