Theorizing the Real in Social Robot Care Technologies in Japan

References

• Ahmed, Sara. 2004. “The Affective Politics of Fear.” In The Cultural Politics of Emotion, 62–81. New York: Routledge. 004
   Google Scholar
• Amrith, Megha. 2017. Caring for Strangers. Filipino Medical Workers in Asia. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Atanasoski, Neda, and Kalindi Vora. 2019. Surrogate Humanity: Race, Robots, and the Politics of Technological Futures, 1–26. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aulino, F. 2019. Rituals of Care. Karmic Politics in an Aging Thailand. New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aronsson, Anne, and Fynn Holm. 2020. “Conceptualizing Robotic Agency: Social Robots in Elder Care in Contemporary Japan,” in special issue “Finding Agency in Nonhumans.” Relations: Beyond Anthropocentrism 8 (1–2): 17–35. https://www.ledonline.it/index.php/Relations/article/view/2462/1416
   Google Scholar
• Aronsson, Anne. 2020. “Social Robots in Elderly Care: The Turn Toward Emotional Machines in Contemporary Japan,” in special issue “Relations, Entanglements, and Enmeshments of Humans and Things: A Materiality Perspective.” Japanese Review of Cultural Anthropology 21(1): 421–55. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jrca/21/1/21_421/_pdf
   Google Scholar
• Aronsson, Anne. 2022. “Professional Women and Elder Care in Contemporary Japan: Anxiety and the Move Toward Technocare.” Anthropology & Aging 43 (1): 17–34.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, Karen. 2003. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28 (3): 801–831. doi:10.1086/345321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, Chris, and Emma Jane. 2016. Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bateson, Gregory. 1972. “A Theory of Play and Fantasy.” In Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology, 150–166. New York: Ballantine.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, Ruha. 2019. Captivating Technology: Race, Carceral Technoscience, and Liberatory Imagination in Everyday Life. Durham: Duke University Press. (for reference).
   Google Scholar
• Black, Steven. 2018. “The Ethics and Aesthetics of Care.” Annual Review of Anthropology 47: 79–95. doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-102317-050059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blickstein, Tamar. 2019. “Affects of Racialization.” In Affective Societies: Key Concepts, edited by Jan Slaby, and Christian von Scheve, 152–165. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boellstorff, Tom. 2008. Coming of Age in Second Life: An Anthropologist Explores the Virtually Human. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boellstorff, Tom. 2016. “For Whom the Ontology Turns Theorizing the Digital Real.” Current Anthropology 57 (4): 387–407. doi:10.1086/687362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogost, Ian. 2004. “Asynchronous Multiplay: Futures for Casual Multiplayer Experience.” Proceedings of the Other Players conference, Copenhagen, Denmark. Available at: http://www.itu.dk/op/papers/bogost.pdf Accessed 27 October, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Borovoy, Amy, and Li Zhang. 2017. “Between Biopolitical Governance and Care: Rethinking Health, Selfhood, and Social Welfare in East Asia.” Medical Anthropology 36 (1): 1–5. doi:10.1080/01459740.2016.1158178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braidotti, Rosi. 2019. Posthuman Knowledge. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Breazeal, Cynthia. 2002. Designing Sociable Robots. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brock, Jr, André. 2020. Distributed Blackness: African American Cybercultures. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruckermann, Charlotte. 2017. “Caring Claims and the Relational Self Across Time: Grandmothers Overcoming Reproductive Crises in Rural China.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 23 (2): 356–375. doi:10.1111/1467-9655.12611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buch, Elana. 2013. “Senses of Care: Embodying Inequality and Sustaining Personhood in the Home Care of Older Adults in Chicago.” American Ethnologist 40 (4): 637–650. doi:10.1111/amet.12044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office for Gender Equality. 2016. “The Fourth Basic Plan for Gender Equality” http://www.gender.go.jp/about_danjo/basic_plans/4th/pdf/2-02.pdf. Accessed 22 October, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office, Government of Japan. 2020. “Annual Report on the Ageing Society.” https://www8.cao.go.jp/kourei/english/annualreport/2020/pdf/2020.pdf. Accessed 22 October, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Castronova, Edward. 2005. Synthetic Worlds: The Business and Culture of Online Games. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, David. 2022. Reality+: Virtual Worlds and the Problems of Philosophy. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Coe, Cati. 2015. “The Temporality of Care: Gender, Migration, and the Entrainment of Life- Courses.” In Anthropological Perspectives on Care: Work, Kinship, and the Life-Course, edited by Erdmute Alber, and Heike Drotbohm, 181–205. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Damiano, Luisa, and Paul Dumouchel. 2018. “Anthropomorphism in Human-Robot Co-Evolution.” Frontiers in Psychology 9: 1–9. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, Veena. 2013. “Being Together with Animals: Death, Violence and Noncruelty in Hindu Imagination.” In Living Beings: Perspectives on Interspecies Engagements, edited by Penelope Dransart, 1–16. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, Gilles. 1994. Difference and Repetition, Translated by Paul Patton. London: Athlone.
   Google Scholar
• Dooren, Thom van. 2019. The Wake of Crows: Living and Dying in Shared Worlds. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dooren, Thom van, Eben Kirksey, and Ursula Münster. 2016. “Multispecies Studies: Cultivating Arts of Attentiveness.” Environmental Humanities 8 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1215/22011919-3527695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumouchel, Paul, and Luisa Damiano. 2018. “Anthropomorphism in Human-Robot Co-Evolution.” Frontiers in Psychology 9: 1–9. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00468
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 1984. “What is Enlightenment?” The Foucault Reader. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Geraci, Robert. 2010. Apocalyptic AI: Visions of Heaven in Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, and Virtual Reality. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guevarra, Anna Romina. 2015. “Techno-Modeling Care: Racial Branding, Dis/Embodied Labor, and ‘Cybraceros’ in South Korea.” Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies 36 (3): 139–159. doi:10.5250/fronjwomestud.36.3.0139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamaguchi, Keiichiro. 2019. “How Have Japanese Policies Changed in Accepting Foreign Workers?” Japan Labor Issues 3 (14): 2–7.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. 2003. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. 2014. “Speculative Fabulations for Technoculture’s Generations: Taking Care of Unexpected Country.” In The Multispecies Salon, edited by Eben Kirksey, 242–262. London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hareven, Tamara. 1982. Family Time and Industrial Time: The Relationship Between the Family and Work in a New England Industrial Community. Lanham: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Hashimoto, Akiko. 1996. The Gift of Generations: Japanese and American Perspectives on Aging and the Social Contract. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hatano, Aiko. 2018. “「在宅一人暮らし高齢者の日常生活における人形ロボットの 役割」” (The Role of Doll Robots for the Elderly Living Alone in Japan). Core Ethics (14): 211–222.
   Google Scholar
• Helmreich, Stefan. 2011. “What Was Life: Answers from Three Limit Biologies.” Critical Inquiry 37 (4): 671–696. doi:10.1086/660987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henare, Amiria, Martin Holbraad, and Sari Wastell. 2007. “Introduction: Thinking Through Things.” In Thinking Through Things: Theorising Artefacts Ethnographically, edited by Amiria Henare, Martin Holbraad, and Sari Wastell, 1–31. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heywood, Paolo. 2012. “Anthropology and What There Is: Reflections on ‘Ontology.’.” Cambridge Anthropology 30: 143–151.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, Swee-Lin. 2018. Friendship and Work Culture of Women Managers in Japan: Tokyo After Ten. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holbraad, Martin, and Morten Axel Pedersen. 2017. The Ontological Turn: An Anthropological Exposition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holbraad, Martin, Morten Axel Pedersen, and Eduardo Viveiros de Castro. 2014. “The Politics of Ontology: Anthropological Positions.” Cultural Anthropology website, http://culanth.org/fieldsights/462-the-politics-of-ontology-anthropological-positions Accessed 22 October, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Ienca, Marcello, and Fabrice Jotterand. 2021. Artificial Intelligence in Brain and Mental Health: Philosophical, Ethical & Policy Issues, edited by Fabrice Jotterand, and Marcello Ienca. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jeon, Chihyung, Heesun Shin, Sungeun Kim, and Hanbyul Jeong. 2020. “Talking Over the Robot: A Field Study of Strained Collaboration in a Dementia-Prevention Robot Class.” Interaction Studies 21 (1): 85–110. doi:10.1075/is.18054.jeo
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, Raya. 2016. “What Makes a Robot ‘Social’?” Social Studies of Science 47 (4): 556–579. doi:10.1177/0306312717704722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kockelman, Paul. 2006. “A Semiotic Ontology of the Commodity.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 16 (1): 76–102. doi:10.1525/jlin.2006.16.1.076
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, Eduardo. 2013. How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology Beyond the Human. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern, Translated by Catherine Porter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 2017. Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime, Translated by Catherine Porter. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Patrick, Keith Abney, and George A. Bekey. 2012. Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics, edited by Patrick Lin, Keith Abney, and George A. Bekey. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Labor, Health, and Welfare. 2018. 『福祉用具・介護ロボットの開発と普及』 (Development and Spread of Welfare Equipment and Care Robots). http://www.techno-aids.or.jp/robot/file30/01kaihatu.pdf Accessed 22 October, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, Annemarie. 1999. “Ontological Politics: A Word and Some Questions.” In Actor Network Theory and After, edited by John Law, and John Hassard, 74–89. Boston: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, Annemarie. 2008. The Logic of Care: Health and the Problem of Patient Choice. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Murakami, Hirofumi. 2018. “Where is Japan Going?” Japan Times, September 14. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2018/09/14/commentary/japan-commentary/where-is-japan-going-2/ Accessed 22 October, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Na, Seonsam. 2021. “Long-term Care Hospital and Changing Elderly Care in South Korea.” Medicine Anthropology Theory 8 (3): 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Nemoto, Kumiko. 2016. Too Few Women at the Top: The Persistence of Inequality in Japan. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noble, Safiya Umoja. 2018. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ogasawara, Yuko. 2016. “The Gender Triad: Men, Women, and Corporations.” In Power in Contemporary Japan, edited by Gill Steel, 167–182. New York: Palgrave Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Park, Han-na. 2022. “AI Robots Deployed to Fill Void in Senior Care. But Can They?” Korea Herald, April 14. http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20220414000682 Accessed 22 October, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, Andrew. 1995. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency and Science. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Puig de la Bellacasa, María. 2017. Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More Than Human Worlds. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Purdy, Jedediah. 2015. After Nature: A Politics for the Anthropocene. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rabinow, Paul. 2011. The Accompaniment: Assembling the Contemporary. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rambelli, Fabio. 2019. Spirits and Animism in Contemporary Japan: The Invisible Empire. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos-Zayas, Ana Yolanda. 2011. “Learning Affect/Embodying Race.” In A Companion to the Anthropology of the Body and Embodiment, edited by Frances E. Mascia-Lees, 24–45. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rees, Tobias. 2018. After Ethnos. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, Glenda. 2011. “Salary Women and Family Well-Being in Urban Japan.” Marriage & Family Review 47 (8): 571–589. doi:10.1080/01494929.2011.619306
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, Jennifer. 2018. Robo Sapiens Japanicus: Robots, Gender, Family, and the Japanese Nation. Oakland: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, Jennifer. 2022. “Robo-Sexism: Gendering AI and Robots in Japan and the United States (and Elsewhere).” Online lecture at Cornell University at the East Asia Program. (April 22).
   Google Scholar
• Scott, Michael. 2013. “The Anthropology of Ontology (Religious Science?).” Journal of the Anthropological Institute 19 (4): 859–872. doi:10.1111/1467-9655.12067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seligman, Adam. 2008. Ritual and its Consequences: An Essay on the Limits of Sincerity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, Lisa. 2014. Life Beside Itself: Imagining Care in the Canadian Arctic. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarde, Gabriel. 2012. Monadology and Sociology, Edited and translated by Theo Lorenc. Prahan: re.press.
   Google Scholar
• Thelen, Tatjana. 2015. “Care as Social Organisation: Creating, Maintaining and Dissolving Significant Relations.” Anthropological Theory 15 (4): 497–515. doi:10.1177/1463499615600893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelen, Tatjana. 2021. “Care as Belonging, Difference, and Inequality.” Oxford Research Encyclopedias Anthropology. 26 May. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190854584.013.353
   Google Scholar
• Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt. 2012. “Unruly Edges: Mushrooms as Companion Species.” Environmental Humanities 1 (1): 141–154. doi:10.1215/22011919-3610012
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, Sherry. 2005. “Relational Artifacts/Children/Elders: The Complexities of CyberCompanions.” Cognitive Science Society, 62–73.
   Google Scholar
• United States, Congress, Senate, Committee on the Judiciary, 2023. Oversight of A.I.: Rules for Artificial Intelligence. 16, May. Presiding Chair Blumenthal. Accessed 30 May, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• White, Daniel, and Hirofumi Katsuno. 2021. “Toward an Affective Sense of Life: Artificial Intelligence, Animacy, and Amusement at a Robot Pet Memorial Service in Japan.” Cultural Anthropology 36 (2): 222–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolgar, Steve, and Javier Lezaun. 2013. “The Wrong Bin Bag: A Turn to Ontology in Science and Technology Studies?” Social Studies of Science 43 (3): 321–340. doi:10.1177/0306312713488820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynter, Sylvia. 2001. “Towards the Sociogenic Principle: Fanon, Identity, the Puzzle of Conscious Experience, and What It Is Like to be ‘Black.” In National Identities and Socio-Political Changes in Latin America, edited by Mercedes F. Durán-Cogan, and Antonio Gómez-Moriana, 30–66. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Završnik, Aleš, and Katja Simončič. 2023. Artificial Intelligence, Social Harms and Human Rights. Cham: Springer International.
   Google Scholar