Uncertainty and Preference Modelling for Multiple Criteria Vehicle Evaluation

References

• Karam , K. S. , Karam , J. S. and Einstein , H. H. 2007 . “ Decision analysis applied to tunnel exploration planning. II: Consideration of uncertainty ” . In Journal of Construction Engineering and Management , 354 – 363 . ASCE .
   Google Scholar
• Demertzis , M. and Tieman , A. F. 2007 . Dealing with uncertainty: Robust rules in monetary policy . Scottish Journal of Political Economy , 54 ( 2 ) : 295 – 307 .
   Google Scholar
• Graves , K. E. and Nagarajah , R. 2007 . Uncertainty estimation using fuzzy measures for multiclass classification . IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks , 18 ( 1 ) : 128 – 140 .
   Google Scholar
• Gottlieb , D. A. , Weiss , T. and Chapman , G. B. 2007 . The format in which uncertainty information is presented affects decision biases . Psychological Science , 18 ( 3 ) : 240 – 246 .
   Google Scholar
• Yu , D. , Hu , Q. and Wu , C. 2007 . “ Uncertainty measure for fuzzy relations and their applications ” . In Applied Soft Computing 1135 – 1143 .
   Google Scholar
• Kahraman , C. and Tolga , A. C. 2009 . An alternative ranking approach and its usage in multi-criteria decision-making . International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems , 2 ( 3 ) : 219 – 235 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong , G. L. , Xu , D. L. and Yang , J. B. 2008 . Clinical decision support systems: a review on knowledge representation and inference under uncertainties . International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems , 1 ( 2 ) : 159 – 167 .
   Google Scholar
• J. D. Power and Associates . Guide to Automotive Studies www.jdpa.com
   Google Scholar
• Apr. 14 2005 . J.D. Power Survey 2005 - How it's done Apr. 14 , http://www.whatcar.com/news-special-report.aspx? NA=214562&EL=3121176
   Google Scholar
• Consumers Union . 2007 . Road & Trail, Consumer Reports 48 – 55 .
   Google Scholar
• Consumers Union . 2007 . Review of the 2006-07 models, Consumer Reports Buying Guide 167 – 190 .
   Google Scholar
• Consumers Union . 2007 . Rating the 2007 models, Consumer Reports Buying Guide 157 – 166 .
   Google Scholar
• Yang , J. B. and Xu , D. L. 1998 . “ Knowledge based executive car evaluation using the evidential reasoning approach ” . In Advances in Manufacturing Technology XII , Edited by: Baines , Taleb-Bendiab and Zhao . 741 – 749 . London : Professional Engineering Publishing .
   Google Scholar
• Yang , J. B. and Xu , D. L. 2005 . The IDS Multi-criteria Assessor software , Cheshire , , UK : Intelligent Decision System Ltd .
   Google Scholar
• Yang , J. B. 2001 . Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multiple attribute decision analysis under uncertainty . European Journal of Operational Research , 131 ( 1 ) : 31 – 61 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty , T. L. 1994 . Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process , Pittsburgh , PA : (RWS Publications .
   Google Scholar
• Yang , J. B. and Sen , P. 1994 . A general multi-level evaluation process for hybrid MADM with uncertainty . IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. , 24 ( 10 ) : 1458 – 1473 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang , J. B. and Xu , D. L. 2002 . On the evidential reasoning algorithm for multiattribute decision analysis under uncertainty . IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans , 32 ( 3 ) : 289 – 304 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang , J. B. and Xu , D. L. 2002 . Nonlinear information aggregation via evidential reasoning in multiattribute decision analysis under uncertainty . IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans , 32 ( 3 ) : 376 – 393 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang , J. B. , Deng , M. and Xu , D. L. Nonlinear regression to estimate both weights and utilities via evidential reasoning for MADM . Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Optimization: Techniques and Applications . Dec . pp. 15 – 17 . Hong Kong
   Google Scholar
• Kaya , T. 2010 . Multi-attribute Evaluation of website quality in E-business using an integrated fuzzy AHPTOPSIS methodology . International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems , 3 ( 3 ) : 301 – 314 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeney , R. L. and Raiffa , H. 1993 . Decisions with Multiple Objectives , 2nd edn. , Cambridge County , , U.K : Cambridge Univ. Press .
   Google Scholar
• Winston , W. L. 1994 . Operations Research—Applications and Algorithms , Belmont , CA : (Duxbury Press .
   Google Scholar
• Wang , Y. M. , Yang , J. B. , Xu , D. L. and Chin , K. S. 2006 . The evidential reasoning approach for multiple attribute decision analysis using interval belief degrees . European Journal of Operational Research , 175 ( 1 ) : 35 – 66 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin , K. S. , Yang , J. B. , Lam , J. and Guo , M. 2009 . An evidential reasoning-interval based method for new product design assessment . IEEE transactions on Engineering Management , 56 ( 1 ) : 142 – 156 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang , Y. M. , Yang , J. B. and Xu , D. L. 2007 . On the combination and normalization of interval-valued belief structures . Information Sciences , 177 ( 5 ) : 1230 – 1247 .
   Google Scholar