A Generic Implementation Framework for Measuring Ontology-Based Information

References

• Mizoguchi, R. ’Tutorial on ontological engineering: part 3: Advanced course of ontological engineering’, New Generation Computing, vol.22, no.2, pp.198–220(2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez-Perez, M., Fernandez-Lopez, M., and Corcho, O. Ontological Engineering: With Examples from the Areas of Knowledge Management, E-commerce and the Semantic Web, Springer(2004).
   Google Scholar
• Razmerita C. ’An Ontology-Based Framework for Modeling User Behavior - A Case Study in Knowledge Management’, IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man and Cybernetics - Part A, Vol.41, No.4, 772–783(2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sicilia, J., Sicilia, M.A., Sonchez-Alonso, et al. ’Knowledge representation issues in ontology-based clinical Knowledge Management systems’, International Journal of Technology Management, vol.47, no.1-3, pp.191–206(2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond Y. K. Lau, Chapmann C.L. Lai and Yuefeng Li. ’Fuzzy Ontology Mining and Semantic Information Granulation for Effective Information Retrieval Decision Making’. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, vol.4, no.1,pp.54–65, (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordi Conesa, Santi Caballe, David Ganon and Josep Prieto. ’Exploiting the SemanticWeb to Represent Information from On-line Collaborative Learning’. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, vol.5,no.4, pp.653–667, (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza, H., Moura, A. and Cavalcanti, M. ’Integrating Ontologies Based on P2P Mappings’, IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man and Cybernetics - Part A, Vol.40, No.5, pp.1071–1082(2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexiev, D., Breu, M., de Bruijn, J., et al. Information Integration with Ontologies: Experiences from an Industrial Showcase, John Wiley & Sons, (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Li, D., Finin, T., Joshi, Y., et al. ’Swoogle: A Search and Metadata Engine for the Semantic Web’, Proceedings of 13th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM), pp.652–659, (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Simperl, E. ’Reusing ontologies on the SemanticWeb: A feasibility study’, Data & Knowledge Engineering, vol.68, no.10, pp.905–925(2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaeta, M., Orciuoli, F., and Paolozzi, S., et al. ’Ontology Extraction for Knowledge Reuse: The e-Learning Perspective’, IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man and Cybernetics - Part A, Vol.40, No.4, pp.789–809(2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Orme, A., Yao, H., and Etzkorn, H. ’Indicating ontology data quality, stability, and completeness throughout ontology evolution’, Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and practice, vol.19, no.1, pp.49–75, (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Gangemi, C. Catenaccia, M. Ciaramita, J., et al. ’Qood grid: A metaontology based framework for ontology evaluation and selection’, Proceedings of WWW2006 Workshop: Evaluation of Ontologies for the Web ( EON2006)(2006).
   Google Scholar
• Tartir, S., Arpinar, I., Moore, M., et al. ’OntoQA: Metric-based ontology quality analysis’, Proceedings of IEEEWorkshop on Knowledge Acquisition from Distributed, Autonomous, Semantically Heterogeneous Data and Knowledge Sources(2005).
   Google Scholar
• Orme, A, Yao, H., Etzkorn, L. ’Complexity metrics for ontology based information’, International Journal of Technology Management, Vol.47, No.1-3 pp.161–173(2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozano-Tello A. and Gomez-Perez A. ’OntoMetric: A method to choose the appropriate ontology’, Journal of Database Management, vol.15, no.2, pp.1–18(2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, Y., Wu, H., Ma, X., et al. ’Stable cohesion metrics for evolving ontologies’, Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice, vol.23, No.5, pp.343–359(2011).
   Google Scholar
• W3C. OWL Web Ontology Language Overview. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/, (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Motik, B. Reasoning in Description Logics using Resolution and Deductive Databases. PhD Thesis, University of Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany, (2006)
   Google Scholar
• Ma Y., Liu S., Jin B., Xu G. Inconsistent ontology revision based on ontology constructs. Expert Systems with Application, vol.37(10), 7269–7275 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Lawler and B. Kitchenham. ”Measurement Modeling Technology”, IEEE Software, vol.20, no.3, pp.68–75, 2003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Y., Jin B., Feng Y. Semantic oriented ontology cohesion metrics for ontology-based systems. Journal of Systems and Software, vol.83, no.1, pp.143–152, 2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, Y. ’Towards Stable Semantic Ontology Measurement’ Proceedings of International SemanticWeb Conference (ISWC2010), pp.21–24(2010).
   Google Scholar
• Ensan F., and Du, W. ’A Metric Suite for Evaluating Cohesion and Coupling in Modular Ontologies’, Proceedings of 2010 Conference on Modular Ontologies (WoMO 2010)(2010).
   Google Scholar
• Oh, S., Yeom, H., Ahn, J. ’Cohesion and coupling metrics for ontology modules’, Information Technology and Management, vol.12, no.2, pp.81–96(2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grau, B. Motik, G. Stoilos, I. Horrocks. ’Completeness Guarantees for Incomplete Ontology Reasoners: Theory and Practice’, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, vol.43, pp.419–476(2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudolph S., Krotzsch M., Hitzler P. ”Description Logic Reasoning with Decision Diagrams: Compiling SHIQ to Disjunctive Datalog”, Proceedings of International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC2008), pp.435–450 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Zhuge H. Communities and Emerging Semantics in Semantic Link Network: Discovery and Learning. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng, vol.21, no.6, pp.785–799 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar