Hybrid Multiobjective Differential Evolution Incorporating Preference Based Local Search

References

• K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan, “A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II,” IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Computation, 6(2), 182–197 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Zitzler, L. Thiele and L. Thiele, “SPEA2: Improving the strength pareto evolutionary algorithm for multiobjective optimization,” Evolutionary Methods for Design Optimisation and Control, 95–100 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• J. D. Knowles and D. W. Corne, “Approximating the nondominated front using the Pareto archive evolution strategy,” Evolutionary Computation, 8(2), 149–172 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Storn and K. Price, “Differential evolution–a simple and efficient adaptative scheme for global optimization over continuous spaces,” Technical Report TR-95-12, International Computer Science, Berkeley, California, (1995).
   Google Scholar
• H. A. Abbass, R. Sarker and C. Newton, “PDE: A Pareto-frontier differential evolution approach for multiobjective optimization problems,” In Proceedings of the Congress on Evolutionary Computation 2001(CEC'2001), 831-836 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• N. K. Madavan, “Multiobjective optimization using a Pareto Differential evolution approach,” In congress of Evolutionary Computation, 2, 1145–1150 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• T. Tobič, and B. Filipič, “DEMO: Differential evolution for multiobjective optimization,” C.A.C. Coello et al. (Eds.) EMO 2005, LNCS 3410, 520–533 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• L. V. Santana-Quintero, and C. A. C. Coello, “An Algorithm Based on Differential Evolution for Multi-Ojbective Prolbems,” International Journal of Computational Intelligence Research, 1(2), 151–169 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• K. Deb, M. Mohan and S. Mishra, “Evaluating the ε-domination based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for a quick computation of Pareto-optimal solutions,” Evolutionary Computation, 13(4), 501–525 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. G. Hernández-Díaz, L. V. Santana-Quintero, C. A. C. Coello and J. Molina, “Pareto-adaptive ε- dominance,” Evolutionary Computation, 15(4), 493–517 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Dong and Y. P. Wang, “A Hybrid Multiobjective Differential Evolution Algorithm Based on Improved ε-Dominance,” International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security (CIS), 24–28 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• M. Laumanns, L. Thiele, K. Deb and E. Zitzler, “Combining Convergence and Diversity in Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization,” Evolutionary Computation, 10(3), 263–282 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Y. Gong and Z. H. Cai, “An improved multiobjective differential evolution based on Pareto-adaptive ε- dominance and orthogonal design,” European Journal of Operational Research, 198(2), 576–601 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Deb, J. Sundar, N. Udaya Bhaskara Roa, S. Chaudhuri, “Reference point based multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms,” International Journal of Computational Intelligence Research, 2(3), 273–286 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Molina J., Santana L.V., Hernndez-Dłaz A.G., Coello Coello C.A., Caballero, R., “g-dominance: Reference point based dominance for multiobjective metaheuristics,” European Journal of Operational Research, 197(2), 685–692 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Thiele, K. Miettinen, P.J. Korhonen, J. Molina, “A preference-based evolutionary algorithm for multi-objective optimization,” Evolutionary Computation, 17(3), 411–436 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Luque, K. Miettinen, A. B. Ruiz, F. Ruiz, “A twoslope achievement scalarizing function for interactive multiobjective optimization,” Computers and Operations Research, 39, 1673–1681 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Zitzler and S. Knzli, “Indicator-based selection in multiobjective search,” In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature (PPSN 2004), Springer, Berlin, 832–842 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• J. F. Figueira, A. Liefooghe, E.-G. Talbi A. P. Werzbicki, “A parallel multiple reference point approach for multi-objective optimization,” European Journal of Operational Research, 205(2), 390–400 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Ishibuchi and T. Murata, “A multi-objective genetic local search algorithm and its application to flowshop scheduling,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics - Part C: Applications and Reviews, 28(3), 392–403 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Jaszkiewicz, “Genetic local search for multiple objective combinatorial optimization,” European Journal of Operational research, 137(1), 50–71 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Goel and K. Deb, “Hybrid methods for multiobjective evolutionary algorithms,” In Proceedings of the 4th Asia-Pacific Conference on Simulated Evolution and Learning (SEAL02), L. Wang, K. C. Tan, T. Furuhashi, J. H. Kim, and X. Yao, Eds., 1, 188–192 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• K. Sindhya, A. Sinha, K. Deb and K. Miettinen, “Local Search Based Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithm for Constrained and Unconstrained Problem,” In Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 2009), IEEE Press, 2919–2926 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• R. Storn and K. Price, “Home page of differential evolution,” 2003. < http://www.ICSI.Berkeley.edu/storn/code.html>
   Google Scholar
• Wierzbicki A. P., “The use of reference objectives in multiobjective optimization,” In: Fandel G, Gal T, editors. Multiple criteria decision making, theory and applications. Berlin:Springer-Verlagp, 468–486 (1980).
   Google Scholar
• Miettinen K., “Nonlinear multiobjective optimization,” Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz F., Luque M. and Cabello J. M, “A classification of the weighting schemes in reference point procedures for multiobjective programming,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, 60(4), 544–553 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luque M., Miettinen K., Eskelinen P., Ruiz F., “Incorporating preference information in interactive reference point methods for multiobjective optimization,” Omega, 37(2), 450–462 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. D. Knowles and D. W. Corne, “Properites of an Adaptive Archiveing Algorithm for Storing Nondominated Vectors,” IEEE Trans. Evolutioanary Computation, 7(2), 100–116 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. W. Leung and Y. Wang, “An orthogonal genetic algorithm with quantization for global numerical optimization,” IEEE Trans. Evolutioanary Computation, 5(1), 41–53 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• E. Zitzler, K. Deb and L. Thiele, “Comparison of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: Empirical Results,” Evolutioanary Computation, 8(2), 173–195 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qingfu Zhang and Hui Li, “MOEA/D: A Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Decomposition,” IEEE Trans. Evolutioanary Computation, 11(6), 712–731 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar