Integrated ANN-HMH Approach for Nonlinear Time-Cost Tradeoff Problem

References

• M. Ehrgott, and X. Gandibleux, “A survey and annotated bibliography of multiobjective combinatorial optimization,” OR Spectrum,22, 425–460 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan, “A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6, 182–197 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.H. Holland, “Adaptation in natural selection and artificial systems,” Univ of Mechigan: Press Ann Arbor Mich, (1975).
   Google Scholar
• D. E. Goldberg, “Genetic algorithms in search optimization and machine learning,” Reading MA: Addison-Wesley,(1989).
   Google Scholar
• R. Sivaraj, and T. Ravichandran, “A review of selection methods in genetic algorithm,” International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 3(5), 3792–3797 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• C.-W. Feng, L. Liu, and S. A. Burns, “Using genetic algorithms to solve construction time-cost trade-off problems,” Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 11, 184–189 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. K. Pathak and S. Srivastava, “MOGA based time-cost tradeoffs: responsiveness for project uncertainties,” Proc. IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC2007, 3085–3092 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• B. K. Pathak, H. K. Singh, and S. Srivastava, “Multi-resource-constrained discrete time-cost tradeoff with MOGA based hybrid method,” Proc. IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC2007, 4425–4432 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• B. K. Pathak, S. Srivastava, and K. Srivastava, “Neural network embedded multiobjective genetic algorithm to solve non-linear time-cost tradeoff problems of project scheduling,” Journal of Science and Industrial Research, 67(2), 124–131 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Xundi, L. Heng, Z. Saixing, W. Vivian, and G. Hongling, “A pareto multi-objective optimization approach for solving time-cost-quality tradeoff problems,” Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 17(1), 22–41 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Zahraie and M. Tavakolan, “Stochastic time-costresource utilization optimization using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm and discrete fuzzy sets,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(11), 1162–1173 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. T. Ng and Y. Zhang, “Optimizing construction time and cost using ant colony optimization approach,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(9), 721–728 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Merkle, M. Middendorf, and H. Schmeck, “Ant colony optimization for resource- constrained project scheduling,” IEEE Journal of Transportations on Evolutionary Computation, 6(4), 333–346 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Christodoulou, “Scheduling resource-constrained Projects with ant colony optimization artificial agents,” Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 24(1), 45–55 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Vanhoucke, “New computational results for the discrete time/cost trade-off problem with time-switch constraints,” European Journal of Operational Research, 165, 359–374 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. K. Pathak and S. Srivastava, “An Intelligent approach for resource-constrained nonlinear multi-objective time-cost tradeoff,” DEI Journal of Science and Engineering Research,14(1&2), 153–163 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• P. De, E. D. James, B. Ghosh, and E. Wells, “The discrete time-cost tradeoff problem revisited,” European Journal of Operational Research, 81, 225–238 (1995).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Srivastava, B. K. Pathak, and K. Srivastava, “Project scheduling: time-cost tradeoff problems,” Computational Intelligence in Optimization, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg (Y Tenne and C-K Goh ed), 7, 325–357 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• K. Deb, “Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms,” NewYork: JohnWiley and Sons, (2001).
   Google Scholar
• C. M. Fonseca and P. J. Fleming, “Genetic algorithm for multiobjective optimization: formulation discussion and generalization,” Proc. of fourth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, 416–423 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• S. Kirkpatrick, C. D. Gelatt, and M. P. Vecchi, “Optimization by simulated annealing,” Science, 220, 671–680 (1983).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Fausett, “Fundamentals of neural networks,” NJ: Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, (1994).
   Google Scholar
• K. H. Raj, R. S. Sharma, S. Srivastava, and C. Patvardhan, “Modelling of manufacturing process with ANNs for intelligent manufacturing,” International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 40, 851–868 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Srivastava, K. Srivastava, R. S. Sharma, K. H. Raj, and S. N. Dwivedi, “Multi-objective process optimization of hot closed die forging for intelligent manufacturing,” International Journal of Agile Manufacturing, 1, 61–69 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• S. Srivastava, K. Srivastava, R. S. Sharma, and K. H. Raj, “Modelling of hot closed die forging of an automotive piston with ANN for intelligent manufacturing,” Journal of Science and Industrial Research, 63, 997–1005 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. V. Arias and C.A.C. Coello, “Asymptotic convergence of metaheurisitcs for multiobjective optimization problems,” Soft Computing, 10, 1001–1005 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Srivastava, S. Srivastava, B. K. Pathak, and K. Deb, “Discrete time-cost tradeoff with a novel hybrid meta heuristics,” Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical System, Springer Publication, 634, 177–188 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• L. Liu, S. Burns, and C. Feng, “Construction time-cost trade-off analysis using LP/IP hybrid method,” Journal of construction engineering and management, 121(4), 446–454 (1995).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. K. Pathak, “Project scheduling using meta-heuristics,” Ph. D. Thesis, Dayalbagh Educational Institute, Dayalbagh, Agra, (2007).
   Google Scholar