A Hybrid MCDM for Private Primary School Assessment Using DEMATEL Based on ANP and Fuzzy Cognitive Map

References

• H. Brandsma and S. Doolaard, Differences in effectiveness between primary schools and their impact on secondary school recommendations, Sch. Eff. Sch. Improv. 10(4) (1999) 130–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. G. Altonji, T. E. Elder and C. R. Taber, Selection on observed and unobserved variables: Assessing the effectiveness of Catholic schools, J. Polit. Econ. 113(1) (2005) 151–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Angrist, E. Bettinger, E. Bloom, E. King and M. Kremer, Vouchers for private schooling in Colombia: Evidence from a randomized natural experiment, Am. Econ. Rev. 92(5) (2002) 1535–1558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. R. Behrman and E. M. King, Household schooling behaviors and decentralization, Econ. Educ. Rev. 20(1) (2001) 321–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. O'Shaughnessy, Parental choice and school quality when peer and scale effects matter, Econ. Educ. Rev. 26(1) (2007) 501–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. C. Opdenakker and J. V. Damme, Effects of schools, teaching staff and classes on achievement and well-being in secondary education: similarities and differences between school outcomes, Sch. Eff. Sch. Improv. 11(2) (2000) 165–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Teske and M. Schneider, What research can tell policymakers about school choice?, J. Policy Anal. Manag. 20(4) (2001) 609–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. P. Du Plessis, J. A. Van Biljon, C. J. Tolmie and T. Wollinger, A model for intelligent computer-aided education systems, Comp. Educ. 24(2) (1995) 89–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Bussell, Parental choice of primary school: An application of Q-methodology, Serv. Ind. J. 18(3) (1998) 135–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Kalaoja and J. Pietarinen, Small rural primary schools in Finland: A pedagogically valuable part of the school network, Int. J. Educ. Res. 48 (2009) 109–116.
   Google Scholar
• P. A. Woods, Responding to the consumer: Parental choice and school effectiveness, Sch. Eff. Sch. Improv. 14(3) (1993) 205–209.
   Google Scholar
• C. Bagley, P. A. Woods and R. Clatter, Scanning the market: School strategies for discovering parental perspectives, Educ. Manag. Admin. 24(2) (1996) 125–138.
   Google Scholar
• F. Lai, E. Sadoulet and A. Janvry, The adverse effects of parents’ school selection errors on academic achievement: Evidence from the Beijing open enrollment program, Econ. Educ. Rev. 28 (2009) 485–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. N. DeSena, What's a mother to do? Gentrification, school selection, and the consequences for community cohesion, Am. Behav. Sci. 50 (2006) 241–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Kindle and I. Colby, School selection preferences of public and private university MSW students: A retrospective study, J. Soc. Work Educ. 44 (2008) 97–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. A. Knights and B. J. Kennedy, Medical school selection: screening for dysfunctional tendencies, Med. Educ. 40 (2006) 1058–1064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Saporito and A. Lareau, School selection as a process: The multiple dimensions of race in framing educational choice, Soc. Probl. 46 (1999) 418–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Bosetti, Determinants of school choice: Understanding how parents choose elementary schools in Alberta, J. Educ. Policy 19(4) (2004) 387–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Hatcher, Class differentiation in education: rational choices?, Brit. J. Educ. 19(1) (1998) 5–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Zhang, J. Ma and J Lu, Emergency management evaluation by a fuzzy multi-criteria group decision support system, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment. 23(4) (2009) 517–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Lu, J. Ma, G. Zhang, X. Zeng and L. Koehl, Theme-based comprehensive evaluation in new product development using fuzzy hierarchical criteria group decision-making method, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 58(6) (2011) 2236–2246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Ruan, J. Lu, E. Laes, G. Zhang, J. Ma and G. Meskens, Multi-criteria Group Decision Support with Linguistic Variables in Long-term Scenarios for Belgian Energy Policy, J. UCS, 16(1) (2010) 103–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Yu, and G. H Tzeng, A soft computing method for multi-criteria decision making with dependence and feedback, Appl. Math. and Comput. 180(1) (2006) 63–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. L. Saaty and L. G. Vargas, Diagnosis with dependent symptoms: Bayes theorem and the analytic hierarchy process, Oper. Res. 46(4) (1998) 491–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. W. Lee and S. H. Kim, Using analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent information system project selection, Comput. Oper. Res. 27(4) (2000) 367–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. J. Chih, H. C. Chen, J. Z. Syzu and G. H. Tzeng, Marketing strategy based on customer behavior for the LCD-TV, Int. J. Manag. Decis. Making. 7(2/3) (2006) 143–165.
   Google Scholar
• C. Y. Huang and G. H. Tzeng, Reconfiguring the innovation policy portfolios for Taiwan's SIP mall industry, Technovation 27(12) (2007) 744–765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. J. H. Liou, G. H. Tzeng and H. C. Chang, Airline safety measurement using a novel hybrid model, J. Air Transp. Manag. 13(4) (2007) 243–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. H. Tzeng, C. H Chiang and C. W. Li, Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL, Expert Syst. Appl. 32(4) (2007) 1028–1044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Chen, H. Lien and G. H. Tzeng, Measures and evaluation for environment watershed plans using a novel hybrid MCDM model, Expert Syst. Appl. 37 (2010) 926–938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• http://www.superdecisions.com (last acess 24.06. 2013)
   Google Scholar
• T. L. Saaty, Fundamentals of the analytic network process- Dependence and feedback in decision-making with a single network, J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 13(2) (2004) 129–157.
   Google Scholar
• Y. C. Erensal, T. Gürbüz and Y. E. Albayrak, A multi-criteria decision model for architecturing competence in human performance technology, Int. J. Comput. Int. Sys. 3(6) (2010) 815–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Büyüközkan, O. Feyzioglu and G. Çifçi, Fuzzy multi-criteria evaluation of knowledge management tools, Int. J. Comput. Int. Sys. 4(2) (2011) 184–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Kahraman, I. Kaya and S. Çebi, Renewable energy system selection based on computing with words, Int. J. Comput. Int. Sys. 3(4) (2010) 461–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Özgen, G. Tuzkaya, U. R. Tuzkaya and D. Özgen, A multi-criteria decision making approach for machine tool selection problem in a fuzzy environment, Int. J. Comput. Int. Sys. 4(4) (2011) 431–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Ekmekçioglu, A. C. Kutlu and C. Kahraman, A fuzzy multi-criteria SWOT analysis: An application to nuclear power plant site selection, Int. J. Comput. Int. Sys. 4(4) (2011) 583–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Çifçi and G. Büyüközkan, A fuzzy MCDM approach to evaluate green suppliers, Int. J. Comput. Int. Sys. 4(5) (2011) 894–909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. M. Meade and A. Presley, R&D project selection using the analytic network process, IEEE T. Eng. Manage. 49(1) (2002) 59–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Karsak, S. Sozer and S. E. Alptekin, Product planning in quality function deployment using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach, Comput. Ind. Eng. 44(1) (2002) 171–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. M. Meade and J. Sarkis, Analyzing organizational project alternatives for agile manufacturing processes: An analytical network approach, Int. J. Prod. Res. 37(2) (1999) 241–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. C. Leung, K. C. Lam and D. Cao, Implementing the balanced scorecard using the analytic hierarchy process & the analytic network process, J. Oper. Res. Soc. 57(6) (2006) 682–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Ravi and R. Shankar, Analysis of interactions among the barriers of reverse logistics. Technol. Forecast. Soc. 72 (2005) 1011–1029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Tsai and W. Chou, Selecting management systems for sustainable development in SMEs: A novel hybrid model based on DEMATEL, ANP, and ZOGP, Expert Syst. Appl. 36 (2009) 1444–1458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Wu, Choosing knowledge management strategies by using a combined ANP and DEMATEL approach, Expert Syst. Appl. 35 (2008) 828–835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Chen and I. Chen, Using a novel conjunctive MCDM approach based on DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP, and TOPSIS as an innovation support system for Taiwanese higher education, Expert Syst. Appl. 37 (2010) 1981–1990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Büyüközkan and D. Öztürkcan, An integrated analytic approach for Six Sigma project selection, Expert Syst. Appl. 37 (2010) 5835–5847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Tsai and W. Hsu, A novel hybrid model based on DEMATEL- and ANP- for selecting cost of quality model development, Total. Qual. Manag. Bus. 21 (2010) 439–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. W. Ho, C. Tsai, G. Tzeng and S. Fang, Combined DEMATEL technique with a novel MCDM model for exploring portfolio selection based on CAPM, Expert Syst. Appl. 38(1) (2011) 16–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. O. Yang, H. Shieh and G. Tzeng, A VIKOR technique based on DEMATEL and ANP for information security risk control assessment, Inform. Science 232 (2013) 482–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Kosko, Fuzzy cognitive maps, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 24 (1986) 65–75.
   Google Scholar
• O. Coban and G. Secme, Prediction of socio-economical consequences of privatization at the firm level with fuzzy cognitive mapping, Inform. Science 169(1-26) (2005) 131–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. D Stylios and P. P. Groumpos, Mathematical formulation of fuzzy cognitive maps, in Proc. 7th Mediterr. Conf. Cont. Automatation, (Haifa, Israel, 1999), pp. 28–30.
   Google Scholar
• D. Yaman and S. Polat, A fuzzy cognitive map approach for effect-based operations: an illustrative case, Inform. Sciences 179(41) (2009) 382–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Gabus and E. Fontela, Perceptions of the world problematic: Communication procedure, communicating with those bearing collective responsibility, DEMATEL Report No: 1. (Geneva, Switzerland, Battelle Geneva Research Centre, 1973).
   Google Scholar
• G. H. Tzeng, W. H. Chen, R. Yu and M. L. Shih, Fuzzy decision maps: A generalization of the DEMATEL methods, Soft Comput. 14 (2010) 1141–1150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Karni, P. Sanchez and V. M. R. Tummala, A comparative study of multiattribute decision making methodologies, Theor. Decis. 29(3) (1990) 203–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980).
   Google Scholar
• T. L. Saaty, Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process (RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, 1996).
   Google Scholar
• M. Tamura, H. Nagata and K. Akazawa, Extraction and systems analysis of factors that prevent safety and security by structural models, in 41st SICE Annual Conference, (Osaka, Japan, 2002), pp. 1752–1759
   Google Scholar
• D. D. Goldhaber, School choice: An examination of the empirical evidence on achievement, parental decision making, and equity, Educ. Res. 28(9) (1999) 16–25.
   Google Scholar