76
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Pure linguistic PROMETHEE I and II methods for heterogeneous MCGDM problems

, &
Pages 250-264 | Received 19 Mar 2013, Accepted 03 Oct 2014, Published online: 23 Dec 2014

References

  • M.F. Abu-Taleb and B. Mareschal. Water resources planning in the middle east: Application of the PROMETHEE v multicriteria method. European Journal of Operational Research, 81(3): 500–511 1995.
  • N. Agell, M. Sanchez, F. Prats and L. Rosello. Ranking multi-attribute alternatives on the basis of linguistic labels in group decisions. Information Sciences, 209, 49–60 2012.
  • A. Albadvi, S.K. Chaharsooghi and A. Esfahanipour. Decision making in stock trading: An application of PROMETHEE. European Journal of Operational Research, 177(2): 673–683 2006.
  • M. Behzadian, R.B. Kazemzadeh, A. Albadvi and M. Aghdasi. PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 200(1): 198–215 2010.
  • D. Ben-Arieh and Z. Chen. Linguistic-labels aggregation and consensus measure for autocratic decision making using group recommendations. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A:Systems and Humans, 36(3): 558–568 2006.
  • J.P. Brans. L'ingénièrie de la décision; Elaboration d'instruments d'aide à la décision. La méthode PROMETHEE. In R. Nadeau and M. Landry, editors, L'aide à la décision: Nature, Instruments et Perspectives d'Avenir, pages 183–213, Québec, Canada, 1982. Presses de l'Université Laval.
  • J.P. Brans and B. Mareschal. The PROMETHEEGAIA decision support system for multicriteria investigations. Investigation Operativa, 4(2): 107–117 1994.
  • J.P. Brans and B. Mareschal. The PROMETHEE VI procedure. How to differentiate hard from soft multicriteria problems. Journal of Decision Systems, 4, 213–223 1995.
  • J.P. Brans and B. Mareschal. 2005. PROMETHEE methods in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. Springer, New York.
  • J.P. Brans, B. Mareschal, and Ph. Vincke. PROMETHEE: a new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis. In J.P Brans, editor, Operational Research, IFORS 84, pages 477–490. North Holland, Amsterdam, 1984.
  • J.P Brans and PH. Vincke. A preference ranking organization method. Management Science, 31(6): 647–656 1985.
  • J.P. Brans, Ph. Vincke and B. Mareschal. How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method. European Journal of Operational Research, 24(2): 228–238 1986.
  • Th. Briggs, P.L. Kunsch and B. Mareschal. Nuclear waste management: An application of the multicriteria PROMETHEE methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 44(1): 1–10 1990.
  • C.-T. Chen, P.-F. Pai and W.-Z. Hung. An integrated methodology using linguistic PROMETHEE and maximum deviation method for third-party logistics supplier selection. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 3(4): 438–451 2010.
  • D. Dhouib and S. Elloumi. A new multi-criteria approach dealing with dependent and heterogeneous criteria for end-of-life product strategy. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 218(5): 1668–1681 2011.
  • D. Dubois and H. Prade. An introduction to bipolar representations of information and preference. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 23(8): 866–877 2008.
  • M. Espinilla, J. Liu and L. Martínez. An extended hierarchical linguistic model for decision-making problems. Computational Intelligence, 27(3): 489–512 2011.
  • M. Espinilla, I. Palomares, L. Martínez and D. Ruan. A comparative study of heterogeneous decision analysis approaches applied to sustainable energy evaluation, International Journal on Uncertainty. Fuzziness and Knowledge-based Systems, 20(supp01): 159–174 2012.
  • F.J. Estrella, M. Espinilla, F. Herrera and L. Martínez. Flintstones: A fuzzy linguistic decision tools enhancement suite based on the 2-tuple linguistic model and extensions. Information Sciences, 280, 152–170 2014.
  • J. Figueira, S. Greco, and M. Ehrgott. Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys, volume 78. Springer Verlag, 2005.
  • J.A Geldermann, T.B Spengler and O.A Rentz. Fuzzy outranking for environmental assessment. case study: Iron and steel making industry. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 115(1): 45–65 2000.
  • N. Halouani, H. Chabchoub and J.-M. Martel. PROMETHEE-md-2t method for project selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 195(3): 841–849 2009.
  • F. Herrera and L. Martínez. A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 8(6): 746–752 2000.
  • F. Herrera, L. Martínez and P.J. Sánchez. Managing non-homogeneous information in group decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 166(1): 115–132 2005.
  • Y.-C. Hu and C.-J. Chen. A PROMETHEE-based classification method using concordance and discordance relations and its application to bankruptcy prediction. Information Sciences, 181(22): 4959–4968 2011.
  • K. Hyde, H.R. Maier and C. Colby. Incorporating uncertainty in the PROMETHEE MCDA method. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 12(4-5): 245–259 2003.
  • A. Ishizaka and P. Nemery. 2013. Multi-criteria Decision Analysis: Methods and Software. Wiley.
  • D. F. Li, Z. G. Huang and G. H. Chen. A systematic approach to heterogeneous multiattribute group decision making. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 59(4): 561–572 2010.
  • L. Martínez and F. Herrera. An overview on the 2-tuple linguistic model for computing with words in decision making: Extensions, applications and challenges. Information Sciences, 207(1): 1–18 2012.
  • J.M. Merigó, M. Casanovas and L. Martínez. Linguistic aggregation operators for linguistic decision making based on the dempster-shafer theory of evidence, International Journal of Uncertainty. Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 18(3): 287–304 2010.
  • J.M. Merigó and A.M. Gil-Lafuente. Induced 2-tuple linguistic generalized aggregation operators and their application in decision-making. Information Sciences, 236, 1–16 2013.
  • G. A. Miller. The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limitations on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2): 81–97 1956.
  • A. Motro and P. Anokhin. Fusionplex: resolution of data inconsistencies in the integration of heterogeneous information sources. Information Fusion, 7(2): 176–196 2006.
  • W Pedrycz. 2013. Granular Computing: Analysis and Design of Intelligent Systems. CRC Press, Francis Taylor Boca Raton.
  • D.H. Peng, C.Y. Gao and L.L. Zhai. Multi-criteria group decision making with heterogeneous information based on ideal points concept. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 6(4): 616–625 2013.
  • S.D. Pohekar and M. Ramachandran. Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 8(4): 365–381 2004.
  • R.M. Rodríguez and L. Martínez. An analysis of symbolic linguistic computing models in decision making. International Journal of General Systems, 42(1): 121–136 2013.
  • O. Senvar, G. Tuzkaya and C. Kahraman. Multi criteria supplier selection using fuzzy PROMETHEE method. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, 313, 21–34 2014.
  • F. Ulengin, Y. Ilker Topcu and S.O. Sahin. An integrated decision aid system for bosphorus watercrossing problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 134(1): 179–192 2001.
  • G.W. Wei. Some harmonic aggregation operators with 2-tuple linguistic assessment information and their application to multiple attribute group decision making. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowlege-Based Systems, 19(6): 977–998 2011.
  • P. Xidonas and J. Psarras. Equity portfolio management within the mcdm frame: A literature review. International Journal of Banking, Accounting and Finance, 1(3): 285–309 2009.
  • W. Yang and Z. Chen. New aggregation operators based on the Choquet integral and 2-tuple linguistic information. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3): 2662–2668 2012.
  • K. Zhang, G. Achari and YY. Pei. Incorporating linguistic, probabilistic, and possibilistic information in a risk-based approach for ranking contaminated sites. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 6(4): 711–724 2010.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.