Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making: A Literature Review

References

• Zopounidis, C., and Doumpos, M.: ‘Multicriteria Decision Aid Classification Methods’ (New York, Springer, 2002).
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S.J., and Hwang, C.L.: ‘Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making’ (Springer-Verlag, 1992)
   Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L.: ‘The concept of a linguistic variable and its applications to approximate reasoning ’, Inform Sciences, 1975, Part I (No. 8), pp. 199–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, C., and Fullér, R.: ‘Fuzzy multiple criteria decision making: Recent developments’, Fuzzy Set Syst, 1996, 78, (2), pp. 139–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, R.A.: ‘Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: A review and new preference elicitation techniques’, Fuzzy Set Syst, 1996, 78, (2), pp. 155–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triantaphyllou, E., and Lin, C.T.: ‘Development and evaluation of five fuzzy multiattribute decision-making methods’, Int J Approx Reason, 1996, 14, (4), pp. 281–310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdullah, L.: ‘Fuzzy Multi Criteria Decision Making and its Applications: A Brief Review of Category’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013, 97, pp. 131–136.
   Google Scholar
• Garibaldi, J.M., Jaroszewski, M., and Musikasuwan, S.: ‘Nonstationary Fuzzy Sets’, Fuzzy Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 2008, 16, (4), pp. 1072–1086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atanassov, K.T.: ‘Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets’, Fuzzy Set Syst, 1986, 20, pp. 87–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yager, R.R.: ‘On The Theory of Bags’, Int J Gen Syst, 1986, 13, (1), pp. 23–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torra, V.: ‘Hesitant fuzzy sets’, Int J Intell Syst, 2010, 25, (6), pp. 529–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Z.: ‘Hesitant Fuzzy Sets Theory’ (Springer, 2014. 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, R.M., Martinez, L., and Herrera, F.: ‘Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets for Decision Making’, Fuzzy Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 2012, 20, (1), pp. 109–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, C.-L., and Masud, A.S.M.: ‘Multiple Objective Decision Making — Methods and Applications: A State-of-the-Art Survey’ (Springer, 1979).
   Google Scholar
• Roy, B.: ‘Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples (la méthode ELECTRE)’, La Revue d'Informatique et de Recherche Opérationelle (RIRO), 1968, 8, pp. 57–75.
   Google Scholar
• Dias, L.S., Mousseau, V., Figueira, J., and Clímaco, J.: ‘An aggregation/disaggregation approach to obtain robust conclusions with ELECTRE TRI’, Eur J Oper Res, 2002, 138, (2), pp. 332–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, B.: ‘ELECTRE III: Un algorithme de classements fonde sur une representation floue des preferences en presence de criteres multiples.’, Cahiers du CERO, 1978, 20, (1), pp. 3–4.
   Google Scholar
• Leyva-López, J.C., and Fernández-González, E.: ‘A new method for group decision support based on ELECTRE III methodology’, Eur J Oper Res, 2003, 148, (1), pp. 14–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belacel, N.: ‘Multicriteria assignment method PROAFTN: Methodology and medical application’, Eur J Oper Res, 2000, 125, (1), pp. 175–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bender, M.J., and Simonovic, S.P.: ‘A fuzzy compromise approach to water resource systems planning under uncertainty’, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 2000, 115, (1), pp. 35–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beccali, M., Cellura, M., and Ardente, D.: ‘Decision making in energy planning: the ELECTRE multicriteria analysis approach compared to a FUZZY-SETS methodology’, Energ Convers Manage, 1998, 39, (16–18), pp. 1869–1881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kangas, A., Kangas, J., and Pykäläinen, J.: ‘Outranking methods as tools in strategic natural resources planning’, Silva Fennica, 2001, 35, (2), pp. 215–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siskos, J., and Hubert, P.: ‘Multi-criteria analysis of the impacts of energy alternatives: A survey and a new comparative approach’, Eur J Oper Res, 1983, 13, (3), pp. 278–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatami-Marbini, A., and Tavana, M.: ‘An extension of the ELECTRE I method for group decision-making under a fuzzy environment’, Omega-Int J Manage S, 2011, 39, (4), pp. 373–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montazer, G.A., Saremi, H.Q., and Ramezani, M.: ‘Design a new mixed expert decision aiding system using fuzzy ELECTRE III method for vendor selection’, Expert Syst Appl, 2009, 36, (8), pp. 10837–10847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevkli, M.: ‘An application of the fuzzy ELECTRE method for supplier selection’, Int J Prod Res, 2009, 48, (12), pp. 3393–3405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahdani, B., and Hadipour, H.: ‘Extension of the ELECTRE method based on interval-valued fuzzy sets’, Soft Comput, 2011, 15, (3), pp. 569–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisdorff, R.: ‘Logical foundation of fuzzy preferential systems with application to the ELECTRE decision aid methods’, Comput Oper Res, 2000, 27, (7–8), pp. 673–687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolga, A.Ç.: ‘A real options approach for software development projects using fuzzy ELECTRE ’, J Mult-Valued Log S, 2012, 18, (5-6), pp. 541–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouyendegh, B.D., and Erkan, T.E.: ‘An Application of the Fuzzy ELECTRE Method for Academic Staff Selection’, Hum Factor Ergon Man, 2013, 23, (2), pp. 107–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaya, T., and Kahraman, C.: ‘A fuzzy approach to e-banking website quality assessment based on an integrated AHP-ELECTRE method’, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 2011, 17, (2), pp. 313–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaya, T., and Kahraman, C.: ‘An integrated fuzzy AHP– ELECTRE methodology for environmental impact assessment’, Expert Syst Appl, 2011, 38, (7), pp. 8553–8562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, M.-C., and Chen, T.-Y.: ‘The ELECTRE multicriteria analysis approach based on Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy sets’, Expert Syst Appl, 2011, 38, (10), pp. 12318–12327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devi, K., and Yadav, S.: ‘A multicriteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for plant location selection with ELECTRE method’, Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2013, 66, (9-12), pp. 1219–1229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, T.-Y.: ‘An ELECTRE-based outranking method for multiple criteria group decision making using interval type-2 fuzzy sets’, Inform Sciences, 2014, 263, pp. 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, N., Xu, Z., and Xia, M.: ‘The ELECTRE I Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method Based On Hesitant Fuzzy Sets’, Int J Inf Tech Decis, 2013, pp. 1–37
   Google Scholar
• Brans, J.P.: ‘L'ingenierie de la decision Elaboration d'instruments d'aide a la decision. Methode PROMETHEE I’, in Nadeau, R., Landry, M. (Ed.): ‘L'aide a la decision: Nature,instruments et perspectives d'avenir’ (Presses de l'Universite Laval, 1982), pp. 183–214.
   Google Scholar
• Brans, J.P., Mareschal B., Vincke P.: ‘How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method’, Eur J Oper Res, 1986, 24, (2), pp. 228–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasanghari, M.; Pour, M.M., “Information and Communication Technology Research Center Ranking Utilizing a New Fuzzy ORESTE Method (FORESTE),” Third International Conference on Convergence and Hybrid Information Technology, ICCIT ‘08, 2, pp.737–742, 11-13 Nov. 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Fasanghari, M.; Mohamedpour, M.; Mohamedpour, M.A., “A Novel Method Combining ORESTE, Fuzzy Set Theory, and TOPSIS Method for Ranking the Information and Communication Technology Research Centers of Iran,” Sixth International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations, ITNG ‘09, pp.165–170, 27-29 April 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Goumas, M., and Lygerou, V.: ‘An extension of the PROMETHEE method for decision making in fuzzy environment: Ranking of alternative energy exploitation projects’, Eur J Oper Res, 2000, 123, (3), pp. 606–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Castro, A.S., and Jiménez, M.: ‘PROMETHEE: An extension through fuzzy mathematical programming’, J Oper Res Soc, 2005, 56, (1), pp. 119–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, W.-C., Lin, W.-T., and Lin, C.-Y.: ‘Application of fuzzy theory and PROMETHEE technique to evaluate suitable ecotechnology method: A case study in Shihmen Reservoir Watershed, Taiwan’, Ecological Engineering, 2007, 31, (4), pp. 269–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.H., Wang, T.C., and Wu, C.Y.: ‘Strategic decisions using the fuzzy PROMETHEE for IS outsourcing’, Expert Syst Appl, 2011, 38, (10), pp. 13216–13222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, R.V., and Patel, B.K.: ‘Decision making in the manufacturing environment using an improved PROMETHEE method’, Int J Prod Res, 2010, 48, (16), pp. 4665–4682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, B., and Dagdeviren, M.: ‘A combined approach for equipment selection: F-PROMETHEE method and zero-one goal programming’, Expert Syst Appl, 2011, 38, (9), pp. 11641–11650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geldermann, J., Spengler, T., and Rentz, O.: ‘Fuzzy outranking for environmental assessment. Case study: iron and steel making industry’, Fuzzy Set Syst, 2000, 115, (1), pp. 45–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araz, C., Ozfirat, P.M., and Ozkarahan, I.: ‘An integrated multicriteria decision-making methodology for outsourcing management’, Comput Oper Res, 2007, 34, (12), pp. 3738–3756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilsel, R.U., Büyüközkan, G., and Ruan, D.: ‘A fuzzy preference-ranking model for a quality evaluation of hospital web sites’, Int J Intell Syst, 2006, 21, (11), pp. 1181–1197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuzkaya, G., Gulsun, B., Kahraman, C., and Ozgen, D.: ‘An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methodology for material handling equipment selection problem and an application’, Expert Syst Appl, 2010, 37, (4), pp. 2853–2863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opricovic, S.: ‘Multicriteria Optimization of Civil Engineering Systems’, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, T.H.: ‘Fuzzy VIKOR method: A case study of the hospital service evaluation in Taiwan’, Inform Sciences, 2014, 271, pp. 196–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opricovic, S., and Tzeng, G.H.: ‘Multicriteria planning of post-earthquake sustainable reconstruction’, Comput-Aided Civ Inf, 2002, 17, (3), pp. 211–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opricovic, S.: ‘A fuzzy compromise solution for multicriteria problems’, Int J Uncertain Fuzz, 2007, 15, (3), pp. 363–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinodh, S., Sarangan, S., and Vinoth, S.C.: ‘Application of fuzzy compromise solution method for fit concept selection’, Appl Math Model, 2014, 38, (3), pp. 1052–1063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousavi, S.M., Vahdani, B., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., and Tajik, N.: ‘Soft computing based on a fuzzy grey group compromise solution approach with an application to the selection problem of material handling equipment’, Int J Comp Integ M, 2014, 27, (6), pp. 547–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, X.Y., Tang, S., Yang, S.L., and Huang, K.D.: ‘Extended VIKOR method based on cross-entropy for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multiple criteria group decision making’, J Intell Fuzzy Syst, 2013, 25, (4), pp. 1053–1066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devi, K.: ‘Extension of VIKOR method in intuitionistic fuzzy environment for robot selection’, Expert Syst Appl, 2011, 38, (11), pp. 14163–14168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahimnejad, S., Mousavi, S.M., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., and Heydar, M.: ‘Risk ranking in mega projects by fuzzy compromise approach: A comparative analysis’, J Intell Fuzzy Syst, 2014, 26, (2), pp. 949–959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buyukozkan, G., Feyzioglu, O., and Cifci, G.: ‘Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Knowledge Management Tools’, Int J Comput Int Sys, 2011, 4, (2), pp. 184–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydin, S., and Kahraman, C.: ‘Vehicle selection for public transportation using an integrated multi criteria decision making approach: A case of Ankara’, J Intell Fuzzy Syst, 2014, 26, (5), pp. 2467–2481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oztaysi, B., and Sürer, O.: ‘Supply chain performance measurement using a SCOR based fuzzy VIKOR approach’, in Kahraman, C., and Oztaysi, B. (Eds.): ‘Supply Chain Management under Fuzziness’ (Springer, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Tadic, D., Milanovic, D.D., Misita, M., and Tadic, B.: ‘New integrated approach to the problem of ranking and supplier selection under uncertainties’, P I Mech Eng B-J Eng, 2011, 225, (B9), pp. 1713–1724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanayei, A., Mousavi, S.F., and Yazdankhah, A.: ‘Group decision making process for supplier selection with VIKOR under fuzzy environment’, Expert Syst Appl, 2010, 37, (1), pp. 24–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, H.Y., Tzeng, G.H., and Chen, Y.H.: ‘A fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluating banking performance based on Balanced Scorecard’, Expert Syst Appl, 2009, 36, (6), pp. 10135–10147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaya, T., and Kahraman, C.: ‘Multicriteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR & AHP methodology: The case of Istanbul’, Energy, 2010, 35, (6), pp. 2517–2527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L.Y., and Wang, T.C.: ‘Optimizing partners’ choice in IS/IT outsourcing projects: The strategic decision of fuzzy VIKOR’, Int J Prod Econ, 2009, 120, (1), pp. 233–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buyukozkan, G., and Ruan, D.: ‘Evaluation of software development projects using a fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach’, Math Comput Simulat, 2008, 77, (5-6), pp. 464–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shemshadi, A., Shirazi, H., Toreihi, M., and Tarokh, M.J.: ‘A fuzzy VIKOR method for supplier selection based on entropy measure for objective weighting’, Expert Syst Appl, 2011, 38, (10), pp. 12160–12167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opricovic, S.: ‘Fuzzy VIKOR with an application to water resources planning’, Expert Syst Appl, 2011, 38, (10), pp. 12983–12990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, M.S., and Liang, G.S.: ‘Combining VIKOR with GRA techniques to evaluate service quality of airports under fuzzy environment’, Expert Syst Appl, 2011, 38, (3), pp. 1304–1312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaya, T., and Kahraman, C.: ‘Fuzzy multiple criteria forestry decision making based on an integrated VIKOR and AHP approach’, Expert Syst Appl, 2011, 38, (6), pp. 7326–7333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahdani, B., Hadipour, H., Sadaghiani, J.S., and Amiri, M.: ‘Extension of VIKOR method based on interval-valued fuzzy sets’, Int J Adv Manuf Tech, 2010, 47, (9-12), pp. 1231–1239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H.C., Liu, L., Liu, N., and Mao, L.X.: ‘Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis with extended VIKOR method under fuzzy environment’, Expert Syst Appl, 2012, 39, (17), pp. 12926–12934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girubha, R.J., and Vinodh, S.: ‘Application of fuzzy VIKOR and environmental impact analysis for material selection of an automotive component’, Mater Design, 2012, 37, pp. 478–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, H.Y., Chen, J.K., and Chen, I.S.: ‘Innovation capital indicator assessment of Taiwanese Universities: A hybrid fuzzy model application’, Expert Syst Appl, 2010, 37, (2), pp. 1635–1642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazzazi, A.A., Osanloo, M., and Karimi, B.: ‘Deriving preference order of open pit mines equipment through MADM methods: Application of modified VIKOR method’, Expert Syst Appl, 2011, 38, (3), pp. 2550–2556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yalcin, N., Bayrakdaroglu, A., and Kahraman, C.: ‘Application of fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methods for financial performance evaluation of Turkish manufacturing industries’, Expert Syst Appl, 2012, 39, (1), pp. 350–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu P., and Wang M.: ‘An extended VIKOR method for multiple attribute group decision making based on generalized interval-valued trapezoidal fuzzy numbers’, Scientific Research and Essays, 2011, 6, (4), pp. 765–776.
   Google Scholar
• Ebrahimnejad, S., Mousavi, S.M., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., Hashemi, H., and Vahdani, B.: ‘A novel two-phase group decision making approach for construction project selection in a fuzzy environment’, Appl Math Model, 2012, 36, (9), pp. 4197–4217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, N., and Wei, G.W.: ‘Extension of VIKOR method for decision making problem based on hesitant fuzzy set’, Appl Math Model, 2013, 37, (7), pp. 4938–4947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, H.C., and Xu, Z.S.: ‘A VIKOR-based method for hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision making’, Fuzzy Optim Decis Ma, 2013, 12, (4), pp. 373–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, G., and Zhang, N.A.: ‘A multiple criteria hesitant fuzzy decision making with Shapley value-based VIKOR method’, J Intell Fuzzy Syst, 2014, 26, (2), pp. 1065–1075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J.H., Cho, H.J., and Kwun, Y.C.: ‘Extension of the VIKOR method to dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision making’, Comput Math Appl, 2013, 65, (4), pp. 731–744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan, S.P., Wang, Q.Y., and Dong, J.Y.: ‘The extended VIKOR method for multi-attribute group decision making with triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers’, Knowl-Based Syst, 2013, 52, pp. 65–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, and Yoon: ‘Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications’ (Springer-Verlag, 1981).
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S., and Hwang, C.L.: ‘Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications’ (Springer-Verlag, 1992).
   Google Scholar
• Ye, F., and Li, Y.N.: ‘An extended TOPSIS model based on the Possibility theory under fuzzy environment’, Knowl-Based Syst, 2014,67, pp. 263–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahraman, C., Çevik, S., Ates, N.Y., and Gülbay, M.: ‘Fuzzy multi-criteria evaluation of industrial robotic systems’, Computers and Industrial Engineering, 2007, 52, (4), pp. 414–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C.B., and Wei, C.C.: ‘An approach for solving fuzzy MADM problems’, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowlege-Based Systems, 1997, 5, (4), pp. 459–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kannan, D., De Sousa Jabbour, A.B.L., and Jabbour, C.J.C.: ‘Selecting green suppliers based on GSCM practices: Using Fuzzy TOPSIS applied to a Brazilian electronics company’, Eur J Oper Res, 2014, 233, (2), pp. 432–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y.J.: ‘The evaluation of financial performance for Taiwan container shipping companies by fuzzy TOPSIS’, Applied Soft Computing Journal, 2014, 22, pp. 28–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, T.C.: ‘Facility location selection using fuzzy topsis under group decisions’, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowlege-Based Systems, 2002, 10, (6), pp. 687–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandic, K., Delibasic, B., Knezevic, S., and Benkovic, S.: ‘Analysis of the financial parameters of Serbian banks through the application of the fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methods’, Economic Modelling, 2014, 43, pp. 30–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, G., and Lu, J.: ‘An Integrated Group Decision-Making Method Dealing with Fuzzy Preferences for Alternatives and Individual Judgments for Selection Criteria’, Group Decision and Negotiation, 2003, 12, pp. 501–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsaura, S.H., Chang, T.Y., and Yen, C.H.: ‘The evaluation of airline service quality by fuzzy MCDM’, Tourism Management, 2002, 23, (2), pp. 107–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y.-M., and Elhag, T.M.S.: ‘Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment’, Expert Syst Appl, 2006, 31, (2), pp. 309–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boran, F.E., Genç, S., Kurt, M., and Akay, D.: ‘A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method’, Expert Syst Appl, 2009, 36, (8), pp. 11363–11368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, T.H., Chen, M.C., and Hung, C.C.: ‘Multiple attribute decision-making methods for the dynamic operator allocation problem’, Math Comput Simulat, 2007, 73, (5), pp. 285–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dagdeviren, M., Yavuz, S., and Kilinc, N.: ‘Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment’, Expert Syst Appl, 2009, 36, (4), pp. 8143–8151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yong, D.: ‘Plant location selection based on fuzzy TOPSIS’, Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2006, 28, (7-8), pp. 839–844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J.W., Cheng, C.H., and Kun-Cheng, H.: ‘Fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS for supplier selection’, Appl Soft Comput, 2009, 9, (1), pp. 377–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Önüt, S., and Soner, S.: ‘Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment’, Waste Manage, 2008, 28, (9), pp. 1552–1559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, T.C., and Lin, Y.C.: ‘A Fuzzy TOPSIS Method for Robot Selection’, Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2003, 21, (4), pp. 284–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y.-J., and Lee, H.-S.: ‘Generalizing TOPSIS for fuzzy multiple-criteria group decision-making’, Comput Math Appl, 2007, 53, (11), pp. 1762–1772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, T.C.: ‘Selecting Plant Location via a Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach’, Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2002, 20, (11), pp. 859–864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onut, S., Kara, S.S., and Isik, E.: ‘Long term supplier selection using a combined fuzzy MCDM approach: A case study for a telecommunication company’, Expert Syst Appl, 2009, 36, (2), pp. 3887–3895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buyukozkan, G., Feyzioglu, O., and Nebol, E.: ‘Selection of the strategic alliance partner in logistics value chain’, Int J Prod Econ, 2008, 113, (1), pp. 148–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, T.-C., and Lee, H.-D.: ‘Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights’, Expert Syst Appl, 2009, 36, (5), pp. 8980–8985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashtiani, B., Haghighirad, F., Makui, A., and Montazer, G.a.: ‘Extension of fuzzy TOPSIS method based on interval-valued fuzzy sets’, Appl Soft Comput, 2009, 9, (2), pp. 457–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, T.-Y., and Tsao, C.-Y.: ‘The interval-valued fuzzy TOPSIS method and experimental analysis’, Fuzzy Set Syst, 2008, 159, (11), pp. 1410–1428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottani, E., and Rizzi, A.: ‘A fuzzy TOPSIS methodology to support outsourcing of logistics services’, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 2006, 11, (4), pp. 294–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, Y., and Chan, F.T.S.: ‘A new fuzzy dempster MCDM method and its application in supplier selection’, Expert Syst Appl, 2011, 38, (8), pp. 9854–9861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braglia, M., Frosolini, M., and Montanari, R.: ‘Fuzzy TOPSIS approach for failure mode, effects and criticality analysis’, Qual Reliab Eng Int, 2003, 19, (5), pp. 425–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue, Z.: ‘TOPSIS-based group decision-making methodology in intuitionistic fuzzy setting’, Inform Sciences, 2014, 277, pp. 141–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, D., and Kumar, S.: ‘Intuitionistic fuzzy entropy and distance measure based TOPSIS method for multi-criteria decision making’, Egyptian Informatics Journal, 2014, 15, (2), pp. 97–104.
   Google Scholar
• Çevik Onar, S., Öztayşi, B., and Kahraman, C.: ‘Strategic Decision Selection Using Hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS and Interval Type-2 Fuzzy AHP: A case study’, International Journal of Computational intelligence systems, 2014, 7, (5), pp. 1002–1021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H., and Rodríguez, R.M.: ‘A fuzzy envelope for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set and its application to multicriteria decision making’, Inform Sciences, 2014, 258, pp. 220–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahraman, C., Oztaysi, B., Cevik Onar, S.: ‘A Multicriteria Supplier Selection Model Using Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets’, Journal of Multiple-Valued Logic and Soft Computing, 2014, in publication process.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Z., and Zhang, X.: ‘Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information’, Knowl-Based Syst, 2013, 52, pp. 53–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celik, E., Bilisik, O.N., Erdogan, M., Gumus, A.T., and Baracli, H.: ‘An integrated novel interval type-2 fuzzy MCDM method to improve customer satisfaction in public transportation for Istanbul’, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2013, 58, pp. 28–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S.M., and Lee, L.W.: ‘Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the interval type-2 TOPSIS method’, Expert Syst Appl, 2010, 37, (4), pp. 2790–2798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yavuz, M., Oztaysi, B., Cevik Onar, S., and Kahraman, C.: ‘Multi-criteria Evaluation of Alternative-Fuel Vehicles via a Hierarchical Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Model’, Expert Syst Appl, 2015, 42, (5), pp. 2835–2848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T.L.: ‘The Analytic Hierarchy Process’ (McGraw-Hill, 1980).
   Google Scholar
• Kahraman, C., and Kaya, I.: ‘A fuzzy multicriteria methodology for selection among energy alternatives’, Expert Syst Appl, 2010, 37, (9), pp. 6270–6281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Laarhoven, P.J.M., and Pedrycz, W.: ‘A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory’, Fuzzy Set Syst, 1983, 11, (1–3), pp. 199–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, J.J.: ‘Fuzzy hierarchical analysis’, Fuzzy Set Syst, 1985, 17, (3), pp. 233–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, D.-Y.: ‘Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP’, Eur J Oper Res, 1996, 95, (3), pp. 649–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, J., An, M., and Smith, N.J.: ‘Application of a fuzzy based decision making methodology to construction project risk assessment’, International Journal of Project Management, 2007, 25, (6), pp. 589–600.
   Google Scholar
• Rezaei, J., Fahim, P.B.M., and Tavasszy, L.: ‘Supplier selection in the airline retail industry using a funnel methodology: Conjunctive screening method and fuzzy AHP’, Expert Syst Appl, 2014, 41, (18), pp. 8165–8179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozgen, D., and Gulsun, B.: ‘Combining possibilistic linear programming and fuzzy AHP for solving the multi-objective capacitated multi-facility location problem’, Inform Sciences, 2014, 268, pp. 185–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalao, E.R., Wu, T., and Shunk, D.: ‘A stochastic AHP decision making methodology for imprecise preferences’, Inform Sciences, 2014, 270, pp. 192–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Z., and Liao, H.: ‘Intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process’, IEEE T Fuzzy Syst, 2014, 22, (4), pp. 749–761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, X.Y., Hu, Y., Deng, Y., and Mahadevan, S.: ‘Supplier selection using AHP methodology extended by D numbers’, Expert Syst Appl, 2014, 41, (1), pp. 156–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Jung, K.A., Yeo, G.T., and Chou, C.C.: ‘Selecting a cruise port of call location using the fuzzy-AHP method: A case study in East Asia’, Tourism Management, 2014, 42, pp. 262–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gim, B., and Kim, J.W.: ‘Multi-criteria evaluation of hydrogen storage systems for automobiles in Korea using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process’, Int J Hydrogen Energ, 2014, 39, (15), pp. 7852–7858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese, A., Costa, R., and Menichini, T.: ‘Using Fuzzy AHP to manage Intellectual Capital assets: An application to the ICT service industry’, Expert Syst Appl, 2013, 40, (9), pp. 3747–3755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakhar, S.K., and Barua, M.K.: ‘An integrated model of supply chain performance evaluation and decision-making using structural equation modelling and fuzzy AHP’, Prod Plan Control, 2014, 25, (11), pp. 938–957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, J., and Lee, J.: ‘Development of a new technology product evaluation model for assessing commercialization opportunities using Delphi method and fuzzy AHP approach’, Expert Syst Appl, 2013, 40, (13), pp. 5314–5330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linstone, H.A., and M., Turoff.: ‘The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications’ (Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Kaya, I., Oztaysi, B., and Kahraman, C.: ‘A Two-Phased Fuzzy Multicriteria Selection among Public Transportation Investments for Policy-Making and Risk Governance’, Int J Uncertain Fuzz, 2012, 20, pp. 31–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh, N.P.: ‘Axiomatic Design Theory for Systems’, Research in Engineering Design – Theory, Applications, and Concurrent Engineering, 1998, 10, (4), pp. 189–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, F.T.S., and Kumar, N.: ‘Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach’, Omega-Int J Manage S, 2007, 35, (4), pp. 417–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsaur, S.-H., Chang, T.-Y., and Yen, C.-H.: ‘The evaluation of airline service quality by fuzzy MCDM’, Tourism Management, 2002, 23, (2), pp. 107–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahraman, C., Ertay, T., and Buyukozkan, G.: ‘A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach’, Eur J Oper Res, 2006, 171, (2), pp. 390–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., and Ruan, D.: ‘Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP: The case of Turkey’, Int J Prod Econ, 2004, 87, (2), pp. 171–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzeng, G.-H., Chiang, C.-H., and Li, C.-W.: ‘Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL’, Expert Syst Appl, 2007, 32, (4), pp. 1028–1044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, H.P.: ‘Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparison’, Int J Approx Reason, 1999, 21, (3), pp. 215–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahraman, C., Ruan, D., and Dogan, I.: ‘Fuzzy group decision-making for facility location selection’, Inform Sciences, 2003, 157, pp. 135–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, C.-H.: ‘Evaluating naval tactical missile systems by fuzzy AHP based on the grade value of membership function’, Eur J Oper Res, 1997, 96, (2), pp. 343–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, J.X., and Chow, M.Y.: ‘A review of emerging techniques on generation expansion planning’, IEEE T Power Syst, 1997, 12, (4), pp. 1722–1728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, L.C., and Cao, D.: ‘On consistency and ranking of alternatives in fuzzy AHP’, Eur J Oper Res, 2000, 124, (1), pp. 102–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulak, O., and Kahraman, C.: ‘Fuzzy multi-attribute selection among transportation companies using axiomatic design and analytic hierarchy process’, Inform Sciences, 2005, 170, (2-4), pp. 191–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A.H.I., Chen, W.C., and Chang, C.J.: ‘A fuzzy AHP and BSC approach for evaluating performance of IT department in the manufacturing industry in Taiwan’, Expert Syst Appl, 2008, 34, (1), pp. 96–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwong, C.K., and Bai, H.: ‘A fuzzy AHP approach to the determination of importance weights of customer requirements in quality function deployment’, J Intell Manuf, 2002, 13, (5), pp. 367–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwong, C.K., and Bai, H.: ‘Determining the importance weights for the customer requirements in QFD using a fuzzy AHP with an extent analysis approach’, IIE Trans, 2003, 35, (7), pp. 619–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, M.-F., and Tzeng, G.-H.: ‘Combining grey relation and TOPSIS concepts for selecting an expatriate host country’, Math Comput Model, 2004, 40, (13), pp. 1473–1490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, C.H., Yang, K.L., and Hwang, C.L.: ‘Evaluating attack helicopters by AHP based on linguistic variable weight’, Eur J Oper Res, 1999, 116, (2), pp. 423–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozdag, C.E., Kahraman, C., and Ruan, D.: ‘Fuzzy group decision making for selection among computer integrated manufacturing systems’, Comput Ind, 2003, 51, (1), pp. 13–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, F.T.S., Kumar, N., Tiwari, M.K., Lau, H.C.W., and Choy, K.L.: ‘Global supplier selection: a fuzzy-AHP approach’, Int J Prod Res, 2008, 46, (14), pp. 3825–3857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahraman, C., Oztaysi, B., Sari, I.U., and Turanoglu, E.: ‘Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with interval type-2 fuzzy sets’, Knowl-Based Syst, 2014, 59, pp. 48–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdullah, L., and Najib, L.: ‘A new type-2 fuzzy set of linguistic variables for the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process’, Expert Syst Appl, 2014, 41, (7), pp. 3297–3305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J., Huang, H.B., and Cao, Q.W.: ‘Research on AHP with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application in multi-criteria decision making problems’, Appl Math Model, 2013, 37, (24), pp. 9898–9906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdullah, L., and Najib, L.: ‘A new preference scale of intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in multi-criteria decision making problems’, J Intell Fuzzy Syst, 2014, 26, (2), pp. 1039–1049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T.L.: ‘Theory and applications of the analytic network process’ (RWS Publications, 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Büyüközkan, G., Ertay, T., Kahraman, C., and Ruan, D.: ‘Determining the importance weights for the design requirements in the house of quality using the fuzzy analytic network approach’, Int J Intell Syst, 2004, 19, (5), pp. 443–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourjavad, E., and Shirouyehzad, H.: ‘Evaluating manufacturing systems by fuzzy ANP: A case study’, International Journal of Applied Management Science, 2014, 6, (1), pp. 65–83.
   Google Scholar
• Li, F., Liu, L., and Xi, B.: ‘Evaluating strategic leadership based on the method of fuzzy analytic network process’, Applied Mathematics and Information Sciences, 2014, 8, (3), pp. 1461–1466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öztayşi, B., Uğurlu, S., and Kahraman, C.: ‘Assessment of green energy alternatives using fuzzy ANP’, in (Ed. Cavallaro F.): ‘Assessment and Simulation Tools for Sustainable Energy Systems’, Green Energy and Technology Series, 2013, 129, pp 55–77.
   Google Scholar
• Senvar, O., Tuzkaya, U.R., and Kahraman, C.: ‘Supply chain performance measurement: An integrated DEMATEL and fuzzy-ANP approach’, in (Eds. C. Kahraman and B. Öztaysi): ‘Supply Chain Management Under Fuzziness, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing Series, 2014, 313, pp. 143–165.
   Google Scholar
• Tadić, S., Zečević, S., and Krstić, M.: ‘A novel hybrid MCDM model based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy VIKOR for city logistics concept selection’, Expert Systems with Applications, 2014, 41, (18), pp. 8112–8128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, R.C., and Tzeng, G.H.: ‘A soft computing method for multi-criteria decision making with dependence and feedback’, Appl Math Comput, 2006, 180, (1), pp. 63–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, M.-L., Chiang, J.H., and Lan, L.W.: ‘Selection of optimal supplier in supply chain management strategy with analytic network process and Choquet integral’, Comput Ind Eng, 2009, 57, (1), pp. 330–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayag, Z., and Ozdemir, R.G.: ‘A hybrid approach to concept selection through fuzzy analytic network process’, Comput Ind Eng, 2009, 56, (1), pp. 368–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dagdeviren, M., Yuksel, I., and Kurt, M.: ‘A fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) model to identify faulty behavior risk (FBR) in work system’, Safety Sci, 2008, 46, (5), pp. 771–783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sipahi, S., and Timor, M.: ‘The analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process: an overview of applications’, Management Decision, 2010, 48, (5), pp. 775–808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuzkaya, U.R., and Önüt, S.: ‘A fuzzy analytic network process based approach to transportation-mode selection between Turkey and Germany: A case study’, Inform Sciences, 2008, 178, (15), pp. 3133–3146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, R.-H.: ‘An integrated FANP–MOLP for supplier evaluation and order allocation’, Appl Math Model, 2009, 33, (6), pp. 2730–2736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büyüközkan, G., and Çifçi, G.: ‘A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers’, Expert Syst Appl, 2012, 39, (3), pp. 3000–3011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayag, Z., and Ozdemir, R.G.: ‘An intelligent approach to ERP software selection through fuzzy ANP’, Int J Prod Res, 2007, 45, (10), pp. 2169–2194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuksel, I., and Dagdeviren, M.: ‘Using the fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) for Balanced Scorecard (BSC): A case study for a manufacturing firm’, Expert Syst Appl, 2010, 37, (2), pp. 1270–1278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinodh, S., Anesh Ramiya, R., and Gautham, S.G.: ‘Application of fuzzy analytic network process for supplier selection in a manufacturing organisation’, Expert Syst Appl, 2011, 38, (1), pp. 272–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Promentilla, M.A.B., Furuichi, T., Ishii, K., and Tanikawa, N.: ‘A fuzzy analytic network process for multi-criteria evaluation of contaminated site remedial countermeasures’, J Environ Manage, 2008, 88, (3), pp. 479–495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, M.L.: ‘Implementation and performance evaluation using the fuzzy network balanced scorecard’, Comput Educ, 2010, 55, (1), pp. 188–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, M.-L., Divinagracia, L., and Divinagracia, R.: ‘Evaluating firm's sustainable production indicators in uncertainty’, Comput Ind Eng, 2009, 57, (4), pp. 1393–1403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H.H., Kang, H.Y., Xing, X.Q., Lee, A.H.I., and Tong, Y.H.: ‘Developing new products with knowledge management methods and process development management in a network’, Comput Ind, 2008, 59, (2-3), pp. 242–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J.-K., and Chen, I.S.: ‘Using a novel conjunctive MCDM approach based on DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP, and TOPSIS as an innovation support system for Taiwanese higher education’, Expert Syst Appl, 2010, 37, (3), pp. 1981–1990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razmi, J., Rafiei, H., and Hashemi, M.: ‘Designing a decision support system to evaluate and select suppliers using fuzzy analytic network process’, Comput Ind Eng, 2009, 57, (4), pp. 1282–1290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y., Cheng, H.-P., Tseng, M.-L., and Tsai, J.C.C.: ‘Using QFD and ANP to analyze the environmental production requirements in linguistic preferences’, Expert Syst Appl, 2010, 37, (3), pp. 2186–2196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wey, W.-M., and Wu, K.-Y.: ‘Using ANP priorities with goal programming in resource allocation in transportation’, Math Comput Model, 2007, 46, (7–8), pp. 985–1000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banae Costa, C.A., and Vansnick, J.-C.: ‘The MACBETH approach: Basic ideas, software, and an application’, in (Ed. Meskens N., R., M.): ‘Advances in Decision Analysis,’ (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999), pp. 131–157.
   Google Scholar
• Dhouib, D.: ‘An extension of MACBETH method for a fuzzy environment to analyze alternatives in reverse logistics for automobile tire wastes’, Omega, 2014, 42, (1), pp. 25–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertay, T., Kahraman, C, and Kaya, İ.: ‘Evaluation of renewable energy alternatives using MACBETH and fuzzy AHP multicriteria methods: the case of Turkey’, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 2013, 19, (1), pp. 38–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontela, E., and Gabus, A.: DEMATEL, innovative methods. Report no. 2 structural analysis of the world problematique. Battelle Geneva Research Institute, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Fontela, E., Gabus, A.: The DEMATEL observer: Battelle Institute. Geneva Research Center, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, B., Chang, C.-W., and Wu, C.-H.: ‘Fuzzy DEMATEL method for developing supplier selection criteria’, Expert Syst Appl, 2011, 38, (3), pp. 1850–1858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh, T.-M., and Huang, Y.-L.: ‘Factors in determining wind farm location: Integrating GQM, fuzzy DEMATEL, and ANP’, Renew Energ, 2014, 66, pp. 159–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Hu, Y., Zhang, X., Deng, Y., and Mahadevan, S.: ‘An evidential DEMATEL method to identify critical success factors in emergency management’, Appl Soft Comput, 2014, 22, pp. 504–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikjoo, A.V., and Saeedpoor, M.: ‘An intuitionistic fuzzy DEMATEL methodology for prioritising the components of SWOT matrix in the Iranian insurance industry’, International Journal of Operational Research, 2014, 20, (4), pp. 439–452.
   Google Scholar
• Bokaei Hosseini, M., and Tarokh, M.: ‘Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Set Extension of DEMATEL Method’, in (Eds. Das, V., and Thankachan, N.): ‘Computational Intelligence and Information Technology’ (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011), pp. 157–165.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, W.-W., and Lee, Y.-T.: ‘Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method’, Expert Syst Appl, 2007, 32, (2), pp. 499–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C.-J., and Wu, W.-W.: ‘A causal analytical method for group decision-making under fuzzy environment’, Expert Syst Appl, 2008, 34, (1), pp. 205–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liou, J.J.H., Yen, L., and Tzeng, G.-H.: ‘Building an effective safety management system for airlines’, Journal of Air Transport Management, 2008, 14, (1), pp. 20–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, M.-L.: ‘A causal and effect decision making model of service quality expectation using grey-fuzzy DEMATEL approach’, Expert Syst Appl, 2009, 36, (4), pp. 7738–7748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, M.-L.: ‘Implementation and performance evaluation using the fuzzy network balanced scorecard’, Comput Educ, 2010, 55, (1), pp. 188–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Q., Huang, W., and Zhang, Y.: ‘Identifying critical success factors in emergency management using a fuzzy DEMATEL method’, Safety Sci, 2011, 49, (2), pp. 243–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büyüközkan, G., Arsenyan, J., and Ruan, D.: ‘Logistics tool selection with two-phase fuzzy multi criteria decision making: A case study for personal digital assistant selection’, Expert Syst Appl, 2012, 39, (1), pp. 142–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulak, O., Kahraman, C., Öztayşi, B., and Tanyaş, M.: ‘Multi-attribute information technology project selection using fuzzy axiomatic design’, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 2005, 18, (3), pp. 275–288.
   Google Scholar
• Marichal, J.L.: ‘An axiomatic approach of the discrete Choquet integral as a tool to aggregate interacting criteria’, Fuzzy Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 2000, 8, (6), pp. 800–807.
   Google Scholar
• Grabisch, M., Kojadinovic, I., and Meyer, P.: ‘A review of methods for capacity identification in Choquet integral based multi-attribute utility theory: Applications of the Kappalab R package’, Eur J Oper Res, 2008, 186, (2), pp. 766–785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Z.: ‘Choquet integrals of weighted intuitionistic fuzzy information’, Inform Sciences, 2010, 180, (5), pp. 726–736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, W., and Chen, Z.: ‘New aggregation operators based on the Choquet integral and 2-tuple linguistic information’, Expert Syst Appl, 2012, 39, (3), pp. 2662–2668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., and Rhodes, E.: ‘Measuring the efficiency of decision making units’, Eur J Oper Res, 1978, 2, (6), pp. 429–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertay, T., Ruan, D., and Tuzkaya, U.R.: ‘Integrating Data Envelopment Analysis and Analytic Hierarchy for the facility layout design in manufacturing systems’, Inform Sciences, 2006, 176, (3), pp. 237–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S.-T.: ‘A fuzzy DEA/AR approach to the selection of flexible manufacturing systems’, Comput Ind Eng, 2008, 54, (1), pp. 66–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, D.D.: ‘Performance evaluation: An integrated method using data envelopment analysis and fuzzy preference relations’, Eur J Oper Res, 2009, 194, (1), pp. 227–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, J., Zhang G., Ruan D., and F., Wu.: ‘Multi-Objective Group Decision Making Methods, Software and Applications With Fuzzy Set Technique’ (Imperial College Press, 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, H.J.: ‘Description and Optimization of Fuzzy Systems’, Int J Gen Syst, 1976, 2, (4), pp. 209–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onar, S.Ç., and Ateş, N.Y.: ‘A fuzzy model for operational supply chain optimization problems’, Journal of Multiple-Valued Logic and Soft Computing, 2008, 14, (3-5), pp. 355–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amid, A., Ghodsypour, S.H., and O'Brien, C.: ‘Fuzzy multiobjective linear model for supplier selection in a supply chain’, International Journal of Production Economics, 2006, 104, (2), pp. 394–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phruksaphanrat, B., and Ohsato, A.: ‘Linear coordination method for fuzzy multi-objective linear programming problems with convex polyhedral membership functions’, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowlege-Based Systems, 2004, 12, (3), pp. 269–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., and Cooper, W.W.: ‘Management models and industrial applications of linear programming’, Wiley, New York, 1961.
   Google Scholar
• Yaghoobi, M.A., and Tamiz, M.: ‘A short note on the relationship between goal programming and fuzzy programming for vectormaximum problems’, Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 1979, 2, (2), pp. 31–36.
   Google Scholar
• Hannan, E.L.: ‘On fuzzy goal programming’, Decision Sciences, 1981, 12, pp. 522–531.
   Google Scholar
• El-Wahed A., Waiel F., and Lee, S.M.: ‘Interactive fuzzy goal programming for multi-objective transportation problems’, Omega, 2006, 34, (2), pp. 158–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, C.-F., Teng, C.-J., and Li, S.-Y.: ‘A fuzzy goal programming approach to multi-objective optimization problem with priorities’, Eur J Oper Res, 2007, 176, (3), pp. 1319–1333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuwano, H.: ‘On the fuzzy multi-objective linear programming problem: Goal programming approach’, Fuzzy Set Syst, 1996, 82, (1), pp. 57–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez, F., Gómez Skarmeta, A., Sánchez, G., and Cadenas, J.: ‘Fuzzy Sets based Heuristics for Optimization: Multi-objective Evolutionary Fuzzy Modeling’, in (Ed. Verdegay, J.-L.): Fuzzy Sets Based Heuristics for Optimization, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, 2003, 126, pp 221-234, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 221–234.
   Google Scholar
• Uz, M.E., and Hadi, M.N.S.: ‘Optimal design of semi active control for adjacent buildings connected by MR damper based on integrated fuzzy logic and multi-objective genetic algorithm’, Engineering Structures, 2014, 69, pp. 135–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg, R., and Singh, A.K.: ‘Multi-objective workflow grid scheduling usiing ε-fuzzy dominance sort based discrete particle swarm optimization’, Journal of Supercomputing, 2014, 68, (2), pp. 709–732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahnazari-Shahrezaei, P., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., and Kazemipoor, H.: ‘Solving a new fuzzy multi-objective model for a multi-skilled manpower scheduling problem by particle swarm optimization and elite Tabu search’, Int J Adv Manuf Tech, 2013, 64, (9-12), pp. 1517–1540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar