Fusion of Heterogeneous Incomplete Hesitant Preference Relations in Group Decision Making

References

• R. M. Rodríguez, L. Martínez and F. Herrera, “A group decision making model dealing with comparative linguistic expressions based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets,” Inf. Sci., 241, 28–42 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. L. Saaty, “A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures,” J. Math. Psychol., 15, 234–281 (1977).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. A. Orlovsky, “Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation,” Fuzzy Set Syst., 1, 155–167 (1978).
   Google Scholar
• F. Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma and J. L. Verdegay, “A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments,” Fuzzy Set Syst., 78, 73–87 (1996).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Chiclana, E. Herrera-Viedma, F. Herrera and S. Alonso, “Some induced ordered weighted averaging operators and their use for solving group decisionmaking problems based on fuzzy preference relations,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 182, 383–399 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Dong, Y. Xu and S. Yu, “Linguistic multiperson decision making based on the use of multiple preference relations,” Fuzzy Set Syst., 160, 603–623 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Dong, G. Zhang, W. Hong and Y. Xu, “Consensus models for AHP group decision making under row geometric mean prioritization method,” Decis. Support Syst., 49, 281–289 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Zhang and C. Guo, “Consistency and consensus models for group decision-making with uncertain 2-tuple linguistic preference relations,” Int. J. Syst. Sci., doi: 10.1080/00207721.2014.999732 (2016).
   Google Scholar
• F. Chiclana, E. Herrera-Viedma, S. Alonso and F. Herrera, “Cardinal consistency of reciprocal preference relations: a characterization of multiplicative transitivity,”jIEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 17, 14–23 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• E. Herrera-Viedma, F. J. Cabrerizo, J. Kacprzyk and W. Pedrycz, “A review of soft consensus models in a fuzzy environment,” Inf. Fusion, 17, 4–13 (2014).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Herrera-Viedma, F. Herrera, F. Chiclana and M. Luque, “Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 154, 98–109 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Ma, Z. Fan, Y. Jiang, J. Mao and L. Ma, “A method for repairing the inconsistency of fuzzy preference relations,”jFuzzy Set Syst., 157, 20–33 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• E. Herrera-Viedma, S. Alonso, F. Chiclana and F. Herrera, “A consensus model for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations,” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 15, 863–877 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Tanino, “Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making,” Fuzzy Set Syst., 12, 117–131 (1984).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Wu and J. Xu, “A concise consensus support model for group decision making with reciprocal preference relations based on deviation measures,” Fuzzy Set Syst., 206, 58–73 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Xia, Z. Xu and J. Chen, “Algorithms for improving consistency or consensus of reciprocal [0,1]-valued preference relations,” Fuzzy Set Syst., 216, 108–133 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. S. Xu, “Goal programming models for obtaining the priority vector of incomplete fuzzy preference relation,” Int. J. Approx. Reasoning, 36, 261–270 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Fedrizzi and S. Giove, “Incomplete pairwise comparison and consistency optimization,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 183, 303–313 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. J. Cabrerizo, R. Heradio, I. J. P´erez and E. Herrera-Viedma, “A selection process based on additive consistency to deal with incomplete fuzzy linguistic information,” J. Univers. Comput. Sci., 16, 62–81 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Herrera-Viedma, F. Chiclana, F. Herrera and S. Alonso, “Group decision-making model with incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency,” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part BCybern., 37, 176–189 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Zhang and C. Guo, “Consistency-based algorithms to estimate missing elements for uncertain 2-tuple linguistic preference relations,” Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst., 7, 924–936 (2014).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Ure˜na, F. Chiclana, J. A. Morente and E. Herrera-Viedma, “Managing incomplete preference relations in decision making: A review and future trends,” Inf. Sci., 302, 14–32 (2015).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Alonso, F. Chiclana, F. Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma, J. Alcal´a-Fdez and C. Porcel, “A consistency-based procedure to estimate missing pairwise preference values,” Int. J. Intell. Syst., 23, 155–175 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Chiclana, E. Herrera-Viedma, S. Alonso and F. Herrera, “A note on the estimation of missing pairwise preference values: a uninorm consistency based method,” Int. J. Uncertainty Fuzziness Knowl.-Based Syst., 16, 19–32 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Gong, “Least-square method to priority of the fuzzy preference relations with incomplete information,” Int. J. Approx. Reason., 47, 258–264 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Liu, Y. Pan, Y. Xu and S. Yu, “Least square completion and inconsistency repair methods for additively consistent fuzzy preference relations,” Fuzzy Set Syst., 198, 1–19 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Jiang and Z. Fan, “An approach to group decision making based on incomplete fuzzy preference relations,” Int. J. Uncertainty Fuzziness Knowl.-Based Syst., 16, 83–94 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Zhang and C. Guo, “Notes on ‘Logarithmic least squares method to priority for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations’,” Appl. Math. Model., 40, 1788–1792 (2016).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. T. Atanassov, “Intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Set Syst., 20, 87–96 (1986).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Dubois and H. Prade, Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Theory and Applications, New York: Academic Press (1980).
   Google Scholar
• I. T. Turksen, “Interval valued fuzzy sets based on normal forms,” Fuzzy Set Syst., 20, 191–210 (1986).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. R. Yager, “On the theory of bags,” Int. J. Gen. Syst., 13, 23–37 (1986).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. M. Rodríguez, L. Martínez, V. Torra, Z. S. Xu and F. Herrera, “Hesitant fuzzy sets: state of the art and future directions,” Int. J. Intell. Syst., 29, 495–524 (2014).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. M. Rodríguez, B. Bedregal, H. Bustince, Y. C. Dong, B. Farhadinia, C. Kahraman, L. Martínez, V. Torra, Y. J. Xu, Z. S. Xu and F. Herrera, “A position and perspective analysis of hesitant fuzzy sets on information fusion in decision making. Towards high quality progress,” Inf. Fusion, 29, 89–97 (2016).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Torra, Y. Narukawa, “On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision,” in Proc. of the 18th IEEE Int. Conf. Fuzzy Syst., Jeju Island, Korea, 1378–1382 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• V. Torra, “Hesitant fuzzy sets,” Int. J. Intell. Syst., 25, 529–539 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Xia and Z. Xu, “Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making,” Int. J. Approx. Reason., 52, 395–407 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Xu and M. Xia, “Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets,” Inf. Sci., 181, 2128–2138 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Liao, Z. Xu and X. Zeng, “Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their application in multi-criteria decision making,” Inf. Sci., 271, 125–142 (2014).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Zhang and Z. Xu, “The TODIM analysis approach based on novel measured functions under hesitant fuzzy environment,” Knowledge-Based Syst., 61, 48–58 (2014).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Zhu and Z. Xu, “Regression methods for hesitant fuzzy preference relations,” Technol. Econ. Dev. Eco., 19, S214–S227 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Liao, Z. Xu and M. Xia, “Multiplicative consistency of hesitant fuzzy preference relation and its application in group decision making,” Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. , 13, 47–76 (2014).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. M. Rodríguez, L. Martínez and F. Herrera, “Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making,” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 20, 109–119 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Zhu and Z. Xu, “Consistency measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations,” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 22, 35–45 (2014).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Chen, Z. Xu and M. Xia, “Interval-valued hesitant preference relations and their applications to group decision making,” Knowledge-Based Syst., 37, 528–540 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Zhu, Z. Xu and J. Xu, “Deriving a ranking from hesitant fuzzy preference relations under group decision making,” IEEE Trans. Cybern., 44, 1328–1337 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Xia and Z. Xu, “Managing hesitant information in GDM problems under fuzzy and multiplicative preference relations,” Int. J. Uncertainty Fuzziness Knowl.-Based Syst., 21, 865–897 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Zhang and C. Wu, “A decision support model for group decision making with hesitant multiplicative preference relations,” Inf. Sci., 282, 136–166 (2014).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Zhu and Z. Xu, “Analytic hierarchy processhesitant group decision making,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 239, 794–801 (2014).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Crawford and C. Williams, “A note on the analysis of subjective judgment matrices,” J. Math. Psychol., 29, 387–405 (1985).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Wang and Z. Fan, “Group decision analysis based on fuzzy preference relations: Logarithmic and geometric least squares methods,” Appl. Math. Comput., 194, 108–119 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Xu, R. Patnayakuni and H. Wang, “Logarithmic least squares method to priority for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations,” Appl. Math. Model., 37, 2139–2152 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. S. Xu. “Study on the relation between two classes of scales in AHP,” Syst. Eng. Theory Pract., 19, 97–101 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Z. S. Xu, Uncertain Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Beijing: Tsinghua Univ. Press, Beijing (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Z. Xu, “Incomplete linguistic preference relations and their fusion,” Inf. Fusion, 7, 331–337 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Herrera, L. Martínez and P. J. S´anchez, “Managing non-homogeneous information in group decision making,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 166, 115–132 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Palomares, R. M. Rodríguez and L. Martínez, “An attitude-driven web consensus support system for heterogeneous group decision making,” Expert Syst. Appl., 40, 139–149 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Zhang and C. Guo, “An approach to group decision making with heterogeneous incomplete uncertain preference relations,” Comput. Ind. Eng., 71, 27–36 (2014).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Chen, H. Zhang and Y. Dong, “The fusion process with heterogeneous preference structures in group decision making: A survey,” Inf. Fusion, 24, 72–83 (2015).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Xia and Z. Xu, “On consensus in group decision making based on fuzzy preference relations,” in E. Herrera-Viedma, et al. (Eds.), Consensual Processes, Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 263–287 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Z. S. Xu and Q. L. Da, “Three reciprocal judgement matrices-based methods for priorities of complementary judgement matrices,” J. Southeast Univ. (Natural Science), 31, 106–107 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York: McGraw-Hill (1980).
   Google Scholar
• S. Alonso, E. Herrera-Viedma, F. Chiclana and F. Herrera, Individual and social strategies to deal with ignorance situations in multi-person decision making,” Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak., 8, 313–333 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Chen, H. Wang and Y. Lu, “A multicriteria group decision-making approach based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets: A comparative perspective,” Expert Syst. Appl., 38, 7647–7658 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Liu, J. Cai and L. Jiang, “On improving the additive consistency of the fuzzy preference relations based on comparative linguistic expressions,” Int. J. Intell. Syst., 29, 544–559 (2014).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar