Men, masculinities and the material(-)discursive

References

• Abercrombie, N., & Turner, B. S. (1978). The dominant ideology thesis. British Journal of Sociology, 29, 149–170. 10.2307/589886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alaimo, S., & Hekman, S. (Eds.) (2008). Material feminisms. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C. (1981). Mothers, fathers, and children: From private to public patriarchy. In L. Sargent (Ed.), Women and revolution: The unhappy marriage of Marxism and feminism (pp. 239–267). London: Pluto.
   Google Scholar
• Carrigan, T., Connell, R. W., & Lee, J. (1985). Towards a new sociology of masculinity. Theory and Society, 14, 551–604. 10.1007/BF00160017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvin, T. (2002). Re-enfleshing the bright boys; or, how male bodies matter to feminist theory. In J. Kegan Gardiner (Ed.), Masculinity studies and feminist theory: New directions (pp. 60–89). New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clatterbaugh, K. (1998). What is problematic about masculinities? Men and Masculinities, 1, 24–45. 10.1177/1097184X98001001002
   Google Scholar
• Collinson, D. L., & Hearn, J. (1994). Naming men as men: Implications for work, organizations and management. Gender, Work and Organization, 1, 2–22. 10.1111/j.1468-0432.1994.tb00002.x
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R.W. (1983). Which way is up? Essays on class, sex and culture. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Dansky, S., Knoebel, J., & Pitchford, K. (1976). Effeminist manifesto. In J. Snodgrass (Ed.), For men against sexism: A book of readings (pp. 116–120). Albion, CA: Times Change Press.
   Google Scholar
• Delphy, C. (1977). The main enemy. London: WRRC.
   Google Scholar
• Delphy, C. (1984). Close to home. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Egeberg Holmgren, L., & Hearn, J. (2009). Framing ‘men in feminism’: Theoretical locations, local contexts and practical passings in men's gender-conscious positionings on gender equality and feminism. Journal of Gender Studies, 18, 403–418. 10.1080/09589230903260076
   Google Scholar
• Eisenstein, Z. (Ed.) (1979). Capitalist patriarchy and the case for socialist feminism. New York: Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, J., & Straub, K. (Eds.) (1991). Body guards: The cultural politics of gender ambiguity. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, A. (1989). Blood at the root. London: Pandora.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, A., & Folbre, N. (1981). The unhappy marriage of patriarchy and capitalism. In L. Sargent (Ed.), Women and revolution: The unhappy marriage of Marxism and feminism (pp. 313–318). London: Pluto.
   Google Scholar
• Firestone, S. (1970). The dialectic of sex. London: Jonathan Cape.
   Google Scholar
• Gerschick, T. J. (2005). Masculinity and degrees of bodily heteronormativity in Western culture. In M. Kimmel, J. Hearn, & R.W. Connell (Eds.), Handbook of studies on men and masculinities (pp. 367–378.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanmer, J. (1990). Men, power and the exploitation of women. In J. Hearn & D. Morgan (Eds.), Men, masculinities and social theory (pp. 21–42). London and New York: Unwin Hyman/Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1992). The promises of monsters: a regenerative politics for inappropriate/d Others. In L. Grossberg, C. Nelson & P. A. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural Studies (pp. 295–337). New York & London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, H. (1979). The unhappy marriage of Marxism and feminism: Towards a more progressive union. Capital and Class, 8, 1–33. 10.1177/030981687900800102
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. (1983). Birth and afterbirth: A materialist account. London: Achilles Heel.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. (1987). The gender of oppression: Men, masculinity and the critique of Marxism. Brighton/New York: Wheatsheaf/St. Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. (1988, March). Speaking the unspeakable: The historical development of organisations and men's sexuality in the public domain. Paper presented at the British Sociological Association Conference, Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. (1990). State organisations and men's sexuality in the public domain 1870–1920. In L. Jamieson & H. Corr (Eds.), The state, private life and political change (pp. 50–72) London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. (1991). Gender: biology, nature and capitalism. In T. Carver (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Marx (pp. 222–245). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. (1992). Men in the public eye: The construction and deconstruction of public men and public patriarchies. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. (1996a). Deconstructing the dominant: making the one(s) the other(s). Organization: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Organization, Theory and Society, 3, 611–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. (1996b). ‘Is masculinity dead?’ A critical account of the concepts of masculinity and masculinities. In M. Mac an Ghaill (Ed.), Understanding masculinities: Social relations and cultural arenas (pp. 202–217). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. (1998). The violences of men. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. (2004). From hegemonic masculinity to the hegemony of men. Feminist Theory, 5, 49–72. 10.1177/1464700104040813
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. (2006). The implications of information and communication technologies for sexualities and sexualized violences: Contradictions of sexual citizenships. Political Geography, 25, 944–963. 10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. (2008a). The personal is work is political is theoretical: Continuities and discontinuities in (pro)feminism, women's studies, men and my selves. NORA: Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 16, 241–256. 10.1080/08038740802440982
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. (2008b). A materialist-discursive approach to sexuality, sexual violence and sexualing globalisation: The case of ICTs. In L. Gunnarsson, A. G. Jónasdóttir, & G. Karlsson (Eds.), GEXcel work in progress report volume II. Proceedings from GEXcel theme 1: Gender, sexuality and global change, fall 2007 ( GEXcel Work in progress series) (pp. 65–76). Linköping & Örebro: Institute of Thematic Gender Studies, Linköping & Örebro Universities. Retrieved from: http://www.genderexcel.org/webfm_send/13
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. (2009). Patriarchies, transpatriarchies and intersectionalities. In E. Oleksy (Ed.), Gender and intimate citizenships: Politics, sexualities and subjectivity (pp. 177–192), London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. (2011). The materiality of men, bodies, and towards the abolition of ‘men’. In M. Läubli & S. Sahli (Eds.), Männlichkeiten denken. Männlichkeitskonzepte aus kulturwissenschaftlicher Sicht [Thinking masculinities: Concepts of masculinities from a socio-cultural perspective] (pp. 195–215). Bielefeld: Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. (2012a). A multi-faceted power analysis of men's violence to known women: From hegemonic masculinity to the hegemony of men. Sociological Review, 60, 589–610. 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02125.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. (2012b). The abolition of (the category of) men. In M. Eduards, M. Jansson, M. Wendt, & C. Åse (Eds.), Det heter feminism! 20 anspråksfulla förslag för att förändra världen (pp. 55–59). Stockholm: Hallongrottan och Feministiskt Perspektiv.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. (2012c). Male bodies, masculine bodies, men's bodies: the need for a concept of gex. In B.S. Turner (Ed.), Routledge handbook of body studies (pp. 307–320). London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J., & Sandberg, L. (2009). Older men, ageing and power: Masculinities theory and alternative spatialised theoretical perspectives. Sextant: Revue du Groupe Interdisciplinaire D'Etudes sur les Femmes et le Genre, 27, 147–163.
   Google Scholar
• Heasley, R. (2005). Queer masculinities of straight men: a typology. Men and Masculinities, 7, 310–320. 10.1177/1097184X04272118
   Google Scholar
• Herdt, G. (Ed.) (1994). Third sex, third gender: Beyond sexual dimorphism in culture and history. New York: Zone.
   Google Scholar
• Howson, R. (2006). Challenging hegemonic masculinity. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Howson, R. (2009). Deconstructing hegemonic masculinity: Contradiction, hegemony and dislocation. NORMA: Nordic Journal for Masculinity Studies, 4, 6–24.
   Google Scholar
• Howson, R. (2013). Hegemonic masculinity as empty signifier: Limit, antagonism and hegemony. Unpublished seminar paper, CFS seminar, Örebro University, September.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. (1987). What is cultural studies anyway? Social Text, 6, 38–80.
   Google Scholar
• Jónasdóttir, A. G., & Jones, K. B. (2010). Out of epistemology: Feminist theory in the 1980s and beyond. In A. G. Jónasdóttir & K. B. Jones (Eds.), The political interests of gender: Reconstructing feminist theory and political research (pp. 17–57). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, A. (1978). Structures of patriarchy and capital in the family. In A. Kuhn & A. M. Wolpe (Eds.), Feminism and materialism (pp. 41–67). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Lorber, J. (Ed.) (2005). Gender inequality: Feminist theories and politics. Los Angeles: Roxbury.
   Google Scholar
• Lykke, N. (2010) The timeliness of post-constructionism. NORA: Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 18, 131–136. 10.1080/08038741003757760
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, C. A. (1982). Feminism, Marxism, method, and the state: An agenda for theory. Signs, 7, 515–544. 10.1086/493898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, C. A. (1983). Feminism, Marxism, method and the state: Towards feminist jurisprudence. Signs, 8, 635–658. 10.1086/494000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (1975a). Preface (to A contribution to the critique of political economy). In Karl Marx: Early writings (pp. 424–428). London and Harmondsworth: Penguin/New Left Review.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (1975b). The economic and philosophical manuscripts. In Karl Marx: Early writings (pp. 279–400). London and Harmondsworth: Penguin/New Left Review.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1970). The German ideology. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Meigs, A. (1990). Multiple gender ideologies and statuses. In P. Reeves Sanday & R. Gallagher Goodenough (Eds.), Beyond the second sex: New directions in the anthropology of gender (pp. 92–11). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien, M. (1981). The politics of reproduction. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien, M. (1990). Reproducing the world. Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Poster, M. (1984). Foucault, Marxism, and history: Mode of production versus mode of information. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. E. (1987). Feminist reflections on political economy. Studies on Political Economy, 30, 37–59.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. E. (1990a). The conceptual practices of power: A feminist sociology of knowledge. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. E. (1990b). Texts, facts and femininity: Exploring the relations of ruling. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stoltenberg, J. (1989). Refusing to be a man: Essays on sex and justice. New York: Meridian.
   Google Scholar
• Walby, S. (1986). Patriarchy at work. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Walby, S. (1990). Theorising patriarchy. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Waldby, C. (1995). Destruction: Boundary erotics and refigurations of the heterosexual male body. In E. Grosz & E. Probyn (Eds.), Sexy bodies: The strange carnalities of feminism (pp. 266–277). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weinbaum, B. (1978). The curious courtship of women's liberation and socialism. Boston, MA: South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, S. (2002). Men and masculinities. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Widerberg, K. (2005). Situating knowledge – liberating or oppressive? In E. Englestad & S. Gerrard (Eds.), Challenging situatedness: Gender (pp. 259–267). Delft: Eburon.
   Google Scholar
• Wittig, M. (1992). The straight mind and other essays. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar