Masculinity and affect: new possibilities, new agendas

References

• Ahmed, S. (2010). The promise of happiness. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allan, J. A. (2016). Phallic affect, or why men’s rights activists have feelings. Men and Masculinities, 19(1), 22–41. doi: 10.1177/1097184X15574338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. (2014). Encountering affect: Capacities, apparatuses, conditions. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berlant, L. G. (2011). Cruel optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brickell, C. (2014). Affect and the history of masculinities. Qualitative Research Journal, 14(1), 28–40. doi: 10.1108/QRJ-03-2014-0005
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, M., & Hendler, G. (Eds.). (1999). Sentimental men: Masculinity and the politics of affect in American culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chu, J. Y. (2014). When boys become boys: Development, relationships, and masculinity. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clough, P. T. (Ed.). (2007). The affective turn: Theorizing the social. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Courtenay, W. H. (2000). Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men’s well-being: A theory of gender and health. Social Science & Medicine, 50(10), 1385–1401. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00390-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boise, S. (2015). Men, masculinity, music and emotions. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• de Boise, S., & Hearn, J. (2017). Are men getting more emotional? Critical sociological perspectives on men, masculinities and emotions. The Sociological Review, 65(4), 779–796. doi: 10.1177/0038026116686500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1988). Spinoza: Practical philosophy. San Francisco, CA: City Lights Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ekenstam, C. (1998). En historia om manlig gråt. In C. Ekenstam, J. Frykman, T. Johansson, J. Kuosmanen, J. Ljunggren, & A. Nilsson (Eds.), Rädd att falla: Studier i manlighet (pp. 50–123). Stockholm: Gidlund.
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, J. K. (1999). Cato's tears and the making of anglo-American emotion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evers, C. (2004). Men who surf. Cultural Studies Review, 10(1), 27–41. doi: 10.5130/csr.v10i1.3519
   Google Scholar
• Evers, C. (2009). ‘The point’: Surfing, geography and a sensual life of men and masculinity on the gold coast, Australia. Social & Cultural Geography, 10(8), 893–908. doi: 10.1080/14649360903305783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality: An introduction. Vol. 1. New York, NY: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Furneaux, H. (2016). Military men of feeling: Emotion, touch, and masculinity in the crimean War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galasiński, D. (2004). Men and the language of emotions. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Garlick, S. (2017). The nature of masculinity: Critical theory, new materialisms, and technologies of embodiment. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garlick, S. (2019). Sexual affects: Masculinity and online pornography. In L. Gottzén, U. Mellström, & T. Shefer (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of masculinity studies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gottzén, L. (2017a). Geographies of anger and fear: Exploring the affective atmospheres of men’s ‘domestic’ violence. In M. Livholts & L. Bryant (Eds.), Social work in a globalized world (pp. 106–118). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gottzén, L. (2017b). Monsters in the closet: The affective spaces of (not) coming out as a violent man. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 16(3), 528–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottzén, L. (2018). Chafing masculinity: Heterosexual violence and young men’s shame. Feminism & Psychology, 1–17. doi: 10.1177/0959353518776341
   Google Scholar
• Gregg, M., & Seigworth, G. (Eds.). (2010). The affect theory reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. (1993). Emotive subjects: Organizational men, organizational masculinities and the (de) construction of “emotions”. In S. Fineman (Ed.), Emotion in organizations (pp. 142–166). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• hooks, b. (2004). The will to change: Men, masculinity, and love. New York: Atria Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hot Ones. (2015, December 3). Sean Evans and Chili Klaus eat the Carolina Reaper, the world’s hottest chili pepper [Video file]. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/9k-SBpElcWA
   Google Scholar
• Kabesh, A. T. (2013). Postcolonial masculinities: Emotions, histories and ethics. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Kimmel, M. (1994). Masculinity as homophobia: Fear, shame, and silence in the construction of gender identity. In H. Brod & M. Kaufman (Eds.), Theorizing masculinities (pp. 119–141). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kimmel, M. (2013). Angry white men: American masculinity at the end of an era. New York: Nation Books.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Middleton, P. (1992). The inward gaze: Masculinity and subjectivity in modern culture. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, L. (2008). Queer(y)ing the heterosexualisation of emotion. In L. Moon (Ed.), Feeling queer or queer feelings? Radical approaches to counselling sex, sexualities and genders (pp. 36–53). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Probyn, E. (2005). Blush: Faces of shame. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reber, D. (2016). Coming to our senses: Affect and an order of things for global culture. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reeser, T. (2017a). Theorizing the masculinity of affect. In J. M. Armengol, M. Bosch-Vilarrubias, À Carabí, & T. Requena-Pelegrí (Eds.), Masculinities and literary studies: Intersections and new directions (pp. 109–120). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reeser, T. (2017). Producing awkwardness: Affective labour and masculinity in popular culture. Mosaic: An Interdisciplinary Critical Journal, 50(4), 51–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeser, T. (2019). Approaching affective masculinities. In L. Gottzén, U. Mellström, & T. Shefer (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of masculinity studies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Seidler, V. (1989). Rediscovering masculinity: Reason, language and sexuality. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Seidler, V. (2007). Masculinities, bodies, and emotional life. Men and Masculinities, 10(1), 9–21. doi: 10.1177/1097184X07299636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seigworth, G., & Gregg, M. (2010). An inventory of shimmers. In Gregg & Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 1–25). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shamir, M., & Travis, J. (2002). Boys don’t cry? Rethinking narratives of masculinity and emotion in the US. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thien, D. (2005). After or beyond feeling? A consideration of affect and emotion in geography. Area, 37(4), 450–454. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2005.00643a.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolia-Kelly, D. P. (2006). Affect – an ethnocentric encounter? Exploring the ‘universalist’ imperative of emotional/affectual geographies. Area, 38(2), 213–217. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2006.00682.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Travis, J. (2005). Wounded hearts: Masculinity, law, and literature in American culture. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vaught, J. C. (2008). Masculinity and emotion in early modern English literature. Aldershot; Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Way, N. (2013). Deep secrets: Boys, friendships, and the crisis of connection. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar