Big sperm. The making of the (new) male repro-consumer

References

• Adams, V., Murphy, M., & Clarke, A. (2009). Anticipation: Technoscience, life, affect, temporality. Subjectivity, 28(1), 246–265. doi: 10.1057/sub.2009.18
   Google Scholar
• Almeling, R. (2007). Selling genes, selling gender: Egg agencies, sperm banks, and the medical market in genetic material. American Sociological Review, 72(3), 319–340. doi: 10.1177/000312240707200301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeling, R. (2011). Sex cells: The medical market for eggs and sperm. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Almeling, R., & Waggoner, M. R. (2013). More and less than equal. How men factor in the reproductive equation. Gender & Society, 27(6), 821–842. doi: 10.1177/0891243213484510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade-Rocha, F. T. (2017). On the origins of the semen analysis: A close relationship with the history of the reproductive medicine. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences, 10(4), 242–255. doi: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_97_17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bach, A. S., & Aarseth, H. (2016). Adaptation, equality, and fairness. Towards a sociological understanding of ‘the supportive husband’. NORMA, 11(3), 174–189. doi: 10.1080/18902138.2016.1217692
   Google Scholar
• Bhatia, R., & Campo-Engelstein, L. (2018). The biomedicalization of social egg freezing: A comparative analysis of European and American professional ethics opinions and US news and popular media. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 43(5), 864–887. doi: 10.1177/0162243918754322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassela, C. (2019). Men have a biological clock, too, and 40 years of data says they need to pay attention. Science Alert. Retrieved from https://www.sciencealert.com/men-have-a-biological-clock-just-like-women-and-it-affects-more-than-them
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, A.-D., & Jensen, S. Q. (2014). Combining hegemonic masculinity and intersectionality. NORMA: International Journal for Masculinity Studies, 9(1), 60–75. doi: 10.1080/18902138.2014.892289
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. E., Friese, C., & Washburn, R. S. (2018). Situational analysis. Grounded theory after the interpretive turn. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. E., Shim, J. K., Mamo, L., Fosket, J. R., & Fishman, J. (2003). Biomedicalization: Technoscientific transformations of health, illness, and U.S. Biomedicine. American Sociological Review, 68(2), 161–194. doi: 10.2307/1519765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W. (2005). Masculinities (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, C. R. (2006). Exposing men. The science and politics of male reproduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farstad, G. R., & Stefansen, K. (2015). Involved fatherhood in the Nordic context: Dominant narratives, divergent approaches. NORMA: International Journal for Masculinity Studies, 10(1), 55–70. doi: 10.1080/18902138.2015.1013348
   Google Scholar
• Fisch, H. (2005). The male biological clock. The startling news about aging, sexuality, and fertility in men. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fishman, P. (2010). The making of viagra. The biomedicalization of sexual dysfunction. In A. E. Clarke, L. Mamo, J. R. Fosket, J. R. Fishman, & J. K. Shim (Eds.), Biomedicalization. Technoscience, health, and illness in the U.S (pp. 289–306). Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forsberg, L. (2007). Negotiating involved fatherhood: Household work, childcare and spending time with children. NORMA, 2(2), 109–126.
   Google Scholar
• Foss, S. (1984). Women priests in the Episcopal Church: A cluster analysis of establishment rhetoric. Religious Communication Today, 7(1), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Godwin, R. (2019). The Rise of Big Sperm: does the tech world have the answer to our semen crisis? The Guardian July 7 2019 available: https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2019/jul/07/the-rise-of-big-sperm-does-the-tech-world-have-the-answer-to-our-semen-crisis Retrieved August 15, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J., Nordberg, M., Andersson, K., Balkmar, D., Gottzén, L., Klinth, R., … Sandberg, L. (2012). Hegemonic masculinity and beyond. 40 years of research in Sweden. Men and Masculinities, 15(1), 31–55. doi: 10.1177/1097184X11432113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inhorn, M. C. (2012). The new Arab man. Emergent masculinities, technologies and Islam in the Middle East. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Inhorn, M. C., & Wentzell, E. A. (2011). Embodying emergent masculinities: Men engaging with reproductive and sexual health technologies in the Middle East and Mexico. American Ethnologist, 38(4), 801–815. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1425.2011.01338.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S. H. (2009). Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear regulation in the U.S. and South Korea. Minerva, 47(2), 119–146. doi: 10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, T., & Adreasson, J. (2017). Fatherhood in transition: Masculinity, identity and everyday life. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Layne, L. (2009). The home pregnancy test: A feminist technology? WSQ: Women’s Studies Quarterly, 37(1–2), 61–79. doi: 10.1353/wsq.0.0157
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2015). Quantified sex: A critical analysis of sexual and reproductive self-tracking using apps. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17(4), 440–453. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2014.920528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamo, L. (2005). Biomedicalizating kinship: Sperm banks and the creation of affinity-ties. Science as Culture, 14(3), 237–264. doi: 10.1080/09505430500216833
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mamo, L. (2010). Fertility Inc. Consumption and subjectification in U.S. Lesbian reproductive practices. In A. E. Clarke, L. Mamo, J. R. Fosket, J. R. Fishman, & J. K. Shim (Eds.), Biomedicalization. Technoscience, health, and illness in the U.S (pp. 173–196). Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mohr, S. (2018). Being a sperm donor: Masculinity, sexuality, and biosociality in Denmark. New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mohr, S. (2016). Containing Sperm-Managing Legitimacy: Lust, Disgust, and Hybridity at Danish Sperm Banks. Journal of contemporary ethnography, 45(3), 319–342. doi: 10.1177/0891241614558517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, L. J. (2007). Sperm counts. Overcome by man’s most precious fluid. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. (2012). Seizing the means of reproduction. Entanglements of feminism, health, and technoscience. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosas, C. (2019). The Future is Femtech: Privacy and Data Security Issues Surrounding Femtech Applications. Harvard Business Law Journal, 15(2), 319–341.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (2007). The politics of life itself. Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, C. (2015). The race idea in reproductive technologies: Beyond epistemic scientism and technological mastery. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 12, 601–612. doi: 10.1007/s11673-015-9663-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shostak, S. (2010). Marking populations and persons at risk. Molecular epidemiology and environmental health. In A. E. Clarke, L. Mamo, J. R. Fosket, J. R. Fishman, & J. K. Shim (Eds.), Biomedicalization: Technoscience, health, and illness in the U.S (pp. 242–262). Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1997). Grounded theory in practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. (2009). Skin tone and the persistence of biolotical race in egg donation for assisted reproduction. In E. G. Nakano (Ed.), Shades of difference. Why skin color matters (pp. 131–147). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, T. (2009). “It’s a bit unmanly in a way”: Men and infertility in Denmark. In M. C. Inhorn, T. Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, H. Goldberg, & M. la Cour Mosegaard (Eds.), Reconceiving the second sex: Men, masculinity and reproduction (pp. 226–252). Oxford and New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Virtanen, H. E., Jørgensen, N., & Toppari, J. (2017). Semen quality in the 21st century. Nature Reviews Urology, 14(2), 120–130. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlberg, A. (2018). Good quality. The routinization of sperm banking in China. Oakland: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, J., Roberts, C., & Mort, M. (2015). Ovulation monitoring and reproductive heterosex: Living the conceptive imperative. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17(4), 454–469. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2015.1005671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, S., Rubin, M., Geevarughese, S., Pino, J. S., Rodriguez, H. F., & Asghar, W. (2018). Emerging technologies for home-based semen analysis. Andrology, 6(1), 10–19. doi: 10.1111/andr.12441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar