Militarized masculinities in the home: ‘I’m not your army buddy - I’m your wife'

References

• Ackerly, B. A., Stern, M., & True, J. (2006). Feminist methodologies for international relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Atherton, S. (2009). Domesticating military masculinities: Home, performance and the negotiation of identity. Social & Cultural Geography, 10(8), 821–836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjarnegård, E., & Melander, E. (2011). Disentangling gender, peace and democratization: The negative effects of militarized masculinity. Journal of Gender Studies, 20(2), 139–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulmer, S., & Eichler, M. (2017). Unmaking militarized masculinity: Veterans and the project of military-to-civilian transition. Critical Military Studies, 3(2), 161–181.
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn, C. (2001). The gendered dynamics of armed conflict and political violence. In C. Moser & F. Clark's (Eds.), Victims, perpetrators or actors: Gender, Armed conflict and political violence (pp. 13–129). London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Deschamps, M. (2015). External review into sexual misconduct and sexual harassment in the Canadian Armed Forces. https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-defence/corporate/reports-publications/sexual-misbehaviour/external-review-2015.html
   Google Scholar
• Doucet, A. (2018). Do men mother? Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duncanson, C. (2009). Forces for good? Narratives of military masculinity in peacekeeping operations. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 11(1), 63–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichler, M. (2014). Militarized masculinities in international relations. Brown Journal of World Affairs, 21(1), 81–95.
   Google Scholar
• Febbraro, A. R. (2003). Women, leadership and gender integration in the Canadian combat arms: A qualitative study. Defence R&D Canada (December)# TR, 170.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, L. (1995). Canada's shame: Amid the outrage, one question lingers: Where were the officers? Maclean's, 108(5), 14–16.
   Google Scholar
• Gentry, C. E. (2016). Chechen political violence as desperation: What feminist discourse analysis reveals. In A. T. Wibben’s (Ed.), Researching war: Feminist methods, ethics and politics (pp. 19–38). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gorman-Murray, A. (2008). Masculinity and the home: A critical review and conceptual framework. Australian Geographer, 39(3), 367–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, D., & Laliberté, L. (1997). Gender, the military, and military family support. In L. Weinstein & C. C. White's (Eds.), Wives and warriors: Women and the military in the United States and Canada (pp. 35–55). Westport: Bergin & Garvey.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, D., & Laliberté, L. (2002). The first casualty: Violence against women in Canadian military communities. Toronto: James Lorimer & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Hockey, J. (2017). No more heroes: Masculinity in the infantry. In R. Jamieson's (Ed.), The criminology of war (pp. 401–411). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde, A. (2017). The civilian wives of military personnel: Mobile subjects or agents of militarisation? In R. Woodward & C. Duncanson's (Eds.), The Palgrave international handbook of gender and the military (pp. 195–209). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, A. L., & Afifi, T. D. (2010). Military wives’ stressful disclosures to their deployed husbands: The role of protective buffering. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38(4), 412–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk, G. (2008). Contesting militarization: Global perspectives. In B. Sutton, S. Morgen, & J. Novkov’s (Eds.), Security disarmed: Critical perspectives on gender, race, and militarization (pp. 30–55). London: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kovitz, M. (2000). The enemy within: Female soldiers in the Canadian Armed Forces. Canadian Woman Studies, 19(4), 36–41.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, A. (2017). Special men: The gendered militarization of the Canadian Armed Forces. International Journal: Canada’s International Journal of Global Policy Analysis, 72(4), 463–483.
   Google Scholar
• Manser, L. (2018). State of military families in Canada: Issues facing regular force members and their families. Ottawa: Canadian Forces Morale and Welfare Services.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, A. J., & Mills, J. H. (2006). Masculinity and the making of trans-Canada Air Lines, 1937–1940: A feminist poststructuralist account. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de L'Administration, 23(1), 34–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moelker, R., & van der Kloet, I. (2006). Military families and the armed forces. In G. Caforio's (Ed.), Handbook of the sociology of the military (pp. 201–223). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Monaghan, L. F. (2002). Embodying gender, work and organization: Solidarity, cool loyalties and contested hierarchy in a masculinist occupation. Gender, Work & Organization, 9(5), 504–536.
   Google Scholar
• Ramazanoglu, C., & Holland, J. (2002). Feminist methodology: Challenges and choices. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Richter-Montpetit, M. (2016). Militarized masculinities, women torturers, and the limits of gender analysis at Abu ghraib. In A. T. R. Wibben's (Ed.), Researching war: Feminist methods, ethics and politics (pp. 92–116). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sion, L. (2007). Reinterpreting combat masculinity. Sociologie, 3(1), 95–110.
   Google Scholar
• Skomorovsky, A., Norris, D., Martynova, E., McLaughlin, K. J., & Wan, C. (2019). Work -family conflict and parental strain among Canadian Armed Forces single mothers: The role of coping. Journal of Military, Veteran and Family Health, 5(1), 93–104.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, B. R., & Heiselberg, M. H. (2019). The invisible uniform. In B. R. Sørensen & E. Ben-Ari’s (Eds.), Civil–military entanglements: Anthropological perspectives (pp. 21–41). New York: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Sprague, J. (2016). Feminist methodologies for critical researchers: Bridging differences. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A. (2008). Decentering voice in qualitative inquiry. In A. Y. Jackson & L. Mazzei's (Eds.), Voice in qualitative inquiry: Challenging conventional, interpretive, and critical conceptions (pp. 319–336). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taber, N. (2018). After Deschamps: Men, masculinities, and the Canadian armed forces. Journal of Military, Veteran and Family Health, 4(1), 100–107.
   Google Scholar
• Taber, N. (2020). The Canadian armed forces: Battling between operation honour and operation hop on her. Critical Military Studies, 6(1), 19–40.
   Google Scholar
• Tait, V. (2020). Regendering the Canadian Armed Forces. Atlantis, 41(2), 9–25.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7202/1076197
   Google Scholar
• van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Varga-Dobai, K. (2012). The relationship of researcher and participant in qualitative inquiry: From “self and other” binaries to the poststructural feminist perspective of subjectivity. Qualitative Report, 17(93), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Voris, S. E., & Steinkopf, J. (2019). Suffering in the shadows: Interviews with wives of combat veterans suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder and/or traumatic brain injury. Marriage & Family Review, 55(6), 493–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weedon. (1987). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Incorporated.
   Google Scholar
• Whitworth, S. (2008). Rethinking the man question: Sex, gender and violence in international relations (pp. 109–126). Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Willig, C. (2003). Discourse analysis. In J. Smith's (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 159–183). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, R. (2000). Warrior heroes and little green men: Soldiers, military training, and the construction of rural masculinities. Rural Sociology, 65(4), 640–657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar