Finnish Exceptionalism at Play? The Effectiveness of the Recommendations of UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies in Finland

References

• “Anti-torture committee criticises Finnish prison conditions again.” 2009. Helsingin Sanomat, 21 January: Available online at http://www.hs.fi/english/article/Anti-torture+committee+criticises+Finnish+prison+conditions+again/1135242915526 (accessed 10 March 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Bayefsky, A. F. 1996. Report on the UN Human Rights Treaties: Facing the Implementation Crisis. York: International Law Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bayefsky, A. F. 2000. The UN Human Rights System in the 21st Century. The Hague: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. A., and T. Risse. 2012. “From Europeanisation to Diffusion: Introduction.” West European Politics 35: 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrnes, A. 2000. “Uses and Abuses of the Treaty Reporting Procedure: Hong Kong Between Two Systems.” In The Future of UN Human Rights Treaty Monitoring, edited by P. Alston and J. Crawford. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 287–315.
   Google Scholar
• Central Union for Child Welfare. 2008. Finland and its Children. Challenges and Responses. Jyväskyla: Kirjapaino Oma.
   Google Scholar
• Cherif Bassiouni. M., and W. A. Schabas (eds). 2012. New Challenges for the UN Human Rights Machinery. Antwerp: Intersentia.
   Google Scholar
• Clapham, A. 2000. “UN Human Rights Reporting Procedures: An NGO Perspective.” In The Future of UN Human Rights Treaty Monitoring, edited by P. Alston and J. Crawford, 175–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connors, J. 2000. “An Analysis and Evaluation of the System of State Reporting.” In The UN Human Rights System in the 21st Century, edited by Anne F. Bayefsky, 4–21. The Hague: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Dai, X. 2005. “Why Comply? The Domestic Constituency Mechanism.” International Organization 59: 363–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Editorial Note”. 2012. Nordic Journal of Human Rights 30: 120.
   Google Scholar
• Falkner, G., M. Hartlapp, S. Leiber, and O. Treib. 2007. “In Search of the Worlds of Compliance: Promises and Pitfalls of Quantitative Testing.” Available online at http://www.ihs.ac.at/publications/pol/pw_113.pdf (accessed 12 June 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Foreign Affairs Ministry. 2004. Government Report to Parliament on the Human Rights Policy of Finland 2004. Available online at http://formin.finland.fi/public/default.aspx?nodeid=42553&contentlan=2&culture=en-US (accessed 12 June 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Foreign Affairs Ministry. 2009. Government Report to Parliament on the Human Rights Policy of Finland 2009. Available online at http://formin.finland.fi/public/default.aspx?nodeid=42553&contentlan=2&culture=en-US (accessed 12 June 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Foreign Affairs Ministry. 2012. “Submission to the UN Treaty Body Strengthening Process by Finland.” 3 February. Available online at www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/HRTD/docs/FinlandSubmission03022012.pdf (accessed 12 June 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Gaer, F. D. 2012. “Implementing Treaty Body Recommendations: Establishing Better Follow-up Procedures.” In New Challenges for the UN Human Rights Machinery, edited by M. Cherif Bassiouni and William A. Schabas, 107–121. Antwerp: Intersentia.
   Google Scholar
• Halme-Tuomisaari, M. 2008. Human Rights in Action. Helsinki: Helsinki University Printing House.
   Google Scholar
• Hathaway, O. A. 2002. “Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference?” Yale Law Journal 111: 1935–2042. doi:10.2307/797642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyns, C., and F. Viljoen. 2001. “The Impact of the United Nations Human Rights Treaties on the Domestic Level.” Human Rights Quarterly 23: 483–535. doi:10.1353/hrq.2001.0036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyns, C., and F. Viljoen. 2002. The Impact of the United Nations Human Rights Treaties on the Domestic Level. The Hague: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Holli, A. M., E. Luhtakallio, and E. Raevaara. 2006. “Quota Trouble. Talking about Gender Quotas in Finnish Local Politics.” International Feminist Journal of Politics, 8: 169–193.
   Google Scholar
• Husa, J. 2010. “Nordic Constitutionalism and European Human Rights. Mixing Oil and Water?” Scandinavian Studies in Law 55: 101–124.
   Google Scholar
• Husa, J. 2011. The Constitution of Finland. A Contextual Analysis. Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Husa, J., K. Nuotio, and H. Pihlajamäki (eds). 2007. Nordic Law – Between Tradition and Dynamism. Antwerp: Intersentia.
   Google Scholar
• International Law Association. 2004. Final Report on the Impact of Findings of the United Nations Human Rights Treaty Bodies. Available online at http://www.ila-hq.org/download.cfm/docid/3B0BF58A-C096-4113-830E8E1B5BC6DEC5 (accessed 10 March 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Justice Ministry. (2006). Available online at http://oikeusministerio.fi/fi/index/julkaisut/julkaisuarkisto/1149508943707/Files/7b3b69oecmj2dy2.pdf (accessed 12 June 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Justice Ministry. 2012. National Action Plan on Fundamental and Human Rights 2012–2013, 20. Available online at http://oikeusministerio.fi/material/attachments/om/julkaisut/6Fioq2aMR/OMSO_20_2012_88p.pdf (accessed 10 March 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Keck, M. E., and K. Sikkink. 1999. “Transnational Advocacy Networks in International and Regional Politics.” International Social Science Journal 51: 89–101. doi:10.1111/1468-2451.00179.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, H., and G. Ulfstein. 2012. UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies. Law and Legitimacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koulu, S. and I. Hetemäki. 2010. “20 Years of CRC in Finland.” Unpublished paper.
   Google Scholar
• Krommendijk, J. 2012a. “Can Mr. Zaoui Freely Cross the Foreshore and Seabed? The Effectiveness of UN Human Rights Monitoring Mechanisms in New Zealand.” Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 43: 579–616.
   Google Scholar
• Krommendijk, 2012b. “The (Non) Implementation of Recommendations of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination in the Netherlands Explained.” Perspectives on European Politics and Society 13: 462–479.
   Google Scholar
• Krommendijk, J. 2014. The Domestic Impact and Effectiveness of the Process of State Reporting under UN Human Rights Treaties in the Netherlands, New Zealand and Finland. Paper-Pushing or Policy Prompting? Antwerp: Intersentia.
   Google Scholar
• Kurki-Suonio, K. 2010. “The Parliamentary Ombudsman as an Overseer of the Rights of the Child.” In Parliamentary Ombudsman 90 Years, 326–340. Sastamala: Vammalan Kirjapaino Oy.
   Google Scholar
• Lavapuro, J., T. Ojanen, and M. Scheinin. 2011. “Rights-Based Constitutionalism in Finland and the Development of Pluralist Constitutional Review.” I-CON 9: 505–531.
   Google Scholar
• Leckie, S. 2000. “The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Catalyst for Change in a System Needing Reform.” In The Future of UN Human Rights Treaty Monitoring, edited by P. Alston and J. Crawford, 129–144. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lempinen, M. 2008. “The Activity, Progressiveness and Consistency of the Human Rights Policy of Finland.” Unpublished paper. Available online at www.abo.fi/institution/en/onlinepublications (accessed 12 June 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Mavrommatis, A. 2001. “The First Ten Years of the Human Rights Committee.” In International Human Rights Monitoring Mechanisms. Essays in Honour of Jakob Th. Möller, edited by G. Alfredsson, J. Grimheden, and B. G. Ramcharan, 147–152. The Hague: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Mikkola, M. (2010. Social Human Rights of Europe. Porvoo: Bookwell Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Morijn, J. 2011. “Reforming United Nations Human Rights Treaty Monitoring Reform.” Netherlands International Law Review 58: 295–334. doi:10.1017/S0165070X11300010.
   Google Scholar
• Niemi, H. 2003. National Implementation of Findings by United Nations Human Rights Treaty Bodies. A Comparative Study. Available online at web.abo.fi/instut/imr/norfa/Heli.pdf (accessed 12 June 2013).
   Google Scholar
• “The Nordic Human Rights Paradox”. 2013. Available online at http://www.jus.uio.no/smr/english/research/projects/nordic-paradox (accessed 24 June 2013).
   Google Scholar
• O'Flaherty, M., and P. L. Tsai. 2012. “Periodic Reporting: The Backbone of the UN Treaty Body Review Procedures.” In New Challenges for the UN Human Rights Machinery, edited by M. Cherif Bassiouni and William A. Schabas, 37–56. Antwerp: Intersentia.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Ombudsman for Children. 2011. “Report to the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child.” Available online at http://www.crin.org/docs/Finland_OCF_CRC_Report.pdf (accessed 12 June 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Ojanen, T. 2009. “From Constitutional Periphery Toward the Center – Transformations of Judicial Review in Finland.” Nordic Journal of Human Rights 27: 194–207.
   Google Scholar
• Ojanen, T. 2012. “The Europeanization of Finnish Law. Observations on the Transformations of the Finnish Scene of Constitutionalism.” In Introduction to Finnish Law and Legal Culture, edited by K. Nuotio, S. Melander and M. Huomo-Kettunen, 97–110. Helsinki: Forum Iuris.
   Google Scholar
• Pillay, N. 2012. Strengthening the United Nations Human Rights Treaty Body System. June. Available online at http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/HRTD/docs/HCReportTBStrengthening.pdf (accessed 12 June 2013).
   Google Scholar
• “Preparation of a National Human Rights Action Plan”. 2011. September. Available online at 213214137012.edelkey.net/text/en/Etusivu/Valmisteilla/Kehittamishankkeita/1302674002425 (accessed 31 July 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Raustiala, K. 2000. “Compliance and Effectiveness in International Regulatory Cooperation.” Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 32: 387–440.
   Google Scholar
• “Reporting Status”. 2013. Available online at http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Countries/ENACARegion/Pages/FIIndex.aspx (accessed 11 December 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Risse, T., and K. Sikkink. 1999. “The Socialization of International Human Rights Norms into Domestic Practices: Introduction.” In The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change, edited by T. Risse, S. C. Ropp, and K. Sikkink, 1–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosas, A. 1988. “The Nordic Countries and the International Protection of Human Rights.” Nordic Journal of International Law 57: 424–441. doi:10.1163/157181088X00443.
   Google Scholar
• Rosas, A. 2001. “Finland.” In Fundamental Rights in Europe. The European Convention on Human Rights and its Member States, 1950–2000, edited by R. Blackburn and J. Polakiewicz, 289–312. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scheinin, M. 2003. “Protection of the Right to Housing in Finland.” In National Perspectives on Housing Rights, edited by S. Leckie, 241–252. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Scheinin, M. 2000. “Domestic implementation of international human rights treaties: Nordic and Baltic experience.” In The Future of UN Human Rights Treaty Monitoring, edited by P. Alston and J. Crawford, 229–242. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Semb, A. J. 2012. “Why (not) Commit? Norway, Sweden and Finland and the ILO Convention 169.” Nordic Journal of Human Rights 30: 140–145.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, B. 2009. Mobilizing for Human Rights. International Law in Domestic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sverdrup, U. 2004. “Compliance and Conflict Management in the European Union: Nordic Exceptionalism.” Scandinavian Political Studies 27: 23–24. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2004.00098.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallroth, P. 2012. Who Safeguards Our Rights? The Finnish Institutions and the Discussion about a Constitutional Court. Helsinki: Unigrafia.
   Google Scholar
• Theytaz-Bergman, L. 2009. What Happened? A Study on the Impact of the Convention on the Rights of the Child in Five Countries: Estonia, Nepal, Peru, Uganda and Yemen. Stockholm: Save the Children Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Toivanen, R. 2007. “Education on Human Rights – a Method for Inducing Global Critical Thinking.” In Education for Global Responsibility – Finnish Perspectives, edited by Taina Kaivola and Monica Melén-Paaso, 34–44. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 1989. UN Doc. A/44/668.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 1991. UN Doc. CAT A/46/46.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 1992. UN Doc CESCR E/1992/23.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 1993. UN Doc. CEDAW/C/FIN/2.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 1996a. UN Doc. A/51/18.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 1996b. UN Doc. CRC A/51/41. (1996).
   Google Scholar
• UN. 1996c. UN Doc. CRC/C/SR.284.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 1996d. UN Doc. CAT A/51/44.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 1998a. UN Doc. CCPR/C/SR.1660.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 1998b. UN Doc. CRC/C/70/Add.3.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 1998c. UN Doc. CAT/C/44/Add.6.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 1999a. UN Doc. CERD A/54/18.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 1999b. UN Doc. CAT/C/SR/402.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 2000a. UN Doc. CRC/C/SR.643.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 2000b. UN Doc. CAT A/55/40.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 2000c. UN Doc. CERD A/55/18.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 2000d. UN Doc. CERD/C/SR.1404.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 2001. UN Doc. CERD/C/409/Add.2.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 2003a. UN Doc. CERD/C/SR.1600.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 2003b. UN Doc. CRC/C/129/Add.5.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 2005a. UN Doc. CAT/C/CR/34/FIN.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 2005b. UN Doc. CAT/C/SR.650.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 2006. UN Doc. HRI/MC/2006/2.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 2007. UN Doc. CERD/C/FIN/19.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 2008a. UN Doc. A/HRC/WG.6/1/FIN/1.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 2008b. UN Doc. CRC/C/FIN/4.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 2008c. UN Doc. CAT/C/CR/34/FIN.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 2009. UN Doc. CERD/C/FIN/CO/19.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 2010. UN Doc. CAT/C/FIN/5-6.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 2011. UN Doc. CCPR/C/FIN/6.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 2012. UN Doc. CERD/C/FIN/CO/20–22.
   Google Scholar
• “UN Human Rights Committee Criticises Finland over Sámi Issue.” 2004. Helsingin Sanomat International Edition 8 November. Available online at http://www.hs.fi/english/article/1076154467010 (accessed 10 March 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Uvin, P. 2004. Human Rights and Development. Bloomfield: Kumarian Press.
   Google Scholar
• Väärälä, R., and T. Kahiluoto. 2011. “Comments on the CRC Conclusions.” 20 June, 471694 v. 1. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health.
   Google Scholar
• Wind, M. 2010. “The Nordics, the EU and the Reluctance towards Supranational Judicial Review.” Journal of Common Market Studies 48: 1039–1063. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02085.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwingel, S. 2005. “How do International Women's Rights Norms become Effective in Domestic Contexts? An Analysis of the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW).” Available online at www2.potsdam.edu/zwinges/cv-englisch.pdf (accessed 12 June 2013).
   Google Scholar