Beyond the written words of informed consent: What participants would like to know about research

References

• Adler, P., & Adler, P. (2002). Do university lawyers and the police define research values? In W. C.Van Den Hoonard (Ed.), Walking the tightrope: Ethical issues for qualitative researchers (pp. 34–42). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alby, F., & Di Pede, S. (in press). Repertori discorsivi e pratiche domestiche e genitoriali degli uomini nelle famiglie a doppia carriera [Discursive repertoires and domestic practices of men in dual career families]. Rassegna di psicologia.
   Google Scholar
• Alby, F., & Fatigante, M. (2013). Preserving the respondent's standpoint in a research interview: Different strategies of ‘Doing’ the interviewer. Human Studies. https://doi.org/doi:10.1007/s10746-013-9292.
   Google Scholar
• APA (American Psychological Association). (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. (http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/in dex.aspx).
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M. (1994). Repopulating the depopulated pages of social psychology. Theory and Psychology, 4(3), 307–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, D. J., Napier, A., & Cuschieri, A. (1988). How informed is signed consent?British Medical Journal, 296(6625), 839–840.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Caffi, C. (2001). La mitigazione. Un approccio pragmatico alla comunicazione nei contesti terapeutici. [Mitigation. A pragmatic approach to communication in therapeutic contexts]Münster: LIT Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2005). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duranti, A. (1997). Linguistic anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, C. (2007). Telling secrets, revealing lives: Relational ethics in research with intimate others. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(1), 3–29. 10.1177/1077800406294947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etherington, K. (2007). Ethical research in reflexive relationships. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(5), 599–616. 10.1177/1077800407301175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faden, R., & Beauchamp, T. (1986). A history and theory of informed consent. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flory, J., & Emanuel, E. (2004). Interventions to improve research participants’ understanding in informed consent for research: A systematic review. JAMA, 292, 1593–1601. 10.1186/1472-6939-14–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giorgi, S., & Pontecorvo, C. (2009). Culture familiari tra pratiche quotidiane e rappresentazioni. [Family cultures between practices and representations of the everyday life]. Etnografia e Ricerca Qualitativa, Introduction to the Special Issue2, 191–203.
   Google Scholar
• Glenn, P. (2003). Laughter in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2003). Pointing as situated practice. In S.Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture and cognition meet (pp. 217–241). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, D., Pope, C., Mort, M., & Smith, A. (2003). Ethics and ethnography: An experiential account. Qualitative Health Research, 13(4), 567–577. 10.1177/1049732302250723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280. 10.1177/1077800403262360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansson, M. G. (2005). Building on relationships of trust in biobank research. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31, 415–418. 10.1136/jme.2004.009456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, J., MacGibbon, L., & Morton, M. (2001). Regimes of trustworthiness in qualitative research: The rigors of reciprocity. Qualitative Inquiry, 7, 323–345. https://doi.org/doi:10.1177/107780040100700305.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, K. W. (1989). Exposing masculine science: An alternative approach to women's communication. In K. C.Carter & C.Spitzack (Eds.), Doing research in women's communication (pp. 40–64). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse- Biber, S. N., & Leavy, P. (2010). The ethics of social research. The practice of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 59–89). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hewitt, J. (2007). Ethical components of researcher − researched relationships in qualitative interviewing. Qualitative Health Research, 17, 1149–1160. 10.1177/1049732307308305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoeyer, K. (2003). “Science is really needed—that's all I know’’. Informed consent and the non-verbal practices of collecting blood for genetic research in northern Sweden. New Genetics and Society, 22, 229–244. 10.1080/1463677032000147199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homan, R. (1991). The ethics of social research. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Homan, R. (1992). The ethics of open methods. The British Journal of Sociology, 43(3), 321–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israel, B. A., Eng, E., Schultz, A. J. & Parker, E. A. (Eds.). (2005). Methods in community-based participatory research for health. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kent, G. (1996). Shared understandings for informed consent: The relevance of psychological research on the provision of information. Social Science and Medicine, 43(10), 1517–1523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynoe, N., & Hoeyer, K. (2005). Quantitative aspects of informed consent: Considering the dose response curve when estimating quantity of information. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31, 736–738. 10.1136/jme.2005.012013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynoe, N., Sandlund, M., & Dahlqvist, G. (1991). Informed consent: Study of quality of information given to participants in a clinical trial. British Medical Journal, 303, 610–613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauss, M. (1954). The gift: Forms and functions of exchange in archaic societies. London: Cohen and West.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard, D., Freese, J., & Schaeffer, N. C. (2010). Calling for participation: Requests, blocking moves, and rational (inter)action in survey introductions. American Sociological Review, 75(5), 791–814. 10.1177/0003122410379582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard, D., & Hudak, P. L. (2008). Small talk, high stakes: Interactional disattentiveness in the context of prosocial doctor–patient interaction. Language in Society, 37, 661–688. 10.1017/S0047404508080986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard, D. W., & Schaeffer, N. C. (1997). Keeping the gate: Declinations of the request to participate in a telephone survey interview. Sociological Methods and Research, 26, 34–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mecacci, L. (1999). Psicologia moderna e postmoderna. [Modern and post-modern Psychology]Roma-Bari: Laterza.
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2006). La demande d'autorisation comme moment structurant pour l'enregistrement et l'analyse des pratiques bilingues. [The request for authorization as structuring time for recording and analysing bilingual practices]. Tranel, 43, 129–155.
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (in press). Ethics in action: Anonymization as a participant's concern and a participant's practice. Human Studies. 10.1007/s10746-013-9286-9.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, E., & Dingwall, R. (2007). Informed consent, anticipatory regulation and ethnographic practice. Social Science e Medicine, 65(11), 2223–2234. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.08.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochs, E. & Kremer-Sadlik, T. (Eds.). (2013). Fast forward family: Home, work and relationships in middle class America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Padiglione, V., Fatigante, M., & Giorgi, S. (2007). Sulla soglia: istanze riflessive. Costruire la relazione in una etnografia sulle famiglie. [At the thresholds: reflexive demands. Bulding rapport in an ethnography on families]. Rivista di Psicolinguistica Applicata, 7(3), 53–79.
   Google Scholar
• Paoletti, I. (in press). Ethical issues in collecting interactional data. Special issue of Human Studies. https://doi.org/doi:10.1007/s10746-013-9299-4.
   Google Scholar
• Pontecorvo, C. (Ed.). (2006). La vita quotidiana di famiglie italiane di classe media. [The everyday life of Italian middle-class families]. Età Evolutiva, Introduction to the Special Issue, 85, 191–203.
   Google Scholar
• Pope, C. (2005). Conducting ethnography in medical settings. Medical Education, 39, 1180–1187. 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02330.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, J., & Hepburn, A. (2010). Putting aspiration into words: ‘Laugh particles’, managing descriptive trouble and modulating action. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(6), 1543–1555. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psathas, G. (1995). Conversation analysis: The study of talk-in-interaction. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rabinow, P. (1977). Reflections on fieldwork in Morocco. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragan, S. L. (1990). Verbal play and multiple goals in the gynaecological exam interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 9, 67–84.
   Google Scholar
• Ramcharan, P., & Cutcliffe, J. R. (2001). Judging the ethics of qualitative research: Considering the “ethics as process model.”Health and Social Care in the Community, 9(6), 358–366. 10.1046/j.1365-2524.2001.00323.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivera, R., Reed, J. S., & Menius, D. (1992). Evaluating the readability of informed consent forms used in contraceptive clinical trials. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 38(3), 227–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A symplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Speer, S. A., & Stokoe, E. (2014). Ethics in action: Consent–gaining interactions and implications for research practice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53, 54–73. 10.1111/bjso.12009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truman, C. (2003). Ethics and the ruling relations of research production. Sociological Research Online, 8, 1, http://www.socresonline.org.uk/8/1/truman.html. https://doi.org/doi:10.1177/0038038508094567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1979). Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html.
   Google Scholar
• Weindling, P. (2004). Nazi medicine and the nuremberg trials: From medical war crimes to informed consent. Palgrave: London.
   Google Scholar
• Wiles, R., Charles, V., Crow, G., & Heath, S. (2006). Researching researchers: lessons for research ethics. Qualitative Research, 6(3), 283–299. 10.1177/1468794106065004.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S. (1998). Focus groups in feminist research: Power, interaction, and the co-construction of meaning. Women's Studies International Forum, 21(1), 111–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, T. M. (2001). Research, informed consent, and the limits of disclosure. Bioethics, 5(4), 341–363. 10.1111/1467-8519.00243.
   Google Scholar
• Zucchermaglio, C., Alby, F., Fatigante, M., & Saglietti, M. (2013). Fare ricerca situata in Psicologia Sociale [Doing situated research in Social Psychology]. Bologna: Il Mulino.
   Google Scholar