The usability and effectiveness of the Finnish investigative instrument of child sexual abuse in mock evaluations

References

• Antfolk, J., Rönnholm, M., Salo, B., Rantamäki, S., & Santtila, P. (in press). Children’s suggestibility in interviews – a meta-analysis of the effects of child’s age, post-event delay, event-type, and question-type.
   Google Scholar
• Bolen, R. M., & Scannapieco, M. (1999). Prevalence of child sexual abuse: A corrective metanalysis. Social Service Review, 73(3), 281–313. doi:10.1086/514425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (1989). Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science, 243(4899), 1668–1674. doi: 10.1126/science.2648573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Zutter, A., Horselenberg, R., & van Koppen, P. J. (2017). Detecting the true nature of allegations of rape. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 32(2), 114–127. doi: 10.1007/s11896-016-9203-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duodecim (the Finnish Medical Society) (2013a). Current care guidelines: Investigating suspicions of child sexual abuse. Retrieved from http://www.kaypahoito.fi/web/kh/suositukset/suositus;jsessionid=7E3A7E56839CC04A143BED0DA7F6BD97?id=hoi34040
   Google Scholar
• Duodecim (the Finnish Medical Society) (2013b). Current care guidelines: Investigating suspicions of child sexual abuse.
   Google Scholar
• Ellonen, N., Fagerlund, M., Kääriäinen, J., Peltola, M., & Sariola, H. (2013). Child victim survey 2013 [dataset]. Version 1.0 (2015-03-16). Retrieved from http://urn.fi/urn:Nbn:Fi:Fsd:T-FSD2943
   Google Scholar
• Finnish Supreme Court (2014). A decision concerning a child sexual abuse allegation.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, G. S., Batterman-Faunce, J. M., Schaaf, J. M., & Kenney, R. (2002). Nearly 4 years after an event: Children’s eyewitness memory and adults’ perceptions of children’s accuracy. Child Abuse & Neglect, 26(8), 849–884. doi: 10.1016/S0145-2134(02)00354-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, S. (2010). The role of corroborative evidence in child sexual abuse evaluations. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 7(3), 189–212. doi: 10.1002/jip.122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hershkowitz, I., Fisher, S., Lamb, M. E., & Horowitz, D. (2007). Improving credibility assessment in child sexual abuse allegations: The role of the NICHD investigative interview protocol. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31(2), 99–110. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2006.09.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, H., & Nuttall, R. (1993). Clinician responses to sexual abuse allegations. Child Abuse & Neglect, 17(1), 127–143. doi: 10.1016/0145-2134(93)90013-U
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janus, E. S., & Prentky, R. A. (2003). Forensic use of actuarial risk assessment with sex offenders: Accuracy, admissibility and accountability. American Criminal Law Review, Vol. 40, 1443–1499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korkman, J., Antfolk, J., Fagerlund, M., & Santtila, P. (2019). The prevalence of unfounded suspicions of child sexual abuse in Finland. Nordic Psychology, 71(1), 39–50. doi: 10.1080/19012276.2018.1470554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korkman, J., Pakkanen, T., Laajasalo, T. (2017). Child forensic interviewing in Finland: Investigating suspected child abuse at the forensic psychology unit for children and adolescents. In Collaborating against child abuse: Exploring the Nordic Barnahus Model (pp. 145–164). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Korkman, J., Santtila, P., & Sandnabba, N. K. (2006). Dynamics of verbal interaction between interviewer and child in interviews with alleged victims of child sexual abuse. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 47(2), 109–119. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2006.00498.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korkman, J., Santtila, P., Westeråker, M., & Sandnabba, N. K. (2008). Interviewing techniques and follow-up questions in child sexual abuse interviews. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5(1), 108–128. doi: 10.1080/17405620701210460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Rooy, D., Brubacher, S. P., Aromäki-Stratos, A., Cyr, M., Hershkowitz, I., Korkman, J., … Lamb, M. E. (2015). The NICHD protocol: A review of an internationally-used evidence-based tool for training child forensic interviewers. Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice, 1(2), 76–89. doi: 10.1108/JCRPP-01-2015-0001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahtinen, H.-M., Laitila, A., Korkman, J., & Ellonen, N. (2018). Children’s disclosures of sexual abuse in a population-based sample. Child Abuse & Neglect, 76, 84–94. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.10.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melkman, E. P., Hershkowitz, I., & Zur, R. (2017). Credibility assessment in child sexual abuse investigations: A descriptive analysis. Child Abuse & Neglect, 67, 76–85. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.01.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otgaar, H., de Ruiter, C., Howe, M. L., Hoetmer, L., & van Reekum, P. (2017). A case concerning children’s false memories of abuse: Recommendations regarding expert witness work. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 24(3), 365–378. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2016.1230924
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pipe, M. E., Sutherland, R., Webster, N., Jones, C., & La Rooy, D. (2004). Do early interviews affect children’s long-term event recall? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18(7), 823–839. doi: 10.1002/acp.1053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quas, J. A., Malloy, L. C., Melinder, A., Goodman, G. S., D'Mello, M., & Schaaf, J. (2007). Developmental differences in the effects of repeated interviews and interviewer bias on young children’s event memory and false reports. Developmental Psychology, 43(4), 823–837. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.4.823
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadei, A., Finnilä, K., Reite, A., Antfolk, J., & Santtila, P. (2016). Judges’ capacity to evaluate psychological and psychiatric expert testimony. Nordic Psychology, 68(3), 204. doi: 10.1080/19012276.2015.1125303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadei, A., Finnilä, K., Korkman, J., Salo, B., & Santtila, P. (2014). Features used by judges to evaluate expert witnesses for psychological and psychiatric legal issues. Nordic Psychology, 66(4), 239–253. doi: 10.1080/19012276.2014.963648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadei, A., Pensar, J., Corander, J., Finnilä, K., Santtila, P., & Antfolk, J. (2017). A Bayesian decision-support tool for child sexual abuse assessment and investigation. Sexual Abuse, 31(4), 374–396. doi: 10.1177/1079063217732791
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajac, R., Garry, M., London, K., Goodyear-Smith, F., & Hayne, H. (2013). Misconceptions about childhood sexual abuse and child witnesses: Implications for psychological experts in the courtroom. Memory, 21(5), 608–617. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2013.778287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar