Network or hierarchy? Personality profiles of future military leaders

References

• Anusic, I., Schimmack, U., Pinkus, R. T., & Lockwood, P. (2009). The nature and structure of correlations among Big Five ratings: The halo-alpha-beta model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1142–1156. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Army Command. (2014). Functional Description, Sergeant Major of the Army. 2014-05-01.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, B. N., & Lelkes, Y. (2018). Selling ourselves short? How abbreviated measures of personality change the way we think about personality and politics. The Journal of Politics, 80(4), 1311–1325. https://doi.org/10.1086/698928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartone, P. T., Eid, J., Johnsen, B. H., Laberg, J. C., & Snook, S. A. (2009). Big five personality factors, hardiness, and social judgment as predictors of leader performance. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 30(6), 498–521. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730910981908
   Google Scholar
• Benmelech, E., & Frydman, C. (2015). Military CEOs. Journal of Financial Economics, 117(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bono, J. E., & Judge, T. A. (2004). Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 901–910. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.901
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brænder, M., & Holsting, V. S. (2020). The power of experience? Innovative and authoritative leadership values among Danish army cadets. Armed Forces & Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X20951435
   Google Scholar
• Bundeswehr. (2018). “#Fürung”. Facebook, October 19, 2018. (https://www.facebook.com/bundeswehr.karriere/photos/a.219080981464702/1996222787083837/?type=1&theater. Downloaded June 1, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Carretta, T. R., King, R. E., Ree, M. J., Teachout, M. S., & Barto, E. (2016). Compilation of cognitive and personality norms for military aviators. Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance, 87(9), 764–771. https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.4545.2016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chappelle, W. L., Novy, M. P. L., Sowin, C. T. W., & Thompson, W. T. (2010). NEO PI-R normative personality data that distinguish US Air Force female pilots. Military Psychology, 22(2), 158–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/08995600903417308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, A. J., Smillie, L. D., & Corr, P. J. (2010). A confirmatory factor analysis of the Mini-IPIP five-factor model personality scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(5), 688–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO–PI–R professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Damian, R. I., Spengler, M., Sutu, A., & Roberts, B. W. (2019). Sixteen going on sixty-six: A longitudinal study of personality stability and change across 50 years. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(3), 674–‒695. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Neve, J. E. (2015). Personality, childhood experience, and political ideology. Political Psychology, 36(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deary, I. J. (2012). Intelligence. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 453–482. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Defence Command. (2008). Leadership codex of the armed forces. The Defense Command.
   Google Scholar
• DeYoung, C. G., Hirsh, J. B., Shane, M. S., Papademetris, X., Rajeevan, N., & Gray, J. R. (2010). Testing predictions from personality neuroscience. Brain structure and the big five. Psychological Science, 21(6), 820–828. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610370159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnellan, M. B., Oswald, F. L., Baird, B. M., & Lucas, R. E. (2006). The mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment, 18(2), 192–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellemers, N., De Gilder, D., & Haslam, S. A. (2004). Motivating individuals and groups at work: A social identity perspective on leadership and group performance. Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 459–478. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2004.13670967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, J., Gao, D., Carroll, S. A., Lopez, F. J., Tian, T. S., & Meng, H. (2012). Testing the efficacy of a new procedure for reducing faking on personality tests within selection contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(4), 866–880. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gøtzsche-Astrup, O. (2018). The bright and dark sides of talent at work: A study of the personalities of talent-development-program participants. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 70(2), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/cpb0000105
   Google Scholar
• Gøtzsche-Astrup, O. (2020). Pathways to violence: Do uncertainty and dark world perceptions increase intentions to engage in political violence? Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 13(2), 142–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2020.1714693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holenweger, M. (2017). Introduction. In M. Holenweger, M. K. Jager, & F. Kernic (Eds.), Leadership in extreme situations (pp. 3–20). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holsting, V. S., & Damkjer, A. (2020). Militaert chefvirke. At skabe handlekraft i komplekse situationer. Samfundslitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Holsting, V. S. (2017). Militaert chefvirke: Kritik og retfaerdiggørelse mellem politik og profession [Military commandship: Critique and justification between politics and profession] [PhD dissertation]. (PhD Series, No. 32-2017). Copenhagen Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. P. (1985). The soldier and the state. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1957)
   Google Scholar
• Hystad, S. W., Eid, J., Laberg, J. C., & Bartone, P. T. (2011). Psychological hardiness predicts admission into Norwegian military officer schools. Military Psychology, 23(4), 381–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janowitz, M. (1959). Changing patterns of organizational authority: The military establishment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 3(4), 473–493. https://doi.org/10.2307/2390811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, M. M., Braender, M., & Moelker, R. (2019). What sets the officer apart? Dutch and Danish educational reforms leading to the habitus of the thinking soldier. In W. Klinkert, M. Bollen, M. Jansen, H. de Jong, E-H. Kramer, & L. Vos (Eds.), Educating officers: the thinking soldier - the NLDA and the Bologna Declaration. NL ARMS Netherlands Annual Review of Military Studies (pp. 337–353). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. L., & Hill, W. R. (2009). Personality traits and military leadership. Individual Differences Research, 7(1), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 765–780. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karriere–Forsvaret. (2019). Optagelsesprøve – Officer, (Admissions test – officer). Webpage, downloaded 2019-05-15. https://karriere.forsvaret.dk/uddannelse/optagelsesprove–-officer/
   Google Scholar
• King, A. C. (2017). Mission command 2.0: From an individualist to a collectivist model. Parameters, 47(1), 7–19.
   Google Scholar
• Lall, R., Holmes, E. K., Brinkmyer, K. R., Johnson, W. B., & Yatko, B. R. (1999). Personality characteristics of future military leaders. Military Medicine, 164(12), 906–910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormack, L., & Mellor, D. (2002). The role of personality in leadership: An application of the five-factor model in the Australian military. Military Psychology, 14(3), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327876MP1403_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. (1980). Structure in 5's: A synthesis of the research on organization design. Management Science, 26(3), 322–341. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.26.3.322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, M. S., Baer, M. D., Ambrose, M. L., Folger, R., & Palmer, N. F. (2018). Cheating under pressure: A self-protection model of workplace cheating behavior. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(1), 54–73. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohdin, A. (2019, January 3). UK army recruitment ads target “snowflake” millennials. The Guardian, Retrieved from theguardian.com.
   Google Scholar
• Mondak, J. J., Hibbing, M. V., Canache, D., Seligson, M. A., & Anderson, M. R. (2010). Personality and civic engagement: An integrative framework for the study of trait effects on political behavior. American Political Science Review, 104(1), 85–110. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055409990359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moskos, C. C. (1977). From institution to occupation: Trends in military organization. Armed Forces & Society, 4(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X7700400103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozcelik, H., & Barsade, S. G. (2018). No employee an island: Workplace loneliness and job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 61(6), 2343–2366. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.1066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polderman, T. J., Benyamin, B., De Leeuw, C. A., Sullivan, P. F., Van Bochoven, A., Visscher, P. M., & Posthuma, D. (2015). Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies. Nature Genetics, 47(7), 702–709. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revelle, W., Wilt, J., & Condon, D. M. (2011). Overview of differential psychology. In T. Chamorro-Premuzic, S. von Stumm, & A. Furnham (Eds.), Wiley-Blackwell handbook of individual differences (pp. 3–38). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rokos, A. (2006). Foreword. In K. Nørgaard & V. S. Holsting (Eds.), Royal Danish Defence College (pp. 5–9) http://www.fak.dk/publikationer/Documents/international_operations_net.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rolland, J. P., Parker, W. D., & Stumpf, H. (1998). A psychometric examination of the French translations of NEO-PI-R and NEO-FFI. Journal of Personality Assessment, 71(2), 269–291. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa7102_13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rukavishnikov, V. O., & Pugh, M. (2006). Civil military relations. In G. Caforio (Ed.), Handbook of the sociology of the military (pp. 131–‒149). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rumsey, M. G., & Arabian, J. M. (2014). Introduction to the special issue on selected new developments in military enlistment testing. Military Psychology, 26(3), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1037/mil0000041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumsey, M. G., & White, L. A. (2010). Benefits and barriers to personality measures in military personnel selection. In P. T. Bartone, B. H. Johnsen, J. Eid, J. M. Violanti, & J. C. Laberg (Eds.), Enhancing human performance in security operations (pp. 85–119). Charles C Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Salgado, J. F. (1998). Big Five personality dimensions and job performance in army and civil occupations: A European perspective. Human Performance, 11(2), 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1102&3_8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, R., & Masal, D. (2015). Public leadership: A review of the literature and framework for future research. Public Management Review, 17(8), 1165–1189. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.895031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, L. A., Rumsey, M. G., Mullins, H. M., Nye, C. D., & LaPort, K. A. (2014). Toward a new attrition screening paradigm: Latest Army advances. Military Psychology, 26(3), 138–152. https://doi.org/10.1037/mil0000047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winsborough, D. L., & Sambath, V. (2013). Not like us: An investigation into the personalities of New Zealand CEOs. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 65(2), 87–107. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033128
   Google Scholar
• Woodruff, T., Kelty, R., & Segal, D. R. (2006). Propensity to serve and motivation to enlist among American combat soldiers. Armed Forces & Society, 32(3), 353–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X05283040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar