Transnational corporations and the proliferation of bilateral investment treaties: more than a bit influential

References

• Allee, T., & Peinhardt, C. (2014). Evaluating three explanations for the design of bilateral investment treaties. World Politics, 66, 47–87. doi: 10.1017/S0043887113000324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, D.C., & Sharpe, K.E. (1985). Transnational corporations versus the state: The political economy of the mexican auto industry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernhard, W., & Leblang, D. (2002). Political parties and monetary commitments. International Organization, 56, 803–830. doi: 10.1162/002081802760403784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broz, J.L. (2002). Political system transparency and monetary commitment regimes. International Organization, 56, 861–887. doi: 10.1162/002081802760403801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cable, V. (1995). The diminished Nation-state: A study in the loss of economic power. Daedalus, 124, 23–53. doi: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20027296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, S.D. (2007). Multinational corporations and foreign direct investment: avoiding simplicity, embracing complexity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, W.R. (2002). ‘Partisan and electoral motivations and the choice of monetary institutions under fully mobile capital.’ International Organization, 56, 725–749. doi: 10.1162/002081802760403757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dent, C.M. (2003). Transnational capital, the state and foreign economic policy: Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan. Review of International Political Economy, 10, 246–277. doi: 10.1080/0969229032000063225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Destler, I.M. 1992. American trade politics. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Drope, J.M., & Hansen, W.L. (2004). Purchasing protection? the effect of political spending on U.S. Trade policy. Political Research Quarterly, 57, 27–37. doi: 10.2307/3219832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkins, Z., Guzman, A.T., & Simmons, B.A. (2006). Competing for capital: The diffusion of bilateral investment treaties, 1960–2000. International Organization, 60, 811–846. doi: 10.1017/S0020818306060279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkins, Z., & Simmons, B. (2005). On waves, clusters, and diffusion: A conceptual framework. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598, 33–51. doi: 10.1177/0002716204272516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frieden, J.A. (1991). Invested interests: The politics of national economic policies in a world of global finance. International Organization, 45, 425–451. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300033178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froot, K.A. (1989). Consistent covariance matrix estimation with Cross-sectional dependence and heteroskedasticity in financial data. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 24, 333–355. doi: 10.2307/2330815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. (2004). State-building: Governance and world order in the 21st century. New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gawande, K., & Bandyopadhyay, U. (2000). Is protection for sale? evidence on the Grossman-helpman theory of endogenous protection. Review of Economics and Statistics, 82, 139–152. doi: 10.1162/003465300558579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Globerman, S., & Shapiro, D. (2002). Global foreign direct investment flows: The role of governance infrastructure. World Development, 30, 1899–1919. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00110-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gourevitch, P.A. (1996). Squaring the circle: The domestic sources of international cooperation. International Organization, 50, 349–373. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300028599.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, G.M., & Helpman, E. (1994). Protection for sale. The American Economic Review, 84, 833–850. doi: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:84:y:1994:i:4:p:833-50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzman, A.T. (1998). Why LDCs sign treaties that hurt them: Explaining the popularity of bilateral investment treaties. Virginia Journal of International Law, 38, 639–688. doi: http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/facpubs/904.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., & Tatham, R.L., (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hallerberg, M. (2002). ‘Veto players and the choice of monetary institutions.’ International Organization, 56, 775–802. doi: 10.1162/002081802760403775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, W.L., & Prusa, T.J. (1997). The economics and politics of trade policy: An empirical analysis of ITC decision making. Review of International Economics, 5, 230–245. doi: 10.1111/1467-9396.00053.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, L.R., & Page, B.I. (2005). Who influences U.S. Foreign policy?. American Political Science Review, 99, 107–123. doi: 10.1017.S000305540505152X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keefer, P., & Stasavage, D. (2002). Checks and balances, private information, and the credibility of monetary commitments. International Organization, 56, 751–774. doi: 10.1162/002081802760403766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobrin, S.J. (1987). Testing the bargaining hypothesis in the manufacturing sector in developing countries. International Organization, 41, 609–638. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300027624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krasner, S.D. (1985). Structural conflict: The third world against global liberalism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• La, P., Rafael, F. L-d-S., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106, 1113–1155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C.K., & Strang, D. (2006). The international diffusion of Public-sector downsizing: Network emulation and theory-driven learning. International Organization, 60, 883–909. doi: 10.1017/S0020818306060292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipson, C. (1985). Standing guard: Protecting foreign capital in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meseguer, C., & Gilardi, F. (2009). What is new in the study of policy diffusion?. Review of International Political Economy, 16, 527–543. doi: 10.1080/09692290802409236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner, H.V. (1997). Interests, institutions, and information: Domestic politics and international relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, T.H. (1985). Multinational Corporations and the Developing Countries: An Analytical Overview. In Moran, T.H. (Ed.), Multinational corporations. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, R.E., & Moore, D.H. (1978). Case one: Brazilian bargaining power success in befiex export promotion program with the transnational automotive industry. New York: U.N. Centre on Transnational Corporations.
   Google Scholar
• North, D.C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Onishi, N. (1999). Deep in the Republic of Chevron. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/1999/07/04/magazine/deep-in-the-republic-of-chevron.html?pagewanted=all.
   Google Scholar
• Organization of American States (OAS). (1974). Regulation policies toward multinational corporations for host countries within the organization of American States: Generalizations from the analysis of issues in the automotive sector. Washington, DC: OAS.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R.D. (1988). Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization, 42, 427–460. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300027697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. (1996). Why do more open economies have bigger governments? National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Rogowski, R. (1989). Commerce and coalitions: How trade affects domestic political alignments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rueschemeyer, D., & Evans, P.B. (1985). The state and economic transformation: Toward an analysis of the conditions underlying effective intervention. In Evans, P., Rueschemeyer, D., & Skocpol, T. (Eds), Bringing the state back. (pp. 44–77). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggie, J.G. (1982). International regimes, transactions, and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. International Organization, 36, 379–415. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300018993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, B.A. (2001). The international politics of harmonization: The case of capital market regulation. International Organization, 55, 589–620. doi: 10.1162/00208180152507560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, B.A. (2014). Bargaining over BITs, arbitrating awards: The regime for protection and promotion of international investment. World Politics, 66, 12–46. doi: 10.1017/S0043887113000312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, B.A., Dobbin, F., & Garrett, G. (2006). Introduction: The international diffusion of liberalism. International Organization, 60, 781–810. doi: 10.1017/S0020818306060267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, B.A., & Elkins, Z. (2004). The globalization of liberalization: Policy diffusion in the international political economy. The American Political Science Review, 98, 171–189. doi: 10.1017/S0003055404001078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafer, M. (1985). Capturing the mineral multinationals: Advantage or disadvantage? InMoran, T.H. (Ed.), Multinational corporations. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sornarajah, M. (2010). The international law on foreign investment (3rd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stopford, J.M., & Strange, S. (1991). Rival states, rival firms: Competition for world market shares. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Story, J., (2000). Setting the parameters: A strange world system. In Lawton, T.C., Rosenau, J.N., & Verdun, A.C. (Eds.), Strange power: Shaping the parameters of international relations and international political economy. (pp. 19–39). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Strange, S. (1986). Casino capitalism. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Strange, S. (1988a). States and markets. London, UK: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Strange, S. (1988b). The future of the american empire. Journal of International Affairs, 42, 1–17. Retrieved from http://www.ucs.mun.ca/∼russellw/Teaching_files/POSC%203250%20-%20Unit%20Two.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Strange, S. (1994). States and markets (2nd ed.). London, UK: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Strange, S. (1996). The retreat of the state: The diffusion of power in the world economy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strange, S. (1998). Mad money: When markets outgrow governments. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swenson, D.L. (2009). Why do developing countries sign BITs? In Sauvant, K.P., & Sachs, L.E. (Eds.), The effect of treaties on foreign direct investment: Bilateral investment treaties, double taxation treaties, and investment flows. (pp. 400–437). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Underhill, G.R.D. (2000). Global money and the decline of state power. In Lawton, T.C., Rosenau, J.N., & Verdun, A.C. (Eds.), Strange power: Shaping the parameters of international relations and international political economy. (pp. 115–138). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Vachani, S. (1995). Enhancing the obsolescing bargain theory: A longitudinal study of foreign ownership of U.S. and european multinationals. Journal of International Business, 26, 159–180. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandevelde, K.J. (2009). A Brief History of International Investment Agreements. In Sauvant, K.P., & Sachs, L.E. (Eds.), The effect of treaties on foreign direct investment: Bilateral investment treaties, double taxation treaties, and investment flows. (pp. 3–36). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vernon, R. (1971). Sovereignty at bay:Tthe multinational spread of U.S. Enterprises. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Vernon, R. (1977). Storm over the multinationals: The real issues. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vis-Dunbar, D. (2009a). Norway shelves its draft model bilateral investment treaty. Investment Treaty News. Retrieved from http://www.iisd.org/itn.
   Google Scholar
• Vis-Dunbar, D. (2009b). U.S. Academics urge the obama administration to improve the international investment regime. Investment Treaty News. Retrieved from http://www.iisd.org/itn.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, S.-J. (2000). How taxing is corruption on international investors?. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 82, 1–11. doi: 10.1162/003465300558533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinthal, E., & Luong, P.J. (2006). Combating the resource curse: An alternative solution to managing mineral wealth. Perspectives on Politics, 4, 35. doi: 10.1017/S1537592706060051.
   Google Scholar
• Whitsitt, E. 2009. United States Trade Representative and State Department Hold Public Hearing and Solicit Written Comments in US Model BIT Review. Investment Treaty News. Retrieved from http://www.iisd.org/itn.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R.L. (2000). A note on robust variance estimation for Cluster-correlated data. Biometrics, 56, 645–646. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00645.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winters, L.A. (1996). Regionalism versus multilateralism. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Yackee, J.W. (2008). Bilateral investment treaties, credible commitment and the rule of (international) law: Do BITs promote foreign direct investment?. Law & Society Review, 42, 805–832. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2008.00359.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar