Economic viability of foreign investment in public transport of Pakistan – orange line metro train in focus

References

• Ahmed, V., Abbas, A., & Ahmed, S. 2013. Public infrastructure and economic growth in Pakistan: A dynamic CGE-microsimulation analysis. In J. Cockburn, Y. Dissou, J. Duclos, & L. Tiberti (Eds.), Infrastructure and economic growth in Asia. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Ali, Y. (2019a). Economic viability of foreign investment in railways: a case study of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). The Engineering Economist, 65, 158–175. doi:10.1080/0013791X.2019.1668096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, Y., Razi, M., De Felice, F., Sabir, M., & Petrillo, A. (2019b). A VIKOR based approach for assessing the social, environmental and economic effects of “smog” on human health. The Science of the Total Environment, 650, 2897–2905. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banister, D., & Goodwin, M.T. (2011). Quantification of the non-transport benefits resulting from rail investment. Journal of Transport Geography, 19, 212–223. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank, L., & Tarquin, A. 2012. Engineering Economics (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• CPEC. 2019. CPEC Offical Website, Planning Commission of Pakistan, Ministry of Planning, Development and Reforms, Government of Pakistan.
   Google Scholar
• Daily Tribune, 2014. Metro Bus Service: Punjab pays Rs5m per day as subsidy [Online]. Retrieved November 16, 2019, from https://tribune.com.pk/story/780840/metro-bus-service-punjab-pays-rs5m-per-day-as-subsidy/
   Google Scholar
• DEVCO. 2015. How to get cities moving? Capacity4dev: Directorate-General for International Cooperation and Development, European Commission’s knowledge-sharing platform for development cooperation.
   Google Scholar
• Ferbrache, F., & Knowles, R.D. (2017). City boosterism and place-making with light rail transit: A critical review of light rail impacts on city image and quality. Geoforum, 80, 103–113. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FHA, 2002. Federal Highway Administration, Policy and Governmental Affairs [Online]. Retrieved November 14, 2019, from https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/2002cpr/pdf/ch14.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gühnemann, A., Laird, J.J., & Pearman, A.D. (2012). Combining cost-benefit and multi-criteria analysis to prioritise a national road infrastructure programme. Transport Policy, 23, 15–24. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gujarati, D.N. 2011. Econometrics by example (2nd ed.). London, UK: Macmillan Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hananel, R., & Berechman, J. (2016). Justice and transportation decision-making: The capabilities approach. Transport Policy, 49, 78–85. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasnain, K. 2019. Tenders for Orange Line operation & maintenance to be floated again. Daily Dawn.
   Google Scholar
• Hyard, A. (2012). Cost-Benefit analysis according to Sen: An application in the evaluation of transport infrastructures in France. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46, 707–719. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2012.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamal, N. 2017. The Cost of CPEC. Daily Dawn.
   Google Scholar
• Kukreja, R., 2016. What is Public Transportation? A blog [Online]. Retrieved November 15, 2019, from https://www.conserve-energy-future.com/benefits_of_public_transportation.php
   Google Scholar
• Legaspi, J., Hensher, D., & Wang, B. (2015). Estimating the wider economic benefits of transport investments: The case of the Sydney North West Rail Link Project. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 3, 182–195. doi:10.1016/j.cstp.2015.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masood, M.T., Khan, M.A., & Naqvi, H. (2015). Transportation problems in developing countries Pakistan: A case-in-point. International Journal of Business and Management, 6, 256–261.
   Google Scholar
• Mehar, A. (2017). Infrastructure development, CPEC and FDI in Pakistan: Is there any connection? Transnational Corporations Review, 9, 232–241. doi:10.1080/19186444.2017.1362857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MoF. 2019. Economic survey of pakistan. Ministry of Finance, Government of Pakistan.
   Google Scholar
• PBS. 2017. National population census 2018. Pakistan Bureau of Statistics, Government of Pakistan.
   Google Scholar
• PMA. 2015a. Budget estimate for metrobus. The Punjab Metrobus Authority.
   Google Scholar
• PMA. 2015b. Lahore Orange Line Train Project. NESPAK Consultant.
   Google Scholar
• PMA. 2016a. Lahore OLMT Project. Punjab Mass Transit Authority.
   Google Scholar
• PMA. 2016b. Orange Line Metro Train System. Punjab Mass Transit Authority.
   Google Scholar
• PMA. 2019. Punjab Mass-Transit Authority [Online]. Retrieved March 3, 2019, from https://pma.punjab.gov.pk/
   Google Scholar
• Rothengatter, W. (2017). Wider economic impacts of transport infrastructure investments: Relevant or negligible? Transport Policy, 59, 124–133. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandmo, A. 2011. Economics evolving: A history of economic thought (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seber, G.A.F., & Lee, A.J. 2003. Linear regression analysis (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (2000). The discipline of cost‐benefit analysis. The Journal of Legal Studies, 29, 931–952. doi:10.1086/468100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharav, N., Givoni, M., & Shiftan, Y. (2019). What transit service does the periphery need? A case study of Israel’s rural country. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 125, 320–333. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2018.09.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherani, T., 2019. Moody's upgrades Pakistan's outlook from negative to stable [Online]. Retrieved November 15, 2019, from https://www.dawn.com/news/1520039
   Google Scholar
• Sierra, A.A., Yepes, V., & Pellicer, E. (2018). A review of multi-criteria assessment of the social sustainability of infrastructures. Journal of Cleaner Production, 187, 496–513. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, Z., Cao, M., Han, T., & Hickman, R. (2019). Public transport accessibility and housing value uplift: Evidence from the Docklands light railway in London. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 7, 607–616. doi:10.1016/j.cstp.2019.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahir, N. 2012. Development and efficiency: Analysis of Pakistan railways in comparison with China and India. CRP Working Paper Series, Working Paper No. 7. Cambridge, UK: Centre of Development Studies, University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Vickerman, R. (2000). Evaluation methodologies for transport projects in the United Kingdom. Transport Policy, 7, 7–16. doi:10.1016/S0967-070X(00)00009-3
   Google Scholar
• Wang, W., Zhong, M., & Hunt, J.D. (2019). Analysis of the wider economic impact of a transport infrastructure project using an integrated land use transport model. Sustainability, 11, 317–364. doi:10.3390/su11020364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisbrod, G., Mulley, C., & Hensher, D. (2016). Recognising the complementary contributions of cost-benefit-analysis and economic impact analysis to an understanding of the worth of public transport investment: A case study of bus rapid transit in Sydney. Research in Transportation Economics, 59, 450–461. doi:10.1016/j.retrec.2016.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar