Origins and Development of the Conversational Argument Coding Scheme

REFERENCES

• Bradley , P. H. , Hamon , C. M. and Harris , A. M. 1976 . Dissent in small groups . Journal of Communication , 26 : 155 – 159 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockreide , W. 1975 . Where is argument? . Journal of the American Forensics Association , 11 : 179 – 182 .
   Google Scholar
• Brossmann , B. G. and Canary , D. J. 1990 . An observational analysis of argument structures: The case of Nightline . Argumentation , 4 : 199 – 212 .
   Google Scholar
• Burleson , B. R. 1981 . A cognitive-development perspective on social reasoning processes . Western Journal of Speech Communication , 45 : 133 – 147 .
   Google Scholar
• Burnett , A. and Badzinski , D. M. 2000 . An exploratory study of argument in the jury decision-making process . Communication Quarterly , 48 : 380 – 396 .
   Google Scholar
• Canary , D. J. 1992 . Manual for coding conversational arguments , University Park : Unpublished manuscript, Department of Speech Communication, The Pennsylvania State University .
   Google Scholar
• Canary , D. J. , Brossmann , J. , Brossmann , B. G. and Weger , H. Jr. 1995 . Toward a theory of minimally rational argument: Analyses of episode-specific effects of argument structures . Communication Monographs , 62 : 183 – 212 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canary , D. J. , Brossmann , B. G. and Seibold , D. R. 1987 . Argument structures in decision-making groups . Southern Speech Communication Journal , 53 : 18 – 37 .
   Google Scholar
• Canary , D. J. , Brossmann , B. G. , Sillars , A. L. and LoVette , S. 1987 . “ Married couples' argument structures and sequences: A comparison of satisfied and dissatisfied dyads ” . In Argument and social criticism: Proceedings of the fifth SCA/AFA conference on argumentation , Edited by: Wenzel , W. J. Annandale, VA : Speech Communication Association . InEd.
   Google Scholar
• Canary , D. J. , Ratledge , N. T. and Seibold , D. R. November 1982 . Argument and group decision making: Development of a coding scheme , November , Louisville, KY : Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association .
   Google Scholar
• Canary , D. J. and Weger , H. Jr. 1993 . “ Competence assessments of interpersonal argument structures: An observational analysis ” . In Argument and the postmodern challenge: Proceedings of the SCA/AFA summer conference on argument , Edited by: McKerrow , R. 252 – 259 . Annandale, VA : Speech Communication Association . InEd.pp.
   Google Scholar
• Canary , D. J. , Weger , H. Jr. and Stafford , L. 1991 . Couples argument sequences and their associations with relational characteristics . Western Journal of Speech Communication , 55 : 159 – 179 .
   Google Scholar
• Ellis , D. G. and Maoz , I. 2002 . Cross-cultural argument interactions between Israeli-Jews and Palestinians . Journal of Applied Communication Research , 30 : 181 – 194 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis , D. G. and Maoz , I. 2007 . Online argument between Israeli Jews and Palestinians . Human Communication Research , 33 : 291 – 309 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens , A. 1976 . New rules of sociological method , New York : Basic Books .
   Google Scholar
• Giddens , A. 1977 . Studies in social and political theory , New York : Basic Books .
   Google Scholar
• Giddens , A. 1979 . Central problems in social theory: Action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis , Berkeley : University of California Press .
   Google Scholar
• Gottman , J. M. 1979 . Marital interaction: Experimental investigations , New York : Academic Press .
   Google Scholar
• Gottman , J. M. 1994 . What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes , Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Gouran , D. S. 1969 . Variables related to consensus in group discussions of questions of policy . Speech Monographs , 36 : 387 – 391 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouran , D. S. , Brown , C. and Henry , D. R. 1978 . Behavioral correlates of perceptions of quality in decision-making discussions . Communication Monographs , 45 : 51 – 63 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hample , D. 1980 . A cognitive view of argument . Journal of the American Forensics Association , 17 : 151 – 158 .
   Google Scholar
• Hill , T. A. 1976 . An experimental study of the relationship between opinionated leadership and small group consensus . Communication Monographs , 43 : 246 – 257 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson , S. and Jacobs , S. 1980 . Structure of conversational argument: Pragmatic cases for the enthymeme . Quarterly Journal of Speech , 66 : 251 – 265 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs , S. and Jackson , S. 1981 . Argument as a natural category: The routine grounds for arguing in conversation . Western Journal of Speech Communication , 45 : 111 – 117 .
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs , S. and Jackson , S. 1982 . “ Conversational argument: A discourse analytic approach ” . In Advances in argumentation theory and research , Edited by: Cox , J. R. and Willard , C. A. 205 – 237 . Carbondale : Southern Illinois University Press .
   Google Scholar
• McPhee , R. D. , Poole , M. S. and Seibold , D. R. 1981 . “ The valence model unveiled: Critique and alternative formulation ” . In Communication yearbook 5 , Edited by: Burgoon , M. 259 – 278 . New Brunswick, NJ : International Communication Association/Transaction Books .
   Google Scholar
• O'Keefe , B. J. and Benoit , P. J. 1982 . “ Children's arguments ” . In Advances in argumentation theory and research , Edited by: Cox , J. R. and Willard , C. A. 154 – 183 . Carbondale, IL : Southern Illinois University Press .
   Google Scholar
• O'Keefe , D. J. 1977 . Two concepts of argument . Journal of the American Forensic Association , 13 : 121 – 128 .
   Google Scholar
• Perelman , C. H. and Olbrechts-Tyteca , L. 1969 . The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation , Edited by: Wilkinson , J. and Weaver , P. Notre Dame, IN : University of Notre Dame Press . Trans.
   Google Scholar
• Poole , M. S. , McPhee , R. D. and Seibold , D. R. 1982 . A comparison of normative and interactional explanations of group decision making: Social decision schemes versus valence distributions . Communication Monographs , 49 : 1 – 19 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole , M. S. , Seibold , D. R. and McPhee , R. D. April 1982 . A structurational theory of group decision making: The group as permanent process , April , University Park, PA : Paper presented at the Pennsylvania State University Conference on Group Communication Research .
   Google Scholar
• Poole , M. S. , Seibold , D. R. and McPhee , R. D. 1985 . Group decision making as a structurational process . Quarterly Journal of Speech , 71 : 74 – 102 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole , M. S. , Seibold , D. R. and McPhee , R. D. 1986 . “ A structurational approach to theory development in group research ” . In Communication and group decision making , Edited by: Hirokawa , R. Y. and Poole , M. S. 237 – 264 . Beverly Hills, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Ratledge , N. T. 1986 . Theoretical and methodological integrity of a structurational scheme for coding argument in decision-making groups , Los Angeles : Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California .
   Google Scholar
• Scheidel , T. M. 1986 . “ Divergent and convergent thinking in group decision making ” . In Communication and group decision making , Edited by: Hirokawa , R. Y. and Poole , M. S. 113 – 132 . Beverly Hills, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Seibold , D. R. April 1981a . Toward an understanding of communication and group decisions , April , Paper presented to the Department of Rhetoric and Communication, State University of New York at Albany .
   Google Scholar
• Seibold , D. R. 1981b . Communication and group decision making , Paper presented to the Department of Speech, University of California at Santa Barbara . November
   Google Scholar
• Seibold , D. R. February 1982a . Structuration theory and small group research , February , Bloomington : Paper to the Department of Speech, Indiana University .
   Google Scholar
• Seibold , D. R. 1982b . Communication and group decision making: A structuration perspective , Paper presented to Department of Speech Communication, University of Nebraska-Lincoln . June
   Google Scholar
• Seibold , D. R. , Canary , D. J. and Tanita-Ratledge , N. November 1983 . Argument and group decision making: Interim report on a structurational research program , November , Washington, DC : Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association .
   Google Scholar
• Seibold , D. R. , McPhee , R. D. and Poole , M. S. April 1980 . New prospects for research in small group communication , April , Chicago : Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Central States Speech Association .
   Google Scholar
• Seibold , D. R. , McPhee , R. D. , Poole , M. S. , Tanita , N. E. and Canary , D. J. 1981 . “ Argument, group influence, and decision outcomes ” . In Dimensions of argument: Proceedings of the second SCA/AFA summer conference on argumentation , Edited by: Ziegelmueller , G. and Rhodes , J. 663 – 692 . Annandale, VA : Speech Communication Association .
   Google Scholar
• Seibold , D. R. and Meyers , R. A. 2007 . Group argument: A structuration perspective and research program . Small Group Research , 38 : 312 – 336 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semic , B. A. and Canary , D. J. 1997 . Trait argumentativeness, verbal aggressiveness, and minimally rational argument: An observational analysis of friendship discussions . Communication Quarterly , 45 : 355 – 378 .
   Google Scholar
• Semic , B. A. and Canary , D. J. 2003 . An investigation of the association among friends' argument sequences, perceptions of communicative competence, and communication satisfaction . Paper presented at the 2003 annual conference of the International Communication Association . 2003 , San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Sillars , A. L. , Weisberg , J. , Burggraf , C. S. and Zietlow , P. H. 1990 . Communication and understanding revisited: Married couples' understanding and recall of conversations . Communication Research , 17 : 500 – 522 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ting-Toomey , S. 1983 . An analysis of verbal communication patterns in high and low marital adjustment groups . Human Communication Research , 9 : 306 – 319 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toulmin , S. E. 1958 . The uses of argument , Cambridge, , UK : The University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin , S. E. , Reike , R. and Janik , A. 1979 . An introduction to reasoning , New York : Macmillan .
   Google Scholar
• Trapp , R. 1982 . Some generic characteristics of argument . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association . November 1982 , Louisville, KY.
   Google Scholar
• Trapp , R. and Hoff , N. 1985 . A model of serial arguments in interpersonal relationships . Journal of the American Forensic Association , 22 : 1 – 11 .
   Google Scholar
• Weger , H. Jr. and Canary , D. J. 1991 . “ A closer look at argument behavior in romantic dyads ” . In Argument in controversy: Proceedings of the seventh SCA/AFA summer conference on argumentation , Edited by: Parson , D. W. 211 – 216 . Annandale, VA : Speech Communication Association . InEd.pp.
   Google Scholar
• Willard , C. A. 1979 . The epistemic functions of argument: Reasoning and decision making from a constructivist/interactionist point of view . Journal of the American Forensic Association , 15 : 169 – 191 .
   Google Scholar