Extending the Conversational Argument Coding Scheme in Studies of Argument Quality in Group Deliberations

REFERENCES

• Brashers , D. E. , Adkins , M. and Meyers , R. A. 1994 . “ Argumentation in computer-mediated decision making ” . In Communication in context: Studies of naturalistic groups , Edited by: Frey , L. 262 – 283 . Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Brashers , D. and Meyers , R. A. . Tag-team argument and group decision making: A preliminary investigation . Spheres of argument: Proceedings of the sixth SCA/AFA conference on argumentation . Annandale, VA. Edited by: Gronbeck , B. pp. 542 – 550 . Speech Communication Association .
   Google Scholar
• Burnett , A. and Badzinski , D. M. 2000 . An exploratory study of argument in the jury decision-making process . Communication Quarterly , 48 : 380 – 396 .
   Google Scholar
• Canary , D. J. 1992 . Manual for coding conversational arguments , University Park : Department of Speech Communication, The Pennsylvania State University .
   Google Scholar
• Canary , D. J. , Brossmann , J. , Brossmann , B. G. and Weger , H. Jr. 1995 . Toward a theory of minimally rational argument: Analyses of episode-specific effects of argument structures . Communication Monographs , 62 : 183 – 212 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canary , D. J. , Brossmann , B. G. and Seibold , D. R. 1987 . Argument structures in decision-making groups . Southern Speech Communication Journal , 53 : 18 – 37 .
   Google Scholar
• Canary , D. J. , Ratledge , N. T. and Seibold , D. R. . Argument and group decision making: Development of a coding scheme . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association . Louisville, KY. November ,
   Google Scholar
• Canary , D. J. and Sillars , A. L. 1992 . “ Argument in satisfied and dissatisfied married couples ” . In Readings in argumentation , Edited by: Benoit , W. L. , Hample , D. and Benoit , P. J. 737 – 764 . New York : Foris .
   Google Scholar
• Canary , D. J. , Weger , H. Jr. and Stafford , L. 1991 . Couples argument sequences and their associations with relational characteristics . Western Journal of Speech Communication , 55 : 159 – 179 .
   Google Scholar
• Davis , J. H. 1973 . Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes . Psychological Review , 80 : 97 – 125 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis , D. G. and Maoz , I. 2002 . Cross-cultural argument interactions between Jews and Palestinians . Journal of Applied Communication Research , 30 : 181 – 194 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher , W. R. and Sayles , E. M. 1966 . “ The nature and functions of argument ” . In Perspectives on argumentation , Edited by: Miller , G. R. and Nilsen , T. R. 2 – 22 . Chicago : Scott, Foresman .
   Google Scholar
• Garlick , R. and Mongeau , P. A. 1993 . Argument quality and group member status as determinants of attitudinal minority influence . Western Journal of Communication , 57 : 289 – 308 .
   Google Scholar
• Gebhardt , L. J. and Meyers , R. A. 1995 . Subgroup influence in decision-making groups: Examining consistency from a communication perspective . Small Group Research , 26 : 147 – 168 .
   Google Scholar
• Giddens , A. 1984 . The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration , Berkeley : University of California Press .
   Google Scholar
• Gouran , D. S. 1990 . “ Exploiting the predictive potential of structuration theory ” . In Communication yearbook 13 , Edited by: Anderson , J. A. 313 – 322 . Newbury Park, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Gouran , D. S. , Brown , C. and Henry , D. R. 1978 . Behavioral correlates of perceptions of quality in decision-making discussions . Communication Monographs , 45 : 51 – 63 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirokawa , R. Y. and Pace , R. 1983 . A descriptive investigation of the possible communication-based reasons for effective and ineffective group decision making . Communication Monographs , 50 : 369 – 379 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman , L. R. 1979 . The group problem-solving model: Studies of a valence model , New York : Praeger .
   Google Scholar
• Jackson , S. and Jacobs , S. 1980 . Structure of conversational argument: Pragmatic cases for the enthymeme . Quarterly Journal of Speech , 66 : 251 – 265 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs , S. and Jackson , S. 1982 . “ Conversational argument: A discourse analytic approach ” . In Advances in argumentation theory and research , Edited by: Cox , J. R. and Willard , C. A. 205 – 237 . Carbondale : Southern Illinois University .
   Google Scholar
• Kang , P. , Meyers , R. A. and Seibold , D. R. . Examining argument in naturally occurring jury deliberations . Paper presented at the Third Annual Conference of the Interdisciplinary Network for Group Research (INGRoup) . Kansas City, KS. July ,
   Google Scholar
• Lemus , D. R. and Seibold , D. R. 2008 . Argument development versus argument strength: The predictive potential of argument quality in computer-mediated group deliberations . Proceedings of the 3rd Tokyo conference on argumentation: Argumentation,the law and justice . 2008 , Tokyo. Edited by: Suzuki , T. , Kato , T. and Kubota , A. pp. 166 – 174 . JDA .
   Google Scholar
• Lemus , D. R. and Seibold , D. R. . Argument structures and decision outcomes in computer-mediated groups . Considering argument: Selected papers from the 15th NCA/AFA conference on argumentation . Washington, DC. Edited by: Jacobs , S. pp. 478 – 486 . National Communication Association .
   Google Scholar
• Lemus , D. R. , Seibold , D. R. , Flanagin , A. J. and Metzger , M. J. 2004 . Argument in computer-medi-ated groups . Journal of Communication , 54 : 302 – 320 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPhee , R. D. 1994 . Response to Hoffman and Kleinman . Human Communication Research , 21 : 60 – 63 .
   Google Scholar
• McPhee , R. D. , Poole , M. S. and Seibold , D. R. 1982 . “ The valence model unveiled: Critique and alternative formulation ” . In Communication yearbook 5 , Edited by: Burgoon , M. 259 – 278 . New Brunswick, NJ : International Communication Association/Transaction Books .
   Google Scholar
• Meyers , R. A. 1989a . Persuasive arguments theory: A test of assumptions . Human Communication Research , 15 : 357 – 381 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers , R. A. 1989b . Testing persuasive arguments theory's predictor model: Alternative interactional accounts of group argument and influence . Communication Monographs , 56 : 112 – 132 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers , R. A. 1997 . “ Social influence and group argumentation ” . In Managing the tensions of group life: Communication in decision-making groups , Edited by: Frey , L. R. and Barge , J. K. 183 – 201 . Burlington, ME : Houghton-Mifflin .
   Google Scholar
• Meyers , R. A. and Brashers , D. E. . Multi-stage versus single-stage coding of small group argument: A preliminary comparative assessment . Argumentation and values: Proceedings of the ninth SCA/AFA conference on argumentation . Annandale, VA. Edited by: Jackson , S. pp. 93 – 100 . Speech Communication Association .
   Google Scholar
• Meyers , R. A. and Brashers , D. E. 1998 . Argument and group decision-making: Explicating a process model and investigating the argument-outcome link . Communication Monographs , 65 : 261 – 281 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers , R. A. , Brashers , D. E. and Hanner , J. 2000 . Majority/minority influence: Identifying argumentative patterns and predicting argument-outcomes links . Journal of Communication , 50 : 3 – 30 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers , R. A. and Seibold , D. R. 1990 . “ Perspectives on group argument: A critical review of persuasive arguments theory and an alternative structurational view ” . In Communication yearbook 13 , Edited by: Anderson , J. 268 – 302 . Newbury Park, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Meyers , R. A. , Seibold , D. R. and Brashers , D. 1991 . Argument in initial group decision-making discussions: Refinement of a coding scheme and a descriptive quantitative analysis . Western Journal of Speech Communication , 55 : 47 – 68 .
   Google Scholar
• Perelman , C. H. and Olbrechts-Tyteca , L. 1969 . The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation , Edited by: Wilkinson , J. and Weaver , P. Notre Dame : University of Notre Dame Press .
   Google Scholar
• Poole , M. S. , McPhee , R. D. and Seibold , D. R. 1982 . A comparison of normative and interactional explanations of group decision making: Social decision schemes versus valence distributions . Communication Monographs , 49 : 1 – 19 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibold , D. R. , Canary , D. J. and Tanita-Ratledge , N. . Argument and group decision making: Interim report on a structurational research program . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association . Washington, DC. November ,
   Google Scholar
• Seibold , D. R. and Lemus , D. R. 2005 . “ Argument quality in group deliberation: A structurational approach and quality of argument index ” . In Critical problems in argumentation , Edited by: Willard , C. A. 203 – 215 . Washington, DC : National Communication Association .
   Google Scholar
• Seibold , D. R. , McPhee , R. D. , Poole , M. S. , Tanita , N. E. and Canary , D. J. 1981 . “ Argument, group influence, and decision outcomes ” . In Dimensions of argument: Proceedings of the second SCA/AFA summer conference on argumentation , Edited by: Ziegelmueller , C. and Rhodes , J. 663 – 692 . Annandale, VA : Speech Communication Association .
   Google Scholar
• Seibold , D. R. and Meyers , R. A. 2007 . Group argument: A structuration perspective and research program . Small Group Research , 38 ( 3 ) : 312 – 336 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibold , D. R. , Meyers , R. A. and Shoham , M. D. 2009 . “ Social influence in groups and organizations ” . In Handbook of communication science , 2nd , Edited by: Berger , C. R. , Roloff , M. E. and Roskos-Ewolsen , D. 237 – 253 . Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Seibold , D. R. and Myers , K. K. 2005 . “ Communication as structuring ” . In Communication as …Perspectives on theory , Edited by: Shepherd , G. J. , St. John , J. and Striphas , T. 143 – 152 . Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Semic , B. A. and Canary , D. J. 1997 . Trait argumentativeness, verbal aggressiveness, and minimally rational argument: An observational analysis of friendship discussions . Communication Quarterly , 45 : 355 – 378 .
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin , S. E. 1958 . The uses of argument , Cambridge, , UK : The University Press .
   Google Scholar