Mediators' Facilitative Versus Controlling Argument Strategies and Tactics: A Qualitative Analysis Using the Conversational Argument Coding System

REFERENCES

• Aakhus , M. 2003 . Neither naïve nor critical reconstruction: Dispute mediators, impasse, and the design of argumentation . Argumentation , 17 : 265 – 290 .
   Google Scholar
• Alberts , J. K. , Heisterkamp , B. L. and McPhee , R. M. 2005 . Disputant perceptions of and satisfaction with a community mediation program . International Journal of Conflict Management , 16 : 218 – 244 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brossmann , B. G. and Canary , D. J. 1990 . An observational analysis of argument structures: The case of Nightline . Argumentation , 4 : 199 – 212 .
   Google Scholar
• Burrell , N. A. , Donahue , W. A. and Allen , M. 1990 . The impact of disputants' expectations on mediation: Testing an interventionist model . Human Communication Research , 17 : 104 – 139 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canary , D. J. 1992 . Manual for coding conversational argument , Unpublished document, Arizona State University .
   Google Scholar
• Canary , D. J. , Brossmann , J. , Brossmann , B. G. and Weger , H. Jr. 1995 . Toward a theory of minimally rational argument: Analyses of episode-specific effects of argument structures . Communication Monographs , 62 : 183 – 212 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donohue , W. A. 1991 . Communication, marital dispute and divorce mediation , Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .
   Google Scholar
• Donohue , W. A. 2001 . “ Resolving relational paradox: The language of conflict in relationships ” . In The language of conflict and resolution , Edited by: Eadie , W. and Nelson , P. 21 – 46 . Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Donohue , W. A. 2006 . “ Managing interpersonal conflict: The mediation process ” . In The Sage handbook of conflict communication , Edited by: Oetzel , J. G. and Ting-Toomey , S. 211 – 234 . Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Hatfield , J. D. and Wieder-Hatfield , D. 1978 . The comparative utility of three types of behavioral units for interaction analysis . Communication Monographs , 45 : 45 – 50 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedeen , T. and Coy , P. G. 2000 . Community mediation and the court system: The ties that bind . Mediation Quarterly , 17 : 351 – 367 .
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs , S. 2002 . Maintaining neutrality in dispute mediation: Managing disagreement while managing not to disagree . Journal of Pragmatics , 34 : 1403 – 1426 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs , S. and Aakhus , M. 2002 . “ How to resolve a conflict: Two models of dispute resolution ” . In Advances in pragma-dialectics , Edited by: van Eemeren , F. H. 29 – 44 . Newport News, VA : Vale Press .
   Google Scholar
• Kressel , K. and Pruitt , D. 1989 . Mediation research: The process and effectiveness of third party intervention , San Francisco : Jossey-Bass .
   Google Scholar
• Meierding , N. R. 1993 . Does mediation work? A survey of long-term satisfaction and durability rates for privately mediated agreements . Mediation Quarterly , 11 : 157 – 170 .
   Google Scholar
• Menzel , K. E. 1991 . Judging the fairness of mediation: A critical framework . Mediation Quarterly , 9 : 3 – 20 .
   Google Scholar
• Meyers , R. A. , Seibold , D. R. and Brashers , D. 1991 . Argument in initial group decision-making discussions: Refinement of a coding scheme and a descriptive quantitative analysis . Western Journal of Speech Communication , 55 : 47 – 68 .
   Google Scholar
• Miles , M. B. and Huberman , A. M. 1994 . Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook , Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Moore , C. W. 1986 . The mediation process: Practical strategies for resolving conflict , San Francisco : Jossey-Bass .
   Google Scholar
• National Association for Community Mediation. (n.d.). Overview of community mediation. http://www.nafcm.org (Accessed: 15 October 2008 ).
   Google Scholar
• Newton , D. A. and Burgoon , J. K. 1990 . “ Nonverbal conflict behaviors: Functions, strategies, and tactics ” . In Intimates in conflict: A communication perspective , Edited by: Cahn , D. D. 77 – 104 . Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .
   Google Scholar
• Perrault , W. D. and Leigh , L. E. 1979 . Reliability of nominal data based on qualitative judgments . Journal of Marketing Research , 26 : 135 – 148 .
   Google Scholar
• Riskin , L. and Westbrook , J. 1997 . Dispute resolution and lawyers , 2nd , New York : West Publishing Co .
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro , D. L. and Brett , J. M. 1993 . Comparing three processes underlying judgments of procedural justice: A field study of mediation and arbitration . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 65 : 1167 – 1177 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silbey , S. S. and Merry , S. E. 1986 . Mediator settlement strategies . Law and Policy , 8 : 7 – 32 .
   Google Scholar
• Sillars , A. L. and Wilmot , W. W. 1994 . “ Communication strategies in conflict and mediation ” . In Strategic interpersonal communication , Edited by: Daly , J. A. and Wiemann , J. M. 163 – 190 . Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .
   Google Scholar