Disentangling User Samples: A Supervised Machine Learning Approach to Proxy-population Mismatch in Twitter Research

References

• Abokhodair, N., Yoo, D., & McDonald, D. W. (2015). Dissecting a social botnet: Growth, content and influence in Twitter. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 839–851). New York, NY: ACM. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675208
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman, L. (1984). Classification and Regression Trees. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman, L. (2001). Random Forests. Retrieved April 10, 2017, from https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~breiman/randomforest2001.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, B., Hogan, B., Ellison, N., Lampe, C., & Vitak, J. (2014). Assessing structural correlates to social capital in Facebook ego networks. Social Networks, 38, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrows, R., & Savage, M. (2014). After the crisis? Big data and the methodological challenges of empirical sociology. Big Data & Society, 1(1). doi:10.1177/2053951714540280
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chu, Z., Gianvecchio, S., Wang, H., & Jajodia, S. (2012). Detecting automation of Twitter accounts: Are you a human, bot, or cyborg?. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 9(6), 811–824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, R., & Ruth, D. (2013). Classifying political orientation on Twitter: It’s not easy! In Seventh International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (pp. 91–99). Cambridge, MA: AAAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colleoni, E., Rozza, A., & Arvidsson, A. (2014). Echo chamber or public sphere? Predicting political orientation and measuring political homophily in Twitter using big data. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 317–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dredze, M., Paul, M. J., Bergsma, S., & Tran, H. (2013, June). Carmen: A twitter geolocation system with applications to public health. Papers from the AAAI workshop on expanding the boundaries of health informatics using (pp. 20–24). Bellevue, WA, USA. Association for the Advancement of Artificial (AAA).
   Google Scholar
• Driscoll, K., & Walker, S. (2014). Big data, big questions, working within a black box: Transparency in the collection and production of big Twitter data. International Journal of Communication, 8, 1745–1764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emery, S. L., Szczypka, G., Abril, E. P., Kim, Y., & Vera, L. (2014). Are you scared yet? Evaluating fear appeal messages in Tweets about the Tips campaign. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 278–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engesser, S., & Humprecht, E. (2015). Frequency or skillfulness. Journalism Studies, 16(4), 513–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Bailón, S., Wang, N., Rivero, A., Borge-Holthoefer, J., & Moreno, Y. (2014). Assessing the bias in samples of large online networks. Social Networks, 38, 16–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E. (2015). Is bigger always better? potential biases of Big data derived from Social Network Sites. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 659(1), 63–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E., & Litt, E. (2011). The tweet smell of celebrity success: Explaining variation in Twitter adoption among a diverse group of young adults. New Media & Society, 13(5), 824–842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermida, A. (2010). Twittering the news. Journalism Practice, 4(3), 297–308.
   Google Scholar
• Himelboim, I., McCreery, S., & Smith, M. (2013). Birds of a feather wweet together: Integrating network and content analyses to examine cross-ideology exposure on Twitter. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(2), 40–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. J., & Foucault Welles, B. (2015). Hijacking #myNYPD: Social media dissent and networked counterpublics. Journal of Communication, 65(6), 932–952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, K. H., Chadha, M., & Pellizzaro, K. (2017). Proximity and terrorism news in social media: A construal-level theoretical approach to networked framing of terrorism in Twitter. Mass Communication and Society, 20(6), 869–894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, K. H., Stefanone, M. A., & Barnett, G. A. (2014). Social network influence on online behavioral choices: Exploring group formation on Social Network Sites. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(10), 1345–1360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K., Eoff, B., & Caverlee, J. (2011). Seven months with the devils: A long-term study of content polluters on Twitter. In Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Barcelona, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Loh, W. (2011). Classification and Regression Trees. Retrieved from http://www.stat.wisc.edu/~loh/treeprogs/guide/wires11.pdf 10.1002/widm.8
   Google Scholar
• Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G. S., & Dean, J. (2013). Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 26, 3111–3119.
   Google Scholar
• Morstatter, F., Pfeffer, J., Liu, H., & Carley, K. M. (2013). Is the sample good enough? Comparing data from Twitter’s Streaming API with Twitter’s Firehose. arXiv:1306.5204 [Physics]. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1306.5204
   Google Scholar
• Murthy, D., Bowman, S., Gross, A. J., & McGarry, M. (2015). Do we tweet differently from our mobile devices? A study of language differences on mobile and web-based Twitter platforms. Journal of Communication, 65(5), 816–837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pennebaker, J. W., Booth, R. J., Boyd, R. L., & Francis, M. E. (2015). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC2015. Austin, TX: Pennebaker Conglomerates. www.LIWC.net
   Google Scholar
• Ratkiewicz, J., Conover, M., Miess, M., Goncalves, B., Patil, S., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2011). Truthy: Mapping the spread of astroturf in microblog streams. In WWW 2011 Proceedings of the 20th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web (pp. 249–252). Hyderabad, India: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Ruths, D., & Pfeffer, J. (2014). Social media for large studies of behavior. Science, 346(6213), 1063–1064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salganik, M. (2017). Bit by Bit: Social Research in the Digital Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, R. (2014). Big data and the brave new world of social media research. Big Data & Society, 1(2), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, J., & Thorson, K. (2017). Partisan selective sharing: The biased diffusion of fact-checking messages on social media. Journal of Communication, 67, (2), 233–255. doi:10.1111/jcom.12284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M., Ceni, A., Milic-Frayling, N., Shneiderman, B., Mendes Rodrigues, E., Leskovec, J., & Dunne, C., (2010). NodeXL: A free and open network overview, discovery and exploration add-in for Excel 2007/2010/2013/2016, http://nodexl.codeplex.com/. Social Media Research Foundation
   Google Scholar
• Ugander, J., Karrer, B., Backstrom, L., & Marlow, C. (2011). The anatomy of the Facebook social graph. arXiv:1111.4503 [Physics]. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.4503
   Google Scholar
• Vaccari, C., Chadwick, A., & O’Loughlin, B. (2015). Dual screening the political: Media events, social media, and citizen engagement. Journal of Communication, 65(6), 1041–1061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargo, C. J., Guo, L., McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. L. (2014). Network issue agendas on Twitter during the 2012 U.S. presidential election. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 296–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varol, O., Ferrara, E., Davis, C. A., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2017). Online human-bot interactions: Detection, estimation, and characterization. arXiv:1703.03107 [Cs]. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1703.03107
   Google Scholar
• Woodford, D., Walker, S., & Paul, A. (2013). Slicing big data - Twitter, gambling and time sensitive information. In Selected Papers of Internet Research . 14.0. Denver, CO. Association of Internet Research. Retrieved from http://spir.aoir.org/index.php/spir/article/view/914
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, W.-X., Sornette, D., Hill, R. A., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2005). Discrete hierarchical organization of social group sizes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 272(1561), 439–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar