References
- Araujo, T., Wonneberger, A., Neijens, P., & De Vreese, C. (2017). How much time do you spend online? Understanding and improving the accuracy of self-reported measures of internet use. Communication Methods & Measures, 11(3), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1317337
- Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130–1132. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160
- Barberá, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J. A., & Bonneau, R. (2015). Tweeting from left to right: Is online political communication more than an echo chamber? Psychological Science, 26(10), 1531–1542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615594620
- Barnidge, M. (2017). Exposure to political disagreement in social media versus face-to-face and anonymous online settings. Political Communication, 34(2), 302–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2016.1235639
- Beck, P. A., Dalton, R. J., Greene, S., & Huckfeldt, R. (2002). The social calculus of voting: Interpersonal, media, and organizational influences on presidential choices. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055402004239
- Bolsen, T., Druckman, J. N., & Cook, F. L. (2014). The influence of partisan motivated reasoning on public opinion. Political Behavior, 36(2), 235–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-013-9238-0
- Bond, R. M., & Sweitzer, M. D. (2018). Political homophily in a large-scale online communication network. Communication Research. Online first. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218813655
- Bürkner, P. C. (2017). brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. Journal of Statistical Software, 80(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v080.i01
- Conover, P. J., & Searing, D. D. (2005). Studying “everyday political talk” in the deliberative system. Acta Politica, 40(3), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500113
- Delli Carpini, M. X., Cook, F. L., & Jacobs, L. R. (2004). Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature. Annual Review of Political Science, 7(1), 315–344. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630
- Ernala, S. K., Burke, M., Leavitt, A., & Ellison, N. B. (2020, April). How well do people report time spent on Facebook? An evaluation of established survey questions with recommendations. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–14).
- Eveland, W. P., & Hively, M. H. (2009). Political discussion frequency, network size, and “Heterogeneity” of discussion as predictors of political knowledge and participation. Journal of Communication,59(2), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01412.x
- Eveland, W. P., Jr, & Hutchens, M. J. (2013). The role of conversation in developing accurate political perceptions: A multilevel social network approach. Human Communication Research, 39(4), 422–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12011
- Eveland, W. P., Hutchens, M. J., & Morey, A. C. (2013). Political network size and its antecedents and consequences. Political Communication,30(3), 371–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2012.737433
- Eveland, W. P., Jr., Morey, A. C., & Hutchens, M. J. (2011). Beyond deliberation: New directions for the study of informal political conversation from a communication perspective. Journal of Communication, 61(6), 1082–1103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01598.x
- Eveland, W. P., Jr., Song, H., Hutchens, M. J., & Levitan, L. C. (2019). Not being accurate is not quite the same as being inaccurate: Variations in reported (in)accuracy of perceptions of political views of network members due to uncertainty. Communication Methods & Measures, 13(4), 305–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2019.1612865
- Fiske, S. T., Lau, R. R., & Smith, R. A. (1990). On the varieties and utilities of political expertise. Social Cognition, 8(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1990.8.1.31
- Fitzgerald, J. (2013). What does “political” mean to you? Political Behavior, 35(3), 453–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-012-9212-2
- Flynn, D. J., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2017). The nature and origins of misperceptions: Understanding false and unsupported beliefs about politics. Political Psychology, 38, 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12394
- Garrett, R. K. (2009). Politically motivated reinforcement seeking: Reframing the selective exposure debate. Journal of Communication, 59(4), 676–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01452.x
- Garrett, R. K. (2017). The “echo chamber” distraction: Disinformation campaigns are the problem, not audience fragmentation. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(4), 370–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.011
- Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond power calculations: Assessing type S (sign) and type M (magnitude) errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642
- Gelman, A., Simpson, D., & Betancourt, M. (2017). The prior can often only be understood in the context of the likelihood. Entropy, 19(10), 555. https://doi.org/10.3390/e19100555
- Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2011). Ideological Segregation Online and Offline. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(4), 1799–1839. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr044
- Guess, A., Munger, K., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. (2019). How accurate are survey responses on social media and politics? Political Communication, 36(2), 1241–18258. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1504840
- Guess, A. M. (2015). Measure for measure: An experimental test of online political media exposure. Political Analysis, 23(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpu010
- Haenschen, K. (2020). Self-reported versus digitally recorded: Measuring political activity on Facebook. Social Science Computer Review, 38(5), 567–583. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318813586
- Hayes, A. F., Matthes, J., & Eveland, W. P. (2013). Stimulating the quasi-statistical organ: Fear of social isolation motivates the quest for knowledge of the opinion climate. Communication Research, 40(4), 439–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211428608
- Hibbing, M. V., Ritchie, M., & Anderson, M. R. (2011). Personality and political discussion. Political Behavior, 33(4), 601–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9147-4
- Hoffman, M. D., & Gelman, A. (2014). The No-U-Turn sampler: Adaptively setting path lengths in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 15(1), 1593–1623.https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2627435.2638586
- Huckfeldt, R. (2007). Unanimity, discord, and the communication of public opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 978–995. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00292.x
- Huckfeldt, R., Mendez, J. M., & Osborn, T. (2004). Disagreement, ambivalence, and engagement: The political consequences of heterogeneous networks. Political Psychology, 25(1), 65–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00357.x
- Huckfeldt, R. R., & Sprague, J. (1995). Citizens, politics and social communication: Information and influence in an election campaign. Cambridge University Press.
- Hutchens, M. J., Eveland, W. P., Morey, A. C., & Sokhey, A. E. (2018). Evaluating summary measures of heterogeneous political discussion: The critical roles of excluded cases and discussion with people holding extreme views. Communication Methods & Measures, 12(4), 276–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2018.1479844
- Ikeda, K. I., & Huckfeldt, R. (2001). Political communication and disagreement among citizens in Japan and the United States. Political Behavior, 23(1), 23–51. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017617630744
- Jerit, J., Barabas, J., Pollock, W., Banducci, S., Stevens, D., & Schoonvelde, M. (2016). Manipulated vs. measured: Using an experimental benchmark to investigate the performance of self-reported media exposure. Communication Methods and Measures, 10(2–3), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2016.1150444
- John, N. A., & Dvir-Gvirsman, S. (2015). “I don’t like you any more”: Facebook unfriending by Israelis during the Israel–Gaza conflict of 2014. Journal of Communication, 65(6), 953–974. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12188
- Jones-Jang, S. M., Heo, Y. J., McKeever, R., Kim, J. H., Moscowitz, L., & Moscowitz, D. (2020). Good news! Communication findings may be underestimated: Comparing effect sizes with self-reported and logged smartphone use data. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(5), 346–363. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmaa009
- Jungherr, A. (2018). Normalizing digital trace data. In N. J. Stroud & S. C. McGregor (Eds.), Digital discussions: How big data informs political communication (pp. 19–45). Routledge.
- Jürgens, P., Stark, B., & Magin, M. (2019). Two half-truths make a whole? On bias in self-reports and tracking data. Social Science Computer Review, 38(5), 600–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319831643
- Kahn, A. S., Ratan, R., & Williams, D. (2014). Why we distort in self-report: Predictors of self-report errors in video game play. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(4), 1010–1023. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12056
- Kaplan, K. J. (1972). On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: A suggested modification of the semantic differential technique. Psychological Bulletin, 77(5), 361–372. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032590
- Klofstad, C. A., Sokhey, A. E., & McClurg, S. D. (2013). Disagreeing about disagreement: How conflict in social networks affects political behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 57(1), 120–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00620.x
- Kobayashi, T., & Boase, J. (2012). No such effect? The implications of measurement error in self-report measures of mobile communication use. Communication Methods and Measures, 6(2), 126–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2012.679243
- Krosnick, J. A. (1991). Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5(3), 213–236. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350050305
- Krumpal, I. (2013). Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: A literature review. Quality & Quantity, 47(4), 2025–2047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9640-9
- Levitan, L. C., & Visser, P. S. (2009). Social network composition and attitude strength: Exploring the dynamics within newly formed social networks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(5), 1057–1067 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.001
- Matthes, J. (2015). Observing the “spiral” in the spiral of silence. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 27(2), 155–176. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edu032
- Matthes, J., Knoll, J., Valenzuela, S., Hopmann, D. N., & Von Sikorski, C. (2019). A meta-analysis of the effects of cross-cutting exposure on political participation. Political Communication, 36(4), 523–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1619638
- Minozzi, W., Song, H., Lazer, D. M., Neblo, M. A., & Ognyanova, K. (2019). The incidental pundit: Who talks politics with whom, and why? American Journal of Political Science, 63(2), 491–508. Online first. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12469
- Mussweiler, T., Rüter, K., & Epstude, K. (2004). The ups and downs of social comparison: Mechanisms of assimilation and contrast. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 87(6), 832. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.6.832
- Mutz, D. C. (2002). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science,46(4), 838–855. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088437
- Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. Cambridge University Press.
- Mutz, D. C. (2008). Is deliberative democracy a falsifiable theory? Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 521–538. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.081306.070308
- Neblo, M. A. (2015). Deliberative democracy between theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
- Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. Penguin.
- Parry, D., Davidson, B. I., Sewall, C., Fisher, J. T., Mieczkowski, H., & Quintana, D. S. (2021). A systematic review and meta-analysis of discrepancies between logged and self-reported digital media use. Nature Human Behavior. Online first. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01117–5
- Prior, M. (2009). Improving media effects research through better measurement of news exposure. The Journal of Politics, 71(3), 893–908. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381609090781
- Prior, M. (2013). The challenge of measuring media exposure: Reply to Dilliplane, Goldman, and Mutz. Political Communication, 30(4), 620–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2013.819539
- Rule, N. O., & Ambady, N. (2010). Democrats and Republicans can be differentiated from their faces. PloS One, 5(1), e8733. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008733
- Scharkow, M. (2016). The accuracy of self-reported internet use -- A validation study using client log data. Communication Methods & Measures, 10(1), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2015.1118446
- Schwarz, N. (2007). Cognitive aspects of survey methodology. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(2), 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1340
- Schwarz, N., & Oyserman, D. (2001). Asking questions about behavior: Cognition, communication, and questionnaire construction. American Journal of Evaluation, 22(2), 127–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/109821400102200202
- Settle, J. E. (2018). Frenemies: How social media polarizes America. Cambridge University Press.
- Settle, J. E., & Carlson, T. N. (2019). Opting out of political discussions. Political Communication, 36(3), 476–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1561563
- Sherif, M., & Hovland, C. I. (1961). Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. Yale University Press.
- Slater, M. D. (2004). Operationalizing and analyzing exposure: The foundation of media effects research. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(1), 168–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900408100112
- Song, H., Cho, J., & Benefield, G. A. (2020). The dynamics of message selection in online political discussion forums: Self-segregation or diverse exposure? Communication Research, 47(1), 125–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218790144
- Song, H., & Eveland, J. W. (2015). The structure of communication networks matters: How network diversity, centrality, and context influence political ambivalence, participation, and knowledge. Political Communication, 32(1), 83–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2014.882462
- Stier, S., Breuer, J., Siegers, P., & Thorson, K. (2020). Integrating survey data and digital trace data: Key issues in developing an emerging field. Social Science Computer Review,38(5), 503–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319843669
- Stroud, N. J. (2010). Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 556–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x
- Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Going to extremes:How like minds unite and divide. Oxford University Press.
- Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science,50(3), 755–769. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x
- The Guardian. (2017, December). Echo chambers are dangerous: We must try to break free of our online bubbles. https://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2017/dec/04/echo-chambers-are-dangerous-we-must-try-to-break-free-of-our-online-bubbles
- Tourangeau, R., & Rasinski, K. A. (1988). Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 299. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.299
- Tsfati, Y., Stroud, N. J., & Chotiner, A. (2014). Exposure to ideological news and perceived opinion climate: Testing the media effects component of spiral-of-silence in a fragmented media landscape. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 19(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161213508206
- Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
- Vogelgesang, J., & Scharkow, M. (2017). Bayesian statistics. In J. Matthes, C. S. Davis, & R. F. Potter (Eds..), The international encyclopedia of communication research methods (pp. 1–9). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0013
- Wired. (2016, November). Your filter bubble is destroying democracy. WIRED. https://www.wired.com/2016/11/filter-bubble-destroying-democracy/
- Wojcieszak, M. (2011). Deliberation and attitude polarization. Journal of Communication, 61(4), 596–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01568.x
- Wojcieszak, M., & Price, V. (2010). Bridging the divide or intensifying the conflict? How disagreement affects strong predilections about sexual minorities. Political Psychology, 31(3), 315–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00753.x
- Wojcieszak, M., & Price, V. (2012). Facts versus perceptions: Who reports disagreement during deliberation and are the reports accurate? Political Communication, 29(3), 299–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2012.694984
- Yang, J., Barnidge, M., & Rojas, H. (2017). The politics of “Unfriending”: User filtration in response to political disagreement on social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.079