Exploring the intersection of language and culture via telecollaboration: Utilizing videoconferencing for intercultural competence development

References

• Akiyama, Y., & Cunningham, D. J. (2018, March 24–27). Telecollaboration and synchronous computer-mediated communication: A scoping review. AAAL 2018. Sheraton Grand Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Avgousti, M. I. (2018). Intercultural communicative competence and online exchanges: A systematic review. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–35. doi:10.1080/09588221.2018.1455713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belz, J. (2002). Social dimensions of telecollaborative foreign language study. Language Learning and Technology, 6(1), 60–81. Retrieved October 13, 2017, from, http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num1/belz/
   Google Scholar
• Belz, J. A. (2001). Institutional and individual dimensions of transatlantic group work in network-based language teaching. ReCALL, 13(2), 213–231. doi:10.1017/S0958344001000726a
   Google Scholar
• Belz, J. A. (2003). Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 68–99. Retrieved January 23, 2017, from, http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num3/belz/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. M., & Bennett, M. J. (2004). Developing intercultural sensitivity: An integrative approach to global and domestic diversity. In D. Landis, J. M. Bennett, & M. J. Bennett (Eds.), Handbook of intercultural training (pp. 147–165). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. doi:10.4135/9781452231129.n6
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, M. J. (1993). Towards ethnorelativism: A developmental model of intercultural sensitivity In. In R. Michael Paige (Ed.), Education for the intercultural experience (pp.21–71). Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bohinski, C. A., & Leventhal, Y. (2015). Rethinking the ICC framework: Transformation and telecollaboration. Foreign Language Annals, 48(3), 521–534. doi:10.1111/flan.12149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohinski, C. A., & Mulé, N. (2016). Telecollaboration: Participation and negotiation of meaning in synchronous and asynchronous activities. MEXTESOL Journal, 40(3), 1–16. Retrieved from http://www.mextesol.net/journal/index.php?page=journal&id_article=1489
   Google Scholar
• Brammerts, H. (2003). Autonomous language learning in tandem: The development of a concept. In T. Lewis & L. Walker (Eds.), Autonomous language learning in tandem (pp. 27–37). Sheffield, UK: Academy Electronic Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Branon, R. F., & Essex, C. (2001). Synchronous and asynchronous communication tools in distance education. TechTrends, 45(1), 36. doi:10.1007/bf02763377
   Google Scholar
• Bueno, M. C. (2011). Perceived benefits and drawbacks of synchronous voice-based computer- mediated communication in the foreign language classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(5), 419–432. doi:10.1080/09588221.2011.574639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47. doi:10.1093/applin/1.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Canto, S., Jauregi, K., & van Den Bergh, H. (2013). Integrating cross-cultural interaction through video-communication and virtual worlds in foreign language teaching programs: Is there an added value? ReCALL, 25(1), 105–121. doi:10.1017/S0958344012000274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J. J., & Yang, S. C. (2014). Fostering foreign language learning through technology-enhanced intercultural projects. Language Learning & Technology, 18(1), 57–75. doi:10.10125/44354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, N., Ko, H., Kinshuk, & Lin, T. (2005). A model for synchronous learning using the Internet. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42(2), 181–194. doi:10.1080/14703290500062599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffman, T. (2009). Engaging students through inquiry-oriented learning and technology. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Deardorff, D. K. (2006). Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3), 241–266. doi:10.1177/1028315306287002
   Google Scholar
• Deardorff, D. K. (2009). Implementing intercultural competence assessment. In D. K. Deardorff (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of intercultural competence (pp. 477–491). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Deardorff, D. K. (2012). Framework: Intercultural competence model. In K. Berardo & D. K. Deardorff (Eds.), Building cultural competence: Innovative activities and models (pp. 45–52). Sterling, Virginia: Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• de Fornel, M. (1996). The interactional frame of videophonic exchange. (L. Libbrecht,Trans.). Réseaux, 4(1), 47–72. doi:10.3406/reso.1996.3305
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y.. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Dervin, F. (2010). Assessing intercultural competence in language learning and teaching: A critical review of current efforts. New Approaches to Assessment in Higher Education, 5, 155–172.
   Google Scholar
• Dooly, M. (2017). Telecollaboration. In C. A. Chapelle & S. Sauro (Eds.), The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp. 169–183). Oxford, U.K: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Fantini, A. (2001, April 6–8). Exploring intercultural competence: A construct proposal. Paper presented at NCOLCTL Fourth Annual Conference. Foreign Service Institute and Holiday Inn Arlington.
   Google Scholar
• Fantini, A. E. (2009). Assessing intercultural competence: Issues and tools. In D. K. Deardorff (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of intercultural competence (pp. 456–476). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C., Hauck, M., & Müller-Hartmann, A. (2012). Promoting learner autonomy through multiliteracy skills development in cross-institutional exchanges. Language Learning & Technology, 16(3), 82–102. doi:10.125/44301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• George, E., & Montelongo, I. V. (2015). Voices from the periphery: The Victoria university and university of Texas at El Paso global learning community. In A. S. Moore & S. Simon (Eds.), Globally networked teaching in the humanities (pp. 97–109). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• González-Lloret, M. (2003). Designing task-based call to promote interaction: En busca de esmeraldas. Language Learning & Technology, 7(1), 86–104. Retrieved October 13, 2017, from, http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num1/gonzalez/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudykunst, W. B. (1993). Toward a theory of effective interpersonal and intergroup communication: An anxiety/uncertainty management perspective. In R. L. Wiseman & J. Koester (Eds.), Intercultural communication competence (pp. 33–71). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Guest, M. (2002). A critical “checkbook” for culture teaching and learning. ELT Journal, 56(2), 154–161. doi:10.1093/elt/56.2.154
   Google Scholar
• Guichon, N. (2010). Preparatory study for the design of a desktop videoconferencing platform for synchronous language teaching. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(2), 169–182. doi:10.1080/09588221003666255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guth, S., & Helm, F. (2010). Telecollaboration 2.0: Language, literacies, and intercultural learning in the 21st Century (Vol. 1). Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang. doi:10.3726/978-3-0351-0013-6
   Google Scholar
• Hafez, K., & Skinner, A. (2007). The myth of media globalization. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helm, F., & Guth, S. (2010). The multifarious goals of telecollaboration 2.0: Theoretical and practical implications. In S. Guth & F. Helm (Eds.), Telecollaboration 2.0: Language, literacies, and intercultural learning in the 21st century (pp. 69–106). New York, NY: Peter Lang. doi:10.3726/978-3-0351-0013-6
   Google Scholar
• Huebener, T. (1959). How to teach foreign languages effectively. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hung, Y.-W., & Higgins, S. (2016). Learners’ use of communication strategies in text-based and video-based synchronous computer-mediated communication environments: Opportunities for language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(5), 901–924. doi:10.1080/09588221.2015.1074589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jauregi, K., & Bañados, E. (2008). Virtual interaction through video-web communication: A step towards enriching and internationalizing learning programs. ReCALL, 20(2), 183–207. doi:10.1017/S0958344008000529
   Google Scholar
• Kato, F., Spring, R., & Mori, C. (2016). Mutually beneficial foreign language learning: Creating meaningful interactions through video-synchronous computer-mediated communication. Foreign Language Annals, 49(2), 355–366. doi:10.1111/flan.12195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klemp, G. O., Jr. (1979). Identifying, measuring and integrating competence. In P. S. Pottinger & J. Goldsmith (Eds.), Defining and measuring competence (pp. 41–52). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kozar, O. (2016). Perceptions of webcam use by experienced online teachers and learners: A seeming disconnect between research and practice. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(4), 800–810. doi:10.1080/09588221.2015.1061021
   Google Scholar
• Lenkaitis, C. A. & English, B. (2017). Technology and telenovelas: Incorporating culture and group work in the L2 classroom. MEXTESOL Journal, 41(3), 1–20. Retrieved from http://www.mextesol.net/journal/index.php?page=journal&id_article=2514
   Google Scholar
• Lenkaitis, C. A. (in press). Rethinking study abroad and intercultural competence. In B. Loranc-Paszylk & T. Szczygłowska (Eds.), Rethinking directions in language learning within the university context. Research-publishing.net.
   Google Scholar
• Liaw, M. L. (2006). E-learning and the development of intercultural competence. Language Learning & Technology, 10(3), 49–64. doi: 10125/44074
   Google Scholar
• Liddicoat, A. J., & Scarino, A. (2013). Intercultural language teaching and learning. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–463). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, R., Goodale, T., & Guo, Y. (2014). Impact of videoconference with native English speakers on Chinese EFL learners’ oral competence and self-confidence. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2(2), 54–60. doi:10.4236/jss.2014.22008
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, K. A. (2003). Face-to-face versus threaded discussions: The role of time and higher- order thinking. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3), 55–65. Retrieved October 17, 2017, from, https://onlinelearningconsortium.org/read/journal-issues/
   Google Scholar
• Moeller, A. K., & Nugent, K. (2014). Building intercultural competence in the language classroom. In S. Dhonau (Ed.), Unlock the gateway to communication (pp. 1–18). Eau Clarie, WI: Crown Prints.
   Google Scholar
• Moridani, M. (2007). Asynchronous video streaming vs. synchronous videoconferencing for teaching a pharmacogenetic pharmacotherapy course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 71(1), 16. doi:10.5688/aj710116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, E., Rodríguez-Manzanares, M. A., & Barbour, M. (2011). Asynchronous and synchronous online teaching: Perspectives of Canadian high school distance education teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), 583–591. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01112.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The National Standards Collaborative Board. (2015). World-readiness standards for learning languages (4th ed.). Alexandria, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• O’Dowd, R., & Eberbach, K. (2004). Guides on the side? Tasks and challenges for teachers in telecollaborative projects. Recall, 16(1), 5–19. doi:10.1017/S0958344004000217
   Google Scholar
• O’Dowd, R., & Ritter, M. (2006). Understanding and working with ‘Failed communication’ in telecollaborative exchanges. CALICO Journal, 23(3), 623–642. doi:10.1558/cj.v23i3.623-642
   Google Scholar
• O’Dowd, R., & Ware, P. (2009). Critical issues in telecollaborative task design. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(2), 173–188. doi:10.1080/09588220902778369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved from http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html
   Google Scholar
• Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2011). 21st century skills map. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://www.actfl.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/21stCenturySkillsMap/p21_worldlanguagesmap.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pica, T. (1991). Classroom interaction, participation, and negotiation. System, 19(4), 437–452. doi:10.1016/0346-251X(91)90024-J
   Google Scholar
• Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second language learning conditions, processes and outcomes? Language Learning, 44(3), 493–527. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01115.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runyan, A. S., Marchand, M. H., & Stoll, C. (2015). Crossing borders. In A. S. Moore & S. Simon (Eds.), Globally networked teaching in the humanities (pp. 110–123). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Schneker, T. (2012). Intercultural competence and cultural learning through telecollaboration. CALICO Journal, 29(3), 449–470. doi:10.11139/cj.29.3.449-470
   Google Scholar
• Seidl, M. (1998). Language and culture: Towards a transcultural competence in language learning. Forum for Modern Language Studies, 32(2), 101–113. doi:10.1093/fmls/XXXIV.2.101
   Google Scholar
• Sykes, J., Oskoz, A., & Thorne, S. (2008). Web 2.0, synthetic immersive environments, and mobile resources for language education. CALICO Journal, 25(3), 528–546.
   Google Scholar
• Thanasoulas, D. (2001). The importance of teaching culture in the foreign language classroom. Radical Pedagogy. Retrieved August 1, 2018, from https://media.startalk.umd.edu/workshops/2009/SeattlePS/
   Google Scholar
• Thorne, S. (2003). Artifacts and Cultures-of-Use in Intercultural Communication. Language Learning and Technology, 7(2), 38–67. Retrieved October 13, 2017, from, http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/thorne/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C. I., Peng, H., & Lu, W. H. (2006). A framework for the assessing of intercultural communicative competence: A mixed approach. In E. Pearson & P. Bohman (Eds.,) Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2006–world conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia & telecommunications (pp. 2977–2984) Orlando, FL USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) Retrieved fromhttps://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/23428/
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. (2006). Negotiation of meaning in desktop videoconferencing-supported distance language learning. ReCALL, 18(1), 122–145. doi:10.1017/S0958344006000814
   Google Scholar
• Ware, P. (2005). “Missed” communication in online communication: Tensions in a German- American telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 9(2), 64–89. Retrieved January 23, 2017, from, http://llt.msu.edu/vol9num2/ware/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic communication in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13(2), 7–26.
   Google Scholar
• Willig, C. (2013). Introducing qualitative research in psychology. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar