Heterosis in Tomato for Growth and Yield Traits

References

• Bai, Y. and P. Lindhout. 2007. Domestication and breeding of tomatoes: what have we gained and what can we gain in the future? Ann. Bot. 100:1085–1094. doi:10.1093/aob/mcm150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatt, R.P., V.R. Biswas, and N. Kumar. 2001. Heterosis, combining ability and genetics for vitamin C, TSS and yield in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) at 1700 m altitude. J. Agr. Sci. 137:71–75. doi:10.1017/S0021859601008838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bose, T.K., J. Kabir, T.K. Maity, V.A. Parthasarathy, and M.G. Som. 2002. Vegetable crops. Naya Prakash, Kolkata, India.
   Google Scholar
• Celine, V.A. and P.S. Sirohi. 1998. Generation mean analysis for earliness and yield in Bitter Gourd (Momordica charantia L.). Veg. Sci. 25:51–54.
   Google Scholar
• Chauhan, V.B.S., R. Kumar, T.K. Behera, and R.K. Yadav. 2014. Studies on heterosis for yield and its attributing traits in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Intl. J. Agr. Environ. Biotechnol. 7:95–100. doi:10.5958/j.2230-732X.7.1.013.
   Google Scholar
• Choudhary, B. 1965. Vegetables. National Book Trust of India, New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, M.J., S. Ahmad, M.U. Nazim, A.K.M. Quamruzzaman, and M.M.A. Patwary. 2010. Expression of heterosis for productive traits in F1 Brinjal (Solanum melongena L.) hybrids. Agriculturist 8:8–13.
   Google Scholar
• Dasi, S., B. Mandal, and P. Hazra. 2009. Study of heterosis in Brinjal (Solanum melongena L.) for yield attributing traits. J. Crop Weed. 5:25–30.
   Google Scholar
• Dharmatti, P.R., G.P. Kulkarni, and R.V. Patil. 2006. Heterosis for yield and bacterial wilt incidence in tomato. J. Asian Hort. 2:151–154.
   Google Scholar
• Dudi, B.S. and G. Kalloo. 1982. Correlation and path analysis studies in tomato. Haryana J. Hort. Sci. 11:122–126.
   Google Scholar
• Fernie, A.R., Y. Tadmor, and D. Zamir. 2006. Natural genetic variation for improving crop quality. Curr. Opin. Plant Biotechnol. 9:196–202. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2006.01.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg, N., D.S. Cheema, and N. Chawla. 2013. Manifestation of heterosis for fruit yield, quality and shelf-life in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) hybrids incorporating rin, nor or alc alleles in main- and late-seasons of north Indian plains. Veg. Sci. 40:28–33.
   Google Scholar
• Gull, R., H.U. Rahman, I.H. Khalil, S.M.A. Shah, and A. Ghafoor. 2010. Heterosis for flower and fruit traits in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). African J. Biotechnol. 9:4144–4151.
   Google Scholar
• Hannan, M.M., M.B. Ahmed, M.A. Razvy, R. Karim, M. Khatun, A. Haydar, M. Hossain, and U.K. Roy. 2007. Heterosis and correlation of yield and yield components in Tomato (Lycopersicon esulentum Mill.). Amer-Eurasian J. Sci. Res. 2:146–150.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, H.K., I.R. Immer, and D.C. Smith. 1956. Methods of plant breeding. McGraw Hill, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Hedrick, U.P. and N. Booth. 1907. Mendelian characters in tomato. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 5:19–23.
   Google Scholar
• Himanshu, G., N. Rai, R.K. Singh, and D.B. Singh. 2008. Expression of heterosis and combining abilities (GCA & SCA) in inter-specific crosses of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. syn. Solanum lycopersicum L.). J. Plant Genet. Resour. 21:221–224.
   Google Scholar
• Kamble, C., R. Mulge, M.B. Madalageri, and R.C. Jadeesha. 2009. Studies on heterosis in Capsicum (Capsicum annuum L.) for yield and yield traits. Karnataka J. Agr. Sci. 22:155–157.
   Google Scholar
• Kanthaswamy, V., M.M. Koder, and S. Thamburaj. 1995. A study of generation means analysis in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). South Indian Hort. 43:25–29.
   Google Scholar
• Kempthorne, O. 1957. An introduction to genetic statistics. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, R., N.K. Mishra, J. Singh, G.K. Rai, A. Verma, and M. Rai. 2006. Studies on yield and quality traits in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Veg. Sci. 33:126–132.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, R.L., O. Sridevi, U. Kage, P.M. Salimath, D. Madalageri, and P. Natikar. 2014. Heterosis studies in Chilli (Capsicum annuum L.). Intl. J. Hort. 4:40–43.
   Google Scholar
• Kumari, S. and M.K. Sharma. 2011. Exploitation of heterosis for yield and its contributing traits in Tomato, Solanum lycopersicum L. Intl. J. Farm Sci. 1:45–55.
   Google Scholar
• Negi, P.K., R.R. Sharma, and R. Kumar. 2012. Heterosis and inbreeding depression in tomato under low temperature regime. Indian J. Hort. 69:443–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patwary, M.M.A., M.M. Rahman, S. Ahmad, M.A.K. Miah, and H. Barua. 2013. Study of heterosis in heat tolerant Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) during summer. Bangladesh J. Agr. Res. 38:531–544.
   Google Scholar
• Saleem, M.Y., M. Asghar, M.A. Haq, T. Rafique, A. Kamran, and A.A. Khan. 2009. Genetic analysis to identify suitable parents for hybrid seed production in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Pakistan J. Bot. 41:1107–1116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shull, G.H. 1914. Duplicate genes for capsule form in Bursa bursa-pastoris. Zeitscher. Induct. Abstamm. U. Verebungsl. 12:97–149.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, A., J.P.S. Gautam, M. Upadhyay, and A. Joshi. 2005. Heterosis for yield and quality characters in tomato. Crop Res. 29:285–287.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, N.P., A.K. Bharadwaj, A. Kumar, and K.M. Singh. 2004. Modern technology on vegetable production. Intl. Book Distributing Co., Lucknow, India.
   Google Scholar
• Solieman, T.H.I., M.A.H. El-Gabry, and A.I. Abido. 2013. Heterosis, potence ratio and correlation of some important characters in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Sci. Hort. 150:25–30. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2012.10.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellington, R. 1912. Influence of crossing in increasing the yield of tomato. Bull. N.Y. Agr. Expt. Sta. 346:57–76.
   Google Scholar
• Yadav, S.K., B.K. Singh, D.K. Baranwal, and S.S. Solankey. 2013. Genetic study of heterosis for yield and quality components in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). African J. Agr. Res. 8:5585–5591.
   Google Scholar