2,146
Views
43
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Explicit Verbal Sexual Consent Communication: Effects of Gender, Relationship Status, and Type of Sexual Behavior

, , , , &
Pages 60-70 | Received 31 Jul 2018, Accepted 09 Dec 2018, Published online: 19 Feb 2019

References

  • Beres, M. A. (2007). ‘Spontaneous’ sexual consent: An analysis of sexual consent literature. Feminism & Psychology, 17(1), 93–108. doi:10.1177/0959353507072914
  • Beres, M. (2010). Sexual miscommunication? Untangling assumptions about sexual communication between casual sex partners. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 12(1), 1–14. doi:10.1080/13691050903075226
  • Beres, M. A. (2014). Rethinking the concept of consent for anti-sexual violence activism and education. Feminism & Psychology, 24(3), 373–389. doi:10.1177/0959353514539652
  • Beres, M. A., Herold, E., & Maitland, S. B. (2004). Sexual consent behaviors in same-sex relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33(5), 475–486. doi:10.1023/B:ASEB.0000037428.41757.10
  • Bennett, J. (2016, January 10). Campus sex … with a syllabus. New York Times (online edition). Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/10/fashion/sexual-consentassault-collegecampuses.html
  • Burkett, M., & Hamilton, K. (2012). Postfeminist sexual agency: Young women’s negotiations of sexual consent. Sexualities, 15(7), 815–833. doi:10.1177/1363460712454076
  • Byers, E. S., Henderson, J., & Hobson, K. M. (2009). University students’ definitions of sexual abstinence and having sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38(5), 665–674. doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9289-6
  • Curtis, J. N., & Burnett, S. (2017). Affirmative consent: What do college student leaders think about “yes means yes” as the standard for sexual behavior?. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 12(3), 201–214. doi:10.1080/15546128.2017.1328322
  • Dougherty, T. (2015). Yes means yes: Consent as communication. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 43(3), 224–253. doi:10.1111/papa.12059
  • Foubert, J. D., Garner, D. N., & Thaxter, P. J. (2006). An exploration of fraternity culture: Implications for programs to address alcohol-related sexual assault. College Student Journal, 40(2), 361–373.
  • Hall, D. S. (1998). Consent for sexual behavior in a college student population. Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality, 1, 1–16.
  • Hickman, S. E., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (1999). “By the semi‐mystical appearance of a condom”: How young women and men communicate sexual consent in heterosexual situations. Journal of Sex Research, 36(3), 258–272. doi:10.1080/00224499909551996
  • Humphreys, T. (2007). Perceptions of sexual consent: The impact of relationship history and gender. Journal of Sex Research, 44(4), 307–315. doi:10.1080/00224490701586706
  • Humphreys, T. P., & Brousseau, M. M. (2010). The sexual consent scale–revised: Development, reliability, and preliminary validity. Journal of Sex Research, 47(5), 420–428. doi:10.1080/00224490903151358
  • Humphreys, T., & Herold, E. (2007). Sexual consent in heterosexual relationships: Development of a new measure. Sex Roles, 57(3-4), 305–315. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9264-7
  • Hust, S. J., Rodgers, K. B., & Bayly, B. (2017). Scripting sexual consent: Internalized traditional sexual scripts and sexual consent expectancies among college students. Family Relations, 66(1), 197–210. doi:10.1111/fare.12230
  • Jozkowski, K. N. (2016). Barriers to affirmative consent policies and the need for affirmative sexuality. University of Pacific Law Review, 47, 741–772.
  • Jozkowski, K. N., Canan, S. N., Rhoads, K., & Hunt, M. (2016). Methodological considerations for content analysis of sexual consent communication in mainstream films. Sexualization, Media, & Society, 2(4), 1–17. doi:10.1177/2374623816679184
  • Jozkowski, K. N., Marcantonio, T. L., & Hunt, M. E. (2017). College students sexual consent communication and perceptions of sexual double standards: A qualitative investigation. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 49(4), 237–244. doi:10.1363/psrh.12041
  • Jozkowski, K. N., & Peterson, Z. D. (2013). College students and sexual consent: Unique insights. Journal of Sex Research, 50(6), 517–523. doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.700739
  • Jozkowski, K. N., Peterson, Z. D., Sanders, S. A., Dennis, B., & Reece, M. (2014). Gender differences in heterosexual college students’ conceptualizations and indicators of sexual consent: Implications for contemporary sexual assault prevention education. Journal of Sex Research, 51(8), 904–916. doi:10.1080/00224499.2013.792326
  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310
  • Light, R. J. (1971). Measures of response agreement for qualitative data: Some generalizations and alternatives. Psychological Bulletin, 76(5), 365–377. doi:10.1037/h0031643
  • McLeod, L. (2015). Towards a culture of consent: Sexual consent styles and contemporary social interventions (Unpublished thesis). James Cook University, Cairns, Australia.
  • Marcantonio, T., Jozkowski, K. N., & Wiersma-Mosley, J. (2018). The influence of partner status and sexual behavior on college women’s consent communication and feelings. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 1–26. doi:10.1080/0092623X.2018.1474410
  • Middlestadt, S. E., Bhattacharyya, K., Rosenbaum, J., Fishbein, M., & Shepherd, M. (1996). The use of theory based semistructured elicitation questionnaires: Formative research for CDC's Prevention Marketing Initiative. Public Health Reports, 111(Supplement 1), 18–27.
  • Muehlenhard, C. L., Humphreys, T. P., Jozkowski, K. N., & Peterson, Z. D. (2016). The complexities of sexual consent among college students: A conceptual and empirical review. Journal of Sex Research, 53(4-5), 457–487. doi:10.1080/00224499.2016.1146651
  • Sanders, S. A., Hill, B. J., Yarber, W. L., Graham, C. A., Crosby, R. A., & Milhausen, R. R. (2010). Misclassification bias: Diversity in conceptualisations about having ‘had sex’. Sexual Health, 7(1), 31–34. doi:10.1071/SH09068
  • Wiederman, M. W. (2005). The gendered nature of sexual scripts. The Family Journal, 13(4), 496–502. doi:10.1177/1066480705278729
  • Willis, M., & Jozkowski, K. N. (2018). Barriers to the success of affirmative consent initiatives: An application of the Social Ecological Model. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 13(3), 324–336. doi:10.1080/15546128.2018.1443300
  • Willis, M., & Jozkowski, K. N. (in press). Let’s not talk about sex, baby: Sexual precedent’s effect on sexual consent communication. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10508-018-1348-7
  • Willis, M., Canan, S. N., Jozkowski, K. N., & Bridges, A. J. (2018, November). An overview of the consent cues depicted in mainstream pornography. Oral presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality, Montreal, Canada.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.