Multiple Casual Sex Scripts: Shared Beliefs about Behavior among Portuguese Emerging Adults

References

• Afifi, W. A., & Faulkner, S. L. (2000). On being ‘just friends’: The frequency and impact of sexual activity in cross-sex friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17(2), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407500172003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agnew, C. R., & Loving, T. J. (1998). The role of social desirability in self-reported condom use attitudes and intentions. AIDS and Behavior, 2(3), 229–239. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022189801933
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez, M.-J., & Garcia-Marques, L. (2008). Condom inclusion in cognitive representations of sexual encounters. Journal of Sex Research, 45(4), 358–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490802398415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez, M.-J., Garcia, M., & Pereira, C. (2019). A diversidade dos relacionamentos casuais e suas características [The diversity of casual relationships and their characteristics]. Psicologia, 33(2), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v33i2.1423
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez, M.-J., Pegado, A., Luz, R., & Amaro, H. (2021). Still striving after all these years: Between normality of conduct and normativity of evaluation in casual relationships among college students. Current Psychology, 2021, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02344-9
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez, M.-J., Pereira, C. R., Godinho, C. A., & Luz, R. (2021). Clear-cut terms and culture-sensitive characteristics of distinctive casual sexual relationships in Portuguese emerging adults. Sexuality & Culture, 25(6), 1966–1989. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-021-09859-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bargh, J. A. (1996). Automaticity in social psychology. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 169–183). Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Bersamin, M., Zamboanga, B., Schwartz, S., Donnellan, M., Hudson, M., Weisskirch, R., Kim, S., Agocha, V., Whitbourne, S., & Caraway, S. (2014). Risky business: Is there an association between casual sex and mental health among emerging adults? Journal of Sex Research, 51(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.772088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bible, J., Matera, K., & Eeden-Moorefield, B. (2022). An empirical examination of hookup definitions across the literature 2000–2019. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 51(3), 1773–1781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02115-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bower, G. H., Black, J. B., & Turner, T. J. (1979). Scripts in memory for text. Cognitive Psychology, 11(2), 177–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(79)90009-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowleg, L., Burkholder, G., Noar, S., Teti, M., Malebranche, D., & Tschann, J. (2015). Sexual scripts and sexual risk behaviors among black heterosexual men: Development of the Sexual Scripts Scale. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(3), 639–654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0193-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowleg, L., Massie, J., Holt, S., Heckert, A., Teti, M., & Tschann, J. (2021). How black heterosexual men’s narratives about sexual partner type and condom use disrupt the main and casual partner dichotomy: ‘We still get down, but we not together. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 23(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2019.1683228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, C., Kahn, A. S., & Saville, B. K. (2010). To hook up or date: Which gender benefits? Sex Roles, 62, 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9765-7
   Google Scholar
• Claxton, S., & van Dulmen, M. (2013). Casual sexual relationships and experiences in emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 1(2), 138–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696813487181
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, E., Corona-Vargas, E., & Ford, J. V. (2021). Advancing sexual pleasure as a fundamental human right and essential for sexual health, overall health and well-being: An introduction to the special issue on Sexual Pleasure. International Journal of Sexual Health, 33(4), 473–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2021.2015507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correa, A. B., Castro, A., Barrada, J. R., & Ruiz-Gómez, P. (2017). Sociodemographic and psychosexual characteristics of students from a Spanish university who engage in casual sex. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 14(4), 445–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-017-0274-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downing-Matibag, T., & Geisinger, B. (2009). Hooking up and sexual risk taking among college students: A health belief model perspective. Qualitative Health Research, 19(9), 1196–1209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732309344206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaton, A., & Rose, S. (2012). Scripts for actual first date and hanging-out encounters among young heterosexual Hispanic adults. Sex Roles, 67(5-6), 285–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0190-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaton, A., Rose, S., Interligi, C., Fernandez, K., & McHugh, M. (2016). Gender and ethnicity in dating, hanging out, and hooking up: Sexual scripts among Hispanic and white young adults. Journal of Sex Research, 53(7), 788–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1065954
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgar, T., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1993). Expectations for sexual interaction: A cognitive test of the sequencing of sexual communication behaviors. Health Communication, 5(4), 239–261. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327027hc0504_1
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, M., Calzo, J., Smiler, A., & Ward, L. (2009). Anything from making out to having sex: Men’s negotiations of hooking up and friends with benefits scripts. Journal of Sex Research, 46(5), 414–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, J. V., Corona-Vargas, E., Cruz, M., Fortenberry, J. D., Kismodi, E., Philpott, A., Rubio-Aurioles, E., & Coleman, E. (2021). Sexual pleasure and healthcare settings: Focusing on pleasure to improve healthcare delivery and utilization. International Journal of Sexual Health, 33(4), 612–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2021.2023718
   Google Scholar
• Gagnon, J. (1990). The explicit and implicit use of scripting perspective in sex research. Annual Review of Sex Research, 1, 1–43.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, J., Reiber, C., Massey, S., & Merriwether, A. (2012). Sexual hookup culture: A review. Review of General Psychology, 16(2), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027911
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianotten, W. L., Alley, J. C., & Diamond, L. M. (2021). The health benefits of sexual expression. International Journal of Sexual Health, 33(4), 478–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2021.1966564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenn, N., & Marquardt, E. (2001). Hooking up, hanging out and hoping for mister Right: College women on dating and mating today. Institute for American values report to the independent women’s forum.
   Google Scholar
• Grello, C., Welsh, D., & Harper, M. (2006). No strings attached: The nature of casual sex in college students. Journal of Sex Research, 43(3), 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490609552324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadden, B. W., Harvey, S. M., Settersten, R. A., Jr., & Agnew, C. R. (2019). What do I call us? The investment model of commitment processes and changes in relationship categorization. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(2), 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617745115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haselton, M. G. (2003). The sexual overperception bias: Evidence of a systematic bias in men from a survey of naturally occurring events. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(1), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00529-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatfield, E., Hutchison, E. S., Bensman, K., Young, D., & Rapson, R. (2012). Cultural, social, and gender influences on casual sex: New developments. In J. M. Turn & A. D. Mitchell (Eds.), Social psychology: New developments (pp. 1–37). Nova Science.
   Google Scholar
• Holman, A., & Sillars, A. (2012). Talk about “hooking up”: The influence of college student social networks on nonrelationship sex. Health communication, 27(2), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.575540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonason, P. K. (2013). Four functions for four relationships: Consensus definitions of university students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(8), 1407–1414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0189-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., & Cason, M. J. (2009). The “booty call”: A compromise betwen men’s and women’s ideal mating strategies. Journal of Sex Research, 46(5), 460–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490902775827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinkenberg, D., & Rose, S. (1994). Dating scripts of gay men and lesbians. Journal of Homosexuality, 26(4), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v26n04_02
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landgraf, S., von Treskow, I., & Osterheider, M. (2018). “Sex in a relationship” versus “sex during a one-night stand”: The link between mental representations of consensual sexuality, mating strategies, and sexual experience in heterosexual women and men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(3), 725–736.
   Google Scholar
• Laner, M., & Ventrone, N. (1998). Egalitarian daters/Traditional dates. Journal of Family Issues, 19(4), 468–477. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251398019004005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, E. J. (1978). Rethinking the role of thought in social interaction. In J. Harvey, W. Ickes, & R. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 2, pp. 35–58). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Lenton, A. P., & Bryan, A. (2005). An affair to remember: The role of sexual scripts in perceptions of sexual intent. Personal Relationships, 12(4), 483–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2005.00127.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima, A., Hilyard, K., Davis, T., de Marrais, K., Jeffries, W., & Muilenburg, J. (2018). Protective behaviours among young African American women with non-monogamous sexual partners. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 20(4), 442–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2017.1356937
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luz, R., Alvarez, M.-J., Godinho, C. A., & Pereira, C. R. (2022). A fertile ground for ambiguities: Casual sexual relationships among Portuguese emerging adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 823102. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.823102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machia, L. V., Proulx, M. L., Ioerger, M., & Lehmiller, J. J. (2020). A longitudinal study of friends with benefits relationships. Personal Relationships, 27(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maticka-Tyndale, E., & Herold, E. (1997). The scripting of sexual behaviour: Canadian university students on spring break in Florida. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 6(4), 317–328.
   Google Scholar
• Maticka-Tyndale, E., & Herold, E. (1999). Condom use on spring-break vacation: The influence of intentions, prior use and context. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(5), 1010–1027. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00137.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misovich, S., Fisher, J., & Fisher, W. (1997). Close relationships and elevated HIV risk behavior evidence and possible underlying psychological processes. Review of General Psychology, 1(1), 72–107. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.1.1.72
   Google Scholar
• Mongeau, P. A., Knight, K., Williams, J., Eden, J., & Shaw, C. (2013). Identifying and explicating variation among friends with benefits relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 50(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.623797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, L. E., Morrison-Beedy, D., Kearney, M. H., & Dozier, A. (2011). Sexual partner type taxonomy use among urban black adolescent mothers in the United States. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 20(1–2), 1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olmstead, S. B., Norona, J. C., & Anders, K. M. (2019). How do college experience and gender differentiate the enactment of hookup scripts among emerging adults? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(6), 1769–1783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1233-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz-Torres, B., Williams, S. P., & Ehrhardt, A. A. (2003). Urban women’s gender scripts: Implications for HIV prevention. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 5(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/713804639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, J., Fincham, F. D., & Moore, J. (2011). Short-term prospective study of hooking up among college students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(2), 331–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9697-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, E., & Hayes, K. (2002). The casualties of “casual” sex: A qualitative exploration of the phenomenology of college students’ hookups. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19(5), 639–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407502195006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, E., McManus, B., & Hayes, A. (2000). “Hookups”: Characteristics and correlates of college students’ spontaneous and anonymous sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 37(1), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490009552023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philpott, A., Knerr, W., & Boydell, V. (2006). Pleasure and prevention: When good sex is safer sex. Reproductive health Matters, 14(28), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(06)28254-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan, P. C., & Dreyer, C. S. (1999). Lust? Love? Status? Young adults’ motives for engaging in casual sex. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 11(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v11n01_01
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigue, C., Blais, M., Lavoie, F., Adam, B. D., Goyer, M. F., & Magontier, C. (2018). Passion, intimacy, and commitment in casual sexual relationships in a canadian sample of emerging adults. The Journal of Sex Research, 55(9), 1192–1205. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2017.1399195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigue, C., Blais, M., Lavoie, F., Adam, B. D., Magontier, C., & Goyer, M.-F. (2015). The structure of casual sexual relationships and experiences among single adults aged 18–30 years old: A latent profile analysis. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 24(3), 215–227. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.243-A1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, S., & Frieze, I. (1993). Young singles’ contemporary dating scripts. Sex Roles, 28(9–10), 499–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, S., & Frieze, I. H. (1989). Young singles’ scripts for a first date. Gender & Society, 3(2), 258–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124389003002006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakaluk, J. K., Todd, L. M., Milhausen, R., & Lachowsky, N. J. (2014). Dominant heterosexual sexual scripts in emerging adulthood: Conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Sex Research, 51(5), 516–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.745473
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schank, R., & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
   Google Scholar
• Shepardson, R. L., Walsh, J. L., Carey, K. B., & Carey, M. P. (2016). Benefits of hooking up: Self-reports from first-year college women. International journal of Sexual Health, 28(3), 216–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2016.1178677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. (1986). Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15(2), 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, M. C., Erickson, P. I., Badiane, L., Diaz, R., Ortiz, D., Abraham, T., & Nicolaysen, A. M. (2006). Syndemics, sex, and the city: Understanding sexually transmitted diseases in social and cultural context. Social Science & Medicine, 63(8), 2010–2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.05.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skakoon-Sparling, S., Cramer, K., & Shuper, P. (2016). The impact of sexual arousal on sexual risk-taking and decision-making in men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0589-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomaszewska, P., & Krahé, B. (2018). Predictors of sexual aggression victimization and perpetration among Polish university students: A longitudinal study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(2), 493–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0823-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanderdrift, L. E., Lehmiller, J. J., & Kelly, J. R. (2012). Commitment in friends with benefits relationships: Implications for relational and safe-sex outcomes. Personal Relationships, 19(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01324.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrangalova, Z. (2015). Does casual sex harm college students’ well-being? A longitudinal investigation of the role of motivation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(4), 945–959. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0255-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade, L. (2017). American hookup: The new culture of sex on campus. W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, A. D., MacKeigan, K. L., & MacDonald, H. A. (2011). Experiences and perceptions of young adults in friends with benefits relationships: A qualitative study. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 20(1–2), 41–53.
   Google Scholar
• Weitbrecht, E. M., & Whitton, S. W. (2020). College students’ motivations for “hooking up”: Similarities and differences in motives by gender and partner type. Couple and Family Psychology, 9(3), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000138
   Google Scholar
• Wentland, J., & Reissing, E. (2011). Taking casual sex not too casually: Exploring definitions of casual sexual relationships. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 20(3), 75–91.
   Google Scholar
• Wentland, J., & Reissing, E. (2014). Identifying definitions for one night stands, booty calls, fuck buddies, and friends with benefits. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 23(3), 23–40.
   Google Scholar
• Wesche, R., Claxton, S. E., Lefkowitz, E. S., & van Dulmen, M. H. (2018). Evaluations and future plans after casual sexual experiences: Differences across partner type. Journal of Sex Research, 55(9), 1180–1191. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2017.1298714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, C. D., & Harper, S. R. (2014). Toward complex and inclusive studies of sex scripts, college students’ sexual behaviors, and hookup cultures on U.S. campuses. Masculinities and Social Change, 3(3), 271–298.
   Google Scholar
• Woerner, J., & Abbey, A. (2017). Positive feelings after casual sex: The role of gender and traditional gender-role beliefs. Journal of Sex Research, 54(6), 717–727. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1208801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2017). Sexual health and its linkages to reproductive health: An operational approach. ISBN: 978 92 4 151288.
   Google Scholar