Indonesian LIS Professionals’ Understanding of Library 2.0: A Pilot Study

REFERENCES

• Ali, Irhamni, and Triani Rahmawati. 2013. “Expanding Library Service through Floating Libraries: Case Study on Republic of Indonesia.” Poster presented at the IFLA WLIC, Singapore, August 17–23.
   Google Scholar
• Badan PusatStatistik. 2010. “Penduduk Indonesia menurut Provinsi 1971, 1980, 1990, 1995, 2000 dan 2010 [Population of Indonesia by Province 1971, 1980, 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2010].” Accessed May 6, 2014. http://www.bps.go.id/tab_sub/view.php?tabel=1&id_subyek=12.
   Google Scholar
• BBC. 2005. “Berners-Lee on the Read/Write Web.” Accessed January 15, 2013. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4132752.stm.
   Google Scholar
• Casey, Michael, and Laura Savastinuk. 2006. “Library 2.0: Service for the Next-Generation Library.” Library Journal 131 (14):40–2. http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2010/05/technology/library-2-0/#_.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2007. Library 2.0: A Guide to Participatory Library Service. Medford: Information Today.
   Google Scholar
• Central Intelligence Agency. 2013. “The World Factbook.” Accessed June 27, 2013. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/id.html.
   Google Scholar
• Chad, Ken, and Paul Miller. 2005. “Do Libraries Matter?: The Rise of Library 2.0.” Accessed January 14, 2013. http://www.talis.com/downloads/white_papers/DoLibrariesMatter.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chew, Ivan. 2009. “Librarians 2.0: Sowing Padi in (the) SEA.” Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems 43 (3):275–87. doi: 10.1108/00330330910978572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, Jason, and Alan May. 2009. “Library 2.0 at a Small Campus Library.” Technical Services Quarterly 26 (2) ( February 19):89–95. . doi: 10.1080/07317130802260735.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, Juliet, and Anselm Strauss. 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Courtney, Nancy. 2007. Library 2.0 and Beyond: Innovative Technologies and Tomorrow's User. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar
• Fahmi, Ismail. 2005. “Development of Indonesia's National Digital Library Network.” In Design and Usability of Digital Libraries: Case Studies in the Asia Pacific, edited by Yin-Leng Theng and Schubert Foo, 38–54. Hershey: IGI Global. http://hdl.handle.net/10760/9323.
   Google Scholar
• Julien, Heidi. 2008. “Survey Research.” In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, edited by Lisa Given, 846–9. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. doi: 10.4135/9781412963909.
   Google Scholar
• King, David, and Stephanie Brown. 2009. “Emerging Trends, 2.0, and Libraries.” The Serials Librarian 56 (1–4) ( March 6):32–43. . doi: 10.1080/03615260802672452.
   Google Scholar
• Lankes, R.David, Joanne Silverstein, and Scott Nicholson. 2007. “Participatory Networks: The Library as Conversation.” Information Technology and Libraries 26 (4): 17–33. http://www.ala.org/lita/ital/sites/ala.org.lita.ital/files/content/26/4/lankes.pdf.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 43 of 2007 Concerning Libraries (Cth) s 7. http://kelembagaan.pnri.go.id/Digital_Docs/homepage_folders/activities/highlight/ruu_perpustakaan/pdf/UU_43_2007_PERPUSTAKAAN.pdf. Accessed March 12, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Liem, Ina. 2014. “Edukasi: Pustakawan Bukan Penjaga Buku [Education: Librarians are not Book Keepers].” KOMPAS, February 7.
   Google Scholar
• Mangold, W.Glynn, and DavidJ. Faulds. 2009. “Social Media: The New Hybrid Element of the Promotion Mix.” Business Horizons 52 (4) ( July):357–65. . doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2009.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munatsi, Ronald. 2010. “Implementation of Library 2.0 Services in African Academic and Research Libraries: Need for ‘Fundamental Rethink’.” In Standing Conference of Eastern, Central and Southern Africa Library and Information Associations. Gaborone, Botswana.
   Google Scholar
• Murugesan, San. 2007. “Understanding Web 2.0.” IT Professional 9 (4):34–41. doi: 10.1109/MITP.2007.78.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, LinhCuong, Helen Partridge, and SylviaL. Edwards. 2012. “Towards an Understanding of the Participatory Library.” Library Hi Tech 30 (2):335–46. doi: 10.1108/07378831211239997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, Tim. 2005. “What is Web 2.0: Design Pattern and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software.” Accessed January 8, 2013. http://www.oreillynet.com/lpt/a/6228.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2007. “Participative Web and User-Created Content: Web 2.0, Wikis and Social Networking.” Edited by Graham Vickery and Sascha Wunsch-Vincent. Paris: Author. http://browse.oecdbookshop.org/oecd/pdfs/free/9307031e.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Parameswaran, Manoj, and Andrew Whinston. 2007. “Social Computing: An Overview.” Communications of the Association for Information Systems 19 (1). http://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol19/iss1/37.
   Google Scholar
• Partridge, Helen, Victoria Menzies, Julie Lee, and Carrie Munro. 2010. “The Contemporary Librarian: Skills, Knowledge and Attributes Required in a World of Emerging Technologies.” Library & Information Science Research 32 (4) (October):265–71. . doi: 10.1016/j.lisr.2010.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phua, VoonChin. 2004. “Convenience Sample.” In Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods, edited by MichaelS. Lewis-Beck, Alan Bryman, and TimFuting Liao, 198. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. doi: 10.4135/9781412950589.
   Google Scholar
• Saldana, Johnny. 2009. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Sodt, Jill, and Terri Summey. 2009. “Beyond the Library's Walls: Using Library 2.0 Tools to Reach Out to All Users.” Journal of Library Administration 49 (1–2) (February 26): 97–109. . doi: 10.1080/01930820802312854.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, Michael, and Maria Collins. 2007. “Web 2.0, Library 2.0, and the Hyperlinked Library.” Serials Review 33 (4) (December):253–6. . doi: 10.1016/j.serrev.2007.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudarsono, Blasius. 2010. “Menerapkan Konsep Perpustakaan 2.0 [The Implementation of Library 2.0 Concept].” BACA 31 (1):1–14. http://pdii.lipi.go.id/baca/index.php/baca/article/view/95.
   Google Scholar
• Thackeray, Rosemary, Brad Neiger, Carl Hanson, and James McKenzie. 2008. “Enhancing Promotional Strategies Within Social Marketing Programs: Use of Web 2.0 Social Media.” Health Promotion Practice 9 (4) (October):338–43. . doi: 10.1177/1524839908325335.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• The World Bank. 2013. “Data: Indonesia.” Accessed June 3, 2013. http://data.worldbank.org/country/indonesia.
   Google Scholar
• Tripathi, Manorama, and Sunil Kumar. 2010. “Use of Web 2.0 Tools in Academic Librarie: A Reconnaissance of the International Landscape.” International Information & Library Review 42 (3):195–207. doi: 10.1016/j.iilr.2010.07.005.
   Google Scholar
• White, Marilyn, and Emily Marsh. 2006. “Content Analysis: A Flexible Methodology.” Library Trends 55 (1):22–45. doi: 10.1353/lib.2006.0053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicaksono, Hendro. 2010. “Library 2.0 dan Dampaknya dalam Pengembangan Aplikasi dan Layanan Perpustakaan [Library 2.0 and Its Impacts in the Development of Library Application and Library Service].” BACA 31 (1):15–26. http://pdii.lipi.go.id/baca/index.php/baca/article/view/93.
   Google Scholar
• Widyawan, Rosa. 2010. “Library 2.0 Tidak Terasa Ada di Sekitar Kita [The Non-Existence of Library 2.0 Implementation around Us].” BACA 31 (1):65–76. http://pdii.lipi.go.id/baca/index.php/baca/article/view/94.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Chen, Fenfei Ouyang, and Heting Chu. 2009. “The Academic Library Meets Web 2.0: Applications and Implications.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 35 (4) (July): 324–31. . doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2009.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar