Metadata Quality and Academic Visibility Associated with Document Type Coverage in Institutional Repositories of Peruvian Universities

References

• Arlitsch, K., and P. S. O'Brian. 2012. Invisible Institutional Repositories: Addressing the Low Indexing Ratios of IRs in Google. Library Hi Tech 30 (1):60–81. doi:10.1108/07378831211213210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barroso, I., M. Azevedo, and C. Ribeiro. 2009. Thematic Digital Libraries at the University of Porto: Metadata Integration over a Repository Infrastructure. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 5714 LNCS, 392–95. Corfu, Greece. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04346-8_42.
   Google Scholar
• Becerril García, A., R. L. Espinosa, and J. M. M. Espinosa. 2016. Semantic Approach to Context-Aware Resource Discovery over Scholarly Content Structured with OAI-PMH. Computación y Sistemas 20 (1):127–42. doi:10.13053/cys-20-1-2189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bueno-De-La-Fuente, G., T. Hernández-Pérez, D. Rodríguez-Mateos, E. M. Méndez-Rodríguez, and B. Martín-Galán. 2009. Study on the Use of Metadata for Digital Learning Objects in University Institutional Repositories. In ELectronic PUBlishing (ELPUB), 2009 Editor: Nuova Cultura Rethinking Electronic Publishing: Innovation in Communication Paradigms and Technologies—Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Electronic Publishing, 587–94. Milan, Italy. https://e-archivo.uc3m.es/handle/10016/25628.
   Google Scholar
• BOAI. 2012. Budapest Open Access Initiative. http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Cerda Cosme, R. P. 2016. Cybertesis Perú, evaluación del repositorio de tesis de la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. Tesis de Licenciatura. Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Peru. http://cybertesis.unmsm.edu.pe/handle/cybertesis/5795.
   Google Scholar
• Congress of the Republic. Peru. 2013. Ley N^o 30035. Ley Que Regula el Repositorio. Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto.
   Google Scholar
• Congress of the Republic. Peru. 2014. Ley N^o 30220. Ley Universitaria.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, M. P. da. 2014. “Características e contribuições da Via Verde para o acesso aberto à informação científica na América Latina”. Tesis Doctoral. Universidade de Brasília. http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/15687.
   Google Scholar
• Chaves, L., and I. Kafure. 2017. Evaluación de la Usabilidad del Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Brasília. Revista General De Información y documentación, 27 (1):87–106. doi:10.5209/RGID.56563
   Google Scholar
• Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. 2017. Dublin Core. http://dublincore.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Eléspuru Briceño, L., and L. Huaroto. 2016. Los repositorios institucionales como herramientas para medir los indicadores Altmetrics: experiencia de la Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC). In V Congreso Internacional de Bibliotecas Universitarias CIBU 2016: Las Bibliotecas y su rol en la creación de conocimiento. Lima, Peru. http://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/upc/handle/10757/617434.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, D., and A. Nagy. 2014. VuFind: Solr Power in the Library. In Open Source Technology: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications 3–4:1454–79.
   Google Scholar
• Martín-Martín, A., E. Orduña-Malea, J. M. Ayllón, and E. D. López-Cózar. 2016. Un panorama académico de dos caras: retrato de los documentos altamente citados en Google Scholar (1950-2013). Revista Española de Documentación Científica 39 (4):149. doi:10.3989/redc.2016.4.1405.
   Google Scholar
• National Committee in Science, Technology and Technological Innovation. Peru. 2017. Alicia. Repositorio. Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología E Innovación de Acceso Abierto. http://alicia.concytec.gob.pe
   Google Scholar
• Orduña-Malea, E., and E. D. López-Cózar. 2014. The Dark Side of Open Access in Google and Google Scholar: The Case of Latin-American Repositories. Scientometrics 102 (1):829–46. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1369-5.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1369-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orduña-Malea, E., and E. Delgado López-Cózar. 2015. “The dark side of Open Access in Google and Google Scholar: The case of Latin-American repositories.” Scientometrics 102 (1):829–46. https:/doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1369-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orduña-Malea, E., A. Martín-Martín, A. Millán, J. Manuel, and E. D. López-Cózar. 2014. Are Latin-American repositories invisible on Google and Google Scholar? EC3 Google Scholar's Digest Reviews (3):1–9. http://hdl.handle.net/10481/32363.
   Google Scholar
• Otto, J. J. 2014. Administrative Metadata for Long-Term Preservation and Management of Resources: A Survey of Current Practices in ARL Libraries. Library Resources and Technical Services 58 (1):4–32. doi:10.5860/lrts.58n1.4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Planck, S. M. 2003. “La Declaración de Berlín sobre acceso abierto”. GeoTrópico, 1(2):152–154.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, B. K., S. C. Biswas, and P. Mukhopadhyay. 2016. Global Repository Movement in the Domain of Library and Information Science Discipline. International Journal of Information Science & Management 14 (2):15–32. https://ijism.ricest.ac.ir/index.php/ijism/article/view/788/288.
   Google Scholar
• Sandy, H. M., and F. Dykas. 2016. High-Quality Metadata and Repository Staffing: Perceptions of United States-Based OpenDOAR Participants. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 54 (2):101–16. doi:10.1080/01639374.2015.1116480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serrano Vicente, R., R. M. Melero, and E. Abadal. 2014. Indicators for the Evaluation of Open Access Institutional Repositories. Anales de Documentacion 17 (2):1–12. doi:10.6018/analesdoc.17.2.190821.
   Google Scholar
• Spanish National Research Council. 2017. Webometrics. Ranking Web of Repositories. http://repositories.webometrics.info.
   Google Scholar
• University of Nottingham. 2017. OpenDOAR: Directory of Open Access Repositories. http://www.opendoar.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Vílchez-Román, C., and D. N. Shimabukuro. 2008. Usability of a Full Text Information Retrieval System: The Case of Cybertesis Peru. ACIMED 17 (3):1–22. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script = sci_abstract&pid = S1024-94352008000300003.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, M. P. 2011. Repurposing MARC Metadata for an Institutional Repository: Working with Special Collections and University Press Monographs. Library Resources & Technical Services 55 (1):33–44. doi:10.5860/lrts.55n1.33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yañez, L. 2014. “Repositorio institucional de la PUCP: Herramienta para la investigación”. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. http://puntoedu.pucp.edu.pe/noticias/repositorio-institucional-pucp-herramienta-investigacion/
   Google Scholar
• Yang, L. 2016. Making Search Engines Notice: An Exploratory Study on Discoverability of DSpace Metadata and PDF Files. Journal of Web Librarianship 10 (3):147–160. doi:10.1080/19322909.2016.1172539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar