Overhyped Fad or Missed Opportunity? A History of Academic Libraries and the Social Web

References

• Ackerman, Mark. 1994. Providing Social Interaction in the Digital Library. In Proceedings of the Digital Libraries ‘94: First Annual Conference on the Theory and Practice of digital libraries, ed. J. L. Schnase, 198–200. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Daihani, Sultan and Alan Abrahams. 2016. A Text Mining Analysis of Academic Libraries' Tweets. Journal of Academic Librarianship 42 (2):135–43. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2015.12.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alperin, Juan Pablo. 2013. “Ask Not What Altmetrics Can Do for You, But What Altmetrics Can Do for Developing Countries. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology 39 (4):18–21. doi:10.1002/bult.2013.1720390407.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, Timothy, and Walker Sampson. 2014. Preserving the Voices of Revolution: Examining the Creation and Preservation of a Subject-centered Collection of Tweets from the Eighteen Days in Egypt. American Archivist 77 (2):510–33. doi:10.17723/aarc.77.2.794404552m67024n.
   Google Scholar
• Association of College & Research Libraries. 2015. Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. Chicago, IL: American Library Association. http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, Nora Ganim, and Ava M. Lescault. 2014. “The Fortune 500 and Social Media.” University of Massachusetts Dartmouth. http://www.umassd.edu/cmr/socialmediaresearch/2014fortune500andsocialmedia/
   Google Scholar
• Blyberg, John. 2006. 11 Reasons Why Library 2.0 Eists and Matters.” blyberg.net. http://www.blyberg.net/2006/01/09/11-reasons-why-library-20-exists-and-matters/
   Google Scholar
• Bobish, Greg. 2011. Participation and Pedagogy: Connecting the Social Web to ACRL Learning Outcomes. Journal of Academic Librarianship 37 (1):54–63. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2010.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodnar, Jonathan, and Ameet Doshi. 2011. Asking the Right Questions: A Critique of Facebook, Social Media, and Libraries. Public Services Quarterly 7 (3):102–10. doi:10.1080/15228959.2011.623594.
   Google Scholar
• Casey, Michael, and Laura C. Savastinuk. 2006. Library 2.0: Service for the Next-Generation Library. Library Journal 131 (14):40–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnigo, Laurie, and Paula Barnett-Ellis. 2007. Checking Out Facebook.com: The Impact of a Digital Trend on Academic Libraries. Information Technology & Libraries 26 (1):23–34. doi:10.6017/ital.v26i1.3286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, Melanie, and Yvonne Nalani Meulemans. 2008. The Problems and Potential of MySpace and Facebook Usage in Academic Libraries. Internet Reference Services Quarterly 13 (1):69–85. doi:10.1300/J136v13n01_04.
   Google Scholar
• Chu, Samuel K., and Helen S. Du. 2013. Social Networking Tools for Academic Libraries. Journal of Librarianship & Information Science 45 (1):64–75. doi:10.1177/0961000611434361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, Ruth S. 2009. Academic Libraries, Facebook and MySpace, and Student Outreach: A Survey of Student Opinion. Portal: Libraries & the Academy 9 (1):25–36. doi:10.1353/pla.0.0036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowell, Amanda E. 2017. Social Media at the College of New Jersey Library. In the Library with the Lead Pipe. January. http://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2017/social-media-tcnj/
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, Walt. 2006. Library 2.0 and ‘Library 2.0.’” Cites & Insights 6 (2):1–32. http://citesandinsights.info/l2a.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Del Bosque, Darcy, Sam A. Leif, and Susie Skarl. 2012. Libraries Atwitter: Trends in Academic Library Tweeting. Reference Services Review 40 (2):199–213. doi:10.1108/00907321211228246.
   Google Scholar
• De Rosa, Cathy, Joanne Cantrell, Matthew Carlson, Peggy Gallagher, Janet Hawk, and Charlotte Sturtz. 2011. Perceptions of Libraries 2010: Context and Community.” OCLC. https://www.oclc.org/content/dam/oclc/reports/2010perceptions/2010perceptions_all.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Devare, Medha, Jon Corson-Rikert, Brian Caruso, Brian Lowe, Kathy Chiang, and Janet McCue. 2007. VIVO: Connecting People, Creating a Virtual Life Sciences Community. D-Lib Magazine 13 (7/8). doi:10.1045/july2007-devare.
   Google Scholar
• Dickson, Andrea, and Robert P. Holley. 2010. Social Networking in Academic Libraries: The Possibilities and the Concerns. New Library World 111 (11/12):468–479. doi:10.1108/03074801011094840.
   Google Scholar
• Emmelhainz, Celia, and Miriam Rigby. 2017. Following the Yik Yak: Using Social Media Observations to Understand Student Needs on College Campuses. In the Library with the Lead Pipe. July. http://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2017/yik-yak/
   Google Scholar
• Farkas, Meredith. 2007. Your Stuff, Their space. American Libraries 38 (11):36.
   Google Scholar
• Farkas, Meredith. 2012. Participatory Technologies, Pedagogy 2.0 and Information Literacy. Library Hi Tech 30 (1):82–94. doi:10.1108/07378831211213229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galligan, Finar, and Sharon Dyas-Correia. 2013. Altmetrics: Rethinking the Way We Measure. Serials Review 39 (1):55–61. doi:10.1080/00987913.2013.10765486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerolimos, Michalis. 2011. Academic Libraries on Facebook: An Analysis of Users' Comments. D-Lib Magazine 17 (11).
   Google Scholar
• Hank, Carolyn. 2013. Communications in Blogademia: An Assessment of Scholar Blogs' Attributes and Functions. New Review of Information Networking 18 (2):51–69. doi:10.1080/13614576.2013.802179.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, Amanda, Rene Burress, Sarah Velasquez, and Lynnette Schreiner. 2017. Social Media Use in Academic Libraries: A Phenomenological Study. Journal of Academic Librarianship 43 (3):248–56. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2017.02.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartman, Anne. 2014. Fragments of History: Identifying Medieval Manuscript Fragments through Crowdsourcing. Archival Outlook March/April:8–9.
   Google Scholar
• Holley, Rose. 2010. Crowdsourcing: How and Why Should Libraries Do It?”. D-Lib Magazine 16 (3/4). doi:10.1045/march2010-holley.
   Google Scholar
• Holmberg, Kim, Isto Huvila, Maria Kronqvist-Berg, and Gunilla Widen-Wulff. 2008. What is Library 2.0?” Journal of Documentation 66 (4):668–81. doi:10.1108/00220410910970294.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, Jennifer. 2013. Posting Your Latest Article? You Might Have to Take It Down.” Wired Campus. http://chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/posting-your-latest-article-you-might-have-to-take-it-down/48865
   Google Scholar
• Hricko, Mary. 2010. Using Microblogging Tools for Library Services. Journal of Library Administration 50 (5):684–92. doi:10.1080/01930826.2010.488951.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, Terra B. 2011. Facebook As a Library Tool: Perceived vs. Actual Use. College & Research Libraries 72 (1):79–90. doi:10.5860/crl-88r1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, Henry, Katie Clinton, Ravi Purushotma, Alice J. Robison, and Margaret Weigel. 2009. Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keith, Ellen. 2009. Tweet Your Librarian.” The Sheridan Libraries Blog. http://blogs.library.jhu.edu/wordpress/2009/08/tweet-your-librarian/
   Google Scholar
• King, Alison. 1993. From Sage on the Stage to Guide on the Side. College Teaching 41 (1):30–35. doi:10.1080/87567555.1993.9926781.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Yong-Mi, and June Abbas. 2010. Adoption of Library 2.0 Functionalities by Academic Libraries and Users: A Knowledge Management Perspective. Journal of Academic Librarianship 36 (3):211–18. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2010.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laningham, Scott. 2006. Interview with Tim Berners-Lee.” IBM developerWorks. http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/podcast/dwi/cm-int082206txt.html
   Google Scholar
• Library of Congress. 2013. Update on the Twitter Archive at the Library of Congress.” Library of Congress Blog. https://www.loc.gov/static/managed-content/uploads/sites/6/2017/02/twitter_report_2013jan.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gardios, Paolo, Nicoletta Colombi, Gaetano Grillo, and Maria C. Villanacci. 2012. Implementation of Web 2.0 Services in Academic, Medical, and Research Libraries: A Scoping Review. Health Information and Libraries Journal 29 (2):90–109. doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2012.00984.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gartner. (2011). Gartner Says by Year-End 2013, Half of All Companies Will Have Been Asked to Produce Material from Social Media Website for E-Discovery [Press release]. http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/1550715
   Google Scholar
• Hagman, Jessica. (2012). “Joining the Twitter Conversation. Public Services Quarterly 8 (1):78–85. doi:10.1080/15228959.2012.650564.
   Google Scholar
• Mackey, Thomas P., and Trudi E. Jacobson. 2011. Reframing Information Literacy as a Metaliteracy. College & Research Libraries 72 (1):62–78. doi:10.5860/crl-76r1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madhava, Rakesh. 2011. 10 Things to Know About Preserving Social Media. Information Management 45 (5):33–37.
   Google Scholar
• Maness, Jack M. 2006. Library 2.0 Theory: Web 2.0 and Its Implications for Libraries. Webology 3 (2). http://www.webology.org/2006/v3n2/a25.html
   Google Scholar
• Mathews, Brian S. 2006. Do You Facebook? Networking with Students Online. College & Research Libraries News 67 (5):306–07. doi:10.5860/crln.67.5.7622.
   Google Scholar
• Mazer, Joseph P., Richard E. Murphy, and Cheri J. Simonds. 2007. I'll See You On ‘Facebook’: The effects of Computer-Mediated Teacher Self-Disclosure on Student Motivation, Affective Learning, and Classroom Climate. Communication Education 56 (1):1–17. doi:10.1080/03634520601009710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellon, Constance A. 1986. Library Anxiety: A Grounded Theory and Its Development. College & Research Libraries 47 (2):160–65. doi:10.5860/crl_47_02_160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Paul. 2005a. Web 2.0: Building the New Library. Ariadne 45. http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue45/miller
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Paul. 2005b. Do Libraries Matter? The Rise of Library 2.0.” Talis. http://www.talis.com/downloads/white_papers/DoLibrariesMatter.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Paul. 2006. Library 2.0: The Challenge of Disruptive Innovation.” Talis. http://www.talis.com/resources/documents/447_Library_2_prf1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Moran, Mike, Jeff Seaman, and Hester Tinti-Kane. 2011. Teaching, Learning, and Sharing: How Today's Higher Education Faculty Use Social Media.” Pearson Learning Solutions. http://www.pearsonlearningsolutions.com/educators/pearson-social-media-survey-2011-bw.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Moyle, Martin, Justin Tonra, and Valerie Wallace. 2011. Manuscript Transcription by Crowdsourcing: Transcribe Bentham. Liber Quarterly 20 (3/4):347–56. doi:10.18352/lq.7999.
   Google Scholar
• Normile, Dennis. 2014. High-Profile Stem Cell Papers Under Fire.” ScienceInsider. http://news.sciencemag.org/health/2014/02/high-profile-stem-cell-papers-under-fire
   Google Scholar
• O'Reilly, Tim. 2005. What is Web 2.0? Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software.” O'Reilly Media. http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html
   Google Scholar
• Perrin, Andrew. 2015. Social Media Usage: 2005–2015.” Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/10/08/social-networking-usage-2005-2015/
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, Nancy K. 2011. Academic Library Use of Facebook: Building Relationships with Students. Journal of Academic Librarianship 37 (6):512–22. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2011.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prensky, Marc. 2001. Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon 9 (5):1–6. doi:10.1108/10748120110424816.
   Google Scholar
• Price, Elizabeth and Rebecca Richardson. 2017. Eavesdropping on the User Experience. College & Research Libraries News 78(1):16–19. doi:10.5860/crln.78.1.9601.
   Google Scholar
• Ridge, Mia. 2014. Crowdsourcing our Cultural Heritage. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Robison, Mark and Ruth Sara Connell. 2017. Harnessing Yik Yak for Good: A Study of Students' Anonymous Library Feedback. Journal of Web Librarianship 11 (1):35–55. doi:10.1080/19322909.2016.1236001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowlands, Ian, David Nicholas, Bill Russell, Nicholas Canty, and Anthony Watkinson. 2011. Social Media Use in the Research Workflow. Learned Publishing 24 (3):183–95. doi:10.1087/20110306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutherford, Louise L. 2008. Building Participative Library Services: The Impact of Social Software Use in Public Libraries. Library Hi Tech 26 (3):411–23. doi:10.1108/07378830810903337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saylor, Nicole, and Jen Wolfe. 2011. Experimenting with Strategies for Crowdsourcing Manuscript Transcription. Research Library Issues 277:9–14. http://publications.arl.org/rli277/
   Google Scholar
• Sekyere, Kwabena. 2009. Too Much Hullabaloo About Facebook in Libraries! Is It Really Helping Libraries?”. Nebraska Library Association Quarterly 40 (2):25–27.
   Google Scholar
• Schrier, Robert A. 2011. Digital Librarianship & Social Media: The Digital Library as Conversation Facilitator. D-Lib Magazine 17 (7). doi:10.1045/july2011-schrier
   Google Scholar
• Spiteri, Louise F. 2011. Using Social Discovery Systems to Leverage User-Generated Metadata. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 37 (4):27–29. doi:10.1002/bult.2011.1720370408.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, Michael. 2006. Exploring Web 2.0 and Libraries. Library Technology Reports 42 (4):8–14.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, Scott. 2014. Breaking the Ice: Facebook Friending and Reference Interactions. Reference & User Services Quarterly 54 (1):44–49. doi:10.5860/rusq.54n1.44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stonebraker, Ilana, and Tao Zhang. 2015. CrowdAsk: Crowdsourcing Reference and Library Help. In Reimagining Reference in the 21st Century, ed. D. A. Tyckoson and J. G. Dove, 285–94. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swope, Mary Jane, and Jeffrey Katzer. 1972. The Silent Majority: Why Don't They Ask Questions?”. Reference Quarterly 12 (2):161–66.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, Elaine. 2012. Is Your Academic Library Pinning? Academic Libraries and Pinterest. Journal of Web Librarianship 6 (3):164–75. doi:10.1080/19322909.2012.702006.
   Google Scholar
• Vershbow, Ben. 2013. NYPL Labs: Hacking the Library. Journal of Library Administration 53 (1):79–96. doi:10.1080/01930826.2013.756701.
   Google Scholar
• Vucovich, Lee A., Valerie S. Gordon, Nicole Mitchell, and Lisa A. Ennis. 2013. Is the Time and Effort Worth It? One Library's Evaluation of Using Social Networking Tools for Outreach. Medical Reference Services Quarterly 32 (1):12–25. doi:10.1080/02763869.2013.749107.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Young, Courtney L. 2014. Crowdsourcing the Virtual Reference Interview with Twitter. Reference Librarian 55 (2):172–74. doi:10.1080/02763877.2014.879030.
   Google Scholar
• Young, Scott W. H. and Doralyn Rossmann. 2015. Building Library Community Through Social Media. Information Technology and Libraries 34 (1):20–37. doi:10.6017/ital.v34i1.5625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmer, Michael. 2015. The Twitter Archive at the Library of Congress: Challenges for Information Practice and Information Policy. First Monday 20 (7). doi:10.5210/fm.v20i7.5619.
   Google Scholar