References
- Azadbakht, E., Blair, J., & Jones, L. (2017). Everyone’s invited: A website usability study involving multiple library stakeholders. Information Technology and Libraries, 36(4), 34–45. http://doi.org10.6017/ital.v36i4.9959
- Barnum, C. (2011). Usability testing essentials: Ready, set—test. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
- Brett, K., Lierman, A., & Turner, C. (2016). Lessons learned: A primo usability study. Information Technology and Libraries, 35(1), 7–25. http://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v35i1.8965
- Cassidy, E. D., Jones, G., McMain, L., Shen, L., & Vieira, S. (2014). Student searching with EBSCO discovery: A usability study. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 26(1), 17–35. http://doi.org/10.1080/1941126X.2014.877331
- Clark, A. R., Erdmann, A., Ferguson, J., Gambrell, K., & Shaw-Munderback, J. B. (2016). Taking action on usability testing findings: Simmons College Library Case Study. The Serials Librarian, 71(3–4), 186–196. http://doi.org/10.1080/0361526x.2016.1245170
- Dempsey, M., & Valenti, A. M. (2016). Student use of keywords and limiters in web-scale discovery searching. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(3), 200–206. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2016.03.002
- Foster, A., & MacDonald, J. B. (2013). A tale of two discoveries: Comparing the usability of summon and EBSCO discovery service. Journal of Web Librarianship, 7(1), 1–19. http://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2013.757936
- Georgas, H. (2014). Google vs. the Library (Part II): Student search patterns and behaviors when using google and a federated search tool. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 14(4), 503–532. http://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2014.0034
- Hanrath, S., & Kottman, M. (2015). Use and usability of a discovery tool in an academic library. Journal of Web Librarianship, 9(1), 1–21. http://doi.org10.1080/19322909.2014.983259
- Jones, W. E., Pritting, S., & Morgan, B. (2014). Understanding availability: usability testing of a consortial interlibrary loan catalog. Journal of Web Librarianship, 8(1), 69–87. http://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2014.872967
- Kliewer, G., Monroe-Gulick, A., Gamble, S., & Radio, E. (2016). Using primo for undergraduate research: A usability study. Library Hitech, 34(4), 566–584. http://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-05-2016-0052
- Techsmith Corporation. (2015). Morae version 3.34 [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://www.techsmith.com/morae.html
- Nichols, A., Crist, E. A., Sherriff, G., & Allison, M. (2017). What does it take to make discovery a success? A survey of discovery tool adoption, instruction, and evaluation among academic libraries. Journal of Web Librarianship, 11(2), 85–104. http://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2017.1284632
- Pendell, K. D., & Bowman, M. S. (2012). Usability study of a library’s mobile website: An example from Portland state university. Information Technology and Libraries, 31(2), 45–62.
- Techsmith Corporation (2015). Morae version 3.34 [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://www.techsmith.com/morae.html
- Valentine, B., & West, B. (2016). Improving primo usability and teachability with help from the users. Journal of Web Librarianship, 10(3), 176–196. http://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2016.1190678
- Williams, S. C., & Foster, A. K. (2011). Promise fulfilled? An EBSCO discovery service usability study. Journal of Web Librarianship, 5(3), 179–198. http://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2011.597590