The Reading Level of Government and Voluntary Health Organization Smoking Cessation Websites: A Descriptive Analysis

References

• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Current cigarette smoking among adults—United States, 2005–2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65:1205–1211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Smoking—50 Years of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Increases in quitline calls and smoking cessation website visitors during a national tobacco education campaign—March 19–June 10, 2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012;61:667–670.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs—2014. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Fox S. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Health Information Online. http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media/Files/Reports/2005/PIP_Healthtopics_May05.pdf.pdf. Published February 13, 2014. Accessed February 14, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• An L, Schillo B, Saul J, et al. Utilization of smoking cessation informational, interactive, and online community resources as predictors of abstinence: cohort study. ‎J Med Internet Res. 2008;10:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb NK, Graham AL, Bock BC, Papandonatos G, Abrams D. Initial evaluation of a real-world Internet smoking cessation system. Nicotine Tob Res. 2005;7:207–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etter JF. A list of the most popular smoking cessation websites and a comparison of their quality. Nicotine Tob Res. 2006;8:27–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoddard JL, Delucchi KL, Muñoz RF, et al. Smoking cessation research via the Internet: a feasibility study. J Health Commun. 2005;10:27–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb NK, Graham AL. Characterizing Internet searchers of smoking cessation information. J Med Internet Res. 2006;8:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. National Assessment of Adult Literacy: Demographics. http://nces.ed.gov/naal/kf_demographics.asp. Published 2016. Accessed February 14, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Meade CD, Byrd JC. Patient literacy and the readability of smoking education literature. Am J Public Health. 1989;79:204–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold CL, Davis TC, Berkel HJ, Jackson RH, Nandy I, London S. Smoking status, reading level, and knowledge of tobacco effects among low-income pregnant women. Prev Med. 2001;32:313–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Toolkit for making written material clear and effective. https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-education/Outreach/WrittenMaterialsToolkit/ToolkitPart07.html. Published March 16, 2012. Accessed February 14, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Doak CC, Doak LG, Root JH. Teaching Patients With Low Literacy Skills. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: J.B. Lippincott Company; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Weis B. Health Literacy: A Manual for Clinicians. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association, American Medical Foundation; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh TM, Volsko TA. Readability assessment of Internet-based consumer health information. Respir Care. 2008;53:1310–1315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal N, Hansberry DR, Sabourin V, Tomei KL, Prestigiacomo CJ. A comparative analysis of the quality of patient education materials from medical specialties. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:1257–1259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daley C, Cowan P, Nollen NL, Greiner KA, Choi WS. Assessing the scientific accuracy, readability, and cultural appropriateness of a culturally targeted smoking cessation program for American Indians. Health Promot Pract. 2009;10:386–393.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gilbert P Readability and suitability of commonly used tobacco education materials. Paper presented at: 132nd Annual Meeting of the American Public Health Association Washington, DC; November 6–10, 2004. https://apha.confex.com/apha/132am/techprogram/paper_79629.htm. Accessed February 14, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert H, Nazareth I, Sutton S. “Some of these words I can’t pronounce”: a qualitative exploration of the readability of generic and tailored self-help material for quitting smoking. J Appl Biobehav Res. 2009;14:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Meade CD, Byrd JC, Lee M. Improving patient comprehension of literature on smoking. Am J Public Health. 1989;79:1411–1412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheh JA, Ribisl KM, Wildemuth BM. An assessment of the quality and usability of smoking cessation information on the Internet. Health Promot Pract. 2003;4:278–287.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bock B, Graham A, Sciamanna C, et al. Smoking cessation treatment on the Internet: content, quality, and usability. Nicotine Tob Res. 2004;6:207–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunette MF, Ferron JC, Devitt T, et al. Do smoking cessation websites meet the needs of smokers with severe mental illnesses? Health Educ Res. 2012;27:183–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin GH. SMOG grading—a new readability formula. Journal of Reading. 1969;12:639–646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Simply Put: A Guide for Creating Easy-to-Understand Materials. 3rd ed. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Strategic and Proactive Communication Branch, Division of Communication Services, Office of the Associate Director for Communication; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman DB, Hoffman-Goetz L. A systematic review of readability and comprehension instruments used for print and web-based cancer information. Health Educ Behav. 2006;33:352–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Making Health Communication Programs Work: A Planner’s Guide. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute; 2004. Report No. T068.
   Google Scholar
• Hedman AS. Using the SMOG formula to revise a health-related document. Am J Health Educ. 2008;39:61–64.
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Plain Language Materials & Resources. https://www.cdc.gov/healthliteracy/developmaterials/plainlanguage.html. Published December 19, 2016. Accessed February 14, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Plain Language Action and Information Network. Plain Language: It’s the Law. http://www.plainlanguage.gov/plLaw/index.cfm. Published May 2011. Accessed May 24, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Carbone ET, Zoellner JM. Nutrition and health literacy: a systematic review to inform nutrition research and practice. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012;112:254–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corcoran N, Ahmad F. The readability and suitability of sexual health promotion leaflets. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99:284–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrin A, Duggan M, and Pew Research Center. Americans’ Internet Access: 2000–2015. http://www.pewinternet.org/files/2015/06/2015-06-26_internet-usage-across-demographics-discover_FINAL.pdf. Published June 26, 2015. Accessed February 14, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• National Commission of Health Education Credentialing. Responsibilities and Competencies for Health Education Specialists. https://www.nchec.org/responsibilities-and-competencies. Published 2010. Accessed May 24, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• National Institutes of Health. Plain Language at NIH. https://www.nih.gov/institutes-nih/nih-office-director/office-communications-public-liaison/clear-communication/plain-language. Published 2011. Accessed May 24, 2017.
   Google Scholar